Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
JAMA ; 331(2): 162-164, 2024 01 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38109155

ABSTRACT

This study examines how US hospitals perform on billing quality measures, including legal actions taken by a hospital to collect medical debt, the timeliness of sending patients an itemized billing statement, and patient access to a qualified billing representative.


Subject(s)
Economics, Hospital , Reimbursement Mechanisms , Hospitals/standards , Economics, Hospital/standards , Reimbursement Mechanisms/standards , United States , Hospital Charges/standards
2.
J Hosp Med ; 2024 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39164921

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic errors are a leading cause of patient harm. In 2022, the Leapfrog Group published a report containing 29 evidence-based practices that hospitals can adopt to reduce diagnostic errors. OBJECTIVES: To understand the extent to which US hospitals have already implemented these practices, we conducted a national pilot survey of Leapfrog-participating hospitals. METHODS: To reduce respondent burden, we divided the 29 practices across two surveys: one focused on organizational culture and structure (Domain 1), and the second focused on the diagnostic process itself (Domain 2). RESULTS: A total of 95 hospitals from 23 states responded to one or both surveys. On average, hospitals reported implementing 9 of the 16 practices (56%) in Domain 1 and 8 of the 13 practices (62%) in Domain 2. The rate of practice implementation varied greatly, with some hospitals implementing as few as three practices in their domain. The most commonly implemented practices were ensuring access to medical interpreters, continuous access to radiologists, ensuring staff and patients can report diagnostic errors and concerns, and having a formal process to identify and notify patients when diagnostic errors occur. The least implemented practices included convening a multidisciplinary team focused on diagnostic safety and quality, a CEO commitment to diagnostic excellence, conducting diagnosis-focused risk assessments, and training clinicians to optimize clinical reasoning in the diagnostic process. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest large and important implementation gaps for practices related to diagnostic excellence and can inform new initiatives to promote diagnostic excellence in US hospitals.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL