e-Learning for Instruction and to Improve Reproducibility of Scoring Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Colon Carcinoma: Performance and Reproducibility Assessment in the UNITED Study.

BACKGROUND: The amount of stroma in the primary tumor is an important prognostic parameter. The tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) was previously validated by international research groups as a robust parameter with good interobserver agreement. OBJECTIVE: The Uniform Noting for International Application of the Tumor-Stroma Ratio as an Easy Diagnostic Tool (UNITED) study was developed to bring the TSR to clinical implementation. As part of the study, an e-Learning module was constructed to confirm the reproducibility of scoring the TSR after proper instruction. METHODS: The e-Learning module consists of an autoinstruction for TSR determination (instruction video or written protocol) and three sets of 40 cases (training, test, and repetition sets). Scoring the TSR is performed on hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections and takes only 1-2 minutes. Cases are considered stroma-low if the amount of stroma is ≤50%, whereas a stroma-high case is defined as >50% stroma. Inter- and intraobserver agreements were determined based on the Cohen κ score after each set to evaluate the reproducibility. RESULTS: Pathologists and pathology residents (N=63) with special interest in colorectal cancer participated in the e-Learning. Forty-nine participants started the e-Learning and 31 (63%) finished the whole cycle (3 sets). A significant improvement was observed from the training set to the test set; the median κ score improved from 0.72 to 0.77 (P=.002). CONCLUSIONS: e-Learning is an effective method to instruct pathologists and pathology residents for scoring the TSR. The reliability of scoring improved from the training to the test set and did not fall back with the repetition set, confirming the reproducibility of the TSR scoring method. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands Trial Registry NTR7270; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7072. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/13464.

The prognostic value of the tumor-stroma ratio in squamous cell lung cancer, a cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) is based on the relative amount of stroma in the primary tumor and has proven to be an independent prognostic factor in various solid tumors. The prognosis of patients and adjuvant treatment decision making in lung squamous cell carcinomas (SqCC) is based on the TNM classification. Currently, no other prognostic biomarkers are available. In this study we evaluated the prognostic value of the TSR in lung SqCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients undergoing lung surgery because of lung SqCC between 2000 and 2018 at the Leiden University Medical Center were included. The TSR was scored on hematoxylin & eosin stained tissue sections. Based on the amount of tumor-stroma, two groups were defined: ≤50% was classified as a stroma-low tumor and >50% as stroma-high. The prognostic value of the TSR was determined with survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 174 stage I-III patients were included. Of them, 79 (45%) were stroma-low and 95 (55%) stroma-high. Separately analyzed for tumor stages, the TSR showed to be an independent prognostic biomarker in stage II (n = 68) for 5-year overall survival (HR=3.0; 95% CI, 1.1-8.6; p = 0.035) and 5-year disease free survival (DFS) (HR=3.6; 95% CI, 1.3-9.9; p = 0.014). Patients with a stroma-high tumor had a worse 5-year DFS in the whole cohort (HR 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.4; p = 0.048), but no independent prognostic value was found. CONCLUSION: In stage II lung SqCC patients, stroma-low tumors have a better prognosis compared to stroma-high tumors. Moreover, adjuvant chemotherapy could be spared for these stroma-low patients.

Tumour-stroma ratio has poor prognostic value in non-pedunculated T1 colorectal cancer: A multi-centre case-cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Current risk stratification models for early invasive (T1) colorectal cancer are not able to discriminate accurately between prognostic favourable and unfavourable tumours, resulting in over-treatment of a large (>80%) proportion of T1 colorectal cancer patients. The tumour-stroma ratio (TSR), which is a measure for the relative amount of desmoplastic tumour stroma, is reported to be a strong independent prognostic factor in advanced-stage colorectal cancer, with a high stromal content being associated with worse prognosis and survival. We aimed to investigate whether the TSR predicts clinical outcome in patients with non-pedunculated T1 colorectal cancer. METHODS: Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained tumour tissue slides from a retrospective multi-centre case cohort of patients with non-pedunculated surgically treated T1 colorectal cancer were assessed for TSR by two independent observers who were blinded for clinical outcomes. The primary end point was adverse outcome, which was defined as the presence of lymph node metastasis in the resection specimen or colorectal cancer recurrence during follow-up. RESULTS: All 261 patients in the case cohort had H&E slides available for TSR scoring. Of these, 183 were scored as stroma-low, and 78 were scored as stroma-high. There was moderate inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.42). In total, 41 patients had lymph node metastasis, 17 patients had recurrent cancer and five had both. Stroma-high tumours were not associated with an increased risk for an adverse outcome (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.37-1.18; p = 0.163). CONCLUSIONS: Our study emphasises that existing prognosticators may not be simply extrapolated to T1 colorectal cancers, even though their prognostic value has been widely validated in more advanced-stage tumours.