Lymphovascular Invasion and Perineural Invasion Negatively Impact Overall Survival for Stage II Adenocarcinoma of the Colon.

BACKGROUND: Lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion are histopathological features associated with higher-risk colon cancer. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of lymphovascular and perineural invasion on overall survival after diagnosis and to determine the protective effect of adjuvant chemotherapy for early adenocarcinoma with high-risk factors. DESIGN: This was a retrospective database review of the 2010-2014 National Cancer Database for colon cancer. SETTINGS: Individuals diagnosed with invasive adenocarcinoma of the colon (histology code 8140) with primary surgical resection with >12 nodes harvested and no positive nodes on pathological examination were included. PATIENTS: A total of 32,493 patients underwent surgical resection for stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon. INTERVENTIONS: The study involved multivariate Cox regression analysis of the impact of lymphovascular and perineural invasion and adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival after a diagnosis of stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival after a diagnosis of stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon was measured. RESULTS: Five-year survival after diagnosis and surgical resection without adjuvant chemotherapy was lower for patients with lymphovascular (60.0%), perineural (56.9%), and lymphovascular and perineural invasion (55.8%) compared with double-negative disease (66.1%). Log-rank testing confirmed that adjuvant chemotherapy improved 5-year survival after diagnosis for lymphovascular (85.5%), perineural (83.6%), and lymphovascular and perineural invasion (74.3%). After controlling for differences in cohorts, Cox regression analysis showed an increased HR for mortality of 14.0% for lymphovascular (HR = 1.141 (95% CI, 1.060-1.228)), 32.1% for perineural (HR = 1.321 (95% CI, 1.176-1.483)), and 41.0% for lymphovascular and perineural invasion (HR = 1.409 (95% CI, 1.231-1.612)) compared with having neither. Chemotherapy showed a 43% reduction in hazard for mortality (HR = 0.570 (95% CI, 0.513-0.633)). LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective review and observational bias. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphovascular and perineural invasion have a detrimental effect on survival after diagnosis of stage II adenocarcinoma of the colon. Chemotherapy may be protective specifically when lymphovascular and perineural invasion are present. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A786.

Defining Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery: An Objective Analysis Using Serial Photographic Documentation.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection is common following colorectal surgery, yet the incidence varies widely. CDC criteria include "diagnosis by attending physician," which can be subjective. Alternatively, the ASEPSIS score is an objective scoring system based on the presence of clinical findings. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the interrater reliability of the ASEPSIS score vs CDC definitions in identifying surgical site infection. DESIGN: This 24-month prospective study used serial photography of the wound. Three attending surgeons independently reviewed blinded photographic/clinical data. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at an academic institution. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery were selected. INTERVENTIONS: Surgeons assigned an ASEPSIS score and identified surgical site infection by using CDC definitions. The interrater reliability of ASEPSIS and the CDC criteria were compared by using the κ statistic. These data were also compared with the institutional National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-one patients were included. Four surgical site infections (2.4%) were identified by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Data from the surgeons demonstrated significantly higher yet discrepant rates of infection by the CDC criteria, at 6.2%, 7.4%, and 14.1% with a κ of 0.55 indicating modest interrater agreement. Alternatively, the ASEPSIS assessments demonstrated excellent interrater agreement between surgeons with 96% agreement (2.4%, 2.4%, and 3.6%) and a κ of 0.83. LIMITATIONS: This was a single-institution study. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the relatively poor reliability of CDC definitions for surgical site infections in comparison with an objective scoring system. These findings could explain the wide variability in the literature and raise concern for the comparison of institutional surgical site infection rates as a quality indicator. Alternatively, an objective scoring system, like the ASEPSIS score, may yield more reliable measures for comparison.

Estimating the risk of bowel ischemia requiring surgery in patients with tomographic evidence of pneumatosis intestinalis.

BACKGROUND: Pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) presents a challenging dilemma for surgeons given its association with both benign and life threatening conditions. As such, the need for surgical intervention is oftentimes difficult to discern. We hypothesize that a clinical nomogram can be used to predict the need for surgical intervention in patients with PI. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 217 consecutive cases with PI on abdominal computed tomography over a 10-year period at a tertiary care hospital. Bivariable and multivariable analysis were conducted to assess the statistical significance of the association between patient factors and need for surgical intervention, defined as positive findings at surgery. RESULTS: There were 217 patients with PI identified during the study, of which 178 were treated with curative intent. Of these, 82 patients underwent surgical exploration, and 96 patients were managed conservatively. Forty-four percent of patients who had radiographic evidence of PI were managed conservatively and did well, whereas an additional 6% underwent nontherapeutic laparotomies. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that patients with tenderness on examination, lactic acidosis, and tachycardia had significantly higher likelihood of the need for surgical intervention, whereas patients with diabetes had a lower likelihood of surgical intervention. These and other selected patient characteristics can be used to efficiently and reliably estimate the probability of ischemic bowel at laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of PI does not always warrant surgical intervention. We present a nomogram to assist with clinical decision-making based on the presence of clinical factors.

Standardization of care: impact of an enhanced recovery protocol on length of stay, complications, and direct costs after colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal surgery is associated with considerable morbidity and prolonged length of stay (LOS). Recognizing the need for improvement, we implemented an enhanced recovery (ER) protocol for all patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery at an academic institution. STUDY DESIGN: A multidisciplinary team implemented an ER protocol based on: preoperative counseling with active patient participation, carbohydrate loading, multimodal analgesia with avoidance of intravenous opioids, intraoperative goal-directed fluid resuscitation, immediate postoperative feeding, and ambulation. Discharge requirements remained identical throughout. A before and after study design was undertaken comparing patients before (August 2012 to February 2013) and after implementation of an ER protocol (August 2013 to February 2014). Risk stratification was performed using the NSQIP risk calculator to calculate the predicted LOS for each patient based on 23 variables. RESULTS: One hundred and nine consecutive patients underwent surgery within the ER protocol compared with 98 consecutive historical controls (conventional). The risk-adjusted predicted LOS was similar for each group at 5.1 and 5.2 days. Substantial reductions were seen in LOS, morphine equivalents, intravenous fluids, return of bowel function, and overall complications with the ER group. There was a $7,129/patient reduction in direct cost, corresponding to a cost savings of $777,061 in the ER group. Patient satisfaction as measured by Press Ganey improved considerably during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an ER protocol led to improved patient satisfaction and substantial reduction in LOS, complication rates, and costs for patients undergoing both open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. These data demonstrate that small investments in the perioperative environment can lead to large returns.