Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 112
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
J Transl Med ; 22(1): 33, 2024 01 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38185632

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The evolving variants of SARS-CoV-2 may escape immunity from prior infections or vaccinations. It's vital to understand how immunity adapts to these changes. Both infection and mRNA vaccination induce T cells that target the Spike protein. These T cells can recognize multiple variants, such as Delta and Omicron, even if neutralizing antibodies are weakened. However, the degree of recognition can vary among people, affecting vaccine efficacy. Previous studies demonstrated the capability of T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire analysis to identify conserved and immunodominant peptides with cross-reactive potential among variant of concerns. However, there is a need to extend the analysis of the TCR repertoire to different clinical scenarios. The aim of this study was to examine the Spike-specific TCR repertoire profiles in natural infections and those with combined natural and vaccine immunity. METHODS: A T-cell enrichment approach and bioinformatic tools were used to investigate the Spike-specific TCRß repertoire in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of previously vaccinated (n = 8) or unvaccinated (n = 6) COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: Diversity and clonality of the TCRß repertoire showed no significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. When comparing the TCRß data to public databases, 692 unique TCRß sequences linked to S epitopes were found in the vaccinated group and 670 in the unvaccinated group. TCRß clonotypes related to spike regions S135-177, S264-276, S319-350, and S448-472 appear notably more prevalent in the vaccinated group. In contrast, the S673-699 epitope, believed to have super antigenic properties, is observed more frequently in the unvaccinated group. In-silico analyses suggest that mutations in epitopes, relative to the main SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, don't hinder their cross-reactive recognition by associated TCRß clonotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal distinct TCRß signatures in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals with COVID-19. These differences might be associated with disease severity and could influence clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: FESR/FSE 2014-2020 DDRC n. 585, Action 10.5.12, noCOVID19@UMG.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Leukocytes, Mononuclear , Epitopes , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/genetics
2.
J Med Virol ; 96(6): e29708, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38804179

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) persistence in COVID-19 patients could play a key role in the emergence of variants of concern. The rapid intra-host evolution of SARS-CoV-2 may result in an increased transmissibility, immune and therapeutic escape which could be a direct consequence of COVID-19 epidemic currents. In this context, a longitudinal retrospective study on eight consecutive COVID-19 patients with persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection, from January 2022 to March 2023, was conducted. To characterize the intra- and inter-host viral evolution, whole genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis were performed on nasopharyngeal samples collected at different time points. Phylogenetic reconstruction revealed an accelerated SARS-CoV-2 intra-host evolution and emergence of antigenically divergent variants. The Bayesian inference and principal coordinate analysis analysis showed a host-based genomic structuring among antigenically divergent variants, that might reflect the positive effect of containment practices, within the critical hospital area. All longitudinal antigenically divergent isolates shared a wide range of amino acidic (aa) changes, particularly in the Spike (S) glycoprotein, that increased viral transmissibility (K417N, S477N, N501Y and Q498R), enhanced infectivity (R346T, S373P, R408S, T478K, Q498R, Y505H, D614G, H655Y, N679K and P681H), caused host immune escape (S371L, S375F, T376A, K417N, and K444T/R) and displayed partial or complete resistance to treatments (G339D, R346K/T, S371F/L, S375F, T376A, D405N, N440K, G446S, N460K, E484A, F486V, Q493R, G496S and Q498R). These results suggest that multiple novel variants which emerge in the patient during persistent infection, might spread to another individual and continue to evolve. A pro-active genomic surveillance of persistent SARS-CoV-2 infected patients is recommended to identify genetically divergent lineages before their diffusion.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Phylogeny , SARS-CoV-2 , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus , Humans , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/classification , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/genetics , Middle Aged , Longitudinal Studies , Genome, Viral/genetics , Aged , Whole Genome Sequencing , Evolution, Molecular , Hospitalization , Nasopharynx/virology , Bayes Theorem , Adult
3.
Infection ; 52(2): 323-336, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37996646

ABSTRACT

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are increasingly used worldwide, and infection of these devices remains one of the most feared complications.CIED infections (CDIs) represent a challenge for physicians and the healthcare system in general as they require prolonged hospitalization and antibiotic treatment and are burdened by high mortality and high costs, so management of CDIs must be multidisciplinary.The exact incidence of CDIs is difficult to define, considering that it is influenced by various factors mainly represented by the implanted device and the type of procedure. Risk factors for CDIs could be divided into three categories: device related, patient related, and procedural related and the etiology is mainly sustained by Gram-positive bacteria; however, other etiologies cannot be underestimated. As a matter of fact, the two cornerstones in the treatment of these infections are device removal and antimicrobial treatment. Finally, therapeutic drug monitoring and PK/PD correlations should be encouraged in all patients with CDIs receiving antibiotic therapy and may result in a better clinical outcome and a reduction in antibiotic resistance and economic costs.In this narrative review, we look at what is new in the management of these difficult-to-treat infections.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases , Defibrillators, Implantable , Heart Diseases , Pacemaker, Artificial , Prosthesis-Related Infections , Humans , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Defibrillators, Implantable/microbiology , Device Removal/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Heart Diseases/etiology , Communicable Diseases/therapy , Prosthesis-Related Infections/drug therapy
4.
Infection ; 2024 Apr 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38589748

ABSTRACT

In the context of the evolving global health landscape shaped by the COVID-19 pandemic, tuberculosis (TB) is gaining renewed attention as a reemerging threat even in low-endemic countries. Immunological tests such as the tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) are pivotal in identifying tuberculosis infection (TBI). However, their inability to distinguish between past and ongoing infection poses a diagnostic challenge, possibly leading to the unnecessary treatment of a significant portion of the population with potential side effects. This review delves into the concept of incipient tuberculosis (ITB), a dynamic, presymptomatic stage characterized by heightened Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) metabolic activity and replication that result in minimal radiological changes, signifying a transitional state between TBI and TB. Key focus areas include epidemiological factors, underlying pathogenesis, imaging findings, and the ongoing challenges in the identification of individuals with ITB through the development of new biomarkers and the use of whole-genome sequencing-based analyses to implement early treatment strategies.

5.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 564, 2024 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844861

ABSTRACT

This single-centre retrospective cohort study reports on the results of a descriptive (non-comparative) retrospective cohort study of early initiation of antivirals and combined monoclonal antibody therapy (mAbs) in 48 severely immunocompromised patients with COVID-19. The study assessed the outcomes and the duration of viral shedding. The patients started early combined therapy (ECT) a median of 2 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 1-3 days) after the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Except for 1 patient who died due COVID-19-related respiratory failure, patients had their first negative nasopharyngeal swab result after a median of 11 days (IQR: 6-17 days) after starting combined therapy. There were no reports of severe side effects. During a follow-up period of 512 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 413-575 days), 6 patients (12.5%) died and 16 (33.3%) were admitted to hospital. Moreover, 12 patients (25%) were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 reinfection a median of 245 days (IQR: 138-401 days) after starting combined treatment. No relapses were reported. Although there was no comparison group, these results compare favourably with the outcomes of severely immunocompromised patients with COVID-19 reported in the literature.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Immunocompromised Host , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/mortality , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Aged , Virus Shedding/drug effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage
6.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 380, 2024 Apr 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38589795

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous bacillary angiomatosis (cBA) is a vascular proliferative disorder due to Bartonella spp. that mostly affects people living with HIV (PLWH), transplanted patients and those taking immunosuppressive drugs. Since cBA is mostly related to these major immunocompromising conditions (i.e., T-cell count impairment), it is considered rare in relatively immunocompetent patients and could be underdiagnosed in them. Moreover, antimicrobial treatment in this population has not been previously investigated. METHODS: We searched the databases PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, OpenAIRE and ScienceDirect by screening articles whose title included the keywords "bacillary" AND "angiomatosis" and included case reports about patients not suffering from major immunocompromising conditions to provide insights about antibiotic treatments and their duration. RESULTS: Twenty-two cases of cBA not related to major immunocompromising conditions were retrieved. Antibiotic treatment duration was shorter in patients with single cBA lesion than in patients with multiple lesions, including in most cases macrolides and tetracyclines. CONCLUSIONS: cBA is an emerging manifestation of Bartonella spp. infection in people not suffering from major immunocompromising conditions. Until evidence-based guidelines are available, molecular tests together with severity and extension of the disease can be useful to personalize the type of treatment and its duration.


Subject(s)
Angiomatosis, Bacillary , Humans , Angiomatosis, Bacillary/drug therapy , Skin , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Immunocompromised Host
7.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 78(10): 2505-2514, 2023 10 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37606528

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of carbapenem resistance on mortality in Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection (BSI) in the era of novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with K. pneumoniae BSI between January and August 2020 in 16 centres (CARBANEW study within the MULTI-SITA project). RESULTS: Overall, 426 patients were included: 107/426 (25%) had carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CR-Kp) BSI and 319/426 (75%) had carbapenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae (CS-Kp) BSI. Crude cumulative 30 day mortality was 33.8% and 20.7% in patients with, respectively, CR-Kp BSI and CS-Kp BSI (P = 0.027). Carbapenemase production or carbapenemase-encoding genes were detected in 84/98 tested CR-Kp isolates (85.7%), mainly KPC (78/84; 92.9%). Ceftazidime/avibactam was the most frequently used appropriate therapy for CR-Kp BSI (80/107; 74.7%). In multivariable analyses, variables showing an unfavourable association with mortality after correction for multiple testing were age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.10-1.31, P < 0.001) and Pitt score (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.15-1.55, P < 0.001), but not carbapenem resistance (HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.74-2.22, P = 0.410). In a propensity score-matched analysis, there was no difference in mortality between patients appropriately treated with ceftazidime/avibactam for CR-Kp BSI and patients appropriately treated with other agents (mainly meropenem monotherapy or piperacillin/tazobactam monotherapy) for CS-Kp BSI (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.50-2.29, P = 0.866). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the increased mortality in CR-Kp BSI compared with CS-Kp BSI is not (or no longer) dependent on the type of therapy in areas where ceftazidime/avibactam-susceptible KPC-producing isolates are the most prevalent type of CR-Kp.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Klebsiella Infections , Sepsis , Humans , Ceftazidime/pharmacology , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Klebsiella Infections/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Azabicyclo Compounds/therapeutic use , Azabicyclo Compounds/pharmacology , beta-Lactamases/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Sepsis/drug therapy , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , beta-Lactamase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Disease Susceptibility , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
8.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 61(8): 1518-1524, 2023 07 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36972680

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Nearly three years into the pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 infections are occurring in vaccinated and naturally infected populations. While humoral and cellular responses in COVID-19 are being characterized, novel immune biomarkers also being identified. Recently, an increase in angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 expressing (aka, ACE2 positive) circulating exosomes (ExoACE2) were identified in the plasma of COVID-19 patients (El-Shennawy et al.). In this pilot study, we describe a method to characterize the exosome-associated microRNA (exo-miRNA) signature in ACE2-positive and ACE2-negative exosomal populations (non-ExoACE2). METHODS: We performed a sorting protocol using the recombinant biotin-conjugated SARS CoV-2 spike protein containing the receptor binding domain (RBD) on plasma samples from six patients. Following purification, exo-miRNA were characterized for ACE2-positive and ACE2-negative exosome subpopulations by RT-PCR. RESULTS: We identified differential expression of several miRNA. Specifically let-7g-5p and hsa-miR-4454+miR-7975 were upregulated, while hsa-miR-208a-3p and has-miR-323-3p were downregulated in ExoACE2 vs. non-ExoACE2. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS CoV-2 spike-protein guided exosome isolation permits isolation of ExoACE2 exosomes. Such purification facilitates detailed characterization of potential biomarkers (e.g. exo-miRNA) for COVID-19 patients. This method could be used for future studies to further the understanding mechanisms of host response against SARS CoV-2.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Exosomes , MicroRNAs , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2/genetics , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2/metabolism , Exosomes/metabolism , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/chemistry , Pilot Projects , Biomarkers
9.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(11)2023 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37298376

ABSTRACT

The complex interaction between microorganisms, the host's immune response, and [...].


Subject(s)
Sepsis , Humans , Sepsis/therapy
10.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(11)2023 May 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37298258

ABSTRACT

Sepsis is a life-threatening multiple-organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, with high mortality worldwide; 11 million deaths per year are attributable to sepsis in high-income countries. Several research groups have reported that septic patients display a dysbiotic gut microbiota, often related to high mortality. Based on current knowledge, in this narrative review, we revised original articles, clinical trials, and pilot studies to evaluate the beneficial effect of gut microbiota manipulation in clinical practice, starting from an early diagnosis of sepsis and an in-depth analysis of gut microbiota.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Sepsis , Humans , Sepsis/etiology
11.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 35(2): 95-102, 2022 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34840273

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are a leading cause of morbidity, emergency department visits and hospitalization. In recent years, the spread of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (GNB) is also increasing in SSTIs. However, the armamentarium of available drugs is recently expanding as well. In this review, we reported the most recent data and about management and treatment of SSTIs caused by GNB, mainly for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Pseudomonas spp and Acinetobacter spp. RECENT FINDINGS: The increasing incidence of carbapenem-resistant GNB is challenging for management and treatment, considering the high rate of inappropriate empiric and targeted antimicrobial treatments. The role of new antibiotics, mainly licensed for the treatment of other infections, is an object of continuous debate. As a matter of fact, no specific clinical trials on SSTIs have been performed for new drugs; however, recent data about the use in real life of new compounds in clinical practice are available. SUMMARY: Some recently approved drugs are actually considered the backbone of targeted therapy in patients with severe infections caused by susceptible carbapenem-resistant GNB strains. Prompt diagnosis of cSSTIs is crucial and, when necessary, surgical debridement for source control of infection is the milestone of the treatment. The physicians should be confident to identify patients at high risk for multidrug-resistant pathogens to minimize inappropriate empiric therapy.


Subject(s)
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Soft Tissue Infections , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteria , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Soft Tissue Infections/drug therapy , Soft Tissue Infections/epidemiology , Soft Tissue Infections/microbiology
12.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 113, 2022 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35105333

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: T2Dx was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the rapid detection of a modified panel of ESKAPE bacterial species or Candida spp. causing bloodstream infection (BSI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational study from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019 of all hospitalised patients with suspected BSI who underwent assessment using T2Dx in addition to standard blood culture (BC). T2-positive patients (cases) were compared to a matched group of patients with BSI documented only by BC (1:2 ratio) to investigate the possible impact of T2Dx on the appropriateness of empirical antimicrobial therapy and 21-day mortality. RESULTS: In total, 78 T2Dx-analysed samples (49 patients) were analysed. The T2Dx assay result was positive for18 patients and negative for 31 patients. The concordance rates of the T2Bacteria Panel and T2Candida Panel results with those of standard BC were 74.4% and 91.4%, respectively. In the matched analysis, inappropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy administration was significantly less frequent in cases than in comparators (5.5% vs. 38.8%). The 21-day mortality rate was twofold lower in cases than in comparators (22.2% vs. 44.4%), although the difference was not significant. No other analysed variables were significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrated that T2Dx might be associated with an increase in the appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial therapy in patients with BSI. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether the T2Dx assay can improve patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Sepsis , Biological Assay , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/drug therapy , United States
13.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 793, 2022 Oct 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36266619

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and antivirals have been approved for early therapy of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), however, in the real-life setting, there are difficulties to prescribe these therapies within few days from symptom onset as recommended, and effectiveness of combined use of these drugs have been hypothesised in most-at-risk patients (such as those immunocompromised) but data supporting this strategy are limited. METHODS: We describe the real-life experience of SARS-CoV-2 antivirals and/or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and focus on the hospitalisation rate due to the progression of COVID-19. Clinical results obtained through our risk-stratification algorithm and benefits achieved through a strategic proximity territorial centre are provided. We also report a case series with an in-depth evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 genome in relationship with treatment strategy and clinical evolution of patients. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-eight patients were analysed; 94/288 (32.6%) patients were treated with mAb monotherapy, 171/288 (59.4%) patients were treated with antivirals, and 23/288 (8%) patients received both mAbs and one antiviral drug. Haematological malignancies were more frequent in patients treated with combination therapy than in the other groups (p = 0.0003). There was a substantial increase in the number of treated patients since the opening of the centre dedicated to early therapies for COVID-19. The provided disease-management and treatment appeared to be effective since 98.6% patients recovered without hospital admission. Moreover, combination therapy with mAbs and antivirals seemed successful because all patients admitted to the hospital for COVID-19 did not receive such therapies, while none of the most-at-risk patients treated with combination therapy were hospitalized or reported adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: A low rate of COVID-19 progression requiring hospital admission was observed in patients included in this study. The dedicated COVID-19 proximity territorial service appeared to strengthen the regional sanitary system, avoiding the overwhelming of other services. Importantly, our results also support early combination therapy: it is possible that this strategy reduces the emergence of escape mutants of SARS-CoV-2, thereby increasing efficacy of early treatment, especially in immunocompromised individuals.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Secondary Prevention , Retrospective Studies , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use
14.
Int J Mol Sci ; 23(2)2022 Jan 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35054993

ABSTRACT

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that arises when the body's response to an infection injures its own tissues and organs. Despite significant morbidity and mortality throughout the world, its pathogenesis and mechanisms are not clearly understood. In this narrative review, we aimed to summarize the recent developments in our understanding of the hallmarks of sepsis pathogenesis (immune and adaptive immune response, the complement system, the endothelial disfunction, and autophagy) and highlight novel laboratory diagnostic approaches. Clinical management is also discussed with pivotal consideration for antimicrobic therapy management in particular settings, such as intensive care unit, altered renal function, obesity, and burn patients.


Subject(s)
Disease Susceptibility , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/etiology , Autophagy , Biomarkers , Complement System Proteins/immunology , Complement System Proteins/metabolism , Disease Management , Endothelium/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation , Host-Pathogen Interactions/genetics , Host-Pathogen Interactions/immunology , Humans , Immunity, Innate , Immunomodulation , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Organ Specificity , Sepsis/metabolism , Sepsis/therapy , Severity of Illness Index
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(9): 1664-1676, 2021 11 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33618353

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A growing body of observational evidence supports the value of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) in managing infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed observational data on use and outcomes of CAZ-AVI therapy for infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) strains. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify variables independently associated with 30-day mortality. Results were adjusted for propensity score for receipt of CAZ-AVI combination regimens versus CAZ-AVI monotherapy. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 577 adults with bloodstream infections (n = 391) or nonbacteremic infections involving mainly the urinary tract, lower respiratory tract, and intra-abdominal structures. All received treatment with CAZ-AVI alone (n = 165) or with ≥1 other active antimicrobials (n = 412). The all-cause mortality rate 30 days after infection onset was 25% (146/577). There was no significant difference in mortality between patients managed with CAZ-AVI alone and those treated with combination regimens (26.1% vs 25.0%, P = .79). In multivariate analysis, mortality was positively associated with presence at infection onset of septic shock (P = .002), neutropenia (P < .001), or an INCREMENT score ≥8 (P = .01); with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) (P = .04); and with CAZ-AVI dose adjustment for renal function (P = .01). Mortality was negatively associated with CAZ-AVI administration by prolonged infusion (P = .006). All associations remained significant after propensity score adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: CAZ-AVI is an important option for treating serious KPC-Kp infections, even when used alone. Further study is needed to explore the drug's seemingly more limited efficacy in LRTIs and potential survival benefits of prolonging CAZ-AVI infusions to ≥3 hours.


Subject(s)
Klebsiella Infections , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Azabicyclo Compounds/therapeutic use , Bacterial Proteins , Ceftazidime/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Humans , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Retrospective Studies , beta-Lactamases
16.
J Transl Med ; 19(1): 79, 2021 02 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33596963

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Sars-CoV-2 can cause severe pneumonia with multiorgan disease; thus, the identification of clinical and laboratory predictors of the progression towards severe and fatal forms of this illness is needed. Here, we retrospectively evaluated and integrated laboratory parameters of 45 elderly subjects from a long-term care facility with Sars-CoV-2 outbreak and spread, to identify potential common patterns of systemic response able to better stratify patients' clinical course and outcome. METHODS: Baseline white blood cells, granulocytes', lymphocytes', and platelets' counts, hemoglobin, total iron, ferritin, D-dimer, and interleukin-6 concentration were used to generate a principal component analysis. Statistical analysis was performed by using R statistical package version 4.0. RESULTS: We identified 3 laboratory patterns of response, renamed as low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk, strongly associated with patients' survival (p < 0.01). D-dimer, iron status, lymphocyte/monocyte count represented the main markers discriminating high- and low-risk groups. Patients belonging to the high-risk group presented a significantly longer time to ferritin decrease (p: 0.047). Iron-to-ferritin-ratio (IFR) significantly segregated recovered and dead patients in the intermediate-risk group (p: 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a combination of few laboratory parameters, i.e. iron status, D-dimer and lymphocyte/monocyte count at admission and during the hospital stay, can predict clinical progression in COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/therapy , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Iron/blood , Lymphocytes/pathology , Monocytes/pathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers/blood , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/mortality , Female , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/metabolism , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Long-Term Care , Male , Middle Aged , Platelet Count , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Treatment Outcome
17.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(4)2021 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33916210

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives: Diabetes may affect in-hospital mortality of patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We have retrospectively evaluated clinical characteristics, diabetes management, and outcomes in a sample of COVID-19 patients with diabetes admitted to our hospital. Materials and Methods: All patients admitted to the Infectious Diseases Unit from 28 March 2020, to 16 June 2020, were enrolled. Clinical information and biochemical parameters were collected at the time of admission. Patients were ranked according to diabetes and death. Results: Sixty-one patients with COVID-19 were analyzed. Most of them were from a long-term health care facility. Mean age was 77 ± 16 years, and 19 had type 2 diabetes (T2D). Eighteen patients died, including 8 with T2D and 10 without T2D (p = 0.15). Patients with diabetes were significantly older, had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, and a significantly lower lymphocyte count. No significant relationship was found between diabetes and in-hospital mortality (Odds Ratio OR 2.3; Confidence Interval CI 0.73-7.38, p = 0.15). Patients with diabetes were treated with insulin titration algorithm. Severe hypoglycemic events, ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemias did not occur during hospitalization. Mean pre-meal capillary blood glucose was 157 ± 45 mg/dL, and the coefficient of variation of glycaemia was 29%. Conclusions: Our study, albeit limited by the small number of subjects, did not describe any significant association between T2D diabetes and mortality. Clinical characteristics of patients, and acceptable glucose control prior and during hospitalization may have influenced the result. The use of an insulin titration algorithm should be pursued during hospitalization.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
18.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 412, 2020 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32536344

ABSTRACT

The SARS-CoV-2, which emerged from East Asia in December 2019, has rapidly evolved into a global pandemic infecting close to 7 million people. The current uncertainties regarding its impact on Africa calls for critical monitoring of the evolution of the pandemic and correlation of factors that influence the burden of the disease. We herein discuss possible implications of SARS-CoV-2 on the African continent.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Uncertainty , Africa/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2
19.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 56(3)2020 Feb 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32121135

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives: In Italy, Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infections are most prevalent in people older than 50 years of age, who often experience multi-morbidities, take co-medications, and have a long history of liver disease. These characteristics could potentially affect tolerability of HCV treatments and adherence in this subgroup. After achievement of sustained virological response (SVR), retention into care is very important both to detect the onset of possible complications and prevent further infections. In this study, SVR rates and retention into care of patients treated with directly acting antivirals (DAAs) of a single-center cohort in Southern Italy were evaluated. Materials and Methods: Patients treated with directly acting antivirals from 2014 to 2018 were included. Patients were stratified by age (i.e., <65 vs. ≥65 years) and by cirrhosis presence (i.e., liver stiffness >14.6 KPa or clinical/ultrasound cirrhosis vs. absence of these criteria). Primary outcome was availability of SVR at Weeks 12-24 after the end of treatment. Inter- and intra-group comparisons were performed along the follow-up for significant laboratory parameters. Results: In total, 212 patients were treated; 184 (87%) obtained SVR after the first treatment course and 4 patients after retreatment. Twenty-two (10.4%) patients were lost to follow-up before assessment of SVR, and two patients died before the end of treatment for liver decompensation. Considering only the first treatment episode, per protocol analysis (i.e., excluding patients lost to follow-up) showed the following rates of SVR: 97% (overall), 97% (older age group), 96% (age group <65 years), 94% (cirrhotics), and 100% (non-cirrhotics). By contrast, at the intention to treat analysis (i.e., patients lost were computed as failures), SVR percentages were significantly lower for patients <65 years of age (80%) and for non-cirrhotics (85%). Conclusions: High rates of SVR were obtained. However, younger patients and those without cirrhosis displayed an apparent high risk of being lost to follow-up. This may have important implications: since those who are lost may transmit HCV in case SVR is not achieved, these subpopulations should receive appropriate counselling during treatment.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Liver Cirrhosis/drug therapy , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Hepatitis C, Chronic/complications , Humans , Intention to Treat Analysis , Italy , Liver Cirrhosis/virology , Lost to Follow-Up , Male , Middle Aged , Sustained Virologic Response
20.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(3): 355-364, 2019 01 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29893802

ABSTRACT

Background: Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has been approved in Europe for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections, as well as hospital-acquired pneumonia, and for gram-negative infections with limited treatment options. CAZ-AVI displays in vitro activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) enzyme producers, but clinical trial data on its efficacy in this setting are lacking. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 138 cases of infections caused by KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) in adults who received CAZ-AVI in compassionate-use programs in Italy. Case features and outcomes were analyzed, and survival was then specifically explored in the large subcohort whose infections were bacteremic. Results: The 138 patients started CAZ-AVI salvage therapy after a first-line treatment (median, 7 days) with other antimicrobials. CAZ-AVI was administered with at least 1 other active antibiotic in 109 (78.9%) cases. Thirty days after infection onset, 47 (34.1%) of the 138 patients had died. Thirty-day mortality among the 104 patients with bacteremic KPC-Kp infections was significantly lower than that of a matched cohort whose KPC-Kp bacteremia had been treated with drugs other than CAZ-AVI (36.5% vs 55.8%, P = .005). Multivariate analysis of the 208 cases of KPC-Kp bacteremia identified septic shock, neutropenia, Charlson comorbidity index ≥3, and recent mechanical ventilation as independent predictors of mortality, whereas receipt of CAZ-AVI was the sole independent predictor of survival. Conclusions: CAZ-AVI appears to be a promising drug for treatment of severe KPC-Kp infections, especially those involving bacteremia.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Azabicyclo Compounds/therapeutic use , Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Ceftazidime/therapeutic use , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Salvage Therapy/methods , beta-Lactamase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Italy , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Klebsiella Infections/mortality , Klebsiella Infections/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL