ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: At the time of AtTEnd trial design, standard treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer included carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. This trial assessed whether combining atezolizumab with chemotherapy might improve outcomes in this population. METHODS: AtTEnd was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done in 89 hospitals in 11 countries across Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and Asia. Enrolled patients were aged 18 years or older, and had advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma or carcinosarcoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and received no previous systemic chemotherapy for recurrence. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using an interactive web response system (block size of six) to either atezolizumab 1200 mg or placebo given intravenously with chemotherapy (carboplatin at area under the curve of 5 or 6 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 21 days) for 6-8 cycles, then continued until progression. Stratification factors were country, histological subtype, advanced or recurrent status, and mismatch repair (MMR) status. Participants and treating clinicians were masked to group allocation. The hierarchically tested co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (in patients with MMR-deficient [dMMR] tumours, and in the overall population) and overall survival (in the overall population). Primary analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population, defined as all randomly assigned patients who gave their full consent to participation in the study and data processing. Safety was assessed in all patients included in the intention-to-treat population who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, we report the primary progression-free survival and the interim overall survival results. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03603184. FINDINGS: Between Oct 3, 2018, and Jan 7, 2022, 551 patients were randomly assigned to atezolizumab (n=362) or placebo (n=189). Two patients in the atezolizumab group were excluded from all analyses due to lack of consent. Median follow-up was 28·3 months (IQR 21·2-37·6). 81 (23%) patients in the atezolizumab group and 44 (23%) patients in the placebo group had dMMR disease by central assessment. In the dMMR population, median progression-free survival was not estimable (95% CI 12·4 months-not estimable [NE]) in the atezolizumab group and 6·9 months (6·3-10·1) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·36, 95% CI 0·23-0·57; p=0·0005). In the overall population, median progression-free survival was 10·1 months (95% CI 9·5-12·3) in the atezolizumab group and 8·9 months (8·1-9·6) in the placebo group (HR 0·74, 95% CI 0·61-0·91; p=0·022). Median overall survival was 38·7 months (95% CI 30·6-NE) in the atezolizumab group and 30·2 months (25·0-37·2) in the placebo group (HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·63-1·07; log-rank p=0·048). The p value for the interim analysis of overall survival did not cross the stopping boundary; therefore, the trial will continue until the required number of events are recorded. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (97 [27%] of 356 patients in the atezolizumab group vs 51 [28%] of 185 in the placebo group) and anaemia (49 [14%] vs 24 [13%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 46 (13%) patients in the atezolizumab group and six (3%) patients in the placebo group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in two patients (pneumonia in one patient in each group). INTERPRETATION: Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy increased progression-free survival in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma, particularly in those with dMMR carcinomas, suggesting the addition of atezolizumab to standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment in this specific subgroup. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.
ABSTRACT
For high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) patients, adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended to improve outcome. Yet, predictive biomarkers for response to platinum-based chemotherapy (Pt-aCT) are currently lacking. We tested expression of L1 cell-adhesion molecule (L1CAM), a well-recognised marker of poor prognosis in EC, in tumour samples from high-risk EC patients, to explore its role as a predictive marker of Pt-aCT response. L1CAM expression was determined using RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry in a cohort of high-risk EC patients treated with Pt-aCT and validated in a multicentric independent cohort. The association between L1CAM and clinicopathologic features and L1CAM additive value in predicting platinum response were determined. The effect of L1CAM gene silencing on response to carboplatin was functionally tested on primary L1CAM-expressing cells. Increased L1CAM expression at both genetic and protein level correlated with high-grade, non-endometrioid histology and poor response to platinum treatment. A predictive model adding L1CAM to prognostic clinical variables significantly improved platinum response prediction (C-index 78.1%, P = .012). In multivariate survival analysis, L1CAM expression was significantly associated with poor outcome (HR: 2.03, P = .019), potentially through an indirect effect, mediated by its influence on response to chemotherapy. In vitro, inhibition of L1CAM significantly increased cell sensitivity to carboplatin, supporting a mechanistic link between L1CAM expression and response to platinum in EC cells. In conclusion, we have demonstrated the role of L1CAM in the prediction of response to Pt-aCT in two independent cohorts of high-risk EC patients. L1CAM is a promising candidate biomarker to optimise decision making in high-risk patients who are eligible for Pt-aCT.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Endometrioid , Endometrial Neoplasms , Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1 , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Carboplatin/pharmacology , Carcinoma, Endometrioid/pathology , Endometrial Neoplasms/drug therapy , Endometrial Neoplasms/genetics , Endometrial Neoplasms/metabolism , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1/genetics , Platinum , PrognosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Previous findings showed that cediranib-olaparib increased PFS in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer compared to olaparib alone. METHODS: BAROCCO trial randomized 123 patients: 80mg/m2 paclitaxel weekly up to 24 weeks (control), olaparib 300mg tablets twice daily together with 20mg cediranib daily (continuous schedule) or with 20mg cediranib 5 days/week (intermittent schedule) until progression. The primary objective was the PFS comparison between each experimental arm and the control (alpha one-sided 5%; power 80%; HR 0.5). RESULTS: The median platinum-free interval was 1.9 months, 60% of patients had been pretreated with 3 or more chemotherapy lines. Median PFS for paclitaxel, the continuous, and the intermittent schedules were 3.1, 5.6, and 3.8 months. The HR for PFS in the continuous arm vs control was 0.76 (90% CI: 0.50-1.14, p = 0.265). The HR for PFS in the intermittent arm vs control was 1.03 (90% CI: 0.68-1.55, p = 0.904). Treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 15%, 20%, and 5% of patients in the control, continuous and intermittent arms. Grade ≥ 3 anemia and diarrhea and hypertension of any grade occurred only in the experimental arms, and peripheral neuropathies and alopecia only in the control arm. Five serious adverse drug reactions occurred and two were fatal: one in the control and one in the continuous arm. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cediranib-olaparib was not superior to chemotherapy in terms of PFS in heavily pretreated platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients. However, this oral doublet, is active and may offer a non-chemotherapy option in this difficult to treat population. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFICATION: IRFMN-OVA-7289, EudraCT: 2016-003964-38, NCT03314740.
Subject(s)
Ovarian Neoplasms , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/etiology , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/etiology , Paclitaxel , Phthalazines , Piperazines , QuinazolinesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical and biological prognostic factors for advanced ovarian cancer patients receiving first-line treatment with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab. METHODS: A multicenter, phase IV, single arm trial was performed. Patients with advanced (FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage IIIB-IV) or recurrent, previously untreated, ovarian cancer received carboplatin (AUC (area under the curve) 5), paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1 for six 3-weekly cycles followed by bevacizumab single agent (15 mg/kg) until progression or unacceptable toxicity up to a maximum of 22 total cycles. Here we report the final analysis on the role of clinical prognostic factors. The study had 80% power with a two-tailed 0.01 α error to detect a 0.60 hazard ratio with a factor expressed in at least 20% of the population. Both progression-free and overall survival were used as endpoints. RESULTS: From October 2012 to November 2014, 398 eligible patients were treated. After a median follow-up of 32.3 months (IQR 24.1-40.4), median progression-free survival was 20.8 months (95% CI 19.1 to 22.0) and median overall survival was 41.1 months (95% CI 39.1 to 43.5). Clinical factors significantly predicting progression-free and overall survival were performance status, stage, and residual disease after primary surgery. Neither baseline blood pressure/antihypertensive treatment nor the development of hypertension during bevacizumab were prognostic. There were two deaths possibly related to treatment, but no unexpected safety signal was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel and as maintenance were comparable to previous data. Hypertension, either at baseline or developed during treatment, was not prognostic. Performance status, stage, and residual disease after primary surgery remain the most important clinical prognostic factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2012-003043-29; NCT01706120.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Carboplatin/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Bevacizumab/pharmacology , Carboplatin/pharmacology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/mortality , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Paclitaxel/pharmacology , Prognosis , Progression-Free SurvivalABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The use of routine antithrombotic prophylaxis is not recommended for advanced cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. The effect of bevacizumab-containing therapy on the risk of thromboembolic events remains controversial in ovarian cancer patients. We report on the incidence of thromboembolic events and the prevalence of antithrombotic therapy in patients enrolled in the single arm, phase IV, MITO-16A/MaNGO-OV2A trial. METHODS: In this trial, potential prognostic factors for patients with previously untreated ovarian cancer receiving a combination of platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab were explored and the final analysis has already been reported. In this secondary analysis, the occurrence of thromboembolic events and the use of antithrombotic therapy were described according to the clinical characteristics of the patients. The prognostic role of thromboembolic events for progression-free and overall survival were also evaluated. RESULTS: From October 2012 to November 2014, 398 eligible patients were enrolled. 76 patients (19.1%) were receiving some type of anticoagulant or anti-aggregant treatment at baseline. Overall, 24 thromboembolic events were reported (cumulative incidence of 6.0%). The occurrence of thromboembolic events was not associated with baseline patient characteristics and was not modified by the use of antithrombotic prophylaxis (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.18 to 2.0). Occurrence of thromboembolic events was not associated with progression-free survival (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.83 to 2.15) or overall survival (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.61). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, a 6.0% rate of thromboembolic events was reported during treatment with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. Thromboembolic events were not associated with the clinical characteristics of the patients or with the use of antithrombotic prophylaxis, nor did they significantly affect the long-term prognosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01706120.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Middle AgedABSTRACT
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGS-EOCs) is generally sensitive to front-line platinum (Pt)-based chemotherapy although most patients at an advanced stage relapse with progressive resistant disease. Clinical or molecular data to identify primary resistant cases at diagnosis are not yet available. HGS-EOC biopsies from 105 Pt-sensitive (Pt-s) and 89 Pt-resistant (Pt-r) patients were retrospectively selected from two independent tumor tissue collections. Pathway analysis was done integrating miRNA and mRNA expression profiles. Signatures were further validated in silico on a cohort of 838 HGS-EOC cases from a published dataset. In all, 131 mRNAs and 5 miRNAs belonging to different functionally related molecular pathways distinguish Pt-s from Pt-r cases. Then, 17 out of 23 selected elements were validated by orthogonal approaches (SI signature). As resistance to Pt is associated with a short progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), the prognostic role of the SI signature was assessed, and 14 genes associated with PFS and OS, in multivariate analyses (SII signature). The prognostic value of the SII signature was validated in a third extensive cohort. The expression profiles of SDF2L1, PPP1R12A and PRKG1 genes (SIII signature) served as independent prognostic biomarkers of Pt-response and survival. The study identified a prognostic molecular signature based on the combined expression profile of three genes which had never been associated with the clinical outcome of HGS-EOC. This may lead to early identification, at the time of diagnosis, of patients who would not greatly benefit from standard chemotherapy and are thus eligible for novel investigational approaches.
Subject(s)
Cyclic GMP-Dependent Protein Kinase Type I/genetics , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/drug therapy , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Myosin-Light-Chain Phosphatase/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Platinum/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/genetics , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/pathology , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Olaparib is the first poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved as maintenance therapy of recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) patients with a BRCA mutation. To achieve the maximum clinical benefit, adherence to olaparib must be persistent. However, in clinical practice, this is challenged by the frequent suboptimal management of toxicities. In view of the expanding use of olaparib also in Italy, physicians must learn how to adequately and promptly manage drug toxicities not to unnecessarily interrupt or reduce the dose. The experts agreed that nausea,vomiting, anemia, and fatigue are the most frequent events experienced by OC patients on olaparib, and that these toxicities usually develop early during treatment, are mainly of grade 1-2 and transient and can be managed with simple non-pharmacological interventions. By sharing their real-world experiences, the panel prepared, for each toxicity, an algorithm organized by grade and besides the procedures indicated in the local label, included supportive care interventions based also on nutritional and lifestyle modifications and psycho-oncology consultation. Moreover, in view of the tablet entry into the Italian market, the full and reduced dosages of capsules and tablets were compared. This practical guidance is intended to be a tool to support especially less-experienced physicians in the management of these complex patients, with the aim to help preventing the worsening of patients' conditions and the unnecessary interruption/reduction of olaparib dosage, which may jeopardize treatment efficacy.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Phthalazines/adverse effects , Piperazines/adverse effects , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Anemia/chemically induced , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Fatigue/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Italy , Mutation , Nausea/chemically induced , Nausea/therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Phthalazines/therapeutic use , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Vomiting/chemically inducedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is generally associated with a very dismal prognosis. Nevertheless, patients with similar clinicopathological characteristics can have markedly different clinical outcomes. Our aim was the identification of novel molecular determinants influencing survival. METHODS: Gene expression profiles of extreme HGSOC survivors (training set) were obtained by microarray. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and enriched signalling pathways were determined. A prognostic signature was generated and validated on curatedOvarianData database through a meta-analysis approach. The best prognostic biomarker from the signature was confirmed by RT-qPCR and by immunohistochemistry on an independent validation set. Cox regression model was chosen for survival analysis. RESULTS: Eighty DEGs and the extracellular matrix-receptor (ECM-receptor) interaction pathway were associated to extreme survival. A 10-gene prognostic signature able to correctly classify patients with 98% of accuracy was identified. By an 'in-silico' meta-analysis, overexpression of FXYD domain-containing ion transport regulator 5 (FXYD5), also known as dysadherin, was confirmed in HGSOC short-term survivors compared to long-term ones. Its prognostic and predictive power was then successfully validated, both at mRNA and protein level, first on training than on validation sample set. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the possible involvement of FXYD5 and ECM-receptor interaction signal pathway in HCSOC survival and prognosis.
Subject(s)
Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/metabolism , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Ion Channels/metabolism , Microfilament Proteins/metabolism , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Ovarian Neoplasms/metabolism , Receptors, Cell Surface/metabolism , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carboplatin/therapeutic use , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/drug therapy , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/genetics , Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous/mortality , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Female , Humans , Ion Channels/genetics , Microfilament Proteins/genetics , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Prognosis , Progression-Free Survival , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Survival Analysis , Transcriptome , Up-RegulationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Trabectedin, in addition to its antiproliferative effect, can modify the tumour microenvironment and this could be synergistic with bevacizumab. The efficacy and safety of trabectedin and bevacizumab ± carboplatin have never been investigated. METHODS: In this phase 2 study, women progressing between 6 and 12 months since their last platinum-based therapy were randomised to Arm BT: bevacizumab, trabectedin every 21 days, or Arm BT+C: bevacizumab, trabectedin and carboplatin every 28 days, from cycles 1 to 6, then trabectedin and bevacizumab as in Arm BT. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival rate (PFS-6) and severe toxicity rate (ST-6) at 6 months, assuming a PFS-6 ≤35% for BT and ≤40% for BT+C as not of therapeutic interest and, for both arms, a ST-6 ≥ 30% as unacceptable. RESULTS: BT+C (21 patients) did not meet the safety criteria for the second stage (ST-6 45%; 95%CI: 23%-69%) but PFS-6 was 85% (95%CI: 62%-97%). BT (50 patients) had 75% PFS-6 (95%CI: 60%-87%) and 16% ST-6 (95%CI 7%-30%). CONCLUSIONS: BT compared favourably with other platinum- and non-platinum-based regimens. The combination with carboplatin needs to be assessed further in a re-modulated safer schedule to confirm its apparent strong activity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01735071 (Clinicaltrials.gov).
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Carboplatin/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Middle Aged , Progression-Free Survival , Survival Rate , Trabectedin/administration & dosage , Trabectedin/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the safety and efficacy of niraparib in patients aged ≥70â¯years with recurrent ovarian cancer in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial. METHODS: The trial enrolled 2 independent cohorts with histologically diagnosed recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer who responded to platinum rechallenge, on the basis of germline breast cancer susceptibility gene mutation (gBRCAmut) status. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive niraparib (300â¯mg) or placebo once daily until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. Adverse events (AEs) of special interest were based on the known safety profile of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. RESULTS: Patients aged ≥70â¯years in the gBRCAmut cohort receiving niraparib (nâ¯=â¯14) had not yet reached a median PFS compared with a median PFS of 3.7â¯months for the same age group in the placebo arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.09 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01 to 0.73]). Non-gBRCAmut patients aged ≥70â¯years receiving niraparib (nâ¯=â¯47) had a median PFS of 11.3â¯months compared with 3.8â¯months in the placebo arm (HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.71]). Median duration of follow-up in the niraparib arm was 17.3â¯months in patients ≥70â¯years and 17.2â¯months in patients <70â¯years. Frequency, severity of AEs, and dose reductions in the niraparib arm were similar in patients aged <70 andâ¯≥â¯70â¯years population. The most common gradeâ¯≥â¯3 AEs in patients ≥70â¯years were hematologic: thrombocytopenia event (34.4%), anemia event (13.1%), and neutropenia event (16.4%). CONCLUSIONS: For patients ≥70â¯years of age receiving niraparib as maintenance treatment in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial, PFS benefits and incidence of any grade or serious treatment-emergent AEs were comparable to results in the younger population. Use of niraparib should be considered in this population.
Subject(s)
Indazoles/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Indazoles/adverse effects , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Middle Aged , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Piperidines/adverse effects , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The existence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) within a tumor bulk has been demonstrated for many solid tumors including epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). CSCs have been associated to tumor invasion, metastasis and development of chemoresistant recurrences. In this context, we aim to characterize EOC CSCs from the molecular point of view in order to identify potential biomarkers associated with chemoresistance. METHODS: We isolated a population of cells with stem-like characteristics (OVA-BS4 spheroids) from a primary human EOC cell line under selective conditions. OVA-BS4 spheroids were characterized for drug response by cytotoxicity assays and their molecular profile was investigated by microarray and RT-qPCR. Finally, we performed a gene expression study in a cohort of 74 high-grade serous EOC (HGSOC) patients by RT-qPCR. RESULTS: Spheroids exhibited properties of self-renewal and a pronounced expression of well-known stem cell genes. Moreover, they demonstrated greater resistance towards several anticancer drugs compared to parent cell line, consistent with their higher ABCG2 gene expression. From microarray studies MAL (T-cell differentiation protein) emerged as the most up-regulated gene in spheroids, compared to parent cell line. In HGSOC patients, MAL was significantly overexpressed in platinum-resistant compared to platinum-sensitive patients and resulted as an independent prognostic marker of survival. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation provides an important contribution to the identification of molecular markers of ovarian CSCs and chemoresistance. Successful translation of molecular findings would lead to a better comprehension of the mechanisms triggering chemoresistant recurrences, to the individuation of novel therapeutic targets and to the personalization of treatment regimens.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Myelin and Lymphocyte-Associated Proteolipid Proteins/genetics , Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/metabolism , Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/mortality , Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/surgery , Neoplastic Stem Cells , Ovarian Neoplasms/metabolism , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Prognosis , Up-RegulationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Few data are available on the outcome of surgery after a bevacizumab-containing regimen. The MITO 16A- MaNGO OV2A phase 4 trial evaluates the outcomes of first-line CPB in a clinical-practice-like setting. Here we present the results of the subgroup of patients undergoing IDS after neoadjuvant treatment or suboptimal primary surgery. METHODS: 400 chemonaïve epithelial ovarian cancer patients, age≥18, ECOG PS 0-2 were eligible to receive C (AUC 5 d1, q21) plus P (175mg/m2 d1, q21) and B (15mg/kg d1 q21) for 6cycles followed by B maintenance until cycle 22nd. RESULTS: 79 patients (20%) underwent IDS. Overall, 74 patients received at least one administration of B before IDS. Median age was 61.2, 70% of the patients had FIGO IIIC disease. The median number of cycles before IDS was 3 both for chemotherapy and bevacizumab respectively. A residual disease ≤1cm was achieved in 64 patients (86.5%). Four percent of the patients experienced fever and 4% required blood transfusion after surgery. Surgical wound infection and/or dehiscence, pelvic abscess, intestinal sub-occlusion and fistula were experienced by one patient each. CONCLUSIONS: In the MITO16A-MaNGO OV2A phase 4 trial, combined chemotherapy and bevacizumab did not hamper IDS and the rate of perioperative complications was similar to what expected without bevacizumab. These data support the hypothesis that adding bevacizumab to first line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer might not be denied to patients for whom IDS is planned.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/methods , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Aged , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Combined Modality Therapy , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Paclitaxel/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) is a deadly disease, with a 5-year survival of 30%. The aim of the study was to perform broad-scale protein signaling activation mapping to evaluate if EOC can be redefined based on activated protein signaling network architecture rather than histology. Tumor cells were isolated using laser capture microdissection (LCM) from 72 EOCs. Tumors were classified as serous (n = 38), endometrioid (n = 13), mixed (n = 8), clear cell (CCC; n = 7), and others (n = 6). LCM tumor cells were lysed and subjected to reverse-phase protein microarray to measure the expression/activation level of 117 protein drug targets. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis was utilized to explore the overall signaling network. ANOVA was used to detect significant differences among the groups (p < 0.05). Regardless of histology, unsupervised analysis revealed five pathway-driven clusters. When the EOC histotypes were compared by ANOVA, only CCC showed a distinct signaling network, with activation of EGFR, Syk, HER2/ErbB2, and SHP2 (p = 0.0007, p = 0.0021, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.0410, respectively). The histological classification of EOC fails to adequately describe the underpinning protein signaling network. Nevertheless, CCC presents unique signaling characteristics compared to the other histotypes. EOC may need to be characterized by functional signaling activation mapping rather than pure histology.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Ovary/pathology , Protein Interaction Maps , Signal Transduction , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , ErbB Receptors/analysis , ErbB Receptors/metabolism , Female , Humans , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/analysis , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/metabolism , Middle Aged , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/metabolism , Ovarian Neoplasms/metabolism , Ovary/metabolism , Precision Medicine , Protein Array Analysis , Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11/analysis , Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11/metabolism , Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/analysis , Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/metabolism , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Syk Kinase , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Literature evidence suggests that trabectedin monotherapy is effective in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) presenting BRCA mutation and/or BRCAness phenotype. METHODS: A prospective, open-label, randomized phase III MITO-23 trial evaluated the activity and safety of trabectedin 1.3 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks (arm A) in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers or patients with BRCAness phenotype (ie, patients who responded to ≥two previous platinum-based treatments) with recurrent OC, primary peritoneal carcinoma, or fallopian tube cancer in comparison with physician's choice chemotherapy in the control arm (arm B; pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, topotecan, gemcitabine, once-weekly paclitaxel, or carboplatin). The primary end point was overall survival (OS) evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: Overall, 244 patients from 21 MITO centers were randomly assigned (arm A = 122/arm B = 122). More than 70% of patients received ≥three previous chemotherapy lines and 35.7% had received a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) before enrollment. Median OS was not significantly different between the arms: arm A: 15.8 versus arm B: 17.9 months (P = .304). Median progression-free survival was 4.9 months in arm A versus 4.4 months in arm B (P = .897). Among 208 patients evaluable for efficacy, the objective response rate was 17.1% in arm A and 21.4% in arm B, with comparable median duration of response (5.62 v 5.66 months, respectively). No superior effect was observed for trabectedin in the prespecified subgroup analyses according to BRCA mutational status, chemotherapy type, and pretreatment with a PARPi and/or platinum-free interval. Trabectedin showed a higher frequency of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and serious adverse drug reactions compared with control chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Trabectedin did not improve median OS and showed a worse safety profile in comparison with physician's choice control chemotherapy.
Subject(s)
Mutation , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Ovarian Neoplasms , Trabectedin , Humans , Female , Trabectedin/therapeutic use , Trabectedin/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Aged , Adult , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Phenotype , Prospective Studies , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Progression-Free SurvivalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to investigate within ovarian carcinoma and normal ovarian biopsies the gene expression of multiple secretoglobin family members relative to mammaglobin B, which we previously reported as a promising novel ovarian carcinoma prognostic marker. METHODS: Using quantitative real-time Reverse Transcription PCR we tested 53 ovarian carcinoma and 30 normal ovaries for the expression of 8 genes belonging to the secretoglobin family: mammaglobin A, lipophilin A, lipophilin B, uteroglobin, HIN-1, UGRP-1, RYD5 and IIS. Next, we decided to expand the LipB gene expression analysis to a further 48 ovarian carcinoma samples, for a total of 101 tumor tissues of various histologies and to study its protein expression by immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumors and normal ovaries. Finally, we correlated lipophilin B gene and protein expression to conventional patient clinico-pathological features and outcome. RESULTS: We found significant mammaglobin A, lipophilin A, lipophilin B and RYD5 gene overexpression in ovarian carcinomas compared to normal ovaries. Lipophilin B mRNA showed a higher presence in tumors (75.4%) compared to normal ovaries (16.6%) and the most significant correlation with mammaglobin B mRNA (rs =0.77, p < 0.001). By immunohistochemical analysis, we showed higher lipophilin B expression in the cytoplasm of tumor cells compared to normal ovaries (p < 0.001). Moreover, lipophilin B gene overexpression was significantly associated with serous histology (serous vs clear cell p = 0.027; serous vs undifferentiated p = 0.007) and lower tumor grade (p = 0.02). Lower LipB mRNA levels (low versus high tertiles) were associated to a shorter progression-free (p = 0.03, HR = 2.2) and disease-free survival (p = 0.02, HR = 2.5) by univariate survival analysis and, importantly, they remain an independent prognostic marker for decreased disease-free (p = 0.001, HR = 3.9) and progression-free survival (p = 0.004, HR = 2.8) in multivariate Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The present study represents the first quantitative evaluation of secretoglobin gene expression in normal and neoplastic ovarian tissues. Our results demonstrate lipophilin B gene and protein upregulation in ovarian carcinoma compared to normal ovary. Moreover, lipophilin B gene overexpression correlates with a less aggressive tumor phenotype and represents a novel ovarian carcinoma prognostic factor.
Subject(s)
Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Ovarian Neoplasms/metabolism , Secretoglobins/metabolism , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ovary/metabolism , Phenotype , Prognosis , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Treatment Outcome , Up-RegulationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), kallikrein 6 (KLK6), osteopontin (OPN) and soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP) are new promising biomarkers that could integrate CA125 in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) diagnosis. The autoantibody response to tumor antigens is a potential tool for improving the diagnostic performances of biomarkers. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic potential of these biomarkers in the form of free markers and immunocomplexed with immunoglobulin M (IgM). Moreover, we analyzed the association between these markers and clinico-pathological characteristics of EOC patients. METHODS: Serum and plasma samples of 60 healthy controls, 60 ovarian benign cysts, 60 endometriosis and 60 EOCs, collected before any treatment, were tested for CICs and free antigens by immunoassays. RESULTS: Immunocomplexes were characterized by poor sensitivity and specificity, since they allowed the detection only of a small number of EOC patients and were increased in patients with benign gynecological pathologies. However, the markers in the form of free antigens showed good diagnostic performances. Of note, CA125 and HE4 showed high sensitivity in the detection of the malignancy and HE4 emerged as a useful biomarker in differential diagnosis between EOC and endometriosis. Finally, elevated KLK6 and OPN, were associated with advanced FIGO stage, high grade disease, suboptimally debulked tumor and ascites. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the diagnostic role of CA125, HE4, KLK6, OPN and SMRP, and for the first time showed that CA125, HE4, KLK6, OPN and SMRP immunocomplexed with IgM are not a potential tool for EOC diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , CA-125 Antigen/blood , Immunoconjugates/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/blood , Ovarian Neoplasms/blood , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/chemistry , Biomarkers, Tumor/immunology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial , Case-Control Studies , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , GPI-Linked Proteins/blood , GPI-Linked Proteins/chemistry , GPI-Linked Proteins/immunology , Humans , Immunoassay , Immunoconjugates/chemistry , Immunoconjugates/immunology , Immunoglobulin M/chemistry , Immunoglobulin M/immunology , Kallikreins/blood , Kallikreins/chemistry , Kallikreins/immunology , Male , Mesothelin , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/diagnosis , Osteopontin/blood , Osteopontin/chemistry , Osteopontin/immunology , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Proteins/analysis , Proteins/chemistry , Proteins/immunology , WAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The efficiency of the Myriad Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) test to guide the use of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors has been demonstrated in several phase III trials. However, a need exists for alternative clinically validated tests. METHODS: A novel biomarker for HRD was developed using The Cancer Genome Atlas database and, as part of the ENGOT HRD European Initiative, applied to 469 samples from the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial. Results were compared with the Myriad myChoice Genomic Instability Score (GIS) with respect to the progression-free survival in the olaparib + bevacizumab and placebo + bevacizumab arms. RESULTS: Analysis of the TCGA cohort revealed that a normalization of the number of large-scale state transitions by the number of whole-genome doubling events allows a better separation and classification of HRD samples than the GIS. Analysis of the PAOLA-1 samples, using the Geneva test (OncoScan + nLST), yielded a lower failure rate (27 of 469 v 59 of 469) and a hazard ratio of 0.40 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.57) compared with 0.37 for Myriad myChoice (BRCAm or GIS+) in the nLST-positive samples. In patients with BRCAwt, the Geneva test identified a novel subpopulation of patients, with a favorable 1-year PFS (85%) but a poor 2-year PFS (30%) on olaparib + bevacizumab treatment. CONCLUSION: The proposed test efficiently separates HRD-positive from HRD-negative patients, predicts response to PARP inhibition, and can be easily deployed in a clinical laboratory for routine practice. The performance is similar to the available commercial test, but its lower failure rate allows an increase in the number of patients who will receive a conclusive laboratory result.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma , Ovarian Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Bevacizumab/pharmacology , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy , Biomarkers , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases/genetics , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases/therapeutic use , Homologous RecombinationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Validated prognostic biomarkers for anti-angiogenic therapy using the anti-VEGF antibody Bevacizumab in ovarian cancer (OC) patients are still an unmet clinical need. The EGFR can contribute to cancer-associated biological mechanisms in OC cells including angiogenesis, but its targeting gave disappointing results with less than 10% of OC patients treated with anti-EGFR compounds showing a positive response, likely due to a non adequate selection and stratification of EGFR-expressing OC patients. METHODS: EGFR membrane expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 310 OC patients from the MITO-16A/MANGO-OV2A trial, designed to identify prognostic biomarkers of survival in patients treated with first line standard chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Statistical analyses assessed the association between EGFR and clinical prognostic factors and survival outcomes. A single sample Gene Set Enrichment-like and Ingenuity Pathway Analyses were applied to the gene expression profile of 195 OC samples from the same cohort. In an OC in vitro model, biological experiments were performed to assess specific EGFR activation. RESULTS: Based on EGFR-membrane expression, three OC subgroups of patients were identified being the subgroup with strong and homogeneous EGFR membrane localization, indicative of possible EGFR out/in signalling activation, an independent negative prognostic factor for overall survival of patients treated with an anti-angiogenic agent. This OC subgroup resulted statistically enriched of tumors of histotypes different than high grade serous lacking angiogenic molecular characteristics. At molecular level, among the EGFR-related molecular traits identified to be activated only in this patients' subgroup the crosstalk between EGFR with other RTKs also emerged. In vitro, we also showed a functional cross-talk between EGFR and AXL RTK; upon AXL silencing, the cells resulted more sensitive to EGFR targeting with erlotinib. CONCLUSIONS: Strong and homogeneous cell membrane localization of EGFR, associated with specific transcriptional traits, can be considered a prognostic biomarker in OC patients and could be useful for a better OC patients' stratification and the identification of alternative therapeutic target/s in a personalized therapeutic approach.
Subject(s)
Mangifera , Ovarian Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Erlotinib Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Biomarkers , ErbB Receptors/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic impact of preoperative serum determination of human epididymis protein 4 (sHE4), and to investigate its potential correlation with clinicopathological features and survival endpoints in endometrial cancer patients. METHODS: Preoperative serum samples from 193 endometrial cancer patients and 125 women with normal endometrium were measured for sHE4 and serum CA125 (sCA125) concentrations by quantitative chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassays on the automated Architect instrument. RESULTS: sHE4 concentrations were significantly higher in endometrial cancer patients regardless of tumour stage and grade compared with normal controls. Setting the specificity at 95 % , the sensitivities in detecting endometrial cancer patients were 66 % for HE4, 33 % for CA125 and 64 % for the combination of the two markers. High concentrations of both HE4 and CA125 significantly correlated with all clinicopathological features characterising a more aggressive tumour phenotype.In multivariate analysis, only high preoperative sHE4 concentrations, but not sCA125, were independent prognostic factors for shorter Overall Survival, Disease-Free Survival and Progression-Free Survival. CONCLUSIONS: HE4 is more sensitive and specifi c than CA125in distinguishing endometrial cancer patients from women with normal endometrium, regardless of tumour stage and grade. sHE4 appears to be associated with a more aggressive tumour variant and it could be clinically useful, in identifying high-risk endometrial cancer patients, for a tailored surgical and postoperative therapy. HE4 significant correlation with decreased Overall Survival, Disease Free Survival and Progression Free Survival suggests its potential role as a novel prognostic marker for endometrial cancer.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Endometrial Neoplasms/diagnosis , Proteins/metabolism , Aged , CA-125 Antigen/blood , Endometrial Neoplasms/blood , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Sensitivity and Specificity , Treatment Outcome , WAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2ABSTRACT
Histopathologic assessment of high-risk endometrial cancer (EC) suffers from intersubject variability and poor reproducibility. The pragmatic classification in four molecular subgroups helps to overcome these limits, showing a significant prognostic value. The "no specific molecular profile" (NSMP) is the most heterogeneous EC subgroup, requiring further characterization to better guide its clinical management. DNA sequencing of POLE exonuclease domain and immunohistochemistry for PMS2, MSH6, and p53 were performed in order to stratify a cohort of 94 high-risk EC patients in the four molecular subgroups. Moreover, a panel of seven additional biomarkers was tested. Patients were found to be 16% POLE-mutated, 36% mismatch repair-deficient, 27% p53-abnormal, and 21% NSMP. In the multivariable model, molecular groups confirmed their significant association with disease-specific survival and progression-free survival, with p53-abnormal and NSMP endometrial cancer characterized by poor outcomes. Among the additional evaluated biomarkers, L1CAM was the only one with a significant prognostic value within the NSMP subgroup. NSMP/L1CAM-positive patients experienced the worst outcome and were "early-relapsing" after platinum-based chemotherapy, with a significantly shorter platinum-free interval compared to L1CAM-negative patients. L1CAM appears to be a promising candidate as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in the high-risk NSMP subgroup, which is actually known to lack specific molecular markers.