ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Estimated hepatitis C prevalence within the Veterans Health Administration is higher than the general population and is a risk factor for advanced liver disease and subsequent complications. We describe the hepatitis C care continuum within the Veterans Health Administration 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2022. METHODS: We included individuals in Veterans Health Administration care 2021-2022 who were eligible for direct-acting antiviral treatment 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2022. We evaluated the proportion of Veterans who progressed through each step of the hepatitis C care continuum, and identified factors associated with initiating direct-acting antivirals, achieving sustained virologic response, and repeat hepatitis C viremia. RESULTS: We identified 133 732 Veterans with hepatitis C viremia. Hepatitis C treatment was initiated in 107 134 (80.1%), with sustained virologic response achieved in 98 136 (91.6%). In those who achieved sustained virologic response, 1097 (1.1%) had repeat viremia and 579 (52.8%) were retreated for hepatitis C. Veterans of younger ages were less likely to initiate treatment and achieve sustained virologic response, and more likely to have repeat viremia. Stimulant use and unstable housing were negatively associated with each step of the hepatitis C care continuum. CONCLUSIONS: The Veterans Health Administration has treated 80% of Veterans with hepatitis C in care 2021-2022 and achieved sustained virologic response in more than 90% of those treated. Repeat viremia is rare and is associated with younger age, unstable housing, opioid use, and stimulant use. Ongoing efforts are needed to reach younger Veterans, and Veterans with unstable housing or substance use disorders.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , Continuity of Patient Care , Hepatitis C , Sustained Virologic Response , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veterans , Humans , Male , United States/epidemiology , Female , Middle Aged , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Veterans/statistics & numerical data , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Aged , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Viremia/drug therapy , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis C, Chronic/epidemiology , Adult , Veterans HealthABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Corynebacterium striatum is a gram-positive facultative anaerobe found in the environment and human flora that has historically been considered a contaminant. More recently, Corynebacterium striatum has been implicated in human infections, including respiratory infections, endocarditis, and bone and joint infections, particularly those involving hardware or implanted devices. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old man presented for washout of his left total knee arthroplasty following a revision 20 days prior. The patient underwent debridement of his left total knee and revision of the left total femur arthroplasty. Daptomycin was initiated empirically due to a previous rash from vancomycin. Operative tissue cultures grew Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Corynebacterium striatum. Given concern for daptomycin resistance and the reliability of vancomycin susceptibility, daptomycin was discontinued and vancomycin initiated following a graded challenge. Within a few days, the patient developed a diffuse, blanching, erythematous, maculopapular rash and daptomycin was restarted. Over the next 72 h, his rash progressed and he met criteria for drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. Daptomycin was stopped and oral linezolid initiated; rash improved. C. striatum returned with susceptibility to gentamicin, linezolid, vancomycin and daptomycin. Due to concern for adverse effects on long-term linezolid, daptomycin was restarted and was tolerated for 20 days, at which point purulent drainage from incision increased. The patient underwent another arthroplasty revision and washout. Operative cultures from this surgery were again positive for C. striatum. Repeat C. striatum susceptibilities revealed resistance to daptomycin but retained susceptibility to linezolid. Daptomycin was again changed to linezolid. He completed six weeks of linezolid followed by linezolid 600 mg daily for suppression and ultimately opted for disarticulation. CONCLUSIONS: C. striatum has historically been regarded as a contaminant, particularly when grown in tissue culture in the setting of prosthetic joint infection. Based on the available literature and susceptibility patterns, the most appropriate first-line therapy is vancomycin or linezolid. Treatment with daptomycin should be avoided, even when isolates appear susceptible, due to the risk of development of high-level resistance (MIC > 256 µg/mL) and clinical failure.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Corynebacterium , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
We present a case of persistent bacteremia and psoas abscess from Paeniclostridium sordellii without severe symptoms or the classically associated toxic shock syndrome. Further laboratory evaluation demonstrated that the Paeniclostridium sordellii isolate lacked the lethal toxin gene and there was no cytotoxicity to exposed Vero cells.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Clostridium sordellii , Psoas Abscess , Shock, Septic , Animals , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Chlorocebus aethiops , Psoas Abscess/diagnosis , Psoas Abscess/drug therapy , Shock, Septic/diagnosis , Vero CellsABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We reviewed the current data on infections associated with rituximab use published over the last 5 years. RECENT FINDINGS: New literature was available on rates of serious infections, Hepatitis B reactivation and screening, and infection with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2. Rates of infection varied by study and population, however, higher risk of infection in patients with underlying rheumatologic diseases was seen in those who required a therapy switch, had a smoking history, and those undergoing retreatment who had a serious infection with their first course of therapy. With regards to HBV, the proportion of patients screened continues to be inadequate. Despite the upfront cost, HBV screening and prophylaxis were found to be cost effective. There is still limited data regarding COVID-19 severity in the setting of rituximab, however, rituximab, especially in combination with steroids, may lead to more severe disease and higher mortality.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Opportunistic Infections/epidemiology , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B/diagnosis , Hepatitis B/drug therapy , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Latent Infection/diagnosis , Latent Infection/drug therapy , Latent Infection/epidemiology , Latent Infection/prevention & control , Mass Screening , Risk , SARS-CoV-2 , Virus Diseases/epidemiologyABSTRACT
We determined disseminated nontuberculous mycobacteria incidence in the HIV-infected population of Oregon, USA, during 2007-2012 by using statewide laboratory surveillance. We identified 37 disseminated nontuberculous mycobacteria cases among 7,349 patients with median annual incidence of 110/100,000 HIV person-years and the highest incidence in those with CD4 counts <50 cells/mm3 (5,300/100,000 person-years).
Subject(s)
HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/complications , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/epidemiology , Adult , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria/isolation & purification , Oregon/epidemiology , Viral Load , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the relationship between Staphylococcus aureus colonization and the use of immunosuppressive therapies in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled IMID patients from the rheumatology and dermatology departments of Oregon Health & Science University. At enrolment, we surveyed patients for S. aureus infection risk factors and those using immune-modulating therapies, and evaluated their colonization status with bilateral nares and inguinal fold cultures. Patients were asked to follow up 6-12 months later for reassessment of colonization status by repeat culture. S. aureus isolates were tested for the presence of methicillin resistance by PCR. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 548 IMID patients. At enrolment, 219 (40.0%) patients were colonized with S. aureus, of which 27 (12.3%) were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Baseline colonization rates were similar between TNF-α inhibitor users and non-users (40.5% and 39.4%, P = 0.79), but were significantly higher for psoriasis patients compared with those with RA (43.5% and 31.8%, P = 0.02). A total of 384 patients were available for follow-up. Patients who were colonized at enrolment were more likely to be colonized at follow-up if they were treated with TNF-α inhibitors during the study as compared to patients without TNF-α inhibitor exposure [odds ratio (OR) = 2.2 (95% CI 1.1, 4.2), P = 0.02]. CONCLUSION: Patients with psoriasis are more likely to be colonized with S. aureus than patients with RA. Patients who are colonized with S. aureus are more likely to remain colonized if exposed to TNF-α inhibitors.
Subject(s)
Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Rheumatic Fever/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Abatacept , Adalimumab , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived/therapeutic use , Etanercept , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunoconjugates/adverse effects , Immunoconjugates/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulin G/adverse effects , Immunoglobulin G/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Infliximab , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Psoriasis/complications , Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Rituximab , Staphylococcal Infections/etiology , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Young AdultABSTRACT
Background: Rates of serious injection-related infections in persons who use drugs have increased. Resulting admissions are an opportunity for screening and vaccination of preventable infections such as hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and tetanus. Design and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of adults with documented substance use admitted for bacterial infection between July 2015 and March 2020. We evaluated HAV, HBV, and tetanus vaccination status at admission, along with screening for HAV and HBV infection and immunity. We identified the proportion of patients at risk for infection who received HAV, HBV, and tetanus vaccines during admission and patient-level factors associated with vaccination. Results: We identified 280 patients who met our inclusion criteria. Of the 198 (70.7%) patients at risk for HAV, infectious disease providers recommended vaccination for 21 (10.6%) and 15 (7.6%) received HAV vaccine. Of the 174 (62.1%) patients at risk for HBV, infectious disease providers recommended vaccination for 32 (18.3%) and 25 (14.4%) received HBV vaccine. A large proportion of patients (31.4%, 88) had no documentation of prior tetanus vaccination, and infectious disease providers recommended tetanus vaccination for three (1.1%) and five patients (1.8%) received a tetanus booster. Infectious disease consult vaccine recommendations were statistically significantly associated with HAV or HBV vaccination prior to discharge. Conclusion: Over 70% of our population is at risk for one or more of these preventable infections. Efforts are needed to maximize inpatient screening and vaccination for HAV, HBV, and tetanus in patients with barriers to care.
ABSTRACT
Vancomycin and daptomycin are frequently used in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). We analyze health care utilization and cost to the health care system for vancomycin vs daptomycin in the outpatient setting and find that vancomycin results in significantly higher health care utilization and similar cost per course compared with daptomycin in OPAT.
ABSTRACT
We describe the epidemiology and incidence of infections following gender-affirming vaginoplasty. Urinary tract and surgical site infections were the most common infections with incidences of 17.5% and 5.5%, respectively. We also identified a significant gap in human immunodeficiency virus screening and prescription of preexposure prophylaxis.
ABSTRACT
Data evaluating dalbavancin use for vertebral osteomyelitis remain limited. In our retrospective cohort, 29 of 34 (85.3%) patients completed their dalbavancin course. Adverse reactions occurred for 6 (17.6%) and infection recurrence in 3 (8.8%) within 90 days. Dalbavancin appears to be safe and well-tolerated for vertebral osteomyelitis.
ABSTRACT
Background: Leveraging the National COVID-19 Cohort Collaborative (N3C), a nationally sampled electronic health records repository, we explored associations between individual-level social determinants of health (SDoH) and COVID-19-related hospitalizations among racialized minority people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PWH), who have been historically adversely affected by SDoH. Methods: We retrospectively studied PWH and people without HIV (PWoH) using N3C data from January 2020 to November 2023. We evaluated SDoH variables across three domains in the Healthy People 2030 framework: (1) healthcare access, (2) economic stability, and (3) social cohesion with our primary outcome, COVID-19-related hospitalization. We conducted hierarchically nested additive and adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression models, stratifying by HIV status and race/ethnicity groups, accounting for age, sex, comorbidities, and data partners. Results: Our analytic sample included 280,441 individuals from 24 data partner sites, where 3,291 (1.17%) were PWH, with racialized minority PWH having higher proportions of adverse SDoH exposures than racialized minority PWoH. COVID-19-related hospitalizations occurred in 11.23% of all individuals (9.17% among PWH, 11.26% among PWoH). In our initial additive modeling, we observed that all three SDoH domains were significantly associated with hospitalizations, even with progressive adjustments (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] range 1.36-1.97). Subsequently, our HIV-stratified analyses indicated economic instability was associated with hospitalization in both PWH and PWoH (aOR range 1.35-1.48). Lastly, our fully adjusted, race/ethnicity-stratified analysis, indicated access to healthcare issues was associated with hospitalization across various racialized groups (aOR range 1.36-2.00). Conclusion: Our study underscores the importance of assessing individual-level SDoH variables to unravel the complex interplay of these factors for racialized minority groups.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) drugs are very effective for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis but may increase the risk of serious bacterial infections. We assessed the association between the risk of serious skin and soft tissue infections (SSSTI) and the use of these agents in rheumatoid arthritis patients (RA). METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study among rheumatoid arthritis patients in the Veterans Integrated Service Network 20 from 2000-2008. We identified rheumatoid arthritis patients with SSSTI, matched them to three sets of RA controls and used conditional logistic regression to compare the risk of SSSTI between patients treated and those not treated with an anti-TNF drug, after adjusting for known confounders and important covariates. Limited by the design, we could not assess (absolute) risk but only relative risk in terms of association. RESULTS: Among the 97 cases and 291 controls, 90 percent were male, 62 percent white, with a mean age of 63 years. Twenty percent received anti-TNF drugs during the study period. Thirty-nine percent of cases and 15 percent of controls died, (OR 3.5, 95% CI: 2.033, 6.11, p <0.01). Diabetes mellitus (37%), kidney disease (16%) and a history of skin infections (27%) were common among cases. Based on conditional logistic regression, anti-TNF use was not significantly associated with skin and soft tissue infections (OR 1.1, 95% CI: 0.61-2.03, p = 0.92). However, patients with diabetes mellitus (OR 2.5, 95% CI: 1.53-4.13, p = 0.01) or a prior history of skin infection (OR 5.7, 95% CI: 2.87-11.43, p <0.01) were more likely to have skin and soft tissue infections. CONCLUSION: Use of anti-TNF therapy among RA patients was not associated with an increased risk of SSSTI, but patients with diabetes mellitus and those with a history of prior skin infection were significantly more likely to have SSSTI and mortality was higher among cases than controls in this veteran cohort.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Skin Diseases/etiology , Soft Tissue Infections/etiology , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/adverse effects , Aged , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/mortality , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/therapeutic useABSTRACT
The immunocompromised host is at an increased risk for pulmonary and extrapulmonary NTM infections. Where data are available in these specific populations, increased mortality is observed with NTM disease. Prior to starting therapy for NTM disease, providers should ensure diagnostic criteria are met as treatment is long and often associated with significant side effects and toxicities. Treatment should involve 2 to 4 agents and be guided by cultures and antimicrobial susceptibilities. Drug interactions are important to consider, especially in those with HIV or transplant recipients. Whenever possible, immunosuppression should be reduced or changed.
Subject(s)
Lung Diseases , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous , Humans , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/drug therapy , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/microbiology , Lung , Immunocompromised Host , Lung Diseases/microbiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are highly abundant in soil, dust, and water sources, making human-pathogen contact frequent and recurrent. NTM represents over 200 species/subspecies; some are considered strict or opportunistic pathogens. Mycobacterium abscessus, often regarded as one of the most antibiotic-resistant mycobacteria, is the second most frequent NTM pulmonary disease pathogen. OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology of M. abscessus through a literature review focusing on clinical aspects. SOURCES: We conducted searches on PubMed and Web of Knowledge for articles published from 2010 to the present using the keywords 'Mycobacterium abscessus', 'Nontuberculous mycobacteria', and 'epidemiology'. Our search prioritized original reports on the occurrence of NTM and M. abscessus infection/disease. CONTENT: Advanced molecular and genetic diagnostic techniques have refined the M. abscessus complex (MABC) microbiological classification over the last few decades. MABC can adhere to surfaces and form a biofilm. This characteristic and its resistance to common disinfectants allow these microorganisms to persist in the water distribution systems, becoming a constant reservoir. The frequency and manifestation of NTM species vary geographically because of environmental conditions and population susceptibility differences. MABC lung disease, the most frequent site of NTM infection in humans, is often seen in patients with underlying lung diseases such as bronchiectasis, whereas MABC disseminated disease is related to immunosuppression. Skin and soft tissue infections are associated with surgical or injection procedures. Epidemiological evidence suggests an overall increase in MABC infection and disease in the last decade. IMPLICATIONS: Establishing the burden of this disease is challenging because of varying measures of incidence and prevalence, referral bias, and differences in medical practices and reporting. Furthermore, environmental and structural determinants, infection routes, and MABC pulmonary disease mechanisms require additional investigation. This review contributes to a better understanding of the epidemiology of MABC, which could inform clinical practice and future research.
ABSTRACT
Background: Mycobacterium abscessus is a virulent human pathogen. Treatment is complex and often poorly tolerated with suboptimal rates of eradication, highlighting the need for improved therapeutics. This study reports clinical experience with omadacycline for treatment of M abscessus infections at five large nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) disease clinics across the United States to better understand long-term safety and tolerability. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective chart review of adults with M abscessus infections. All patients treated with omadacycline as part of a multidrug therapeutic regimen through December 2021 were included. Clinical data from time of omadacycline initiation and up to 12 months of follow-up were collected. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results: Analysis included 117 patients. Among patients with M abscessus isolate subspeciation, 58 of 71 (81.7%) were M abscessus spp abscessus. In isolates with reported drug susceptibility testing, 15 of 70 (21.4%) had confirmed susceptibility to macrolides. The most common site of infection was lungs. Median duration omadacycline treatment was 8 months (range, 0.25-33 months; interquartile range, 4-15 months). Omadacycline was discontinued in 60 patients (51.3%); 20 completed planned treatment course, 23 experienced intolerance or adverse event leading to drug cessation, and 17 stopped due to cost, death (unrelated to NTM infection or therapy), or another reason. In those with pulmonary disease, 44 of 95 (46%) had 1 or more negative cultures at time of final microbiological assessment, with 17 of 95 (18%) achieving culture conversion. Conclusions: This study reports data supporting long-term safety and tolerability of omadacycline along with signal of effectiveness in treatment of M abscessus infections.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The true incidence and risk factors for secondary bacterial infections in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains poorly understood. Knowledge of risk factors for secondary infections in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 is necessary to optimally guide selective use of empiric antimicrobial therapy. DESIGN: Single-center retrospective cohort study of symptomatic inpatients admitted for COVID-19 from April 15, 2020, through June 30, 2021. SETTING: Academic quaternary-care referral center in Portland, Oregon. PATIENTS: The study included patients who were 18 years or older with a positive severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) PCR test up to 10 days prior to admission. METHODS: Secondary infections were identified based on clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic data. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for secondary infection. We also assessed mortality, length of stay, and empiric antibiotics among those with and without secondary infections. RESULTS: We identified 118 patients for inclusion; 31 (26.3%) had either culture-proven or possible secondary infections among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Mortality was higher among patients with secondary infections (35.5%) compared to those without secondary infection (4.6%). Empiric antibiotic use on admission was high in both the secondary and no secondary infection groups at 71.0% and 48.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of secondary bacterial infection was moderate among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. However, a higher proportion of patients received empiric antibiotics regardless of an identifiable secondary infection. Transfer from an outside hospital, baseline immunosuppressant use, and corticosteroid treatment were independent risk factors for secondary infection. Additional studies are needed to validate risk factors and best guide antimicrobial stewardship efforts.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , COVID-19 , Coinfection , Virus Diseases , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Coinfection/drug therapy , Coinfection/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Virus Diseases/drug therapyABSTRACT
Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) cause significant disease and economic burden. Uncomplicated UTIs (uUTIs) occur in otherwise healthy individuals without underlying structural abnormalities, with uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) accounting for 80% of cases. With recent transitions in healthcare toward virtual visits, data on multidrug resistance (MDR) (resistant to ≥3 antibiotic classes) by care setting are needed to inform empiric treatment decision making. Methods: We evaluated UPEC resistance over time by care setting (in-person vs virtual), in adults who received outpatient care for uUTI at Kaiser Permanente Southern California between January 2016 and December 2021. Results: We included 174 185 individuals who had ≥1 UPEC uUTI (233 974 isolates) (92% female, 46% Hispanic, mean age 52 years [standard deviation 20]). Overall, prevalence of UPEC MDR decreased during the study period (13% to 12%) both in virtual and in-person settings (P for trend <.001). Resistance to penicillins overall (29%), coresistance to penicillins and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) (12%), and MDR involving the 2 plus ≥1 antibiotic class were common (10%). Resistance to 1, 2, 3, and 4 antibiotic classes was found in 19%, 18%, 8%, and 4% of isolates, respectively; 1% were resistant to ≥5 antibiotic classes, and 50% were resistant to none. Similar resistance patterns were observed over time and by care setting. Conclusions: We observed a slight decrease in both class-specific antimicrobial resistance and MDR of UPEC overall, most commonly involving penicillins and TMP-SMX. Resistance patterns were consistent over time and similar in both in-person and virtual settings. Virtual healthcare may expand access to UTI care.
ABSTRACT
Patients with bronchiectasis are at high risk for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) disease and suspicion should be high in the setting of worsening respiratory symptoms and disease progression on imaging. Meeting the case definition for NTM disease does not equal a decision to treat; risk and benefits of therapy should be discussed with patients. When treatment is initiated, a multidrug regimen should be used and selected based on susceptibility testing from a reliable laboratory. Monotherapy or macrolide-fluoroquinolone dual therapy should never be used. After discontinuation of therapy, ongoing mycobacterial sputum culture surveillance is needed, as infection relapse is common.
Subject(s)
Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Humans , Laboratories , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/diagnosis , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/drug therapyABSTRACT
Background: Patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) and severe bacterial infections requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy represent a significant challenge to providers due to complexity of care coordination required to ensure safe and effective treatment. Our institution developed a patient-centered multidisciplinary discharge planning conference, OPTIONS-DC, to address this challenge. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review to evaluates parameters between patients who received an OPTIONS-DC and those who did not. Results: We identified 73 patients receiving an OPTIONS-DC and 100 who did not. More patients with an OPTIONS-DC were < 40 years of age (76.7% versus 61.0%, OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.1-4.7, p = 0.02), had positive HCV antibody testing (58.9% versus 41.0%, OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1-3.8, p = 0.02), injection drug use (93.2% versus 79.0%, OR = 3.6 95% CI = 1.3-10.1, p = 0.01), used methamphetamines (84.9% versus 72.0%, OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.0-4.8, p = 0.04), and started inpatient SUD treatment (80.8% versus 63%, OR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.2-5.0, p = 0.04) compared with those without a conference. The OPTIONS-DC group was more likely to be diagnosed with bacteremia (74.0% versus 57.0%, OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.1-4.1, p = 0.02), endocarditis (39.7% versus21.0%, OR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.3-4.9, p = 0.03), vertebral osteomyelitis (45.2% versus 15.0%, OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 2.3-9.6, p < 0.01), and epidural abscess (35.6% versus 10.0%, OR = 5.0, 95% CI = 2.2-11.2, p < 0.01) and require 4 weeks or more of antibiotic treatment (97.3% versus 51.1%, OR = 34.1, 95% CI = 7.9-146.7, p = 0.01). Patients with an OPTIONS-DC were also more likely to be admitted between 2019 and 2020 than between 2018 and 2019 (OR = 4.1, 95% CI = 2.1-7.9, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Patients with an OPTIONS-DC tended to have more complicated infections and longer courses of antibiotic treatment. While further research on outcomes is needed, patients receiving an OPTIONS-DC were able to successfully complete antibiotic courses across a variety of settings.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with substance use disorders admitted for severe bacterial infection are in a prime position to be screened for important co-infections. However, data suggest that standard screening for co-infections in this population during hospital admission can vary in frequency and type of testing. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients to evaluate screening for co-infections during admission, followed by a case-control analysis to determine factors associated with lack of any screening. Results: We identified 280 patients with 320 eligible admissions. Most were male and Caucasian with unstable housing. Only 67 (23.9%) patients had a primary-care provider. About 89% (n = 250) of our cohort were screened for one or more co-infection during their first admission with one patient never screened despite subsequent admissions. Of those screened, the greatest proportion was HIV (219, 81.4% of those without history of HIV), HCV (94, 79.7% of those without a prior positive HCV antibody), syphilis (206, 73.6%), gonorrhea, and chlamydia (47, 16.8%) with new positive tests identified in 60 (21.4%) people. Screening for all five co-infections was only completed in 15 (14.0%) of the 107 patients who had screening indications. Overall, a high proportion of those screened had a new positive test, including three cases of neurosyphilis, highlighting the importance of screening and treatment initiation. One patient was prescribed HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis at discharge and only 37 (34.6%) of those eligible were referred for HCV treatment or follow-up. In multivariable case-control analysis, non-Medicaid insurance (OR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.2-6.6, p = 0.02), use of only 1 substance (OR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.3-6.5, p < 0.01), and no documented screening recommendations by the infectious disease team (OR 3.7, 95% CI: 1.5-8.8, p < 0.01), were statistically significantly associated with lack of screening for any co-infection during hospital admission. Conclusion: Our data suggest additional interventions are needed to improve inpatient screening for co-infections in this population.