ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is significant potential to streamline the clinical pathway for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of implementing BENCHMARK best practices on the efficiency and safety of TAVI in 28 sites in 7 European countries. METHODS: This was a study of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing TAVI with balloon-expandable valves before and after implementation of BENCHMARK best practices. Principal objectives were to reduce hospital length of stay (LoS) and duration of intensive care stay. Secondary objective was to document patient safety. RESULTS: Between January 2020 and March 2023, 897 patients were documented prior to and 1491 patients after the implementation of BENCHMARK practices. Patient characteristics were consistent with a known older TAVI population and only minor differences. Mean LoS was reduced from 7.7 ± 7.0 to 5.8 ± 5.6 days (median 6 vs. 4 days; P < .001). Duration of intensive care was reduced from 1.8 to 1.3 days (median 1.1 vs. 0.9 days; P < .001). Adoption of peri-procedure best practices led to increased use of local anaesthesia (96.1% vs. 84.3%; P < .001) and decreased procedure (median 47 vs. 60â min; P < .001) and intervention times (85 vs. 95â min; P < .001). Thirty-day patient safety did not appear to be compromised with no differences in all-cause mortality (0.6% in both groups combined), stroke/transient ischaemic attack (1.4%), life-threatening bleeding (1.3%), stage 2/3 acute kidney injury (0.7%), and valve-related readmission (1.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Broad implementation of BENCHMARK practices contributes to improving efficiency of TAVI pathway reducing LoS and costs without compromising patient safety.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Benchmarking , Length of Stay , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Male , Female , Aged, 80 and over , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Critical Pathways , Europe/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Patient SafetyABSTRACT
AIMS: Myocardial inflammation is increasingly detected non-invasively by tissue mapping with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Intraindividual agreement with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) or marker of myocardial injury, high-sensitive troponin (hs-cTnT) in patients with clinically suspected viral myocarditis not understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective multicentre study of consecutive patients with clinically suspected myocarditis who underwent blood testing for hs-cTnT, CMR and EMB as a part of diagnostic work-up. EMB was considered positive based on immunohistological criteria in line with the ESC definitions. CMR diagnoses employed tissue mapping using sequence-specific cut-off for native T1 and T2 mapping; active inflammation was defined as T1≥2SD and T2≥2SD above the mean of normal range. Hs-cTnT of greater than 13.9ng/1 was considered significant. A total of 114 patients (age (mean±SD) 54±16, 65% males) were included, of which 79(69%) had positive EMB-criteria, 64(56%) CMR criteria, and a total of 58 (51%) positive troponin. Agreement between EMB and CMR diagnostic criteria was poor (CMR vs. ESC: AUCs: 0.51 (0.39-0.62)). The agreement between the significant hs-cTnT rise and CMR-based diagnosis of myocarditis was good (AUC: 0.84 (0.68-0.92); p<0.001), but poor for EMB (0.50 (0.40-0.61). Hs-cTnT was significantly associated with native T1 and T2, hs-CRP and NT-pro BNP (r=0.37, r=0.35, r=0.30, r=0.25 p<0.001), but not immunohistochemical criteria or viral presence. CONCLUSIONS: In clinically suspected viral myocarditis, all diagnostic approaches reflect the pathophysiological elements of myocardial inflammation, however the differing underlying drivers only partially overlap. The EMB and CMR diagnostic algorithms are neither interchangeable in terms of interpretation of myocardial inflammation nor in their relationship with myocardial injury.
ABSTRACT
Liver cirrhosis is the end stage of all chronic liver diseases and contributes significantly to overall mortality of 2% globally. The age-standardized mortality from liver cirrhosis in Europe is between 10 and 20% and can be explained by not only the development of liver cancer but also the acute deterioration in the patient's overall condition. The development of complications including accumulation of fluid in the abdomen (ascites), bleeding in the gastrointestinal tract (variceal bleeding), bacterial infections, or a decrease in brain function (hepatic encephalopathy) define an acute decompensation that requires therapy and often leads to acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) by different precipitating events. However, due to its complexity and organ-spanning nature, the pathogenesis of ACLF is poorly understood, and the common underlying mechanisms leading to the development of organ dysfunction or failure in ACLF are still elusive. Apart from general intensive care interventions, there are no specific therapy options for ACLF. Liver transplantation is often not possible in these patients due to contraindications and a lack of prioritization. In this review, we describe the framework of the ACLF-I project consortium funded by the Hessian Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the Arts (HMWK) based on existing findings and will provide answers to these open questions.
Subject(s)
Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure , End Stage Liver Disease , Esophageal and Gastric Varices , Humans , End Stage Liver Disease/complications , Esophageal and Gastric Varices/complications , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/therapy , Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure/therapy , Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure/etiologyABSTRACT
RATIONALE: Clonal hematopoiesis driven by mutations of DNMT3A (DNA methyltransferase 3a) is associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular disease and poor prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and aortic stenosis. Although experimental studies suggest that DNMT3A clonal hematopoiesis-driver mutations may enhance inflammation, specific signatures of inflammatory cells in humans are missing. OBJECTIVE: To define subsets of immune cells mediating inflammation in humans using single-cell RNA sequencing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Transcriptomic profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed in n=6 patients with HF harboring DNMT3A clonal hematopoiesis-driver mutations and n=4 patients with HF and no DNMT3A mutations by single-cell RNA sequencing. Monocytes of patients with HF carrying DNMT3A mutations demonstrated a significantly increased expression of inflammatory genes compared with monocytes derived from patients with HF without DNMT3A mutations. Among the specific upregulated genes were the prototypic inflammatory IL (interleukin) IL1B (interleukin 1B), IL6, IL8, the inflammasome NLRP3, and the macrophage inflammatory proteins CCL3 and CCL4 as well as resistin, which augments monocyte-endothelial adhesion. Silencing of DNMT3A in monocytes induced a paracrine proinflammatory activation and increased adhesion to endothelial cells. Furthermore, the classical monocyte subset of DNMT3A mutation carriers showed increased expression of T-cell stimulating immunoglobulin superfamily members CD300LB, CD83, SIGLEC12, as well as the CD2 ligand and cell adhesion molecule CD58, all of which may be involved in monocyte-T-cell interactions. DNMT3A mutation carriers were further characterized by increased expression of the T-cell alpha receptor constant chain and changes in T helper cell 1, T helper cell 2, T helper cell 17, CD8+ effector, CD4+ memory, and regulatory T-cell-specific signatures. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that circulating monocytes and T cells of patients with HF harboring clonal hematopoiesis-driver mutations in DNMT3A exhibit a highly inflamed transcriptome, which may contribute to the aggravation of chronic HF.
Subject(s)
Clonal Hematopoiesis/genetics , DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases/genetics , Heart Failure/genetics , Immunogenetic Phenomena , Monocytes/enzymology , Mutation , T-Lymphocytes/enzymology , Aged , Cell Adhesion , Chronic Disease , Coculture Techniques , DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases/metabolism , DNA Methyltransferase 3A , Female , Heart Failure/enzymology , Heart Failure/immunology , Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells/metabolism , Humans , Inflammation Mediators/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Monocytes/immunology , Paracrine Communication , RNA-Seq , Single-Cell Analysis , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , THP-1 Cells , TranscriptomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) represents an alternative stroke prevention method in patients with atrial fibrillation and an increased bleeding risk, chronic kidney disease or contraindications to oral anticoagulants. Aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of percutaneous LAAO in high-risk, frail patients having undergone transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: Thirty-one patients having undergone TAVI and scheduled for LAAO were prospectively included in our study. RESULTS: Implantation was successful in 29 of 31 cases (93.5%).There were no patients that developed a major acute cardiovascular event, stroke, or device dislocation/embolization. There was a single case of major bleeding (3.2%) and 3 cases of acute kidney injury (9.7%). At 3 months, no patients experienced a stroke, one patient had a device-related thrombus (3.4%), one patient showed a significant peri-device leak, and one patient had a persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defect. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that percutaneous LAAO may represent a feasible alternative strategy for stroke prevention, that can be safely performed in high-risk, multimorbid patients with high bleeding risk or contraindications to oral anticoagulation.
Subject(s)
Atrial Appendage , Atrial Fibrillation , Septal Occluder Device , Stroke , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Atrial Appendage/diagnostic imaging , Atrial Appendage/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Frail Elderly , Humans , Octogenarians , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Few randomized trials have compared bioprostheses for transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and no trials have compared bioprostheses with supra-annular design. The SCOPE 2 trial (Safety and Efficacy Comparison of Two TAVI Systems in a Prospective Randomized Evaluation 2) was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of the ACURATE neo and CoreValve Evolut bioprostheses for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. METHODS: SCOPE 2 was a randomized trial performed at 23 centers in 6 countries between April 2017 and April 2019. Patients ≥75 years old with an indication for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement as agreed by the heart team were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either the ACURATE neo (n=398) or the CoreValve Evolut bioprostheses (n=398). The primary end point, powered for noninferiority of the ACURATE neo bioprosthesis, was all-cause death or stroke at 1 year. The key secondary end point, powered for superiority of the ACURATE neo bioprosthesis, was new permanent pacemaker implantation at 30 days. RESULTS: Among 796 randomized patients (mean age, 83.2±4.3 years; mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score, 4.6±2.9%), clinical follow-up information was available for 778 (98%) patients. Within 1 year, the primary end point occurred in 15.8% of patients in the ACURATE neo group and in 13.9% of patients in the CoreValve Evolut group (absolute risk difference, 1.8%, upper 1-sided 95% confidence limit, 6.1%; P=0.0549 for noninferiority). The 30-day rates of new permanent pacemaker implantation were 10.5% in the ACURATE neo group and 18.0% in the CoreValve Evolut group (absolute risk difference, -7.5% [95% CI, -12.4 to -2.60]; P=0.0027). No significant differences were observed in the components of the primary end point. Cardiac death at 30 days (2.8% versus 0.8%; P=0.03) and 1 year (8.4% versus 3.9%; P=0.01), and moderate or severe aortic regurgitation at 30 days (10% versus 3%; P=0.002) were significantly increased in the ACURATE neo group. CONCLUSIONS: Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the self-expanding ACURATE neo did not meet noninferiority compared with the self-expanding CoreValve Evolut in terms of all-cause death or stroke at 1 year, and it was associated with a lower incidence of new permanent pacemaker implantation. In secondary analyses, the ACURATE neo was associated with more moderate or severe aortic regurgitation at 30 days and cardiac death at 30 days and 1 year. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03192813.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Bioprosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Europe , Female , Hemodynamics , Humans , Male , Prosthesis Design , Recovery of Function , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Stroke/etiology , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock the use of mechanical circulatory support devices remains controversial and data from randomized clinical trials are very limited. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) - venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation - provides the strongest hemodynamic support in addition to oxygenation. However, despite increasing use it has not yet been properly investigated in randomized trials. Therefore, a prospective randomized adequately powered clinical trial is warranted. STUDY DESIGN: The ECLS-SHOCK trial is a 420-patient controlled, international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. It is designed to compare whether treatment with ECLS in addition to early revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or alternatively coronary artery bypass grafting and optimal medical treatment is beneficial in comparison to no-ECLS in patients with severe infarct-related cardiogenic shock. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of the two treatment arms. The primary efficacy endpoint of ECLS-SHOCK is 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures such as hemodynamic, laboratory, and clinical parameters will serve as surrogate endpoints for prognosis. Furthermore, a longer follow-up at 6 and 12 months will be performed including quality of life assessment. Safety endpoints include peripheral ischemic vascular complications, bleeding and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: The ECLS-SHOCK trial will address essential questions of efficacy and safety of ECLS in addition to early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Sample Size , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/mortalityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cerebral O2 saturation (ScO2 ) reflects cerebral perfusion and can be measured noninvasively by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). OBJECTIVES: In this pilot study, we describe the dynamics of ScO2 during TAVI in nonventilated patients and its impact on procedural outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured ScO2 of both frontal lobes continuously by NIRS in 50 consecutive analgo-sedated patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI (female 58%, mean age 80.8 years). Compared to baseline ScO2 dropped significantly during RVP (59.3% vs. 53.9%, p < .01). Five minutes after RVP ScO2 values normalized (post RVP 62.6% vs. 53.9% during RVP, p < .01; pre 61.6% vs. post RVP 62.6%, p = .53). Patients with an intraprocedural pathological ScO2 decline of >20% (n = 13) had higher EuroSCORE II (3.42% vs. 5.7%, p = .020) and experienced more often delirium (24% vs. 62%, p = .015) and stroke (0% vs. 23%, p < .01) after TAVI. Multivariable logistic regression revealed higher age and large ScO2 drops as independent risk factors for delirium. CONCLUSIONS: During RVP ScO2 significantly declined compared to baseline. A ScO2 decline of >20% is associated with a higher incidence of delirium and stroke and a valid cut-off value to screen for these complications. NIRS measurement during TAVI procedure may be an easy to implement diagnostic tool to detect patients at high risks for cerebrovascular complications and delirium.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Female , Humans , Pilot Projects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
AIMS: Clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), defined as the presence of an expanded somatic blood cell clone without other haematological abnormalities, was recently shown to increase with age and is associated with coronary artery disease and calcification. The most commonly mutated CHIP genes, DNMT3A and TET2, were shown to regulate inflammatory potential of circulating leucocytes. The incidence of degenerative calcified aortic valve (AV) stenosis increases with age and correlates with chronic inflammation. We assessed the incidence of CHIP and its association with inflammatory blood cell phenotypes in patients with AV stenosis undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Targeted amplicon sequencing for DNMT3A and TET2 was performed in 279 patients with severe AV stenosis undergoing TAVI. Somatic DNMT3A- or TET2-CHIP-driver mutations with a VAF ≥ 2% were detected in 93 out of 279 patients (33.3%), with an age-dependent increase in the incidence from 25% (55-69 years) to 52.9% (90-100 years). Patients with DNMT3A- or TET2-CHIP-driver mutations did not differ from patients without such mutations in clinical parameters, concomitant atherosclerotic disease, blood cell counts, inflammatory markers, or procedural characteristics. However, patients with DNMT3A- or TET2-CHIP-driver mutations had a profoundly increased medium-term all-cause mortality following successful TAVI. Differential myeloid and T-cell distributions revealed pro-inflammatory T-cell polarization in DNMT3A-mutation carriers and increased pro-inflammatory non-classical monocytes in TET2-mutation carriers. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to show that acquired somatic mutations in the most commonly mutated CHIP-driver genes occur frequently in patients with severe degenerative AV stenosis, are associated with increased pro-inflammatory leucocyte subsets, and confer a profound increase in mortality following successful TAVI.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Calcinosis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/genetics , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Clonal Hematopoiesis , Humans , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: We tested if a novel combination of predictors could improve the accuracy of outcome prediction after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Materials and Methods: This prospective study recruited 169 participants (49% female; median age 81 years). The primary endpoint was midterm mortality; secondary endpoints were acute Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 complication rate and post-TAVI in-hospital length of stay (LoS). EuroSCORE II (ESII), comorbidities (e.g., coronary artery disease), eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate; based on cystatin C), hemoglobin, creatinine, N-Terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP) levels and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs, namely EuroQol-5-Dimension-5-Levels, EQ5D5L; Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, KCCQ; clinical frailty scale, CFS) at baseline were tested as predictors. Regression (uni- and multi-variate Cox; linear; binary logistic) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-curve analysis were applied. Results: Within a median follow-up of 439 (318-585) days, 12 participants died (7.1%). Independent predictors of mortality using multivariate Cox regression were baseline eGFR (p = 0.001) and KCCQ (p = 0.037). Based on these predictors, a Linear Prediction Score (LPS1) was calculated. The LPS1-area under the curve (AUC)-value (0.761) was significantly higher than the ESII-AUC value (0.597; p = 0.035). Independent predictors for LoS > 6 days (the median LoS) were eGFR (p = 0.028), NTproBNP (p = 0.034), and EQ5D5L values (p = 0.002); a respective calculated LPS2 provided an AUC value of 0.677 (p < 0.001). Eighty participants (47.3%) experienced complications. Male sex predicted complications only in the univariate analysis. Conclusions: The combination of KCCQ and eGFR can better predict midterm mortality than ES II alone. Combining eGFR, NTproBNP, and EQ5D5L can reliably predict LoS after TAVI. This novel method improves personalized TAVI risk stratification and hence may help reduce post-TAVI risk.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Length of Stay , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Limited data suggest that transcatheter (TAVR) as compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) may be more effective in female than male patients. To date, most evidence is derived from subgroup analyses of large trials, and a dedicated randomized trial evaluating whether there is a difference in outcomes between these interventions in women is warranted. The RHEIA trial will compare the safety and efficacy of TAVR with SAVR in women with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis requiring aortic valve intervention, irrespective of surgical risk. METHODS/DESIGN: The RHEIA trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled study that will enroll up to 440 patients across 35 sites in Europe. Women with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, with any but prohibitive surgical risk status, will be randomized 1:1 to undergo aortic valve intervention with either transfemoral TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 or SAPIEN 3 Ultra device or SAVR and followed up for 1 year. The objective is to determine whether TAVR is non-inferior to SAVR in this patient population and, if this is fulfilled whether TAVR is actually superior to SAVR. The primary safety/efficacy endpoint is a composite of all-cause mortality, all stroke, and re-hospitalization (for valve or procedure-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure) at 1 year post-procedure. Other outcomes (assessed at 30 days and/or 1 year) include all-cause mortality; bleeding, vascular, cardiac, cerebrovascular and renal complications; aortic valve prosthesis and left ventricular function; cognitive function, health status, and quality of life. DISCUSSION: The RHEIA study has been designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAVR compared with SAVR specifically in women with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, irrespective of the level of surgical risk. The results will be the first to provide specific randomized evidence to guide treatment selection in female patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04160130.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Aortic Valve , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Postoperative Complications , Quality of Life , Risk Adjustment/methods , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/psychology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Female , Health Status , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis/classification , Humans , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/psychology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methodsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The treatment of aortic stenosis has been revolutionized by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), but the experience in patients with liver disease is limited. To address this open question, we report the outcome of patients with liver disease undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), transapical (TA), and transfemoral (TF) TAVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 2004 and August 2016, 4,394 patients received aortic valve replacement at our institution. We identified 85 patients (mean follow-up 504 ± 733 days, age 73.4 ± 9.2 years, 44.7% female) with preexisting liver disease (median model of end-stage liver disease score 11, MELD-Na), who underwent TF-TAVR (n = 30), TA-TAVR (n = 13), or SAVR (n = 42). Baseline Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) and of Mortality and Morbidity (STS-PROMM) were the lowest in SAVR patients (related to TF- and TA-TAVR, both p < 0.01). Operative mortality (18.8%) was high, but no procedure showed superior short-term outcome. Need for renal replacement therapy (31.5% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.046) and reoperation occurred more frequently after SAVR than after TF-TAVR (26.6% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.021). Moreover, TF-TAVR patients had superior long-term survival compared to SAVR (log-rank test p = 0.048 and Cox regression adjusted for MELD and STS-PROM, p = 0.01, HR 0.25, CI95 0.09-0.71). Baseline MELD-Na (p = 0.013) and STS PROMM (p = 0.01) were predictors for operative mortality (ROC-analysis). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate increased perioperative risks for patients with liver disease undergoing AVR, but favorable long-term survival after TF-TAVR compared to SAVR. For baseline risk, stratification in patients with liver disease undergoing AVR, MELD-Na and STS-PROMM are valuable predictors.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Catheterization, Peripheral , Femoral Artery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Liver Diseases/complications , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral/mortality , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Humans , Liver Diseases/diagnosis , Liver Diseases/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) results in a short-term decrease in left atrium (LA) size and whether such decrease may predict patients' clinical outcome. BACKGROUND: Increased LA size is a hallmark of severe aortic stenosis (AS) and is associated with adverse patients' cardiovascular outcome. Whether TAVR may lead to a decrease in LA size is not known. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hundred and four patients with severe symptomatic AS and dilated LA undergoing TAVR were enrolled. LA volume was assessed by echocardiography before and shortly after TAVR (median time: 7 days). Composite rate of death and hospitalization for acutely decompensated heart failure (HF) was recorded and clinical status was assessed through NYHA-class evaluation at 12 months median follow-up. After TAVR, 49 patients (47%) demonstrated a decrease in LA volume. Despite a similar baseline NYHA class, patients with decrease in LA size had significant better improvement in clinical status respect to patients with unvaried LA size (NYHA post: 1.2 ± 0.6 vs. 1.8 ± 1.1, p = .001; NYHA reduction: -1.6 ± 0.9 vs. -0.9 ± 1.0, p = .002, respectively). Moreover, these patients had a significantly reduced rate of death or HF-hospitalization (4 vs. 29%, p = .001) and a significantly longer event-free-survival from Kaplan-Meier curves (p = .003). COX regression analysis showed that, among echocardiographic parameters, decrease in LA size was an independent predictor of clinical outcome (HR: 0.149, CI: 0.034-0.654, p = .012). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of decrease in LA size shortly after TAVR is associated with significantly higher rates of death and HF-hospitalization, as well as with impaired improvement in clinical status during long-term follow-up.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Atrial Function, Left , Atrial Remodeling , Heart Atria/physiopathology , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Female , Functional Status , Heart Atria/diagnostic imaging , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Humans , Male , Patient Readmission , Progression-Free Survival , Prospective Studies , Registries , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortalityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the value of post/preprocedural aortic regurgitation index (ARI) ratio as a marker for more-than-mild aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and as an indication of the need for corrective measures, provided that the implantation depth was acceptable. BACKGROUND: Post/preprocedural ARI increases accuracy of residual AR assessment by considering hemodynamic status prior to TAVR. METHODS: ARI ratio was calculated in 70 patients undergoing TAVR. ARI ratios were defined as post/preprocedural ARI (ARI ratio 1), and as postcorrective measure/preprocedural ARI (ARI ratio 2). Intraprocedurally, corrective measures use was decided based on angiographically assessed AR severity. The relationship of such decisions to ARI ratios based on a recently proposed threshold (ARI ratio < 0.6) was evaluated. ARI ratios in corrected versus noncorrected patients and precorrection versus postcorrection values were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, mean (±SD) ARI ratio 1 (n = 70) was 0.81 (±0.36). Corrective measures were used in 22 patients (31.4%). Mean ARI ratio 1 in such patients was 0.55 (±0.25) versus 0.93 (±0.34) in the 48 noncorrected patients (P < 0.0001). Mean ARI ratio 1 in 21 patients requiring postdilation was 0.56 (±0.25), which was below the previously suggested 0.6 threshold. After postdilation, ARI ratio 2 increased to 0.85 (±0.16) (P < 0.0001), with all patients showing an ARI ratio 2 ≥ 0.6. CONCLUSIONS: ARI ratio is closely related to intraprocedural decisions to perform corrective measures based on angiography. Routine use of intraprocedural ARI ratio could be useful as a complementary quantitative marker for residual AR and for the need for corrective measures.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Hemodynamics , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/therapy , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Observer Variation , Predictive Value of Tests , Prosthesis Design , Recovery of Function , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is currently recommended for patients with severe aortic stenosis at intermediate or high surgical risk. The decision process during TAVI evaluation includes a thorough benefit-risk assessment, and knowledge about long-term benefits and outcomes may improve patients' expectation management. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patients' perceived health status and self-reported long-term outcome more than 5 years after TAVI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Demographic and procedure data were obtained from all patients treated with TAVI at our institution from 2006 to 2012. A cross-sectional survey was conducted on the patients alive, measuring health status, including the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, and clinical outcomes. 103 patients (22.8%) were alive at a median follow-up period of 7 years (5.4-9.8). 99 (96%) of the 103 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean age at follow-up was 86.5 years ± 8.0 years, and 56.6% were female. Almost all patients (93.9%) described an improvement of their quality of life after receiving TAVI. At late follow-up, the mean utility index and EQ-VAS score were 0.80 ± 0.20 and 58.49 ± 11.49, respectively. Mobility was found to be the most frequently reported limitation (85.4%), while anxiety/depression was the least frequently reported limitation (19.8%). With respect to functional class, 64.7% were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV, compared to 67.0% prior to TAVI (p=0.51). Self-reported long-term outcomes revealed mainly low long-term complication rates. 74 total hospitalizations were reported after TAVI, and among those 43% for cardiovascular reasons. Within cardiovascular rehospitalizations, new pacemaker implantations were the most frequently reported (18.9%), followed by cardiac decompensation and coronary heart disease (15.6%). CONCLUSION: The majority of the patients described an improvement of health status after TAVI. More than five years after TAVI, the patients' perceived health status was satisfactory, and the incidence of clinical events and hospitalizations was very low.
Subject(s)
Health Status , Quality of Life , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Mobility LimitationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The association between cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and the risk of coronary events is widely acknowledged. Whether individual risk factors may be associated with distinct plaque characteristics is currently unclear. We investigated the relationship between CVRF and coronary plaque burden and phenotype.MethodsâandâResults:We assessed coronary atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by optical coherence tomography in 67 patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing coronary angiography. The plaque burden and the distinct plaque phenotypes were compared with regard to different CVRF. Overall plaque burden was significantly greater in patients with diabetes mellitus (P=0.010), prediabetes (P=0.035) and obesity (P=0.024), and correlated with the number of CVRF (R=0.358, P=0.003). Patients with diabetes had a greater extent of fibroatheroma (P=0.015), calcific fibroatheroma (P=0.031), thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA-P=0.011) and plaque erosion (P=0.002). Obese patients showed a greater extent of fibroatheroma (P=0.007), TCFA (P=0.015) and macrophage load (P=0.043). The number of CVRF correlated with fibroatheroma (R=0.425, P<0.001), calcific fibroatheroma (R=0.321, P=0.008), TCFA (R=0.347, P=0.004), macrophage load (R=0.314, P=0.010) and erosion (R=0.271, P=0.029). In the multivariate analysis, altered glycemic status and obesity were the only independent predictors of TCFA (P=0.026 and P=0.046, respectively), whereas altered glycemic status was the only independent predictor of plaque erosion (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes, prediabetes and obesity show more extensive coronary atherosclerosis and more vulnerable plaque phenotypes.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Diabetes Complications/diagnostic imaging , Obesity , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Prediabetic State , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Aged , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/complications , Obesity/diagnostic imaging , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/diagnostic imaging , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/etiology , Prediabetic State/complications , Prediabetic State/diagnostic imaging , RegistriesABSTRACT
Parachute mitral valve (PMV) is a congenital heart anomaly which consists of a unifocal attachment of the mitral valve chordae into a single or dominant papillary muscle. This morphological anomaly determines the impairment of mitral leaflet motion, resulting in different grades of mitral stenosis. Due to its frequent association with other congenital cardiac defects requiring surgical correction, the therapy of a relevant stenotic PMV is usually represented by surgical commissurotomy. Herein is reported the case of a PMV treated by surgery in infancy, which showed a severe restenosis after 34 years and was successfully treated by percutaneous valvuloplasty with the additional creation of a restrictive atrial communication.
Subject(s)
Heart Defects, Congenital/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty/instrumentation , Mitral Valve Stenosis/surgery , Mitral Valve/surgery , Adult , Balloon Valvuloplasty , Echocardiography, Doppler , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Female , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Heart Defects, Congenital/physiopathology , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Humans , Mitral Valve/abnormalities , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve/physiopathology , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty/adverse effects , Mitral Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Prosthesis Design , Recovery of Function , Recurrence , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of the patients still die or have to be rehospitalized during the first year after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This emphasizes the need for more strategic patient selection. The aim of this prospective observational cohort study was to compare the prognostic value of risk scores and circulating biomarkers to predict all-cause mortality and rehospitalization in patients undergoing TAVR. METHODS: We calculated the hazard ratios and C-statistics (area under the curve [AUC]) of 4 risk scores (logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation [EuroSCORE], EuroSCORE II, Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality, and German aortic valve score) and 5 biomarkers of inflammation and/or myocardial dysfunction (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) for the risk of death (n = 80) and the combination of death or rehospitalization (n = 132) during the first year after TAVR in 310 consecutive TAVR patients. RESULTS: The EuroSCORE II and GDF-15 had the strongest predictive value for 1-year mortality (EuroSCORE II, AUC 0.711; GDF-15, AUC 0.686) and for the composite end point (EuroSCORE II, AUC 0.690; GDF-15, AUC 0.682). When added to the logistic EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II, GDF-15 enhanced the prognostic performance of the score and enabled substantial reclassification of patients. Combinations of increasing tertiles of the logistic EuroSCORE or EuroSCORE II and GDF-15 allowed the stratification of the patients into subgroups with mortality rates ranging from 4.0% to 49.1% and death/rehospitalization rates ranging from 15.3% to 68.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified GDF-15 in addition to the logistic EuroSCORE and the EuroSCORE II as the most promising predictors of a poor outcome after TAVR.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Biomarkers/blood , Patient Readmission/trends , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Risk Assessment , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Cause of Death/trends , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Purpose To examine the clinical feasibility of workstation-based CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) for coronary artery disease (CAD) evaluation during preprocedural planning in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Materials and Methods In this retrospective single-center study, 434 patients scheduled for TAVR between 2018 and 2020 were screened for study inclusion; a relevant proportion of patients (35.0% [152 of 434]) was not suitable for evaluation due to insufficient imaging properties. A total of 112 patients (mean age, 82.1 years ± 6.7 [SD]; 58 [52%] men) were included in the study. Invasive angiography findings, coronary CT angiography results, and Agatston score were acquired and compared with on-site CT-FFR computation for evaluation of CAD and prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within a 24-month follow-up. Results Hemodynamic relevant CAD, as suggested by CT-FFR of 0.80 or less, was found in 41 of 70 (59%) patients with stenosis of 50% or more. MACE occurred in 23 of 112 (20.5%) patients, from which 14 of 23 had stenoses with CT-FFR of 0.80 or less (hazard ratio [HR], 3.33; 95% CI: 1.56, 7.10; P = .002). CT-FFR remained a significant predictor of MACE after inclusion in a multivariable model with relevant covariables (HR, 2.89; 95% CI: 1.22, 6.86; P = .02). An Agatston score of 1000 Agatston units or more (HR, 2.25; 95% CI: 0.98, 5.21; P = .06) and stenoses of 50% or more determined via invasive angiography (HR, 0.94; 95% CI: 0.41, 2.17; P = .88) were not significant predictors of MACE. Conclusion Compared with conventional CAD markers, CT-FFR better predicted adverse outcomes after TAVR. A relevant portion of the screened cohort, however, was not suitable for CT-based CAD evaluation. Keywords: CT, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation/Replacement (TAVI/TAVR), Cardiac, Coronary Arteries, Outcomes Analysis © RSNA, 2024 See also the commentary by Weir-McCall and Pugliese in this issue.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Male , Humans , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Constriction, Pathologic , Retrospective Studies , Coronary AngiographyABSTRACT
Background: The CONtrolled delivery For ImproveD outcomEs with cliNiCal Evidence registry was initiated to characterize the clinical safety and device performance from experienced transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) centers in Europe and Australia that use the Portico valve to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis. We herein report for the first time the valve performance at 30-day across all implanted valve sizes and the 1-year survival from this registry. Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm observational clinical investigation of patients clinically indicated for implantation of a Portico valve in experienced TAVI centers. Patients were treated with a commercially available valve (size 23, 25, 27, or 29 mm) using either the first-generation delivery system (DS) (n = 501) or the second-generation (FlexNav) DS (n = 500). Adverse events were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. Echocardiographic outcomes were assessed at 30 days by an independent core laboratory, and a survival check was performed at 1 year. Results: We enrolled 1001 patients (82.0 years, 62.5% female, 63.7% New York Heart Association functional class III/IV at baseline) from 27 clinical sites in 8 countries across Europe and one site in Australia. Implantation of a single valve was successful in 97.5% of subjects. Valve hemodynamics at 30 days were substantially improved relative to baseline, with large aortic valve areas and low mean gradients across all implanted valve sizes (aortic valve areas were 1.7 ± 0.4, 1.7 ± 0.5, 1.8 ± 0.5, and 2.0 ± 0.5 cm2, and mean gradients were 7.0 ± 2.7, 7.5 ± 4.7, 7.3 ± 3.3, and 6.4 ± 3.3 mmHg for 23, 25, 27, and 29 mm valve sizes, respectively). Across all implanted valve sizes, most patients (77.1%) had no patient-prosthesis mismatch. Death from any cause within 1 year occurred in 13.7% of the patients in the first-generation DS group as compared with 11.0% in the second-generation DS group (p = 0.2). Conclusions: The Portico valve demonstrated excellent hemodynamic performance across all valve sizes in a large cohort of subjects implanted in experienced TAVI centers. One-year survival rates were favorable when using both the first-generation and second-generation (FlexNav) DSs in this high-risk cohort. ClinicalTrialsgov Identifier: NCT03752866.