ABSTRACT
The objectives were to conduct a meta-analysis in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards to determine effect sizes (Cohen's d) for cognitive dysfunction in adults with type 2 diabetes, relative to nondiabetic controls, and to obtain effect sizes for the most commonly reported neuropsychological tests within domains. Twenty-four studies, totaling 26,137 patients (n = 3351 with diabetes), met study inclusion criteria. Small to moderate effect sizes were obtained for five of six domains: motor function (3 studies, n = 2374; d = -0.36), executive function (12 studies, n = 1784; d = -0.33), processing speed (16 studies, n = 3076; d = -0.33), verbal memory (15 studies, n = 4,608; d = -0.28), and visual memory (6 studies, n = 1754; d = -0.26). Effect size was smallest for attention/concentration (14 studies, n = 23,143; d = -0.19). The following tests demonstrated the most notable performance decrements in diabetes samples: Grooved Pegboard (dominant hand) (d = -0.60), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (immediate) (d = -0.40), Trails B (d = -0.39), Rey-Osterreith Complex Figure (delayed) (d = -0.38), Trails A (d = -0.34), and Stroop Part I (d = -0.28). This study provides effect sizes to power future epidemiological and clinical diabetes research studies examining cognitive function and to help inform the selection of neuropsychological tests.
Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Neuropsychological Tests , Cognition Disorders/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine if a quality improvement intervention improves sleep and delirium/cognition. DESIGN: Observational, pre-post design. SETTING: A tertiary academic hospital in the United States. PATIENTS: 300 medical ICU patients. INTERVENTIONS: This medical ICU-wide project involved a "usual care" baseline stage, followed by a quality improvement stage incorporating multifaceted sleep-promoting interventions implemented with the aid of daily reminder checklists for ICU staff. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary ICU outcomes were perceived sleep quality and noise ratings (measured on a 0-100 scale using the valid and reliable Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire) and delirium/coma-free days. Secondary outcomes included ICU and hospital length of stay and mortality. Post-ICU measures of cognition and perceived sleep quality were evaluated in an ICU patient subset. During the baseline and sleep quality improvement stages, there were 122 and 178 patients, respectively, with more than one night in the ICU, accounting for 634 and 826 patient-days. Within the groups, 78 (63.9%) and 83 (46.6%) patients received mechanical ventilation. Over the 826 patient-day quality improvement period, checklist item completion rates ranged from 86% to 94%. In multivariable regression analysis of the quality improvement vs. baseline stages, improvements in overall Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire sleep quality ratings did not reach statistical significance, but there were significant improvements in daily noise ratings (mean Ā± SD: 65.9Ā±26.6 vs. 60.5Ā±26.3, p = 0.001), incidence of delirium/coma (odds ratio: 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.89; p = 0.02), and daily delirium/coma-free status (odds ratio: 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.58; p = 0.03). Improvements in secondary ICU outcomes and post-ICU outcomes did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: An ICU-wide quality improvement intervention to improve sleep and delirium is feasible and associated with significant improvements in perceived nighttime noise, incidence of delirium/coma, and daily delirium/coma-free status. Improvement in perceived sleep quality did not reach statistical significance.
Subject(s)
Cognition , Intensive Care Units , Quality Improvement , Sleep , Adult , Aged , Baltimore , Delirium/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Noise, Occupational , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Deep sedation and delirium are common in the ICU. Mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury are at especially high risk for deep sedation, delirium, and associated long-term physical and neuropsychiatric impairments. We undertook an ICU-wide structured quality improvement project to decrease sedation and delirium. DESIGN: Prospective quality improvement project in comparison with a retrospective acute lung injury control group. SETTING: Sixteen-bed medical ICU in an academic teaching hospital with pre-existing use of goal-directed sedation with daily interruption of sedative infusions. PATIENTS: Consecutive acute lung injury patients. INTERVENTION: A "4Es" framework (engage, educate, execute, evaluate) was used as part of the quality improvement process. A new sedation protocol was created and implemented, which recommends a target Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score of 0 (alert and calm) and requires failure of intermittent sedative dosing prior to starting continuous infusions. In addition, twice-daily delirium screening using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU was introduced into routine practice. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sedative use and delirium status in acute lung injury patients after implementation of the quality improvement project (n = 82) were compared with a historical control group (n = 120). During the quality improvement vs. control periods, use of narcotic and benzodiazepine infusions were substantially lower (median proportion of medical ICU days per patient: 33% vs. 74%, and 22% vs. 70%, respectively, both p < 0.001). Further, wakefulness increased (median Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score per patient: -1.5 vs. -4.0, p < 0.001), and days awake and not delirious increased (median proportion of medical ICU days per patient: 19% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Through a structured quality improvement process, use of sedative infusions can be substantially decreased and days awake without delirium significantly increased, even in severely ill, mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury.
Subject(s)
Acute Lung Injury/therapy , Deep Sedation/methods , Delirium/prevention & control , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Academic Medical Centers , Acute Lung Injury/etiology , Adult , Body Mass Index , Clinical Protocols , Comorbidity , Delirium/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Inservice Training , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Male , Middle Aged , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
Cultural differences in time attitudes and their effect on timed neuropsychological test performance were examined in matched non-clinical samples of 100 Russian and American adult volunteers using 8 tests that were previously reported to be relatively free of cultural bias: Color Trails Test (CTT); Ruff Figural Fluency Test (RFFT); Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT); and Tower of London-Drexel Edition (ToL(Dx)). A measure of time attitudes, the Culture of Time Inventory (COTI-33) was used to assess time attitudes potentially affecting time-limited testing. Americans significantly outscored Russians on CTT, SDMT, and ToL(Dx) (p,.05) while differences in RFFT scores only approached statistical significance. Group differences also emerged in COTI-33 factor scores, which partially mediated differences in performance on CTT-1, SDMT, and ToL(Dx) initiation time, but did not account for the effect of culture on CTT-2. Significant effect of culture was revealed in ratings of familiarity with testing procedures that was negatively related to CTT, ToL(Dx), and SDMT scores. Current findings indicated that attitudes toward time may influence results of time limited testing and suggested that individuals who lack familiarity with timed testing procedures tend to obtain lower scores on timed tests.
Subject(s)
Attitude/ethnology , Culture , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Time Perception/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/psychology , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Demography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Russia , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Young AdultABSTRACT
Screening tests for memory can be administered more quickly than standard tests of memory. They can be particularly useful with patients with acute medical illness or with the elderly who are unable to tolerate complex or lengthy memory testing, such as patients with acute stroke. However, screening measures for memory often lack validation and may have significant psychometric limitations. The purpose of this study was to validate and determine the psychometric properties of the Three Cities Test (TCT), a short test of memory that uses a selective reminding paradigm and the names of well-known cities as stimuli. The TCT was administered to 115 subjects: 60 patients with acute cerebrovascular accidents (Stroke group) and 55 age-matched orthopedic control patients (Ortho group). Results show that the TCT was significantly correlated with general measures of cognition (MMSE), another well-validated measure of learning and memory (HVLT-R), and clinical variables such as length of hospitalization and functional recovery. Compared to the Ortho group, the Stroke group had significantly worse performance on the TCT in terms of number of trials to criterion, delayed recall, and recognition discrimination. Preliminary results suggest that this instrument is well-received by patients with acute medical illness and cognitive impairment and that it possesses good construct and discriminative validity. Sensitivity and specificity performance as well as recommended cut scores are offered for the TCT.
Subject(s)
Memory Disorders/diagnosis , Memory Disorders/etiology , Point-of-Care Systems , Stroke/complications , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Bone Diseases/complications , Case-Control Studies , Female , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Psychometrics , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Patient-reported cognitive complaints are common in those with post-treatment Lyme disease syndrome (PTLDS). Objective evidence of cognitive impairment in this population is variable in part due to methodological variability in existing studies. In this study, we sought to use a systematic approach to characterizing PTLDS based on the most current consensus diagnosis. We further examined PTLDS-related cognitive decline, operationalized as a significant decline in cognitive test performance relative to premorbid cognitive ability. METHOD: We enrolled a case series of 124 patients with confirmed PTLDS defined by Infectious Diseases Society of America-proposed case definition. Cognitive functioning was evaluated using standardized neuropsychological measures. RESULTS: The majority (92%) of participants endorsed some level of cognitive difficulty, yet 50% of the sample showed no statistically or clinically significant cognitive decline, 26% of the sample evidenced significant cognitive decline on measures of memory and variably on measures of processing speed, and 24% of the sample were excluded from analyses due to suboptimal test engagement. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings are consistent with the literature showing that the most robust neurocognitive deficit associated with PTLDS is in verbal memory and with variable decline in processing speed. Compared to population normative comparison standards, PTLDS-related cognitive decline remains mild. Thus, further research is needed to better understand factors related to the magnitude of subjective cognitive complaints as well as objective evidence of mild cognitive decline.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Dysfunction/complications , Cognitive Dysfunction/psychology , Post-Lyme Disease Syndrome/complications , Post-Lyme Disease Syndrome/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological TestsABSTRACT
The article aims to suggest clinically-useful tools in neuropsychological assessment for efficient use of embedded measures of performance validity. To accomplish this, we integrated available validity-related and statistical research from the literature, consensus statements, and survey-based data from practicing neuropsychologists. We provide recommendations for use of 1) Cutoffs for embedded performance validity tests including Reliable Digit Span, California Verbal Learning Test (Second Edition) Forced Choice Recognition, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test Combination Score, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Failure to Maintain Set, and the Finger Tapping Test; 2) Selecting number of performance validity measures to administer in an assessment; and 3) Hypothetical clinical decision-making models for use of performance validity testing in a neuropsychological assessment collectively considering behavior, patient reporting, and data indicating invalid or noncredible performance. Performance validity testing helps inform the clinician about an individual's general approach to tasks: response to failure, task engagement and persistence, compliance with task demands. Data-driven clinical suggestions provide a resource to clinicians and to instigate conversation within the field to make more uniform, testable decisions to further the discussion, and guide future research in this area.
Subject(s)
Malingering/diagnosis , Neuropsychological Tests/standards , Neuropsychology/methods , Psychology, Clinical/methods , Psychomotor Performance , HumansABSTRACT
Delirium is an important syndrome affecting inpatients in various hospital settings. This article focuses on multidisciplinary and interdepartmental collaboration to advance efforts in delirium clinical care and research. The Johns Hopkins Delirium Consortium, which includes members from the disciplines of nursing, medicine, rehabilitation therapy, psychology, and pharmacy within the departments and divisions of anesthesiology, geriatrics, oncology, orthopedic surgery, psychiatry, critical care medicine, and physical medicine and rehabilitation at the Johns Hopkins Hospital and Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, is one model of such collaboration. This article describes the process involved in developing functional collaboration around delirium and highlights projects, opportunities, and challenges resulting from them.
Subject(s)
Delirium/therapy , Interdisciplinary Communication , Aged , Cooperative Behavior , Delirium/prevention & control , Hospital Departments , Humans , Models, OrganizationalABSTRACT
PROBLEM: Diabetes clinical practice recommendations call for assessment and intervention on diabetes self-management during inpatient hospitalization. Although diabetes is prevalent in inpatient rehabilitation settings, diabetes self-management has not traditionally been a focus of inpatient rehabilitation psychology care. This is because diabetes is often a secondary diagnosis when an individual is admitted to rehabilitation for an acute event. OBJECTIVES: The authors provide a rationale for a role for rehabilitation psychologists in assessing and intervening on the psychosocial, behavioral, and functional self-management needs of individuals with diabetes within the rehabilitation setting. The development of a rehabilitation psychology Inpatient Rehabilitation Diabetes Consultation Service is described. Theoretical and empirical bases for compilation of the assessment and intervention materials are provided. Format and implementation of the service on a university-affiliated inpatient rehabilitation unit is described, with special consideration given to professional issues faced by rehabilitation psychologists and teams. RESULTS: A flexible consultation model was implemented using a guided diabetes psychosocial assessment with brief educational handouts addressing selected key topics (i.e., hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, blood sugar monitoring, nutrition, physical activity, medication, and, A1C and average blood sugar). The consultation service was feasible and well-accepted by treated individuals and the rehabilitation team. CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation psychologists are uniquely positioned to address the functional, psychosocial, and behavioral needs of individuals with diabetes. With further research to assess clinical outcomes, this approach may further address practice recommendations for inpatient diabetes care. Moreover, such a diabetes consultation model may be useful on an outpatient rehabilitation basis as well.
Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/rehabilitation , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/rehabilitation , Interdisciplinary Communication , Patient Admission , Patient Education as Topic , Referral and Consultation , Self Care/psychology , Caregivers/education , Caregivers/psychology , Diabetes Complications/psychology , Diabetes Complications/rehabilitation , Feasibility Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Health Behavior , Hospitals, University , Humans , Life Style , Needs Assessment , Rehabilitation CentersABSTRACT
We evaluated a 23 year-old man after recovery from encephalitis. In contrast to the expected pattern of increasingly better acquisition across the 5 learning trials of the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-2), he produced a "J-shaped" curve (Trials 1-5: 8,6,6,9,11). Because he also demonstrated excessive levels of proactive interference as well as poor divided attention, we hypothesized that his atypical learning pattern was due to a build-up of proactive interference secondary to executive dyscontrol. Using a large sample of 4462 healthy adult men, we identified four groups exhibiting various learning patterns. We found that a learning pattern similar to this patient (i.e., a drop after trial 1 followed by recovery) was rare (1.1% of the sample). Individuals with this learning pattern demonstrated increased perseverative responses, as well as greater difficulty maintaining cognitive set on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, decreased attentional control on the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, and greater levels of proactive interference on the CVLT. Taken together, the results of the study suggest that an early drop, followed by a recovery in learning trial performance, is associated with executive dyscontrol.
Subject(s)
Mental Recall/physiology , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Problem Solving/physiology , Verbal Learning/physiology , Adult , Humans , Male , Proactive Inhibition , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Verbal Learning/classificationABSTRACT
The independent effects of cultural and educational experience on neuropsychological test performance were examined among 503 nondemented African Americans ages 65 and older. Measures of cultural experience (acculturation) and quality of education (reading level) were administered. Reading level was the most influential predictor of cognitive test performance, even after accounting for age, sex, years of education, and acculturation level. Age had small but significant unique effects on most measures, especially word list learning. Years of education had independent effects on measures of verbal abstraction, fluency, and figure matching. More acculturated African Americans obtained higher scores on most measures; however, after accounting for age, years of education, sex, and reading level, the effect of acculturation was diminished. The results suggest that quality of education and cultural experience influence how older African Americans approach neuropsychological tasks; therefore, adjustment for these variables may improve specificity of neuropsychological measures.
Subject(s)
Acculturation , Aged/psychology , Black People/psychology , Cultural Diversity , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Reading , Aged, 80 and over , Black People/education , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Discrimination Learning , Educational Measurement , Female , Humans , Male , Pattern Recognition, Visual , Verbal Learning , White People/education , White People/psychologyABSTRACT
Shape and letter cancellation test performance was investigated among large samples of African American, Hispanic, and White non-demented elders. Ethnic minority elders took significantly longer to complete both tasks compared to Whites. An index of task efficiency, which simultaneously measures time and accuracy, suggested that slower time by minority elders was not related to a measurable effort to achieve greater accuracy. The frequency of commission errors was greater in our sample than in previous reports, especially among ethnic minority elders. Although significant differences were observed between the ethnic groups when matched for years of education, equating for literacy level eliminated all performance differences between African Americans and Whites on both cancellation tasks.
Subject(s)
Attention/physiology , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Ethnicity , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Black or African American/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Case-Control Studies , Educational Status , Female , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Humans , Male , Socioeconomic Factors , Time Perception/physiology , Visual PerceptionABSTRACT
The current study sought to determine if discrepancies in quality of education could explain differences in cognitive test scores between African American and White elders matched on years of education. A comprehensive neuropsychological battery was administered to a sample of African American and non-Hispanic White participants in an epidemiological study of normal aging and dementia in the Northern Manhattan community. All participants were diagnosed as nondemented by a neurologist, and had no history of Parkinson's disease, stroke, mental illness, or head injury. The Reading Recognition subtest from the Wide Range Achievement Test-Version 3 was used as an estimate of quality of education. A MANOVA revealed that African American elders obtained significantly lower scores than Whites on measures of word list learning and memory, figure memory, abstract reasoning, fluency, and visuospatial skill even though the groups were matched on years of education. However, after adjusting the scores for WRAT-3 reading score, the overall effect of race was greatly reduced and racial differences on all tests (except category fluency and a drawing measure) became nonsignificant. These findings suggest that years of education is an inadequate measure of the educational experience among multicultural elders, and that adjusting for quality of education may improve the specificity of certain neuropsychological measures.
Subject(s)
Aging/psychology , Black or African American/psychology , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Reading , White People/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , New York City , Psychometrics , Reference Values , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
Literacy may be a more powerful indicator of brain reserve than years of education. Literacy level may be a proxy for native intellectual capacity or life experience that can compensate for brain damage or provide brain reserve. Alternately, the experience of acquiring literacy skills may in itself change the organization of the brain and increase protection against cognitive decline. However, because people with low levels of literacy obtain poor scores on most cognitive measures, only longitudinal studies can elucidate the role of reading ability in reserve. We determined whether literacy skills could predict cognitive change in a sample of 136 English-speaking African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic elders selected from a longitudinal aging study in New York City. According to a physician's independent examination, all participants were nondemented throughout the four longitudinal assessments. Literacy level was assessed using the WRAT-3 reading subtest. After accounting for age at baseline and years of education, GEE analyses showed that elders with low levels of literacy had a steeper decline in both immediate and delayed recall of a word list over time as compared to high literacy elders. Our findings suggest that literacy skills are protective against memory decline among nondemented elders.