Retrospective analysis of pathogens for guided creation of an EMPIRIc antibiotic prEscribing pathway (EMPIRE).

The objective of this study was to evaluate the susceptibilities of pathogens isolated from cultures within the first 7 days of admission to the burn center and in the absence of healthcare-associated infection risk factors (HAIRF) to determine if current empiric antibiotics can be narrowed for refinement of an empiric antibiotic prescribing pathway according to the suspected source. A 3-year sample of patients and cultures was utilized in hopes of obtaining at least 30 isolates of the most common pathogens and their respective susceptibilities. A total of 268 clinically relevant (e.g., deemed infectious, versus colonization) pathogens were included in the final sample with sources including wounds, respiratory, blood, urine, and bone. Of the 268 pathogens included, 45% were Gram-negative and 69% of all pathogens were isolated from wound cultures. The existing empiric pathway, vancomycin plus cefepime, covered 98% and 84% of all Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, respectively. In patients without HAIRF, coverage rose to 98% and 90%, respectively. Initial use of vancomycin and cefepime remains adequate for pathogens isolated within 1 week of admission in patients without HAIRF. For pneumonias, a narrower spectrum beta-lactam would not sufficiently cover respiratory pathogens isolated within the first week of admission. Regarding early wound infections, difficult-to-treat pathogens remain as a rare isolate of wound cultures within 1 week of admission.

An Appraisal of Pharmacotherapy-Pertinent Literature Published in 2021 and 2022 for Clinicians Caring for Patients With Thermal or Inhalation Injury.

Studies focusing on pharmacotherapy interventions to aid patients after thermal injury are a minor focus in burn injury-centered studies and published across a wide array of journals, which challenges those with limited resources to keep their knowledge current. This review is a renewal of previous years' work to facilitate extraction and review of the most recent pharmacotherapy-centric studies in patients with thermal and inhalation injury. Twenty-three geographically dispersed, board-certified pharmacists participated in the review. A Medical Subject Heading-based, filtered search returned 2336 manuscripts over the previous 2-year period. After manual review, 98 (4%) manuscripts were determined to have a potential impact on current pharmacotherapy practice. The top 10 scored manuscripts are discussed. Only 17% of those reviewed were assessed to likely have little effect on current practice. The overall impact of the current cohort was higher than previous editions of this review, which is encouraging. There remains a need for investment in well-designed, high-impact, pharmacotherapy-pertinent research for patients sustaining thermal or inhalation injuries.

Deficiencies of Rule-Based Technology-Generated Antibiograms for Specialized Care Units.

The objective of this study was to compare the pathogens and susceptibilities of the current automated, rule-based technology (RBT) antibiogram with one manually collected through chart review with additional rules applied. This study was a two-year, retrospective cohort study and included all bacterial cultures within the first 30 days from patients admitted to a single Burn Center. The current RBT antibiogram served as the control, and new antibiogram versions were created using additional rules and compared to the control. Six-hundred fifty-seven patients were admitted (61% excluded for lack of cultures). 59% had at least one hospital-acquired risk factor, with over one-third having recent illicit drug use and one-third having a recent hospitalization. Of the 410 cultures included, 57% were Gram-negative, and half were from wound infections. Sensitivities were significantly different when comparing the manual and the RBT version after including factors such as days since admission, presence of hospital-acquired risk factors, or previous antibiotic courses. Recommended empiric Gram-negative antibiotics changed from double coverage to a single ß-lactam with >90% susceptibility. The susceptibilities between the first and subsequent courses were dramatically different. Before developing an antibiogram or interpreting the output, it is important to consider which automated criteria are utilized, especially for units with extended lengths of stay.