Assessment of exhaled breath condensate pH in exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A longitudinal study.

RATIONALE: Exhaled breath condensate pH has been proposed as a noninvasive marker of airway inflammation. However, due to standardization difficulties in pH measurement techniques, different pH readings were obtained in previous studies. OBJECTIVES: In this longitudinal study we assessed condensate pH in patients with an exacerbation of asthma or chronic obstructive airway disease using the very precise carbon dioxide standardization method that negates the effect of this gas on condensate acidity. METHODS: Condensate pH, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, lung function, and blood gases were measured in 20 nonsmoking patients with asthma and 21 smoking and 17 ex-smoking patients with chronic obstructive airway disease first at hospital admission due to an acute exacerbation of the disease and again at discharge after treatment. Condensate pH was also assessed in 18 smoking and 18 nonsmoking healthy control subjects. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In patients with asthma, condensate pH was significantly decreased at the time of exacerbation compared with nonsmoking control subjects and increased with treatment. In patients with chronic obstructive airway disease, condensate pH remained unchanged during exacerbation, both in smokers and ex-smokers. Nevertheless, condensates collected from smokers were more acidic than those of ex-smokers. A similar difference was observed between smoker and nonsmoker healthy control subjects. No correlations were found between condensate pH and fractional exhaled nitric oxide or lung function variables measured either at admission or discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that exacerbation of asthma, but not chronic obstructive airway disease, is associated with acidification of breath condensate.

Influence of condensing equipment and temperature on exhaled breath condensate pH, total protein and leukotriene concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Exhaled breath condensate analysis is an attractive but still not fully standardised method for investigating airway pathology. Adherence of biomarkers to various condensing surfaces and changes in condensing temperature has been considered to be responsible for the variability of the results. Our aims were to compare the efficacy of different types of condensers and to test the influence of condensing temperature on condensate composition. METHODS: Breath condensates from 12 healthy persons were collected in two settings: (1) by using three condensers of different type (EcoScreen, R-Tube, Anacon) and (2) by using R-Tube condenser either cooled to -20 or -70 degrees C. Condensate pH at standardised CO(2) level was determined; protein content was measured by the Bradford method and leukotrienes by EIA. RESULTS: Breath condensates collected using EcoScreen were more alkaline (6.45+/-0.20 vs. 6.19+/-0.23, p<0.05 and 6.10+/-0.26, p<0.001) and contained more protein (3.89+/-2.03 vs. 2.65+/-1.98, n.s. and 1.88+/-1.99 microg/ml, p<0.004) as compared to the other devices. Only parameters obtained with R-Tube and Anacon correlated. Condensing temperature affected condensate pH (5.99+/-0.20 at -20 degrees C and 5.82+/-0.07 at -70 degrees C, p<0.05) but not protein content. Leukotriene B(4) was not found in any sample and cysteinyl-leukotriene was not found in condensates collected with R-Tube or Anacon. CONCLUSION: Condenser type influences sample pH, total protein content and cysteinyl-leukotriene concentration. Condensing temperature influences condensate pH but not total protein content. These results suggest that adherence of the biomarkers to condenser surface and condensing temperature may play a role but does not fully explain the variability of EBC biomarker levels.

Exhaled breath condensate pH in lung transplant recipients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) pH is a promising method for investigating airway pathology. However, inaccurate measurement techniques may bias pH readings. In this longitudinal study, we tested whether development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) in lung transplant recipients is associated with acidification of EBC. METHODS: EBC was collected in 15 patients with BOS and 16 stable BOS-free patients during routine clinical visits. From nine BOS patients, samples were collected before and after the onset of BOS, as well. Twenty healthy nontransplant subjects served as controls. EBC pH was measured by the carbon dioxide gas standardization method. RESULTS: EBC pH in patients with and without BOS and controls was similar (BOS group: 6.40±0.04, BOS-free group: 6.45±0.03; controls: 6.39±0.02; P>0.05). In patients who developed BOS during the follow-up, EBC pH before and after the onset of BOS was comparable (pre-BOS: 6.41±0.04 vs. post-BOS: 6.41±0.04; P>0.05). Coefficient of variation for repeated pH measurements in controls and subjects with and without BOS was 2.3%±0.3%, 2.0%±0.3%, and 1.7%±0.2%, respectively (P>0.05). Similarly, the limits of agreement for between-visit variability determined by the Bland-Altman test were comparable among the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that assessment of EBC pH is of limited value for the diagnosis of BOS.

Comparison of nasal and oral inhalation during exhaled breath condensate collection.

Analysis of exhaled breath condensate is a method for noninvasive assessment of the lung. Condensate can be collected with a nose clip (subjects inhale and exhale via the mouth) or without it (subjects inhale via the nose and exhale via the mouth), but the mode of inhalation may influence condensate volume and mediator levels. We compared condensate volume and adenosine, ammonia, and thromboxane B2 levels in young healthy volunteers (n = 25) in samples collected for 10 minutes from subjects with or without a nose clip. Patients with allergic rhinitis (n = 8) were also studied to assess the effect of upper airway inflammation on mediator levels. Adenosine, ammonia, and thromboxane B2 levels were determined by HPLC, spectrophotometry, and radioimmunoassay, respectively. Volume of condensate was significantly higher without nose clip than that with nose clip (mean +/- SD, 2321 +/- 736 microl and 1746 +/- 400 microl, respectively; p = 0.0001). We found no significant difference in any mediator levels between these two collection modes in healthy volunteers, but adenosine showed a tendency to differ between oral and nasal inhalation in patients with allergic rhinitis. Our data indicate that whereas a greater volume of condensate can be obtained when subjects inhale through their noses, the mode of inhalation does not influence mediator levels in young healthy volunteers, but may affect these levels in patients with allergic rhinitis.