Postoperative troponin surveillance to detect myocardial infarction: an observational cohort modelling study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical presentation of postoperative myocardial infarction (POMI) is often silent. Several international guidelines recommend routine troponin surveillance in patients at risk. We compared how these different guidelines select patients for surveillance after noncardiac surgery with our established risk stratification model. METHODS: We used outcome data from two prospective studies: Measurement of Exercise Tolerance before Surgery (METS) and Troponin Elevation After Major non-cardiac Surgery (TEAMS). We compared the major American, Canadian, and European guideline recommendations for troponin surveillance with our established risk stratification model. For each guideline and model, we quantified the number of patients requiring monitoring, % POMI detected, sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and number needed to screen (NNS). RESULTS: METS and TEAMS contributed 2350 patients, of whom 319 (14%) had myocardial injury, 61 (2.5%) developed POMI, and 14 (0.6%) died. Our risk stratification model selected fewer patients for troponin monitoring (20%), compared with the Canadian (78%) and European (79%) guidelines. The sensitivity to detect POMI was highest with the Canadian and European guidelines (0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.92). Specificity was highest using the American guidelines (0.91; 95% CI 0.90-0.92). Our risk stratification model had the best diagnostic odds ratio (2.5; 95% CI 1.4-4.2) and a lower NNS (21 vs 35) compared with the guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Most postoperative myocardial infarctions were detected by the Canadian and European guidelines but at the cost of low specificity and a higher number of patients undergoing screening. Patient selection based on our risk stratification model was optimal.

Postoperative myocardial injury phenotypes and self-reported disability in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a multicentre observational study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative myocardial injury (PMI) comprises a spectrum of mechanisms resulting in troponin release. The impact of different PMI phenotypes on postoperative disability remains unknown. METHODS: This was a multicentre prospective cohort study including patients aged ≥50 yr undergoing elective major noncardiac surgery. Patients were stratified in five groups based on the occurrence of PMI and clinical information on postoperative adverse events: PMI classified as myocardial infarction (MI; according to fourth definition), PMI plus adverse event other than MI, clinically silent PMI (PMI without adverse events), adverse events without PMI, and neither PMI nor an adverse event (reference). The primary endpoint was 6-month self-reported disability (assessed by WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 [WHODAS]). Disability-free survival was defined as WHODAS ≤16%. RESULTS: We included 888 patients of mean age 69 (range 53-91) yr, of which 356 (40%) were women; 151 (17%) patients experienced PMI, and 625 (71%) experienced 6-month disability-free survival. Patients with PMI, regardless of its phenotype, had higher preoperative disability scores than patients without PMI (difference in WHODAS; ß: 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5-6.2), but scores remained stable after surgery (ß: 1.2, 95% CI: -3.2-5.6). Before surgery, patients with MI (n=36, 4%) were more disabled compared with patients without PMI and no adverse events (ß: 5.5, 95% CI: 0.3-10.8). At 6 months, patients with MI and patients without PMI but with adverse events worsened in disability score (ß: 11.2, 95% CI: 2.3-20.2; ß: 8.1, 95% CI: 3.0-13.2, respectively). Patients with clinically silent PMI did not change in disability score at 6 months (ß: 1.39, 95% CI: -4.50-7.29, P=0.642). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with postoperative myocardial injury had higher preoperative self-reported disability, disability scores did not change at 6 months after surgery. However, patients experiencing myocardial infarction worsened in disability score after surgery.

Intraoperative Hypotension in Patients Having Major Noncardiac Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review of Blood Pressure Optimization Strategies.

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative hypotension is associated with increased risks of postoperative complications. Consequently, a variety of blood pressure optimization strategies have been tested to prevent or promptly treat intraoperative hypotension. We performed a systematic review to summarize randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy of blood pressure optimization interventions in either mitigating exposure to intraoperative hypotension or reducing risks of postoperative complications. METHODS: Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials were searched from database inception to August 2, 2023, for randomized controlled trials (without language restriction) that evaluated the impact of any blood pressure optimization intervention on intraoperative hypotension and/or postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: The review included 48 studies (N = 46,377), which evaluated 10 classes of blood pressure optimization interventions. Commonly assessed interventions included hemodynamic protocols using arterial waveform analysis, preoperative withholding of antihypertensive medications, continuous blood pressure monitoring, and adjuvant agents (vasopressors, anticholinergics, anticonvulsants). These same interventions reduced intraoperative exposure to hypotension. Conversely, low blood pressure alarms had an inconsistent impact on exposure to hypotension. Aside from limited evidence that higher prespecified intraoperative blood pressure targets led to a reduced risk of complications, there were few data suggesting that these interventions prevented postoperative complications. Heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes precluded meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Several different blood pressure optimization interventions show promise in reducing exposure to intraoperative hypotension. Nonetheless, the impact of these interventions on clinical outcomes remains unclear. Future trials should assess promising interventions in samples sufficiently large to identify clinically plausible treatment effects on important outcomes.

Effect of a national guideline on postoperative troponin surveillance: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the effect of the 2017 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) guidelines on troponin surveillance after noncardiac surgery. METHODS: This was a single-centre, retrospective, observational study. Patients aged 40 yr or older undergoing intermediate- to high-risk elective noncardiac surgery between 2016 and 2021 were included. We compared the number and percentage of troponin tests ordered before and after the guidelines were published and compared patient characteristics, specifically cardiovascular comorbidity, using odds ratio's (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Outcomes were myocardial injury, myocardial infarction (MI), and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The cohort included 36,386 patients and the median age was 63 yr. Between 2016 and 2018, troponin surveillance was done in 2,461 (13%) of the 19,046 patients, compared with 2,398 (14%) of the 17,340 patients who had surgery between 2019 and 2021 (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.15). Patients who had surgery in the second period had less cardiovascular comorbidity; the adjusted OR for troponin surveillance was 1.14 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.21). In the two periods, troponin was elevated in 561 (2.9%) and 470 (2.7%) patients, an MI was documented in 54 (0.3%) and 36 (0.2%) patients, and 95 (0.5%) and 73 (0.4%) patients died, respectively. After adjustment for baseline differences in the two periods, the ORs for MI and mortality were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.54 to 1.27) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.19), respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the odds of troponin ordering were slightly but significantly higher after publication of the CCS guidelines, the odds for detecting an MI and for mortality did not change.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Notre objectif était d'évaluer l'effet des lignes directrices 2017 de la Société canadienne de cardiologie (SCC) sur le monitorage de la troponine après une chirurgie non cardiaque. MéTHODE: Il s'agissait d'une étude observationnelle rétrospective monocentrique. Les patient·es âgé·es de 40 ans ou plus bénéficiant d'une chirurgie non cardiaque non urgente à risque intermédiaire à élevé entre 2016 et 2021 ont été inclus·es. Nous avons comparé le nombre et le pourcentage de tests de troponine prescrits avant et après la publication des lignes directrices et comparé les caractéristiques des patient·es, en particulier la comorbidité cardiovasculaire, en utilisant le rapport de cotes (RC) avec des intervalles de confiance (IC) à 95 %. Les critères d'évaluation comprenaient les lésions myocardiques, l'infarctus du myocarde (IM) et la mortalité hospitalière. RéSULTATS: La cohorte comprenait 36 386 personnes et l'âge médian était de 63 ans. Entre 2016 et 2018, le monitorage de la troponine a été réalisé chez 2461 (13 %) des 19 046 patient·es, contre 2398 (14 %) des 17 340 patient·es opéré·es entre 2019 et 2021 (RC, 1,08; IC 95%, 1,02 à 1,15). Les patient·es qui ont bénéficié d'une intervention chirurgicale au cours de la deuxième période présentaient moins de comorbidité cardiovasculaire; le RC ajusté pour le monitorage de la troponine était de 1,14 (IC 95 %, 1,07 à 1,21). Au cours des deux périodes, la troponine était élevée chez 561 (2,9 %) et 470 (2,7 %) patient·es, un IM a été documenté chez 54 (0,3 %) et 36 (0,2 %) patient·es, et 95 (0,5 %) et 73 (0,4 %) patient·es sont décédé·es, respectivement. Après ajustement pour tenir compte des différences initiales au cours des deux périodes, les RC pour l'IM et la mortalité étaient de 0,83 (IC 95 %, 0,54 à 1,27) et de 0,88 (IC 95 %, 0,64 à 1,19), respectivement. CONCLUSION: Bien que les probabilités de commande de troponine aient été légèrement mais significativement plus élevées après la publication des lignes directrices de la SCC, les probabilités de détection d'un IM et de mortalité n'ont pas changé.

Improved Re-estimation of Perioperative Cardiac Risk Using the Surgical Apgar Score: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) improves re-estimation of perioperative cardiac risk. BACKGROUND: The SAS is a novel risk index that integrates three relevant and easily measurable intraoperative parameters (blood loss, heart rate, mean arterial pressure) to predict outcomes. The incremental prognostic value of the SAS when used in combination with standard preoperative risk indices is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (18 years and older) who underwent elective noncardiac surgery at a quaternary care hospital in Canada (2009-2014). The primary outcome was postoperative acute myocardial injury. The SAS (range 0-10) was calculated based on intraoperative estimated blood loss, lowest mean arterial pressure, and lowest heart rate documented in electronic medical records. Incremental prognostic value of the SAS when combined with the Revised Cardiac Risk Index was assessed based on discrimination (c-statistic), reclassification (integrated discrimination improvement, net reclassification index), and clinical utility (decision curve analysis). RESULTS: The cohort included 16,835 patients, of whom 607 (3.6%) patients had acute postoperative myocardial injury. Addition of the SAS to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index improved risk estimation based on the integrated discrimination improvement [2.0%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5%-2.4%], continuous net reclassification index (54%; 95% CI: 46%-62%), and c-index, which increased from 0.68 (95% CI: 0.65-0.70) to 0.75 (95% CI: 0.73-0.77). On decision curve analysis, addition of the SAS to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index resulted in a higher net benefit at all decision thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: When combined with a validated preoperative risk index, the SAS improved the accuracy of cardiac risk assessment for noncardiac surgery. Further research is needed to delineate how intraoperative data can better guide postoperative decision-making.

Intraoperative hypotension and the risk of acute kidney injury following liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent adverse outcome following liver transplantation (LT) with a multifactorial etiology. It is critical to identify modifiable risk factors to mitigate the risk. One key area of interest is the role of intraoperative hypotension, which remains relatively unexplored in liver transplant cohorts. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study of 1292 adult patients who underwent LT (between 2009 and 2019). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association between intraoperative hypotension, quantified by time duration (in min) under various mean arterial pressure (MAP) thresholds, and the primary outcome of early postoperative AKI according to the KDIGO criteria. RESULTS: AKI occurred in 40% of patients and was independently associated with greater than 20 min spent below MAP thresholds of 55 mm Hg (adjusted OR = 1.866; 95% CI = 1.037-3.44; P = 0.041) and 50 mm Hg (adjusted OR = 1.801; 95% CI = 1.087-2.992; P = 0.023). Further sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the association between intraoperative hypotension and postoperative AKI was accentuated after restricting the analysis to patients with a normal preoperative renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged (>20 min) intraoperative hypotension (below a MAP of 55 mm Hg) was independently associated with AKI following LT, after adjusting for several known confounders.

Systematic reviews and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: mortality, morbidity, and organ failure.

BACKGROUND: Mortality, morbidity, and organ failure are important and common serious harms after surgery. However, there are many candidate measures to describe these outcome domains. Definitions of these measures are highly variable, and validity is often unclear. As part of the International Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative, this study aimed to derive a set of standardised and valid measures of mortality, morbidity, and organ failure for use in perioperative clinical trials. METHODS: Three domains of endpoints (mortality, morbidity, and organ failure) were explored through systematic literature review and a three-stage Delphi consensus process using methods consistently applied across the StEP initiative. Reliability, feasibility, and patient-centredness were assessed in round 3 of the consensus process. RESULTS: A high level of consensus was achieved for two mortality time points, 30-day and 1-yr mortality, and these two measures are recommended. No organ failure endpoints achieved threshold criteria for consensus recommendation. The Clavien-Dindo classification of complications achieved threshold criteria for consensus in round 2 of the Delphi process but did not achieve the threshold criteria in round 3 where it scored equivalently to the Post Operative Morbidity Survey. Clavien-Dindo therefore received conditional endorsement as the most widely used measure. No composite measures of organ failure achieved an acceptable level of consensus. CONCLUSIONS: Both 30-day and 1-yr mortality measures are recommended. No measure is recommended for organ failure. One measure (Clavien-Dindo) is conditionally endorsed for postoperative morbidity, but our findings suggest that no single endpoint offers a reliable and valid measure to describe perioperative morbidity that is not dependent on the quality of deli-vered care. Further refinement of current measures, or development of novel measures, of postoperative morbidity might improve consensus in this area.

Complications of Factor V Leiden in Adults Undergoing Noncardiac Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review.

Factor V Leiden is the commonest hereditary prothrombotic allele, affecting 1% to 5% of the world's population. The objective of this study was to characterize the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of patients with Factor V Leiden compared to patients without a diagnosis of hereditary thrombophilia. This was a focused systematic review of studies including adult (>18 years) patients with Factor V Leiden (heterozygous or homozygous) undergoing noncardiac surgery. Included studies were either randomized controlled trials or observational. The primary clinical outcomes of interest were thromboembolic events occurring from the perioperative period up to 1 year postoperatively, defined as deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or other clinically significant thrombosis occurring during or after a surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included cerebrovascular events, cardiac events, death, transplant-related outcomes, and surgery-specific morbidity. Pediatric and obstetrical patients were excluded, as were case reports and case series. Databases searched included MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception until August 2021. Study bias was assessed through the CLARITY (Collaboration of McMaster University researchers) Risk of Bias tools, and heterogeneity through analysis of study design and end points, as well as the I 2 statistic with its confidence interval and the Q statistic. A total of 5275 potentially relevant studies were identified, with 115 having full text assessed for eligibility and 32 included in the systematic review. On the whole, the literature suggests that patients with Factor V Leiden have an increased risk of perioperative and postoperative thromboembolic events compared to patients without the diagnosis. Increased risk was also seen in relation to surgery-specific morbidity and transplant-related outcomes, particularly arterial thrombotic events. The literature did not support an increased risk for mortality, cerebrovascular, or cardiac complications. Limitations of the data include predisposition toward bias due in many study designs and small sample sizes across the majority of published studies. Variable outcome definitions and durations of patient follow-up across different surgical procedures resulted in high study heterogeneity precluding the effective use of meta-analysis. Factor V Leiden status may confer additional risk for surgery-related adverse outcomes. Large, adequately powered studies are required to accurately estimate the degree of this risk by zygosity.

Associations between intraoperative hypotension, duration of surgery and postoperative myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a retrospective single-centre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Studies of intraoperative hypotension typically specify a blood pressure threshold associated with adverse outcomes. Such thresholds are likely to be study-biased, investigator-biased, or both. We hypothesised that a newly developed modelling method without a threshold, which is biologically more plausible than a threshold-based approach, would reveal a continuous association between exposure to intraoperative hypotension and adverse outcomes. METHODS: Single-centre, retrospective cohort study of subjects ≥60 yr old undergoing noncardiac surgery. We modelled intraoperative hypotension using three different approaches: (1) unweighted, (2) weighted for degree of hypotension (depth), and (3) weighted for duration of hypotension. The primary outcome was myocardial injury, defined as elevated troponin I (>60 ng L-1) measured during the first 3 days after surgery. The associations between the three models, postoperative myocardial injury, and mortality (secondary outcome) were reported as penalised adjusted odds ratios (ORs) scaled between the 75th and 25th percentiles. RESULTS: Myocardial injury occurred in 1812/15 452 (12%) procedures, with 554/15 452 (3.6%) procedures resulting in death before discharge from hospital. The unweighted lower blood pressure measure (OR: 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12-0.53) and the depth-weighted measure (OR: 4.4, 95% CI: 2.6-7.4) were associated with myocardial injury. The duration-weighted measure was not associated with myocardial injury (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.61-1.3). The unweighted measure (OR 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01-0.40) and the depth-weighted measure (OR: 12, 95% CI, 3.8-35) were associated with in-hospital mortality, but not the duration-weighted measure (OR: 1.3, 95% CI: 0.53-3.0). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative hypotension appears to have a graded association with postoperative myocardial injury and mortality, with depth appearing to contribute more than duration.

Outlying End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide During General Anesthesia Is Associated With Postoperative Pulmonary Complications: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study From US Hospitals Between 2010 and 2017.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) occur in up to 33% of patients who undergo noncardiothoracic surgery. Emerging evidence suggests that permissive hypercapnia may reduce the risk of lung injury. We hypothesized that higher intraoperative end-tidal carbon dioxide (Etco2) concentrations would be associated with a decreased risk of PPCs. METHODS: This retrospective, observational, multicenter study included patients undergoing general anesthesia for noncardiothoracic procedures (January 2010-December 2017). The primary outcome was PPC within 30 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes were PPC within 1 week, postoperative length of stay, and inhospital 30-day mortality. The association between these outcomes, median Etco2, and 4 time-weighted average area-under-the-curve (TWA-AUC) thresholds (<28, <35, <45, and >45 mm Hg) was explored using a multivariable mixed-effect model and by plotting associated risks. RESULTS: Among 143,769 cases across 11 hospitals, 10,276 (7.1%) experienced a PPC. When compared to a baseline median Etco2 of 35 to 40 mm Hg, a median Etco2 >40 mm Hg was associated with an increase in PPCs within 30 days (median Etco2, 40-45 mm Hg; adjusted OR, 1.16 [99% confidence interval {CI}, 1.00-1.33]; P value = .008 and median Etco2, >45 mm Hg; OR, 1.64 [99% CI, 1.33-2.02]; P value < .001). The occurrence of any Etco2 value <28 mm Hg (ie, a positive TWA-AUC < 28 mm Hg) was associated with PPCs (OR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.33-1.49]; P value < .001), mortality, and length of stay. Any Etco2 value >45 mm Hg (ie, a positive TWA-AUC >45 mm Hg) was also associated with PPCs (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.17-1.31]; P < .001). The Etco2 range with the lowest incidence of PPCs was 35 to 38 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Both a very low (<28 mm Hg) and a high Etco2 (>45 mm Hg) were associated with PPCs within 30 days. The lowest PPC incidence was found in patients with an Etco2 of 35 to 38 mm Hg. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the relationship between postoperative PPCs and intraoperative Etco2.

Emergency Airway Management in Patients with COVID-19: A Prospective International Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation for patients with COVID-19 is required for invasive mechanical ventilation. The authors sought to describe practice for emergency intubation, estimate success rates and complications, and determine variation in practice and outcomes between high-income and low- and middle-income countries. The authors hypothesized that successful emergency airway management in patients with COVID-19 is associated with geographical and procedural factors. METHODS: The authors performed a prospective observational cohort study between March 23, 2020, and October 24, 2020, which included 4,476 episodes of emergency tracheal intubation performed by 1,722 clinicians from 607 institutions across 32 countries in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. The authors investigated associations between intubation and operator characteristics, and the primary outcome of first-attempt success. RESULTS: Successful first-attempt tracheal intubation was achieved in 4,017/4,476 (89.7%) episodes, while 23 of 4,476 (0.5%) episodes required four or more attempts. Ten emergency surgical airways were reported-an approximate incidence of 1 in 450 (10 of 4,476). Failed intubation (defined as emergency surgical airway, four or more attempts, or a supraglottic airway as the final device) occurred in approximately 1 of 120 episodes (36 of 4,476). Successful first attempt was more likely during rapid sequence induction versus non-rapid sequence induction (adjusted odds ratio, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.49 to 2.39]; P < 0.001), when operators used powered air-purifying respirators versus nonpowered respirators (adjusted odds ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.16 to 2.20]; P = 0.006), and when performed by operators with more COVID-19 intubations recorded (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03 for each additional previous intubation [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.06]; P = 0.015). Intubations performed in low- or middle-income countries were less likely to be successful at first attempt than in high-income countries (adjusted odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.41 to 0.79]; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The authors report rates of failed tracheal intubation and emergency surgical airway in patients with COVID-19 requiring emergency airway management, and identified factors associated with increased success. Risks of tracheal intubation failure and success should be considered when managing COVID-19.

Associations Between Preoperative Biomarkers and Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Elderly Patients: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with mortality after cardiac surgery. Novel risk factors may improve identification of patients at risk for renal injury. The authors evaluated the association between preoperative biomarkers that reflect cardiac, inflammatory, renal, and metabolic disorders and cardiac surgery-associated AKI (CSA-AKI) in elderly patients. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the 2-center prospective cohort study "Anesthesia Geriatric Evaluation." Twelve biomarkers were determined preoperatively in 539 patients. Primary outcome was CSA-AKI. The association between biomarkers and CSA-AKI was investigated with multivariable logistic regression analysis. Secondary outcomes were 1-year mortality and patient-reported disability and were assessed with relative risks (RR) between patients with and without CSA-AKI. RESULTS: CSA-AKI occurred in 88 (16.3%) patients and was associated with increased risk of mortality (RR, 6.70 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 3.38-13.30]) and disability (RR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.53-2.95]). Preoperative concentrations of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), hemoglobin, and magnesium had the strongest association with CSA-AKI. Identification of patients with CSA-AKI improved when a biomarker panel was used (area under the curve [AUC] 0.75 [95% CI, 0.69-0.80]) compared to when only clinical risk factors were used (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation [EuroSCORE II] AUC 0.67 [95% CI, 0.62-0.73]). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative cardiac, inflammatory, renal, and metabolic biomarkers are associated with CSA-AKI and may improve identification of patients at risk.

The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: The Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) is a widely acknowledged prognostic model to estimate preoperatively the probability of developing in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. However, the RCRI does not always make accurate predictions, so various studies have investigated whether biomarkers added to or compared with the RCRI could improve this. OBJECTIVES: Primary: To investigate the added predictive value of biomarkers to the RCRI to preoperatively predict in-hospital MACE and other adverse outcomes in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Secondary: To investigate the prognostic value of biomarkers compared to the RCRI to preoperatively predict in-hospital MACE and other adverse outcomes in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Tertiary: To investigate the prognostic value of other prediction models compared to the RCRI to preoperatively predict in-hospital MACE and other adverse outcomes in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 1 January 1999 (the year that the RCRI was published) until 25 June 2020. We also searched ISI Web of Science and SCOPUS for articles referring to the original RCRI development study in that period. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies among adults who underwent noncardiac surgery, reporting on (external) validation of the RCRI and: - the addition of biomarker(s) to the RCRI; or - the comparison of the predictive accuracy of biomarker(s) to the RCRI; or - the comparison of the predictive accuracy of the RCRI to other models. Besides MACE, all other adverse outcomes were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We developed a data extraction form based on the CHARMS checklist. Independent pairs of authors screened references, extracted data and assessed risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability according to PROBAST. For biomarkers and prediction models that were added or compared to the RCRI in ≥ 3 different articles, we described study characteristics and findings in further detail. We did not apply GRADE as no guidance is available for prognostic model reviews. MAIN RESULTS: We screened 3960 records and included 107 articles.   Over all objectives we rated risk of bias as high in ≥ 1 domain in 90% of included studies, particularly in the analysis domain. Statistical pooling or meta-analysis of reported results was impossible due to heterogeneity in various aspects: outcomes used, scale by which the biomarker was added/compared to the RCRI, prediction horizons and studied populations.  Added predictive value of biomarkers to the RCRI Fifty-one studies reported on the added value of biomarkers to the RCRI. Sixty-nine different predictors were identified derived from blood (29%), imaging (33%) or other sources (38%). Addition of NT-proBNP, troponin or their combination improved the RCRI for predicting MACE (median delta c-statistics: 0.08, 0.14 and 0.12 for NT-proBNP, troponin and their combination, respectively). The median total net reclassification index (NRI) was 0.16 and 0.74 after addition of troponin and NT-proBNP to the RCRI, respectively. Calibration was not reported. To predict myocardial infarction, the median delta c-statistic when NT-proBNP was added to the RCRI was 0.09, and 0.06 for prediction of all-cause mortality and MACE combined. For BNP and copeptin, data were not sufficient to provide results on their added predictive performance, for any of the outcomes. Comparison of the predictive value of biomarkers to the RCRI  Fifty-one studies assessed the predictive performance of biomarkers alone compared to the RCRI. We identified 60 unique predictors derived from blood (38%), imaging (30%) or other sources, such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (32%). Predictions were similar between the ASA classification and the RCRI for all studied outcomes. In studies different from those identified in objective 1, the median delta c-statistic was 0.15 and 0.12 in favour of  BNP and NT-proBNP alone, respectively, when compared to the RCRI, for the prediction of MACE. For C-reactive protein, the predictive performance was similar to the RCRI. For other biomarkers and outcomes, data were insufficient to provide summary results. One study reported on calibration and none on reclassification. Comparison of the predictive value of other prognostic models to the RCRI   Fifty-two articles compared the predictive ability of the RCRI to other prognostic models. Of these, 42% developed a new prediction model, 22% updated the RCRI, or another prediction model, and 37% validated an existing prediction model. None of the other prediction models showed better performance in predicting MACE than the RCRI. To predict myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest, ACS-NSQIP-MICA had a higher median delta c-statistic of 0.11 compared to the RCRI. To predict all-cause mortality, the median delta c-statistic was 0.15 higher in favour of ACS-NSQIP-SRS compared to the RCRI. Predictive performance was not better for CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, R2CHADS2, Goldman index, Detsky index or VSG-CRI compared to the RCRI for any of the outcomes. Calibration and reclassification were reported in only one and three studies, respectively. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Studies included in this review suggest that the predictive performance of the RCRI in predicting MACE is improved when NT-proBNP, troponin or their combination are added. Other studies indicate that BNP and NT-proBNP, when used in isolation, may even have a higher discriminative performance than the RCRI. There was insufficient evidence of a difference between the predictive accuracy of the RCRI and other prediction models in predicting MACE. However, ACS-NSQIP-MICA and ACS-NSQIP-SRS outperformed the RCRI in predicting myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest combined, and all-cause mortality, respectively. Nevertheless, the results cannot be interpreted as conclusive due to high risks of bias in a majority of papers, and pooling was impossible due to heterogeneity in outcomes, prediction horizons, biomarkers and studied populations. Future research on the added prognostic value of biomarkers to existing prediction models should focus on biomarkers with good predictive accuracy in other settings (e.g. diagnosis of myocardial infarction) and identification of biomarkers from omics data. They should be compared to novel biomarkers with so far insufficient evidence compared to established ones, including NT-proBNP or troponins. Adherence to recent guidance for prediction model studies (e.g. TRIPOD; PROBAST) and use of standardised outcome definitions in primary studies is highly recommended to facilitate systematic review and meta-analyses in the future.

Variation in perioperative cerebral and hemodynamic monitoring during carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic disturbances cause half of the perioperative strokes following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Guidelines strongly recommend strict pre- and postoperative blood pressure (BP) monitoring in CEA patients, but do not provide firm practical recommendations. Although in the Netherlands 50 centres perform CEA, no national protocol on perioperative hemodynamic, and cerebral monitoring exists. To assess current monitoring policies of all Dutch CEA-centres, a national survey was conducted. METHODS: Between May and July 2017 all 50 Dutch CEA-centres were invited to complete a 42-question survey addressing perioperative hemodynamic and cerebral monitoring during CEA. Nonresponders received a reminder after 1 and 2 months. By November 2017 the survey was completed by all centres. RESULTS: Preoperative baseline BP was based on a single bilateral BP-measurement at the outpatient-clinic in the majority of centres (n = 28). In 43 centres (86%) pre-operative monitoring (transcranial Doppler (TCD, n = 6), electroencephalography (EEG, n = 11), or TCD + EEG (n = 26)) was performed as a baseline reference. Intraoperatively, large diversity for type of anaesthesia (general: 45 vs. local [LA]:5) and target systolic BP (>100 mm hg - 160 mm hg [n = 12], based on preoperative outpatient-clinic or admission BP [n = 18], other [n = 20]) was reported. Intraoperative cerebral monitoring included EEG + TCD (n = 28), EEG alone (n = 13), clinical neurological examination with LA (n = 5), near-infrared spectroscopy with stump pressure (n = 1), and none due to standard shunting (n = 3). Postoperatively, significant variation was reported in standard duration of admission at a recovery or high-care unit (range 3-48 hr, mean:12 hr), maximum accepted systolic BP (range >100 mm hg - 180 mm Hg [n = 32]), postoperative cerebral monitoring (standard TCD [n = 16], TCD on indication [n = 5] or none [n = 24]) and in timing of postoperative cerebral monitoring (range directly postoperative - 24 hr postoperative; median 3 hr). CONCLUSIONS: In Dutch centres performing CEA the perioperative hemodynamic and cerebral monitoring policies are widely diverse. Diverse policies may theoretically lead to over- or under treatment. The results of this national audit may serve as the baseline dataset for development of a standardized and detailed (inter)national protocol on perioperative hemodynamic and cerebral monitoring during CEA.

Hypoxemia during procedural sedation in adult patients: a retrospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Since 2010, new guidelines for procedural sedation and the Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety have increased patient safety, comfort, and acceptance considerably. Nevertheless, the administration of sedatives and opioids during sedation procedures may put the patient at risk of hypoxemia. However, data on hypoxemia during procedural sedation are scarce. Here, we studied the incidence and severity of hypoxemia during procedural sedations in our hospital. METHODS: A historical, single-centre cohort study was performed at the University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMCU), a tertiary centre in the Netherlands. Data from procedural sedation in our hospital between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2018 (3,459 males and 2,534 females; total, 5,993) were extracted from our Anesthesia Information Management System. Hypoxemia was defined as peripheral oxygen saturation < 90% lasting at least two consecutive minutes. The severity of hypoxemia was calculated as area under the curve. The relationship between the severity of hypoxemia and body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification, and duration of the procedure was investigated. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent of moderately to deeply sedated patients developed hypoxemia. A high incidence of hypoxemia was found in patients undergoing procedures in the heart catheterization room (54%) and in patients undergoing bronchoscopy procedures (56%). Hypoxemia primarily occurred in longer lasting procedures (> 120 min) and especially in the latter phases of the procedures. There was no relationship between severity of hypoxemia and BMI or ASA Physical Status. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that a considerable number of patients are at risk of hypoxemia during procedural sedation with a positive correlation shown with increasing duration of medical procedures. Additional prospective research is needed to investigate the clinical consequences of this cumulative hypoxemia.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Depuis 2010, les nouvelles lignes directrices pour la sédation procédurale et la Déclaration d'Helsinki concernant la sécurité des patients ont considérablement augmenté la sécurité, le confort et l'acceptation des patients. L'administration de sédatifs et d'opioïdes pendant les interventions sous sédation peut toutefois mettre le patient à risque d'hypoxémie. Cependant, les données concernant l'hypoxémie pendant une sédation procédurale sont rares. Ici, nous avons étudié l'incidence et la sévérité de l'hypoxémie pendant la sédation procédurale dans notre hôpital. MéTHODE: Une étude de cohorte historique monocentrique a été réalisée au Centre médical universitaire d'Utrecht (UMCU), un centre tertiaire aux Pays-Bas. Les données des sédations procédurales réalisées dans notre hôpital entre le 1er janvier 2011 et le 31 décembre 2018 (3459 hommes et 2534 femmes; au total, 5993 patients) ont été extraites de notre système de gestion de l'information en anesthésie. L'hypoxémie a été définie comme une saturation périphérique en oxygène < 90 % durant au moins deux minutes consécutives. La sévérité de l'hypoxémie a été calculée en tant que surface sous la courbe. Les relations entre la sévérité de l'hypoxémie et l'indice de masse corporelle (IMC), la classification du statut physique selon l'American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) et la durée de l'intervention ont été étudiées. Le critère d'évaluation principal était l'incidence d'hypoxémie. RéSULTATS: Vingt-neuf pour cent des patients sous sédation modérée à profonde ont développé une hypoxémie. Une incidence élevée d'hypoxémie a été observée chez les patients subissant des interventions en salle d'hémodynamie (54 %) et chez les patients subissant des bronchoscopies (56 %). L'hypoxémie est principalement survenue lors d'interventions plus longues (> 120 min) et particulièrement dans les phases plus tardives des interventions. Aucune relation n'a été observée entre la sévérité de l'hypoxémie et l'IMC ou le statut physique ASA. CONCLUSION: Cette étude a démontré qu'un nombre considérable de patients sont à risque d'hypoxémie pendant la sédation procédurale, une corrélation positive ayant été démontrée avec une durée prolongée des interventions médicales. D'autres recherches prospectives sont nécessaires pour étudier les conséquences cliniques de cette hypoxémie cumulée.

Artifacts annotations in anesthesia blood pressure data by man and machine.

Physiologic data from anesthesia monitors are automatically captured. Yet erroneous data are stored in the process as well. While this is not interfering with clinical care, research can be affected. Researchers should find ways to remove artifacts. The aim of the present study was to compare different artifact annotation strategies, and to assess if a machine learning algorithm is able to accept or reject individual data points. Non-cardiac procedures requiring invasive blood pressure monitoring were eligible. Two trained research assistants observed procedures live for artifacts. The same procedures were also retrospectively annotated for artifacts by a different person. We compared the different ways of artifact identifications and modelled artifacts with three different learning algorithms (lasso restrictive logistic regression, neural network and support vector machine). In 88 surgical procedures including 5711 blood pressure data points, the live observed incidence of artifacts was 2.1% and the retrospective incidence was 2.2%. Comparing retrospective with live annotation revealed a sensitivity of 0.32 and specificity of 0.98. The performance of the learning algorithms which we applied ranged from poor (kappa 0.053) to moderate (kappa 0.651). Manual identification of artifacts yielded different incidences in different situations, which were not comparable. Artifact detection in physiologic data collected during anesthesia could be automated, but the performance of the learning algorithms in the present study remained moderate. Future research should focus on optimization and finding ways to apply them with minimal manual work. The present study underlines the importance of an explicit definition for artifacts in database research.

Artifact Processing Methods Influence on Intraoperative Hypotension Quantification and Outcome Effect Estimates.

BACKGROUND: Physiologic data that is automatically collected during anesthesia is widely used for medical record keeping and clinical research. These data contain artifacts, which are not relevant in clinical care, but may influence research results. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of different methods of filtering and processing artifacts in anesthesiology data on study findings in order to demonstrate the importance of proper artifact filtering. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic literature search to identify artifact filtering methods. Subsequently, these methods were applied to the data of anesthesia procedures with invasive blood pressure monitoring. Different hypotension measures were calculated (i.e., presence, duration, maximum deviation below threshold, and area under threshold) across different definitions (i.e., thresholds for mean arterial pressure of 50, 60, 65, 70 mmHg). These were then used to estimate the association with postoperative myocardial injury. RESULTS: After screening 3,585 papers, the authors included 38 papers that reported artifact filtering methods. The authors applied eight of these methods to the data of 2,988 anesthesia procedures. The occurrence of hypotension (defined with a threshold of 50 mmHg) varied from 24% with a median filter of seven measurements to 55% without an artifact filtering method, and between 76 and 90% with a threshold of 65 mmHg. Standardized odds ratios for presence of hypotension ranged from 1.16 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.26) to 1.24 (1.14 to 1.34) when hypotension was defined with a threshold of 50 mmHg. Similar variations in standardized odds ratios were found when applying methods to other hypotension measures and definitions. CONCLUSIONS: The method of artifact filtering can have substantial effects on estimates of hypotension prevalence. The effect on the association between intraoperative hypotension and postoperative myocardial injury was relatively small. Nevertheless, the authors recommend that researchers carefully consider artifacts handling and report the methodology used.

Preoperative Risk and the Association between Hypotension and Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury.

BACKGROUND: Despite the significant healthcare impact of acute kidney injury, little is known regarding prevention. Single-center data have implicated hypotension in developing postoperative acute kidney injury. The generalizability of this finding and the interaction between hypotension and baseline patient disease burden remain unknown. The authors sought to determine whether the association between intraoperative hypotension and acute kidney injury varies by preoperative risk. METHODS: Major noncardiac surgical procedures performed on adult patients across eight hospitals between 2008 and 2015 were reviewed. Derivation and validation cohorts were used, and cases were stratified into preoperative risk quartiles based upon comorbidities and surgical procedure. After preoperative risk stratification, associations between intraoperative hypotension and acute kidney injury were analyzed. Hypotension was defined as the lowest mean arterial pressure range achieved for more than 10 min; ranges were defined as absolute (mmHg) or relative (percentage of decrease from baseline). RESULTS: Among 138,021 cases reviewed, 12,431 (9.0%) developed postoperative acute kidney injury. Major risk factors included anemia, estimated glomerular filtration rate, surgery type, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, and expected anesthesia duration. Using such factors and others for risk stratification, patients with low baseline risk demonstrated no associations between intraoperative hypotension and acute kidney injury. Patients with medium risk demonstrated associations between severe-range intraoperative hypotension (mean arterial pressure less than 50 mmHg) and acute kidney injury (adjusted odds ratio, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.65 to 4.16 in validation cohort). In patients with the highest risk, mild hypotension ranges (mean arterial pressure 55 to 59 mmHg) were associated with acute kidney injury (adjusted odds ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.56). Compared with absolute hypotension, relative hypotension demonstrated weak associations with acute kidney injury not replicable in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery demonstrate varying associations with distinct levels of hypotension when stratified by preoperative risk factors. Specific levels of absolute hypotension, but not relative hypotension, are an important independent risk factor for acute kidney injury.

Intra-Operative Hypotension is a Risk Factor for Post-operative Silent Brain Ischaemia in Patients With Pre-operative Hypertension Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Intra-operative haemodynamic instability during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been associated with an increased risk of procedural stroke. Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) lesions have been proposed as a surrogate marker for peri-operative silent cerebral ischaemia. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between peri-operative blood pressure (BP) and presence of post-operative DWI lesions in patients undergoing CEA. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed based on patients with symptomatic CEA included in the MRI substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study. Relative intra-operative hypotension was defined as a decrease of intra-operative systolic BP ≥ 20% compared with pre-operative ('baseline') BP, absolute hypotension was defined as a drop in systolic BP < 80  mmHg. The primary endpoint was the presence of any new DWI lesions on post-operative MRI (DWI positive). The occurrence and duration of intra-operative hypotension was compared between DWI positive and DWI negative patients as was the magnitude of the difference between pre- and intra-operative BP. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with symptomatic CEA were included, of whom eight were DWI positive. DWI positive patients had a significantly higher baseline systolic (186 ± 31 vs. 158 ± 27 mmHg, p = .011) and diastolic BP (95 ± 15 vs. 84 ± 13 mmHg, p = .046) compared with DWI negative patients. Other pre-operative characteristics did not differ. Relative intra-operative hypotension compared with baseline occurred in 53/55 patients (median duration 34 min; range 0-174). Duration of hypotension did not differ significantly between the groups (p = .088). Mean systolic intra-operative BP compared with baseline revealed a larger drop in BP (-37 ± 29 mmHg) in DWI positive compared with DWI negative patients (-14 ± 26 mmHg, p = .024). Absolute intra-operative systolic BP values did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: In this exploratory study, high pre-operative BP and a larger drop of intra-operative BP were associated with peri-procedural cerebral ischaemia as documented with DWI. These results call for confirmation in an adequately sized prospective study, as they suggest important consequences for peri-operative haemodynamic management in carotid revascularisation.