Translation and validation of the new knee society knee scoring system into Spanish: Spanish KSS translation.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to translate and validate the English version of the 'Knee Society Knee Scoring System' developed in 2011 (2011 KSS) into Spanish. This new KSS version considers patient satisfaction and expectations before and after knee arthroplasty. Moreover, the questionnaire allows a better characterization of a younger and more diverse population. METHODS: A cross-cultural adaptation process was carried out to obtain the Spanish version of the questionnaire. After that, patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty answered the translated questionnaire before and 6 months after surgery. Psychometric properties including feasibility, validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change were then assessed, and the questionnaire was compared with prior KSS, as well as with SF-12 and WOMAC, all of them already validated to Spanish. RESULTS: In the cross-cultural adaptation process, alternative translations of some items in 'Patient Expectative' and 'Functional Activities' sections were suggested. One hundred and seventy-six patients answered the resulting 1.0 version. Feasibility: 'Charnley Functional Classification', 'Deduction for flexion contracture and extensor lag', the question 'Do you use these aids because of your knees?', and 'Advanced activities (total)' obtained a high number of missing items. Eighty-eight patients (50%) in the preoperative visit and 141 patients (86.5%) after surgery had at least one missing answer. Internal validity: although the analysis suggests the presence of more than one dimension, there was a dimension that explained a higher percentage of variance, which was more noticeable in the postoperative visit. Convergent validity: correlation coefficients with prior KSS, SF-12, and WOMAC confirm the questionnaire's validity. Reliability: Cronbach's alpha for the new KSS was 0.841 and 0.861 in visit 1 and 2, respectively, and higher than that for prior KSS. Sensitivity to change: statistically, significant differences were found between the mean scores between both visits. CONCLUSION: The proposed Spanish version of 2011 KSS is valid, reliable, and sensible to change in patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty. Moreover, it has higher internal consistency (reliability) than the prior KSS. It should be emphasized its correct filling by both health professional and patients LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

High short-term loosening rates with the Wagner Standard Cup.

The stability of prosthetic fixation is to a large extent dependent on component design. The purpose of this study is to analyze the short-term radiological results obtained with the Wagner Standard Cup in primary hip arthroplasty. An assessment was made of one hundred primary hip arthroplasties. The radiological evaluation revealed bone ingrowth in 37 of cases, fibrous integration in 49 and loosening in 14. In summary, osseointegration of the Wagner Standard Cup was unsuccessful in a high percentage of cases. This finding, which was unrelated to the type of stem or bearing surface used, bore a statistically significant relation (P<0.05) with an observed poor bone coverage of the acetabular component. Although insufficient bone coverage could arguably be attributable to a poor surgical technique, we would tend to agree with other authors that it is rather likely to result from a flawed implant design that impedes osseointegration.

Is hip resection arthroplasty a successful definitive treatment?

Purpose: Hip resection arthroplasty as a definitive treatment is an uncommon indication, although still in use selectively. This study evaluates a cohort of patients who have undergone hip resection arthroplasty surgery indicated as a definitive treatment, in order to assess the rate of re-operation, the rate of infection, and the mortality rates. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational, descriptive analysis of a cohort of patients who had undergone a hip resection arthroplasty intended as a definitive treatment, in two University Hospitals from 1994 to 2020. The exclusion criteria were the implantation of a hip cement spacer, or a temporary hip resection arthroplasty in patients undergoing a two-staged surgical approach. We found 26 cases of hip resection arthroplasty. We recorded the indications for a definitive hip resection arthroplasty, the outcomes and complications, and analyzed the success of the hip resection arthroplasty as a definitive surgery using a Kaplan-Meier curve. Results: Seven cases (26.9%) required a re-operation after the hip resection arthroplasty, four cases for persistent hip infection, and in the three remaining a conversion to a total hip arthroplasty was re-considered due to a good medical evolution and non-tolerance to the low functional outcome. The mortality rate was 61.5% (27 days-20 years), with a 19.2% mortality rate in the first 5 years. All the cases that required another surgery after the hip resection arthroplasty were re-operated within the first 18 months. Conclusion: Unfortunately, hip resection arthroplasty continues to show elevated re-operation rate and early mortality rate, as well as low functional outcomes. Two-staged hip revision arthroplasty is the surgical treatment of choice in patients suffering from a periprosthetic joint infection, however we believe that hip resection arthroplasty should be considered in fragile patients, who have endured multiple revision surgeries, or their comorbidities make them unfit from further surgeries.

Complications of standard versus long cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of unstable extracapsular proximal femoral fractures: A randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: To compare in a prospective randomized trial the mechanical complications in patients with unstable extracapsular proximal femur fractures without subtrochanteric extension (AO/OTA 31-A2 and 31-A3) METHODS: We prospectively studied 182 patients with unstable extracapsular proximal femur fractures without fractures lines extending more than 3 cm below the lesser trochanter, randomized to receive either a 'standard' (240 mm) nail or a long nail and followed them up for 1 year. RESULTS: We found no difference in the incidence of mechanical or general complications between the two groups, no cut-outs, no fractures of the tip the implant, 1 cut-through and 2 malrotations in the LN group, 2 non-unions that were reoperated, one on each group. The commonest complication was blade lateral migration, 13 (14%) patients in SN and 6 (9%) in the LN. The operating time was shorter in the SN group 51 minutes compared to 67 minutes in the LN group (p=0.000075). The mortality at 1,3 and 12 months in the SN group was of 2%, 6%, 12% while in the LN group was 12%, 18% and 22%. These differences where significative at 1 (p=0.007) and 3 months (p=0.013), but not at 12 months (p=0.075). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the use of standard nails (240 mm) for this group of fractures, since it does not produce more mechanical complications, and it is faster, cheaper and easier to interlock distally.

Better outcomes in severe and morbid obese patients (BMI > 35 kg/m2) in primary Endo-Model rotating-hinge total knee arthroplasty.

The Endo-Model rotating-hinge prosthesis is preferably indicated as a primary implant in patients with advanced axial deviation of the lower limbs or unstable knees with severe bone defects. Outcomes were studied in 111 knees, operated in a three-year period; the mean followup was 28 months. Joint balance enhancement and limbs mechanical axis correction were achieved after surgery. There were 6 deep infections and 16 patients referred postoperative anterior knee pain. WOMAC index scores disaggregated by gender and BMI showed better outcomes in obese patients (specifically, those with a BMI of 35-40 kg/m(2)) and in men. Although the lack of a control group did not allow definite conclusions and despite a nonnegligible complication rate, our results reveal that the Endo-Model total knee arthroplasty can be a useful tool to deal with severe and morbid obese patients affected of severe gonarthrosis associated with marked axial deviations, ligament instability, or bone defects.

Risk of Mortality for Proximal Femoral Fracture in Patients With and Without COVID-19. A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) has resulted in a widespread loss of lives, morbidity, and major disruptions to the healthcare system. Hip fractures are an emergent condition which require early intervention to reduce increased risk of mortality and morbidity. Infection of SARS-CoV-2 may contribute to increased mortality due to the role of infection and immune response. This study investigated the impact of COVID-19 infection (defined by clinical symptoms) on mortality following proximal femoral fracture (PFF) repair procedures. Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort study. Data from the Premier Healthcare Database® was extracted for patients presenting for PFF during 2019 for control, and February 2020-September 2020 to represent a COVID time-period. Results: A total of N = 73 953 subjects were enrolled for the 2019 period, and a total of N = 34 842 subjects were enrolled for the COVID period. For the 2019 period, subjects who had a PFF procedure and who had flu/COVID-like illness had 2.47 (CI:2.11, 2.88) times the odds of mortality compared to those who did not have flu/COVID-like illness. Subjects who had a PFF procedure and who had flu/COVID-like illness during the COVID period had 2.85 times (CI:2.36, 3.42) the odds of mortality compared to those who did not have flu/COVID-like illness. For the COVID period, within subjects who did not have a PFF procedure, those with flu/COVID-like illness had increased odds of mortality compared to those who did not have flu/COVID-like illness (OR:2.26, CI:1.57, 3.21). Conclusions: Hip fractures present high risk for mortality and morbidity, where timely intervention is critical to improved outcomes. Presence of infection such as flu/COVID-like illness may influence mortality in patients undergoing hip fracture repair procedures. Consideration of infection status as a comorbidity is important to proper management and achieving optimal outcomes.

Is elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic safe? A multi-center prospective study in a high incidence area.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the evolution of patients admitted for elective orthopaedic surgery during the immediate post-COVID-19 peak of the pandemic. METHODS: This is a multi-center, observational study conducted in 8 high complexity hospitals of Catalonia, one of the highest COVID-19 incidence areas in Spain. We included patients ≥18 years of age undergoing elective surgery (total knee or hip arthroplasty, knee or hip revision arthroplasty, shoulder or knee arthroscopy, hand or wrist surgery, forefoot surgery, or hardware removal) after the COVID-19 peak (between May 5th and June 30th, 2020). The main exclusion criterion was a positive result for SARS-CoV-2 PCR within the 7 days before the surgery. The primary outcomes were postoperative complications within 60 days (+/-30) or hospital readmission due to a COVID-19 infection. Following the recommendations of the International Consensus Group (ICM), elective surgeries were re-started when the nationwide lockdown was lifted. Before the surgery, patients were contacted by phone to rule out any exposure to confirmed COVID-19 cases, a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was performed in all patients 48-72 hours before hospital admission, and they were asked to maintain home confinement until the day of the surgery. RESULTS: 675 patients were included: 189 patients in the arthroplasty group (28%) and 486 in the ambulatory surgery group (72%). Mean [SD] age was 57.6 [15.3] years. The mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 2.21 (SD = 2.01, Min = 0, Max = 13). A total of 84 patients (12.75%) obtained an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 3, showing no association between the ASA score and the risk of developing COVID-19 symptoms at follow-up (χ 2 (4) = 0.77, P = 0.94). The mean occupation rate of hospital beds for COVID-19 patients was 13% and the mean occupation rate of critical care beds for COVID-19 patients was 27% at the time of re-introducing elective surgeries. These were important rates to consider to decide when to reintroduce elective surgeries after lockdown. Surgical time, time of ischemia and intra-operative bleeding were not related with a higher risk of developing COVID-19 post-operatively (χ 2 (1) = 0.00, P = 0.98); (χ 2 (2) = 2.05, P = 0.36); (χ 2 (2) = 0.37, P = 0.83). Only 2 patients (0.3 %) presented with a suspected COVID-19 infection at follow-up. None of them presented with pneumonia or required confirmation by a reverse transcription PCR assay. Hospital re-admission was not needed for these patients. CONCLUSION: The risk of developing COVID-19 during the immediate post-COVID-19 peak in a region with a high incidence of COVID-19 has not been proved. These data suggest that elective orthopaedic surgeries can be resumed when assertive and strict protocols are followed.

"Can patients learn how to reduce their shoulder dislocation?" A one-year follow-up of the randomized clinical trial between the Boss-Holzach-Matter self-assisted technique and the Spaso method.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and reproducibility of self-assisted Boss-Holzach-Matter (BHM) technique compared with the Spaso (Sp) method for shoulder dislocation. METHODS: We conducted a follow-up at 1 year from the randomization of 60 patients with shoulder dislocation enrolled in the study "Teaching patients to reduce a shoulder dislocation." Half of these patients had been taught the self-assisted technique, whereas the other half had been treated by a physician's manipulative maneuver for reduction. We surveyed all the enrolled patients to describe recurrence rates and reproducibility for both the techniques without supervision as well as the number of emergency visits. RESULTS: In total, 52 patients (age range: 18-44 years) answered the survey from the 60 patients enrolled in the study. The total rate of recurrence was 38.5% (20 patients). For the Sp group, 4 of the 30 patients were lost. There were 9 recurrent patients (30%), and 7 were treated in the emergency department (ED). For the BHM group, 4 of the 30 patients were lost. There were 11 recurrent patients (37%), and 2 were treated in the ED. The difference in self-reduction rates and ED visits for both the groups was statistically significant (p=0.025). CONCLUSION: Teaching the BHM technique to the patients is effective and reproducible without direct supervision. It can decrease the number of visits to the ED and is a valid option to teach the patients at risk of recurrence when not being able to get immediate help. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, Therapeutic study.

Partial Versus Total Trapeziectomy With Interposition Arthroplasty for Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis Grade II to III Eaton-Littler: A Clinical Trial.

Purpose: Total trapeziectomy is the most widely used technique to treat isolated thumb trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. However, this technique has been associated with proximal migration of the thumb metacarpal, which has led some physicians to consider partial trapeziectomy as a valid alternative. The purpose of this study was to assess whether partial trapeziectomy improves final key pinch strength compared with total trapeziectomy. Methods: We randomized 34 patients with basal thumb osteoarthritis into 2 groups to undergo partial or total trapeziectomy with interposition arthroplasty. Key pinch strength at 12 months was the primary outcome measure. Other variables measured included trapezial space height, range of motion, grip strength, change in key pinch strength, patient-reported outcome measures, and pain. Results: No difference between groups was detected regarding final pinch strength, trapezial space height, grip strength, range of motion, change in pinch strength, patient-reported outcomes (Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, or Hand), or pain. Conclusions: We cannot conclude that partial trapeziectomy provides an advantage over total trapeziectomy at 1 year after surgery. Although trapeziometacarpal space was substantially preserved in the partial trapeziectomy group at 12 months, this difference was not statistically or clinically significant. Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic III.

Usefulness of Urinoculture to Patients With Dementia and Femoral Neck Fracture at Admission to Hospital: Preliminary Results.

INTRODUCTION: While preoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) has the potential to cause bacteremia and postsurgical acute prosthetic joint infections (APJIs), the influence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) in these infections remains unclear. So the majority of guidelines not recommend the treatment of AB prior to the surgery. However, as patients with dementia usually cannot explain the symptoms of dysuria, the differential diagnosis between AB and UTI may be very difficult in this group of patients. The principal aim of the study was to compare the rate of positive urine culture at admission in patients with femoral neck fracture with and without dementia and secondarily try to assess the connection of positive urinoculture and postoperative acute gram-negative PJI. METHODS: All patients with a femoral neck fracture underwent a urine culture on hospital admission and were prospectively recorded. Variables such as sex, age, institutionalization, dementia and other comorbidities, PJI rate, and in-hospital death were collected. The results of cultures were retrospectively revised. Patients who received postoperative antibiotics or had been diagnosed with UTI during hospital stay were excluded. Statistical comparisons between patients with and without dementia were performed using SPSS software version 17. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients were included (52 with dementia). The rate of positive urine culture was 32% (n = 16) in patients with dementia and 11.5% in patients without dementia (P = .003). Of these 16 patients with dementia and positive urine culture, 2 (12.5%) developed an acute gram-negative PJI, whereas there were no cases in the group without dementia (P = .011). DISCUSSION: The only difference between UTI and AB is the expression of symptoms by the patient. However, as patients with dementia have difficulties to explain UTI symptoms, some UTI may be underdiagnosed. CONCLUSION: Patients with dementia have a statistically higher rate of presurgical positive urine culture compared with patients without dementia.

¿Podemos ayudar? Nuestra experiencia como cirujanos ortopédicos durante la pandemia por COVID / Can we help? Our experience as orthopedic surgeons during the COVID-19 pandemic

No disponible