Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
J Intensive Care Med ; 39(5): 429-438, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37904512

ABSTRACT

Purpose: We aim to assess the impact of the exposure to deep versus light sedation by a critical care transport agency during prehospital and interhospital transport on hospital sedation levels, medication exposure, and outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients. Materials and Methods: Retrospective cohort review of mechanically ventilated adult critical care transport patients from January 1, 2019, to March 11, 2020, who arrived at an academic medical center. The primary outcome was the correlation of deep sedation during transport with deep sedation within the first 48 h of hospitalization (defined as Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale [RASS] -3 to -5). The secondary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventilation, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, inpatient mortality, delirium within 48 h, and coma within 48 h. Results: One hundred and ninety-eight patients were included, of whom 183 (92.4%) were deeply sedated during transport which persisted through the first 48 h of hospital care. Deep sedation during transport was not correlated with deep sedation in the hospital within the first 48 h (OR 2.41; 95% CI, 0.48-12.02). There was no correlation with hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, or hospital mortality. Deep sedation during transport was not correlated with delirium or coma within the first 48 h of hospitalization. There was a negligible correlation between final transport RASS and initial hospital RASS which did not differ based on the lapsed time from handoff (<1 h corr. coeff. 0.23; ≥1 h corr. coeff. 0.25). Conclusions: Deep sedation was observed during critical care transport in this cohort and was not correlated with deep sedation during the first 48 h of hospitalization. The transition of care between the transport team and the hospital team may be an opportunity to disrupt therapeutic momentum and re-evaluate sedation decisions.


Subject(s)
Delirium , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Adult , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Coma/therapy , Critical Care , Intensive Care Units , Hospitalization , Respiration, Artificial
2.
Air Med J ; 42(5): 343-347, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37716805

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Mechanically ventilated patients who receive deep levels of sedation have high mortality rates, longer lengths of stay, and longer duration of mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. Prior literature demonstrated a high frequency of deep sedation across all levels of care. Benzodiazepines have been attributed to similar morbidity and mortality findings. METHODS: This study was a descriptive retrospective review of mechanically ventilated adult critical care transport patients from January 1, 2019, to March 11, 2020. Our primary outcome was the percentage of patients who were deeply sedated at handoff to the receiving facility. Deep sedation was defined as a Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale of -3 to -5. Our secondary outcomes were the percentage of patients who received benzodiazepines; the number of unplanned extubations, crew injuries, and unsafe patient care situations; and the incidence of ventilator dyssynchrony. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-three mechanically ventilated patients were transported. Ninety-three patients were excluded because they received paralytics during transport. Four hundred sixty patients were included in the analysis, 422 (91.7%) of whom were deeply sedated. Benzodiazepines were administered to 141 patients (30.6%). There were no differences observed in the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Deep sedation and benzodiazepine administration were frequent during critical care transport of mechanically ventilated patients.


Subject(s)
Hypnotics and Sedatives , Respiration, Artificial , Adult , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Critical Care , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Intensive Care Units , Conscious Sedation
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39122248

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Understanding the incidence and predictors of postpartum depression (PPD) among active-duty service members is critical given the importance of this population and its unique stressors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all active-duty U.S. Army soldiers with a record of at least one live-birth delivery between January 2012 and December 2013. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between demographic, health-related, and military-specific variables and diagnoses of PPD in the total population (N = 4,178) as well as in a subpopulation without a record of depression before delivery (N = 3,615). Results: The overall incidence of PPD diagnoses was 15.9% (N = 664 cases) among the total population and 10.4% (N = 376 cases) among those without prior depression. Statistically significant predictors of PPD in the adjusted model included lower pay grade, a higher number of prior deployments, a higher number of child dependents, tobacco use, and a history of depression or anxiety before or during pregnancy. For soldiers without a history of depression, lower pay grade, and a history of anxiety before or during pregnancy were significantly associated with PPD. Conclusions: Knowing the predictors of overall and novel onset PPD diagnoses in this population could help establish clearer guidelines on PPD prevention, screening, management, and return to duty.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL