Effect of ß-blocker on aneurysm sac behavior after endovascular abdominal aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine whether ß-blocker (BB) therapy is associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac regression after endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR). METHODS: A total of 198 patients (mean age, 76 years) who underwent EVAR were analyzed (104 in the BB group and 94 in the non-BB group). The primary end point was the incidence of AAA sac regression at 1 and 2 years. RESULTS: Hypertension, coronary artery disease, and hyperlipidemia were more common in the BB group. The BB group was also more likely to have been prescribed an aspirin and a statin than the non-BB group. The length of proximal neck was significantly longer in the non-BB group than in the BB group. All study patients were monitored for at least 1 year after EVAR, and 2-year follow-up was available in 104 patients (52.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of aneurysm sac regression in either group at 1 year (52.1% in the non-BB group vs 45.2% in the BB group; P = .330) and 2 years (58.5% in the non-BB group vs 64.7% in the BB group; P = .515). The difference of the change of AAA maximum diameter between two groups did not reach statistical significance at 1 year (-6.0 ± 7.0 mm in the non-BB group vs -5.5 ± 8.1 mm in the BB group; P = .644) and 2 years (-9.0 ± 10.5 mm in the non-BB group vs -9.0 ± 10.0 mm in the BB group; P = .977). BB therapy was not associated with increased odds of AAA sac regression. The effect of third-generation BBs on AAA sac regression was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: BB therapy had no effect on AAA sac regression. At the present time, there is insufficient evidence to recommend BB therapy for the purpose of AAA sac regression.

Endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians and nonagenarians.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this report was to present short and midterm results of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) of infrarenal aortic aneurysms in octogenarians and nonagenarians. METHODS: Between March 1994 and March 2011, elective EVAR was performed in 967 patients in our institution. This includes 279 patients older than 80 years at the time of the procedure (octogenarians: n = 252, nonagenarians: n = 27). Mean follow-up was 48.4 ± 34.5 months. A retrospective analysis was performed. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a survival comparison to patients who underwent EVAR <80 years old (n = 688) was performed. Cox hazard regression analysis was used to assess parameters that influence survival. RESULTS: Technical success was 96% in octogenarians and 85% in nonagenarians. Technical failure in 15 of 279 patients includes primary type I endoleak (n = 6), procedure abortion due to inability to pass the iliac vessels (n = 6), and emergency conversion (n = 3). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher for patients >80 years old (2.8% vs 1.0%; P = .044). Morbidity rates were 11.5% for octogenarians and 7.4% for nonagenarians with predominately cardiopulmonary complications. High-risk patients >80 years old showed a comparable perioperative mortality rate to low-/medium-risk patients >80 years old (2.9% vs 2.5%;P = .717), but a significantly higher complication rate (22.5% vs 9.2%; P = .0275) and reduced midterm survival with 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 79% ± SE 7%, 55% ± SE 8%, and 38% ± SE 9% (log-rank test P = .03). In high-risk patients age >80 years old, their age did not influence 30-day mortality (2.5% vs 2.7%; P = .978) and midterm survival. Survival in octogenarians at 1, 3, and 5 years was 87.9 ± SE 2.1%, 70.9 ± SE 3.0%, and 55.6% ± SE 3.5%, respectively. Survival in nonagenarians at 1 and 3 years was 96.3% ± SE 4% and 60.6% ± SE 10.4%. Higher cardiac (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; P = .038) and renal risk scores (HR, 1.59; P = .0016), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.56; P = .032), and anemia (HR, 2.1; P < .001) influenced midterm survival. CONCLUSION: EVAR in octogenarians and nonagenarians is associated with a significantly higher but still low perioperative mortality compared to younger patients. Midterm survival in octogenarians and nonagenarians, although significantly lower than in younger patients, is still acceptable, indicating that age >80 years should not be an exclusion criteria for EVAR. Even high-risk patients >80 years can be treated safely with a low perioperative mortality and comparable midterm outcome to younger high-risk patients.

Simultaneous complete supraaortic debranching and thoracic aortic endografting in an angiography suite setting.

This case series reports an initial experience in three patients treated with simultaneous complete supraaortic debranching and thoracic aortic endografting in an angiography suite setting. The article focuses on logistics and structural considerations of the setting. This includes size and equipment of the angiography suite, extent and supply of conventional surgical instruments, and safety considerations. The clinical outcome of the patients is reported. This limited experience shows that simultaneous aortic arch hybrid procedures can be performed in an angiography suite setting, given the structural and logistic requirements described.

Retroperitoneal versus direct femoral artery approach for thoracic endovascular aortic repair access: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Many individuals who are candidates for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are found to have iliac artery anatomy and/or disease that preclude transfemoral endovascular access and require retroperitoneal surgical approach through more proximal arteries. This relatively more invasive technique could potentially affect the procedural outcomes. This study compares the retroperitoneal with transfemoral access used for TEVAR in a single center. METHOD: In this study, 133 consecutive patients (96 men; mean age ± SD: 69.5 ± 14.7 years) who underwent TEVAR between 1994 and 2009 in a single center were retrospectively evaluated. The type of endovascular access was identified in all the patients. The basic demographics, access method, endograft type, 30-day morbidity and mortality rates, as well as procedure recordings including fluoroscopic and procedure duration, estimated blood loss, and duration of hospitalization were compared between the TEVAR procedures performed using a surgical retroperitoneal approach and those using the standard femoral access. RESULTS: Retroperitoneal access was used in 19 (14.3%; 13 women; mean age ± SD: 71 ± 12.2 years) and direct femoral access in 114 (85.7%; 24 women; mean age ± SD: 69 ± 15.4 years) patients. Two of the retroperitoneal accesses were obtained after failure of femoral approach. Techniques that were used included iliac artery conduit (seven patients), aortic artery conduit (eight patients), aortobifemoral artery graft conduit (one patient), and direct sheath introduction through the distal aorta (two patients) or common iliac artery (one patient). Retroperitoneal approach was used more frequently in women (35%) as compared with men (6%) (p = 0.0001). In all, 79% of the retroperitoneal approaches were associated with use of delivery sheath sizes larger than 24F (p = 0.049). TEVAR technical success was 100% with retroperitoneal and 97.3% with femoral access (p > 0.05). Thirty-day mortality rates were 0% and 8.8% and the rates of access artery injury were 5.3% and 4.4% in retroperitoneal and femoral access groups, respectively (p > 0.05). The incidence of retroperitoneal hematoma was significantly higher with retroperitoneal access (21% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.008). Additionally, retroperitoneal access was associated with significant increase in estimated blood loss and duration of hospitalization (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Type of access does not affect TEVAR success and the early mortality rate. Retroperitoneal approach is a valuable alternative technique in cases involving failed or impossible femoral access. However, this approach is associated with higher chances of retroperitoneal bleeding and longer procedural time and duration of hospitalization. Thoracic endografts with smaller delivery systems could minimize the need for this approach in the future.

Clinical experience with the use of bivalirudin in a large population undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the use of bivalirudin, a direct thrombin antagonist, compared with unfractionated heparin in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 1994 and September 2007, 740 consecutive patients (mean age, 75.7 y +/- 7.7; 69 women) underwent elective EVAR for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. Bivalirudin was used in 98 of these 740 (13.2%) and unfractioned heparin was used in the other 642 (86.8%). Complications were classified according to the Society of Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery criteria. Major bleeding was defined as clinically overt blood loss resulting in a decrease of hemoglobin of more than 3 g/dL, any decrease in hemoglobin of more than 4 g/dL, transfusion of 2 U or more of red blood cells, or intracranial or retroperitoneal hemorrhage. RESULTS: Grade 1 major complications were observed in 161 of 642 patients (25.2%) in the heparin group and 12 of 98 patients (12.2%) in the bivalirudin group (P = .0046), whereas the incidences of grade 3 major complications were not significantly different between groups (P = .57). The rate of total complications was higher in the heparin group than in the bivalirudin group (247 of 642 [38.5%] vs 21 of 98 [21.4%]; P = .001). Major bleeding occurred in 10 of 98 patients (10.2%) receiving bivalirudin and in 91 of 642 patients (14.2%) receiving heparin (P = .34). One of 21 major complications (4.76%) in the bivalirudin group and 12 of 247 major complications (4.86%) in the heparin group were attributable to thrombosis (P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Bivalirudin is a safe and feasible alternative to unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing EVAR.

Aortic aneurysm pressure sensors can be of value in the acute postoperative setting.

PURPOSE: To report on a case that demonstrates the use and current limits of abdominal aortic pressure sensor devices. CASE REPORT: An 83-year-old, high-risk patient underwent endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of an infrarenal aortic aneurysm (maximum aneurysm diameter: 6.5 cm) with implantation of a pressure sensor device. At the end of the procedure and on the first postoperative day, the sensor detected persistent high pressures in the aneurysm sac, indicating an endoleak that could not be visualized on the intraoperative completion angiography but was confirmed on duplex ultrasound. During repeated angiography (postoperative day 6), again no endoleak could be detected, this time corresponding with the sensor reading that was unfortunately not interrogated again before the reintervention. CONCLUSION: Pressure sensor devices provide a useful, additional diagnostic tool in detecting and following endoleaks after EVAR and can help guide decisions regarding reinterventions.

Adequacy of an early arterial phase low-volume contrast protocol in 64-detector computed tomography angiography for aortoiliac aneurysms.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study was conducted to determine whether a low-volume contrast medium protocol provides sufficient enhancement for 64-detector computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with aortoiliac aneurysms. METHODS: Evaluated were 45 consecutive patients (6 women; mean age, 72 +/- 6 years) who were referred for aortoiliac computed tomography angiography between October 2005 and January 2007. Group A (22 patients; creatinine clearance, 64.2 +/- 8.1 mL/min) received 50 mL of the contrast agent. Group B (23 patients; creatinine clearance, 89.4 +/- 7.3 mL/min) received 100 mL of the contrast agent. The injection rate was 3.5 mL/s, followed by 30 mL of saline at 3.5 mL/s. Studies were performed on the same 64-detector computed tomography scanner using a real-time bolus-tracking technique. Quantitative analysis was performed by determination of mean vascular attenuation at 10 regions of interest from the suprarenal aorta to the common femoral artery by one reader blinded to type and amount of contrast agent and compared using the Student t test. Image quality according to a 4-point scale was assessed in consensus by two readers blinded to type and amount of contrast medium and compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Multivariable adjustments were performed using ordinal regression analysis. RESULTS: Mean total attenuation did not differ significantly between both groups (196.5 +/- 33.0 Hounsfield unit [HU] in group A and 203.1 +/- 44.2 HU in group B; P = .57 by univariate and P > .05 by multivariable analysis). Accordingly, attenuation at each region of interest was not significantly different (P > .35). Image quality was excellent or good in all patients. No significant differences in visual assessment were found comparing both contrast medium protocols (P > .05 by univariate and by multivariable analysis). CONCLUSIONS: Aortoiliac aneurysm imaging can be performed with substantially reduced amounts of contrast medium using 64-detector computed tomography angiography technology.

Matched-pair analysis of endovascular versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in young patients at low risk.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes of endovascular and open aortic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in young patients at low risk. It was hypothesized that endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) compares favorably with open aneurysm repair (OAR) in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients aged 65 years or younger with a low perioperative surgical risk profile underwent EVAR at a single institution between April 1994 and May 2007 (23 men; mean age, 62 years+/-2.8). A sex- and risk-matched control group of 25 consecutive patients aged 65 years or younger who underwent OAR was used as a control group (23 men; mean age, 59 years+/-3.9). Patient outcomes and complications were classified according to Society of Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery reporting standards. RESULTS: Mean follow-up times were 7.1 years+/-3.2 after EVAR and 5.9 years+/-1.8 after OAR (P=.1020). Total complication rates were 20% after EVAR and 52% after OAR (P=.0378), and all complications were mild or moderate. Mean intensive care unit times were 0.2 days+/-0.4 after EVAR and 1.1 days+/-0.4 after OAR (P<.0001) and mean lengths of hospital stay were 2.3 days+/-1.0 after EVAR and 5.0 days+/-2.1 after OAR (P<.0001). Cumulative rates of long-term patient survival did not differ between EVAR and OAR (P=.144). No AAA-related deaths or aortoiliac ruptures occurred during follow-up for EVAR and OAR. In addition, no surgical conversions were necessary in EVAR recipients. Cumulative rates of freedom from secondary procedures were not significantly different between the EVAR and OAR groups (P=.418). Within a multivariable Cox proportional-hazards analysis adjusted for patient age, maximum AAA diameter, and cardiac risk score, all-cause mortality rates (odds ratio [OR], 0.125; 95% CI, 0.010-1.493; P=.100) and need for secondary procedures (OR, 5.014; 95% CI, 0.325-77.410; P=.537) were not different between EVAR and OAR. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this observational study indicate that EVAR offers a favorable alternative to OAR in young patients at low risk.

Anemia is associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) size and decreased long-term survival after endovascular AAA repair.

OBJECTIVE: Anemia is a common comorbid condition in various inflammatory states and an established predictor of mortality in patients with chronic heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and end-stage renal disease. The present study of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) undergoing endovascular repair (EVAR) assessed the relationships between baseline hemoglobin concentration and AAA size, as well as anemia and long-term survival. METHODS: Between March 1994 and November 2006, 711 patients (65 women, mean age 75.8 +/- 7.8 years) underwent elective EVAR. Anemia was defined as a hemoglobin level <13 g/dL in men and <12 g/dL in women. Post-EVAR mean follow-up was 48.3 +/- 32.0 months. Association of hemoglobin level with AAA size was assessed with multiple linear regression. Mortality was determined with use of the internet-based Social Security Death Index and the electronic hospital record. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of anemic and nonanemic patient groups were compared by the log-rank method. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the influence of anemia on vital status after EVAR. RESULTS: A total of 218/711 (30.7%) of AAA patients undergoing EVAR had anemia at baseline. After adjustment for various risk factors, hemoglobin level was inversely related to maximum AAA diameter (beta: - .144, 95%-CI: -1.482 - .322, P = .002). Post-EVAR survival was 65.5% at 5 years and 44.4% at 10 years. In long-term follow-up, survival was significantly lower in patients with anemia as compared to patients without anemia (P < .0001 by log-rank). Baseline hemoglobin levels were independently related to long-term mortality in multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for various risk factors (adjusted HR: 0.866, 95% CI: .783 to .958, P = .005). Within this model, statin use (adjusted HR: .517, 95% CI: .308 to .868, P = .013) was independently related to long-term survival, whereas baseline AAA diameter (adjusted HR: 1.022, 95% CI: 1.009 to 1.036, P = .001) was an independently associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline hemoglobin concentration is independently associated with AAA size and reduced long-term survival following EVAR. Thus, the presence or absence of anemia offers a potential refinement of existing risk stratification instruments.