Feasibility and Safety of Percutaneous Kidney Biopsy in Small Kidneys: Breaking the Paradigm.

INTRODUCTION: The percutaneous kidney biopsy (PKB) is an essential tool in nephrology; small kidney size has been a relative contraindication to PKB and there is limited data on the safety and utility of performing PKB in this setting. Our aim was to describe the complications of PKB in small kidneys and to assess if kidney biopsy results have an impact on medical decisions and outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective, descriptive, and observational study. Patients older than 16 years of age with a decreased kidney size (≤8 cm) and undergoing PKB of native kidneys from July 2019 to December 2022 were included. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were included, 19 women and 6 men. The mean age was 42.3 ± 18.04. The mean kidney length was 7.56 ± 0.33 and the mean width was 4.2 cm. All patients received only 1 puncture, obtaining an average of 12 glomeruli. The mean blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine were 36 mg/dL and 1.94 mg/dL, respectively and the mean Hgb (hemoglobin) was 12.87 ± 2.81 g/dL. Minor complications occurred in 5 patients, perirenal hematoma in 3 patients, hematuria in 1 patient, and hematoma plus hematuria in 1 patient. Histological examination showed FSGS, lupus nephritis, other Glomerular disease, crescentic glomerulonephritis, and tubulointerstitial nephritis in 36%, 20%, 16%, 16%, and 12% of the cases, respectively. Biopsy resulted in management modification in 64% of cases. In a bivariate analysis, kidney size was not associated with higher complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: PKB in small kidneys is a feasible and safe procedure when properly planned, providing an adequate sample in all cases, with an insignificant number of minor complications, and that is clinically relevant.

Evidence and the Main Adverse Effects Regarding Drug Therapies in the War Against COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, the breakthrough of COVID-19 pandemic around the world is the biggest health challenge for the clinicians, and it represents an unexpected effort to identify an effective treatment for those patients. No proven definitive therapies for this infection currently exist. Unfortunately, the infected patients increased in an alarming way every day, faster than medical evidence. At present, the expanding knowledge regarding SARS-COV-2 virology provides several potential drug targets. OBJECTIVE: Therefore, clinicians need a rapid review and guideline about the main adverse effects regarding the most prescribed drugs and, specifically, the efficacy and potential risk of each pharmacological therapy, during hospital care. METHODS: The articles review was performed using PubMed to identify relevant papers in English language reported through July 20th, 2020; a second review was performed using Web of Science until August 28th, 2020. Due to the lack of randomized clinical trials, we included case reports, case series and reviews. We found a total of 1606 related articles. The authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts for inclusion. CONCLUSION: At present, despite the enormous medical effort for publishing several trials or case reports, we have not yet discovered a definitive therapy against the COVID-19 infection. This brief review aims to prompt identification of risk factors and main adverse effects in a systematic view related to therapy with partial evidence proposed to date.