Outcomes by best response with hypomethylating agent plus venetoclax in adults with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare outcomes of patients with AML treated with frontline hypomethylating agent and venetoclax (HMA + Ven) who achieved complete remission (CR), complete remission with partial hematologic recovery (CRh), complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), or morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) as defined by ELN 2022. METHODS: Patients with AML seen at Moffitt Cancer Center between 2018 and 2022 and treated with HMA + Ven were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: About 120 patients achieved blast clearance with best response of CR in 52 (43.3%), CRh in 22 (18.3%), CRi in 31 (25.8%) and MLFS in 15 (12.5%) patients. Greater proportion of patients with MLFS had a prior myeloid malignancy (p = 0.003) and were treated with prior HMA (p < 0.001). Patients that achieved MLFS as their best response had inferior OS compared to the CR/CRh/CRi cohort (8 months vs. 27 months; p < 0.001). RFS was also worse for the MLFS cohort. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study analyzing differences in outcomes of AML patients treated with HMA + Ven based on best response. We noted that prior myeloid malignancy and use of HMA led to more MLFS as best response compared to CR/CRi. The OS and RFS were inferior for MLFS cohort.

New and emerging therapies for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Approximately 40% of patients with DLBCL will experience disease relapse or will be refractory to first line chemoimmunotherapy, necessitating second-line salvage therapy. This has historically consisted of platinum-based chemotherapy regimens followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with curative intent for transplant-eligible patients or palliative chemotherapy for transplant-ineligible patients. In recent years there have been several new therapeutic agents approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory DLBCL, thereby expanding the therapeutic landscape. These agents include polatuzumab vedotin, tafasitamab, loncastuximab tesirine, selinexor, and anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies such as axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel. This review summarizes the pharmacology, efficacy, safety, dosing, and administration of new agents recently approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

Safety and financial analysis of outpatient dose-adjusted EPOCH for B-cell lymphoma at a tertiary comprehensive cancer center.

INTRODUCTION: Dose-adjusted (DA-) EPOCH (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin) is a front-line treatment option for aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Due to regimen complexity, inpatient administration of DA-EPOCH has been historically required. Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) developed an Inpatient/Outpatient (IPOP) program to facilitate administration of complicated regimens in the outpatient setting. We hypothesized that outpatient administration of DA-EPOCH at a comprehensive cancer center is both safe and cost-effective. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective chart review including B-cell lymphoma patients who were 18 years or older and who had received DA-EPOCH at MCC from April 26, 2017 through August 10, 2019. The primary endpoint was hospital admissions during outpatient chemotherapy administration. Additional safety endpoints included hospitalizations between cycles, infectious complications, extravasations, drug spills, pump-malfunctions, and drug-related adverse events. Financial analysis included drug cost, resource utilization, and impact of hospital bed backfill. RESULTS: 56 patients received 219 cycles of DA-EPOCH with 193 cycles administered outpatient. Zero patients required hospitalization during outpatient administration of DA-EPOCH, resulting in 965 saved hospital days. 23 patients (41%) were hospitalized between cycles, most commonly due to neutropenic fever (52%). No extravasations were documented throughout the study period. There were few incidences of drug spills or pump malfunctions. Based on current regimen utilization, the annual transition of 84 cycles of DA-EPOCH to the outpatient setting has a positive impact on margin of $1,444,548. CONCLUSIONS: Routine outpatient administration of DA-EPOCH is both safe and feasible with a positive annual impact on margin of $1,444,548 at a comprehensive cancer center.

How I treat newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in an outpatient setting: a multidisciplinary team perspective.

Historically, patients with acute myeloid leukemia received intensive chemotherapy requiring hospitalization, which can diminish quality of life and increase healthcare costs. The introduction of new therapies facilitated a shift toward outpatient therapy, which requires coordination of a multidisciplinary team, thorough patient evaluation, careful preparation and rigorous patient monitoring. Many patients are candidates for multiple treatment approaches; we generally employ CPX-351 (Vyxeos®) as an intensive outpatient approach and venetoclax (Venclyxto/Venclexta®) plus hypomethylating agents as a lower-intensity approach, with 2-3 visits/week during treatment. Treatment infusions are scheduled in the morning to leave sufficient time for transfusions and other supportive care later the same day, to prevent additional visits. With careful planning and patient monitoring, acute myeloid leukemia treatment can be successfully administered in the outpatient setting.

Utilization of Serial Next-Generation Sequencing Among Patients Receiving CPX-351 for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The phase III trial that led to the approval of CPX-351 for treating secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) in 2017 did not study the effect of specific mutations on outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study was done to evaluate the effect of next-generation sequencing (NGS) results at the time of best response and before allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) in patients treated with CPX-351 as frontline therapy for sAML between 2017 and 2021. RESULTS: The most common mutations seen were DNMT3A (n = 17, 29.8%), SRSF2 (n = 13, 22.8%), RUNX1 (n = 13, 22.8%), TET2 (n = 9, 15.8%), ASXL1 (n = 9, 15.8%), and BCOR (n = 9, 15.8%). Median OS (mOS) for the entire cohort was 47 months. Though 64.7% patients cleared the DNMT3A mutation, only 44.4% and 22.2% of patients cleared the TET2 and ASXL1 mutations, respectively. The mOS for patients who cleared their mutations vs. for those who did not was not significantly longer (46 vs. 30 months; P = .991). The relapse-free survival (RFS) for patients who cleared mutations was numerically longer compared to those who had persistent mutations; however, this did not reach statistical significance (44 months vs. 26 months; P = .786). CONCLUSION: This is the first study reporting NGS at best response and before alloSCT and its effect on OS and RFS. We found that OS and RFS were numerically longer among patients who cleared mutations; however, this did not reach statistical significance. In addition, alloSCT led to improved RFS irrespective of mutational clearance.

Leukoencephalopathy During Daratumumab-Based Therapy: A Case Series of Two Patients with Multiple Myeloma.

Leukoencephalopathy in the setting of multiple myeloma (MM) is a rare demyelinating condition, with few reported cases in literature. Daratumumab is a CD38 targeted monoclonal antibody that has been widely used for the management of MM. In the absence of central nervous system (CNS) disease, many medication-induced leukoencephalopathy cases reported with MM, including daratumumab-induced, are associated with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) and John Cunningham (JC) virus. Currently, there are no reported cases of daratumumab-induced leukoencephalopathy among patients without CNS involvement or PML. We discuss 2 patients who developed leukoencephalopathy while receiving daratumumab-based therapy without evidence of PML or CNS disease. Both patients had baseline MRIs without significant white matter changes before daratumumab-based therapy. Patients began experiencing neurological deficits about 6 to 8 months after daratumumab-based therapy initiation. One patient passed away before being assessed for improvement of symptoms with daratumumab cessation. The second patient had some stabilization of symptoms after cessation; however, the leukoencephalopathy remained irreversible. As the class of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies expands in MM therapy, we highlight a potential treatment complication and the importance of detecting leukoencephalopathy early among patients receiving anti-CD38 therapy. We recommend vigilant monitoring of any new or worsening neurological symptoms to avoid serious complications of irreversible leukoencephalopathy.