Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 387
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 28(1): 27-35, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38010488

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and debilitating condition characterized by joint degeneration and pain. Current treatment options aim to alleviate symptoms and slow disease progression but lack curative potential. Stem cell therapies have emerged as a promising alternative. This article explores the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations of hip and knee OA, and the evolving role of stem cell therapies in their treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: The global prevalence of OA, with knee OA being the most common form, has fueled the demand for stem cell therapies. Despite limited robust evidence supporting their efficacy, clinical trials investigating stem-cell treatments for OA have reported encouraging radiological and clinical improvements. Stem cell therapies offer potential disease-modifying benefits through immunomodulatory actions, growth factor secretion, and chondrogenic capabilities. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) have shown promise in clinical trials for OA treatment, offering potential pain relief and functional improvement. ADMSCs possess advantages such as accessibility and a favorable safety profile, making them a viable option for OA management. Although other stem-cell types, including human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), have been used in OA treatment, ADMSCs have demonstrated superior outcomes. By providing a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of stem cell therapies for hip and knee OA, this article highlights the potential of stem-cell treatments to address the limitations of current therapies. However, further research is required to establish their long-term efficacy, identify optimal stem-cell types, and develop standardized protocols.


Subject(s)
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Pain
2.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 28(1): 37-45, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38032538

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The surge in orthopedic surgeries strains the US healthcare system, necessitating innovative rehabilitation solutions. This review examines the potential of virtual reality (VR)-based interventions for orthopedic rehabilitation. RECENT FINDINGS: The effectiveness of VR-based interventions in orthopedic surgery patients is scrutinized. While some studies suggest better patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction, mixed results emerge from others, demonstrating comparable or varied results compared to traditional rehabilitation. The underlying mechanisms of VR-based rehabilitation are elucidated, showing its positive impact on proprioception, pain management, agency, and balance. Challenges of unfamiliarity, patient engagement, and drop-out rates are identified, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches. VR technology's immersive environments and multisensory experiences offer a novel approach to addressing functional deficits and pain post-surgery. The conclusion drawn is that VR-based rehabilitation complements rather than replaces conventional methods, potentially aiding in pain reduction and functional improvement. VR-based rehabilitation holds promise for enhancing orthopedic surgery outcomes, presenting a dynamic approach to recovery. Its potential to reshape healthcare delivery and reimbursement structures underscores its significance in modern healthcare. Overall, VR-based rehabilitation offers a promising avenue for optimizing postoperative recovery in orthopedic surgery patients.


Subject(s)
Orthopedic Procedures , Virtual Reality , Humans , Pain , Pain Management
3.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 27(12): 811-820, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37897592

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to educate healthcare professionals regarding buprenorphine for the use of opioid use disorder (OUD) as well as for chronic pain management. This review provides physicians and practitioners with updated information regarding the distinct characteristics and intricacies of prescribing buprenorphine. RECENT FINDINGS: Buprenorphine is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for acute pain, chronic pain, opioid use disorder (OUD), and opioid dependence. When compared to most other opioids, buprenorphine offers superior patient tolerability, an excellent half-life, and minimal respiratory depression. Buprenorphine does have notable side effects as well as pharmacokinetic properties that require special attention, especially if patients require future surgical interventions. Many physicians are not trained to initiate or manage patients on buprenorphine. However, buprenorphine offers a potentially safer alternative for medication management for patients who require chronic opioid therapy for pain or have OUD. This review provides updated information on buprenorphine for both chronic pain and OUD.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain , Buprenorphine , Chronic Pain , Opioid-Related Disorders , Humans , Buprenorphine/therapeutic use , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Acute Pain/drug therapy , Opiate Substitution Treatment
4.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 26(4): 337-346, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35286589

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper will examine the efficacy and safety of occipital nerve stimulation as a non-pharmacological alternative treatment for migraine. RECENT FINDINGS: Migraine is characterized as a primary headache disorder with possible premonitory and aura phases, both of which vary greatly in symptomatology. The most common treatments for chronic migraine are pharmacological and are aimed at both acute relief (e.g., nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, triptans, and ergots) and prophylaxis (e.g., propranolol, valproic acid, and topiramate). For patients with medically refractory migraine, acute relief medication overuse can increase the risk of developing more severe and more frequent migraine attacks. Occipital nerve stimulation is a non-pharmacological alternative treatment for chronic migraine, which could eliminate the risk of adverse effects from acute relief medication overuse. Neurostimulation is thought to prevent pain by blocking signal transduction from small nociceptive fibers with non-painful signaling in larger adjacent fibers. Existing data from clinical trials support the overall safety and efficacy of occipital nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic migraine. However, few large controlled, double-blinded studies have been conducted, due to both practical and ethical concerns. Currently, occipital nerve stimulation is available as an off-label use of neurostimulation for pain prevention but is not approved by the FDA specifically for the treatment of chronic migraine.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy , Migraine Disorders , Humans , Migraine Disorders/therapy , Pain , Peripheral Nerves , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Craniofac Surg ; 33(3): 779-783, 2022 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34753868

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: This report intends to summarize the underlying pathophysiology, relevant symptoms, appropriate diagnostic workup, necessary imaging, and medical and surgical treatments of occipital neuralgia (ON). This was done through a comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed literature throughout the most relevant databases. The current understanding of ON is that it causes neuropathic pain in the distribution of the greater occipital nerve, the lesser occipital nerve, the third occipital nerve or a combination of the 3. It is currently a subset of headaches although there is some debate if ON should be its own condition. Occipital neuralgia causes chronic, sharp, stabbing pain in the upper neck, back of the head, and behind the ears that can radiate to the front of the head. Diagnosis is typically clinical and patients present with intermittent, painful episodes associated with the occipital region and the nerves described above. Most cases are unilateral pain, however bilateral pain can be present and the pain can radiate to the frontal region and face. Physical examination is the first step in management of this disease and patients may demonstrate tenderness over the greater occipital and lesser occipital nerves. Anesthetics like 1% to 2% lidocaine or 0.25% to 0.5% bupivacaine can be used to block these nerves and antiinflammatory drugs like corticosteroids can be used in combination to prevent compressive symptoms. Other treatments like botulinum toxin and radiofrequency ablation have shown promise and require more research. Surgical decompression through resection of the obliquus capitis inferior is the definitive treatment however there are significant risks associated with this procedure.


Subject(s)
Neuralgia/diagnosis , Neuralgia/therapy , Spinal Nerves , Cervical Plexus , Headache , Humans , Neck Pain
6.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 25(7): 43, 2021 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33961144

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic pain continues to present a large burden to the US healthcare system. Neuropathic pain, a common class of chronic pain, remains particularly difficult to treat despite extensive research efforts. Current pharmacologic regimens exert limited efficacy and wide, potentially dangerous side effect profiles. This review provides a comprehensive, preclinical evaluation of the literature regarding the role of flavonoids in the treatment of neuropathic pain. RECENT FINDINGS: Flavonoids are naturally occurring compounds, found in plants and various dietary sources, which may have potential benefit in neuropathic pain. Numerous animal-model studies have demonstrated this benefit, including reversal of hyperalgesia and allodynia. Flavonoids have also exhibited an anti-inflammatory effect relevant to neuropathic pain, as evidenced by the reduction in multiple pro-inflammatory mediators, such as TNF-α, NF-κB, IL-1ß, and IL-6. Flavonoids represent a potentially new treatment modality for neuropathic pain in preclinical models, though human clinical evidence is yet to be explored at this time.


Subject(s)
Flavonoids/therapeutic use , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Humans
7.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 25(1): 2, 2021 Jan 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33443607

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This evidence-based systematic review will focus on the use of acupuncture and its role in the treatment of low back pain to help better guide physicians in their practice. It will cover the background and the burden of low back pain and present the current options for treatment and weigh the evidence that is available to support acupuncture as a treatment modality for low back pain. RECENT FINDINGS: Low back pain (LBP), defined as a disorder of the lumbosacral spine and categorized as acute, subacute, or chronic, can be a debilitating condition for many patients. Chronic LBP is more typically defined by its chronicity with pain persisting > 12 weeks in duration. Conventional treatment for chronic LBP includes both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic options. First-line pharmacologic therapy involves the use of NSAIDs, then SNRI/TCA/skeletal muscle relaxants, and antiepileptics. Surgery is usually not recommended for chronic non-specific LBP patients. According to the 2016 CDC Guidelines for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain and the 2017 American College of Physicians (ACP) clinical practice guidelines for chronic pain, non-pharmacologic interventions, acupuncture can be a first-line treatment for patients suffering from chronic low back pain. Many studies have been done, and most show promising results for acupuncture as an alternative treatment for low back pain. Due to non-standardized methods for acupuncture with many variations, standardization remains a challenge.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Chronic Pain/therapy , Low Back Pain/therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/therapeutic use , Electroacupuncture/methods , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Injections, Epidural , Neuromuscular Agents/therapeutic use , Pain Management , Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use
8.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 25(2): 11, 2021 Feb 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33547511

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This is a comprehensive review of the literature regarding post-surgical cutaneous nerve entrapment, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical presentation. It focuses mainly on nerve entrapment leading to chronic pain and the available therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Cutaneous nerve entrapment is not an uncommon result (up to 30% of patients) of surgery and could lead to significant, difficult to treat chronic pain. Untreated, entrapment can lead to neuropathy and damage to enervated structures and musculature, and significant morbidity and financial loss. Nerve entrapment is defined as pressure neuropathy from chronic compression. It causes changes to all layers of the nerve tissue. It is most significantly associated with hernia repair and other procedures employing a Pfannenstiel incision. The initial insult is usually incising of the nerve, followed by formation of a neuroma, incorporation of the nerve during closing, or constriction from adhesions. The three most commonly involved nerves are the iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, and genitofemoral nerves. Cutaneous abdominal nerve entrapment could occur during thoracoabdominal surgery. The presentation of nerve entrapment usually involved post-surgical pain in the territory innervated by the trapped nerve, possibly with radiation that tracks the nerve course. Once a suspected neuropathy is identified, it can be diagnosed with relief in pain after a nerve block has been instilled. Treatment is usually started with pharmaceutical solutions, topical first and oral if those fail. Most patients require escalation to a second line of treatment and see good result with injection therapy. Those that require further escalation can choose between ablation and surgical therapies. Post-surgical nerve entrapment is not uncommon and causes serious morbidity and financial loss. It is underdiagnosed and thus undertreated. Preventing nerve entrapment is the best treatment; when it does occur, options include topical and oral analgesics, nerve blocks, ablation therapy, and repeat surgery.


Subject(s)
Nerve Compression Syndromes/diagnosis , Nerve Compression Syndromes/therapy , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Autonomic Nerve Block/methods , Humans , Nerve Compression Syndromes/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/etiology
9.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 25(3): 13, 2021 Feb 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33630172

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This is a comprehensive review of the superior hypogastric block for the management of chronic pelvic pain. It reviews the background, including etiology, epidemiology, and current treatment available for chronic pelvic pain. It then presents the superior hypogastric block and reviews the seminal and most recent evidence about its use in chronic pelvic pain. RECENT FINDINGS: Several definitions exist for chronic pelvic pain (CPP), making the diagnosis more challenging for the clinician; however, they commonly describe continuous pain lasting 6 months in the pelvis, with an overwhelming majority of patients being reproductive-aged women. This pain is often one of mechanical, inflammatory, or neuropathic. It is generally underdiagnosed and affects anywhere between 5 and 26% of women. The diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain is clinical, consisting of mainly of a thorough history and physical and ruling out other causes. The pathophysiology is often endometriosis (70%) and also includes PID, adhesions, adenomyosis, uterine fibroids, chronic processes of the GI and urinary tracts, as well as pelvic-intrinsic musculoskeletal causes. Treatment includes physical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and oral and parenteral opioids. Interventional techniques provide an added tier of treatment and may help to reduce the requirement for chronic opioid use. Superior hypogastric plexus block is one of the available interventional techniques; first described in 1990, it has been shown to provide long-lasting relief in 50-70% of patients who underwent the procedure. Two approaches described so far, both under fluoroscopy, have seen similar results. More recently, ultrasound and CT-guided procedures have also been described with similar success. The injectate includes local anesthetic, steroids, and neurolytic agents such as phenol or ethanol. CPP is a common debilitating condition. It is diagnosed clinically and is underdiagnosed globally. Current treatments can be helpful at times but may fall short of satisfactory pain relief. Interventional techniques provide an added layer of treatment as well as reduce the requirement for opioids. Superior hypogastric plexus block provides long-lasting relief in many patients, regardless of approach. Evidence level is limited, and further RCTs could help provide better tools for evaluation and patient selection.


Subject(s)
Autonomic Nerve Block/methods , Chronic Pain/diagnostic imaging , Chronic Pain/therapy , Hypogastric Plexus/diagnostic imaging , Pain Management/methods , Pelvic Pain/diagnostic imaging , Pelvic Pain/therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Chronic Pain/metabolism , Endometriosis/diagnostic imaging , Endometriosis/metabolism , Endometriosis/therapy , Female , Humans , Inflammation Mediators/antagonists & inhibitors , Inflammation Mediators/metabolism , Pain Measurement/methods , Pelvic Pain/metabolism
10.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 25(4): 23, 2021 Mar 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33693999

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Opioid use disorder (OUD) remains a national epidemic with an immense consequence to the United States' healthcare system. Current therapeutic options are limited by adverse effects and limited efficacy. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent advances in therapeutic options for OUD have shown promise in the fight against this ongoing health crisis. Modifications to approved medication-assisted treatment (MAT) include office-based methadone maintenance, implantable and monthly injectable buprenorphine, and an extended-release injectable naltrexone. Therapies under investigation include various strategies such as heroin vaccines, gene-targeted therapy, and biased agonism at the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), but several pharmacologic, clinical, and practical barriers limit these treatments' market viability. This manuscript provides a comprehensive review of the current literature regarding recent innovations in OUD treatment.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Buprenorphine/therapeutic use , Delayed-Action Preparations , Drug Implants , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular , Methadone/therapeutic use , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Naltrexone/therapeutic use , Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/agonists , Receptors, Opioid, mu/agonists , Secologanin Tryptamine Alkaloids/therapeutic use , Thiophenes/therapeutic use , Urea/analogs & derivatives , Urea/therapeutic use , Vaccines/therapeutic use
11.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 25(1): 6, 2021 Jan 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33495883

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Loin pain hematuria syndrome (LPHS) is rare and seldom diagnosed, yet it has a particularly significant impact on those affected. This is a review of the latest and seminal evidence of the pathophysiology and diagnosis of LPHS and presents the typical clinical presentation and treatment options available. RECENT FINDINGS: LPHS is typically found in young women with characteristic symptoms, including severe recurrent flank pain and gross or microscopic hematuria. The majority of patients will experience crippling pain for many years without effective therapy, often requiring frequent use of narcotic medication. However, the lack of conclusive pathophysiology, in conjunction with the rarity of LPHS, has prohibited the development and trial of definitive treatment options. Nevertheless, in order to combat this rare but severe disease, management strategies have continued to evolve, ranging from conservative measures to invasive procedures. This review presents an overview of the current hypotheses on the pathophysiology of LPHS in addition to summarizing the management strategies that have been utilized. Only 30% of LPHS patients will experience spontaneous resolution, whereas the majority will continue to face chronic, crippling pain. Several methods of treatment, including invasive and non-invasive, may provide an improved outcome to these patients. Treatment should be individually tailored and multi-disciplinary in nature. Further research is required to further elucidate the pathophysiology and develop new, specific, treatment options.


Subject(s)
Flank Pain/therapy , Hematuria/therapy , Age Distribution , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Capsaicin/administration & dosage , Denervation , Electric Stimulation Therapy , Flank Pain/complications , Flank Pain/epidemiology , Flank Pain/physiopathology , Ganglia, Spinal , Hematuria/complications , Hematuria/epidemiology , Hematuria/physiopathology , Humans , Hypnosis , Infusions, Spinal , Kidney/innervation , Nephrectomy , Neuromuscular Agents/therapeutic use , Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment , Renal Dialysis , Sensory System Agents/administration & dosage , Sex Distribution , Splanchnic Nerves , Sympathectomy , Syndrome , Transplantation, Autologous , Ureter
12.
Pain Pract ; 21(1): 75-82, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32654360

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapies are used in the management of patients with complex regional pain syndrome I (CRPS I) and failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). The purpose of this study was to investigate the racial and health insurance inequalities with SCS therapy in patients with chronic pain who had CRPS I and FBSS. METHODS: Patients with chronic pain who had a discharge diagnosis of FBSS and CRPS I were identified using the National Inpatient Sample database. Our primary outcome was defined as the history of SCS utilization by race/ethnicity, income quartile, and insurance status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the variables associated with utilization of SCS therapy. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2015, 40,858 patients who were hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of FBSS and/or CRPS I were identified. Of these patients, 1,082 (2.7%) had a history of SCS therapy. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients had higher odds of having SCS therapy (Black patients: odds ratio [OR] = 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12 to 1.77; P = 0.003; Hispanic patients: OR = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.81; P = 0.007). Patients with private insurance had significantly higher odds of having SCS therapy compared with those with Medicare (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.43; P = 0.003). Compared to patients with Medicare, Medicaid patients had lower odds of having SCS therapy (OR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.70; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that socioeconomic disparities may exist in the utilization of SCS among hospitalized patients with CRPS I and FBSS the United States. However, confirming these data from other administrative databases, in the outpatient setting, may shed more insight.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/therapy , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Pain Management/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Spinal Cord Stimulation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Chronic Pain/etiology , Failed Back Surgery Syndrome/complications , Failed Back Surgery Syndrome/therapy , Female , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Humans , Male , Medicaid , Medicare , Middle Aged , Pain Management/economics , Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy/complications , Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy/therapy , United States
13.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 24(5): 19, 2020 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32200435

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Migraine headaches are a neurologic disorder characterized by attacks of moderate to severe throbbing headache that are typically unilateral, exacerbated by physical activity, and associated with phonophobia, photophobia, nausea, and vomiting. In the USA, the overall age-adjusted prevalence of migraine in female and male adults is 22.3% and 10.8%, respectively. RECENT FINDINGS: Migraine is a disabling disease that ranks as the 8th most burdensome disease in the world and the 4th most in women. The overarching hypothesis of migraine pathophysiology describes migraine as a disorder of the pain modulating system, caused by disruptions of the normal neural networks of the head. The activation of these vascular networks results in meningeal vasodilation and inflammation, which is perceived as head pain. The primary goals of acute migraine therapy are to reduce attack duration and severity. Current evidence-based therapies for acute migraine attacks include acetaminophen, four nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), seven triptans, NSAID-triptan combinations, dihydroergotamine, non-opioid combination analgesics, and several anti-emetics. Over-the-counter medications are an important component of migraine therapy and are considered a first-line therapy for most migraineurs. These medications, such as acetaminophen, ibuprofen, naproxen, and aspirin, have shown strong efficacy when used as first-line treatments for mild-to-moderate migraine attacks. The lower cost of over-the-counter medications compared with prescription medications also makes them a preferred therapy for some patients. In addition to their efficacy and lower cost, over-the-counter medications generally have fewer and less severe adverse effects, have more favorable routes of administration (oral vs. subcutaneous injection), and reduced abuse potential. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive evidence-based update of over-the-counter pharmacologic options for chronic migraines.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Nonprescription Drugs/therapeutic use , Humans
14.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 24(5): 17, 2020 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32200490

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a hematological disorder which leads to serious complications in multiple organ systems. While significant research has addressed many of the effects of acute pain episodes and end-organ damage connected to this disease, little has approached the chronic pain state associated with this condition. RECENT FINDINGS: Associated chronic pain represents a significant detractor from the quality of life experienced by these patients, affecting over half of those with SCD on more days than not. Current treatment typically is centered upon preventing and responding to acute vasoocclusive crises, presumably because this is the most common reason for hospitalization in these patients. The lack of management of chronic pain symptoms leaves many with SCD in a state of suffering. In this review, the treatment methodologies of SCD patients are examined including alternative treatments, both pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical, as well as procedural approaches specifically aimed at reducing chronic pain in these patients.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Anemia, Sickle Cell/therapy , Chronic Pain/etiology , Chronic Pain/therapy , Pain Management/methods , Humans
15.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 24(6): 27, 2020 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32378039

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS) is a chronic, noncyclic pain condition which can lead to significant patient morbidity and disability. It is defined by pain in the pelvic region, lasting for greater than 3 to 6 months, with no readily identifiable disease process. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive update of diagnosis and treatment of UCPPS. RECENT FINDINGS: UCPPS encompasses chronic pelvic pain syndrome or chronic prostatitis (CP/CPPS) in men and interstitial cystitis or painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS) in women. Underlying inflammatory, immunologic, and neuropathic components have been implicated in the pathogenesis of UCPPS. For optimal patient management, an individualized and multimodal approach is recommended. Medical management and physical therapy are the mainstays of treatment. Injection therapy may offer additional relief in medically refractory patients. Further minimally invasive management may include spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulation, though evidence supporting efficacy is limited.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Chronic Pain/therapy , Pain Management/methods , Pelvic Pain/diagnosis , Pelvic Pain/therapy , Conservative Treatment/methods , Humans , Physical Therapy Modalities , Treatment Outcome , Trigger Points/pathology
16.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 24(6): 24, 2020 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32323013

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive review of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) with a focus on epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prophylaxis. RECENT FINDINGS: PDPH is an adverse iatrogenic complication of neuraxial anesthesia that occurs following inadvertent puncture of the dura after epidural or spinal anesthesia. The overall incidence of PDPH after neuraxial procedures varies from 6 to 36%. The occurrence of PDPH can lead to increased patient morbidity, delayed discharge, and increased readmission. PDPH is a self-limiting postural headache that most often will resolve within 1 week, without need for treatment. Various prophylactic measures have been studied; however, more studies have been recommended to be undertaken in order to establish a proven benefit. For mild PDPH, conservative treatments are currently focused around bed rest, as well as oral caffeine. For moderate-to-severe PDPH, epidural blood patch (EBP) remains the most effective treatment; however, this invasive treatment is not without inherent risks. Further less invasive treatments have been explored such as epidural saline, dextran 40 mg solutions, hydration, caffeine, sphenopalatine ganglion blocks, greater occipital nerve blocks, and surgical closure of the gap; all have shown promise. Further studies are essential to prove efficacy as well as safety over the proven treatment of epidural blood patches. There is still limited evidence in literature about the understanding of PDPH and optimal treatment.


Subject(s)
Blood Patch, Epidural/methods , Disease Management , Post-Dural Puncture Headache/etiology , Post-Dural Puncture Headache/therapy , Spinal Puncture/adverse effects , Age Factors , Female , Humans , Male , Post-Dural Puncture Headache/diagnosis , Pregnancy , Sex Factors , Treatment Outcome
17.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 24(5): 16, 2020 Mar 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32198571

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This comprehensive review of current concepts in the management of vertebral compression fractures is a manuscript of vertebral augmentation literature of risk factors, clinical presentation, and management. The objective of this review is to compare outcomes between multiple augmentation techniques and ongoing discussions of effectiveness of vertebral augmentation procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are a prevalent disease affecting approximately 1.5 million US adults annually. VCFs can cause severe physical limitations, including back pain, functional disability, and progressive kyphosis of the thoracic spine that ultimately results in decreased appetite, poor nutrition, impaired pulmonary function, and spinal cord compression with motor and sensory deficits. The deconditioning that affects patients with vertebral compression fractures leads to mortality at a far higher rate than age-matched controls. The management of vertebral compression fractures has been extensively discussed with opponents arguing in favor or restricting conservative management and against augmentation, while proponents argue in favor of augmentation. The literature is well established in reference to the effects on mortality when patients undergo treatment with vertebral augmentation; in over a million patients with vertebral compression fractures treated with vertebral augmentation as compared with patients treated with non-surgical management, the patients receiving augmentation performed well with a decrease in morbidity and mortality. Summary of the literature review shows that understanding the risk factors, appropriate clinical evaluation, and management strategies are crucial. Analysis of the evidence shows, based on level I and II studies, balloon kyphoplasty had significantly better and vertebroplasty tended to have better pain reduction compared with non-surgical management. In addition, balloon kyphoplasty tended to have better height restoration than vertebroplasty.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Compression/surgery , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Vertebroplasty/methods , Humans , Treatment Outcome
18.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 24(1): 1, 2020 Jan 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31916041

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Post dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a relatively common complication which may occur in the setting of inadvertent dural puncture (DP) during labor epidural analgesia and during intentional DP during spinal anesthetic placement or diagnostic lumbar puncture. Few publications have established the long-term safety of an epidural blood patch (EBP) for the treatment of a PDPH. RECENT FINDINGS: The aim of this pilot study was to examine the association of chronic low back pain (LBP) in patients who experienced a PDPH following labor analgesia and were treated with an EBP. A total of 146 patients were contacted and completed a survey questionnaire via telephone. The EBP group was found to be more likely to have chronic LBP (percentage difference 20% [95% CI 6-33%], RR 2.6 [95% CI 1.3-5.2]) and also LBP < 6 (percentage difference 24% [95% CI 9- 37%], RR 2.3 [95% CI 1.3-4.1]). There were no significant differences in the severity and descriptive qualities of pain between the EBP and non-EBP groups. Our findings suggest that PDPH treated with an EBP is associated with an increased prevalence of subsequent low back pain in parturients. The findings of this pilot study should spur further prospective research into identifying potential associations between DP, EBP, and chronic low back pain.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Analgesia, Obstetrical/adverse effects , Blood Patch, Epidural/adverse effects , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Post-Dural Puncture Headache/therapy , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Pilot Projects , Post-Dural Puncture Headache/complications
19.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 24(8): 43, 2020 Jun 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32594264

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a musculoskeletal pain condition that stems from localized, taut regions of skeletal muscle and fascia, termed trigger points. The purpose of this comprehensive review is to provide updated information on prevalence, pathophysiology, and treatment modalities with a focus on interventional modalities in managing MPS. RECENT FINDINGS: Though MPS can present acutely, it frequently presents as a chronic condition, affecting up to 85% of adults during their lifetime. MPS is an often-overlooked component of pain with overarching effects on society, including patient quality of life, physical and social functioning, emotional well-being, energy, and costs on health care. The prevalence of MPS is generally increased among patients with other chronic pain disorders and has been associated with various other conditions such as bladder pain syndrome, endometriosis, and anxiety. MPS is poorly understood and remains a challenging condition to treat. Non-pharmacologic treatment modalities such as acupuncture, massage, transcutaneous electrical stimulation, and interferential current therapy may offer relief to some patients with MPS. Additional studies are warranted to get a better understanding of managing myofascial pain.


Subject(s)
Myofascial Pain Syndromes/therapy , Acetylcholine Release Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Acupuncture Therapy , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic/therapeutic use , Biofeedback, Psychology , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use , Dry Needling , Electric Stimulation Therapy , Humans , Massage , Myofascial Pain Syndromes/epidemiology , Myofascial Pain Syndromes/physiopathology , Neuromuscular Agents/therapeutic use , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
20.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 24(8): 42, 2020 Jun 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32529305

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic abdominal pain (CAP) is a significant health problem that can dramatically affect quality of life and survival. Pancreatic cancer is recognized as one of the most painful malignancies with 70-80% suffering from substantial pain, often unresponsive to typical medical management. Celiac plexus neurolysis and celiac plexus block (CPB) can be performed to mitigate pain through direct destruction or blockade of visceral afferent nerves. The objective of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive review of the CPB as it pertains to CAP with a focus on the associated anatomy, indications, techniques, neurolysis/blocking agents, and complications observed in patients who undergo CPB for the treatment of CAP. RECENT FINDINGS: The CAP is difficult to manage due to lack of precision in diagnosis and limited evidence from available treatments. CAP can arise from both benign and malignant causes. Treatment options include pharmacologic, interventional, and biopsychosocial treatments. Opioid therapy is typically utilized for the treatment of CAP; however, opioid therapy is associated with multiple complications. CPB has successfully been used to treat a variety of conditions resulting in CAP. The majority of the literature specifically related to CPB is surrounding chronic pain associated with pancreatic cancer. The literature shows emerging evidence in managing CAP with CPB, specifically in pancreatic cancer. This review provides multiple aspects of CAP and CPB, including anatomy, medical necessity, indications, technical considerations, available evidence, and finally complications related to the management.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/therapy , Celiac Plexus , Chronic Pain/therapy , Nerve Block/methods , Visceral Pain/therapy , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Chronic Pain/etiology , Ethanol/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Pancreatic Neoplasms/complications , Pancreatitis, Chronic/complications , Phenol/therapeutic use , Triamcinolone/therapeutic use , Visceral Pain/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL