Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 81
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Ann Surg ; 279(6): 915-917, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38407277

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic forced a wide range of medical practices to virtual formats, including the preoperative informed consent practice. However, virtual informed consent persists despite the pandemic being largely considered resolved. The continued use of virtual formats relies on a problematic "information transfer" model of informed consent. We suggest a "trust-building" model of consent as a better conceptualization of what is occurring during the consent process. Highlighting how virtual formats might fail to fulfill this fuller understanding of consent on both interpersonal and systemic levels, we offer an ethical structure for physicians to navigate this novel virtual space.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Informed Consent , Trust , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Surgical Procedures, Operative/ethics
2.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(4): 1052-1056, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38349348

ABSTRACT

The hardware utilized for rigid internal fixation of the craniofacial skeleton has evolved over time. Thus, the reasons for the unplanned removal of hardware continue to change. The purpose of this study is to compare past (1989-1995) and present (2000-2020) patient cohorts to establish trends related to unplanned removal of craniofacial hardware. A retrospective review study was designed. Data from our institution's original publication describing the unplanned removal of craniofacial hardware (1989-1995) was obtained. Data related to patients who underwent unplanned removal of hardware from 2000 to 2020 was collected from the electronic medical record. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed to compare demographics, reasons for hardware placement, and reasons for unplanned hardware removal between cohorts. This study includes 55 patients treated from 1989 to 1995 and 184 patients treated from 2000 to 2020. The average age at hardware placement decreased from 32 years (1989-1995) to 28 years (2000-2020). The most common reason for hardware placement changed from motor vehicle accident (1989-1995) to congenital deformity (2000-2020). The length of time with hardware in situ increased from 13 months (1989-1995) to 25 months (2000-2020). The most common reason for hardware removal changed from prominent hardware (1989-1995) to hardware exposure (2000-2020). In summary, patients who underwent rigid internal fixation of the craniofacial skeleton from 2000 to 2020 retained their hardware 2 times longer than patients treated from 1989 to 1995. Factors potentially contributing to increased retention include improved surgical technique, decreased profile of hardware, and increased surgeon experience. Further studies are warranted to define preoperative risk factors for unplanned hardware removal.


Subject(s)
Device Removal , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Adult , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Adolescent , Middle Aged , Child , Internal Fixators , Child, Preschool , Young Adult , Facial Bones/surgery
3.
Ann Plast Surg ; 86(1): 58-61, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32349084

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Repair of the soft tissue defect in myelomeningoceles remains challenging. The literature currently lacks a systematic approach, reporting high rates of complications. We present outcomes from the largest series to date and describe a simplified approach that minimizes morbidity and streamlines decision making. METHODS: Patients 1 year or younger who underwent myelomeningocele repair between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed. Flap types were categorized by tissue composition. Complications were dichotomized into early and late (<30 days and >30 days postoperative, respectively). Logistic regression was used to measure the impact of flap tissue composition and skin closure technique on odds of postoperative complications. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Reoperation was required in only 3 (3.0%) patients-1 for wound dehiscence and 2 for surgical site infections. Zero cases of tethered cord or cerebrospinal fluid leak occurred. The most common minor complications were early wound complications (n = 18, 18.6%) and early infection (n = 5, 5.2%). Fascia-only flaps and muscle + other tissue flaps were not associated with higher odds of complications compared with muscle-only flaps (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-8.50, P = 0.29; OR = 2.87, 95% CI 0.66-12.51, P = 0.16, respectively). Rhomboid flaps for skin closure were associated with higher odds of complications (OR, 4.47; 95% CI, 1.00-19.97; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our approach to myelomeningocele repair demonstrated no cases of secondary tethered cord or cerebrospinal fluid leak, and reoperative rates were extremely low. Because complications were unrelated to flap type, we recommend a simplified approach using any tissue type for dural coverage and 2-layer primary closure of the skin.


Subject(s)
Meningomyelocele , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Fascia , Humans , Meningomyelocele/surgery , Reoperation , Surgical Flaps
4.
Ann Plast Surg ; 87(5): 569-574, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33587463

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In patients with craniosynostosis, imaging remains up to the discretion of the plastic surgeon or neurosurgeon. To inform best practice guidelines, we sought to obtain data surrounding the frequency at which craniofacial surgeons order computed tomography (CT), as well as indications. We hypothesized that we would identify considerable variation in both imaging and associated indications. METHODS: We surveyed members of the American Society of Maxillofacial Surgeons and the American Society of Craniofacial Surgeons to measure the frequency of preoperative and postoperative head CTs, as well as indications. Initial items were piloted with 2 craniofacial surgeons and 1 neurosurgeon, using interviews to ensure content validity. χ2 Tests were used to measure associations between operative volume, years in practice, and imaging. RESULTS: Eighty-five craniofacial surgeons responded (13.8% response rate), with the majority (63.5%) having performed a craniosynostosis operation in the last month. Only 9.4% of surgeons never order preoperative CTs. Of those who do, the most common indications included diagnosis confirmation (31.2%) and preoperative planning (27.3%). About 25% of surgeons always obtain postoperative head CTs, usually to evaluate surgical outcomes (46.7%). Only 13.3% of respondents order 2 or more postoperative scans. Higher operative volume was associated with a lower likelihood of ordering preoperative head CTs (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of surgeons obtain preoperative head CTs, whereas only 25% obtain CTs postoperatively, often to evaluate outcomes. Because outcomes may be evaluated clinically, this is a poor use of resources and exposes children to radiation. Consensus guidelines are needed to create best practices and limit unnecessary studies.


Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses , Surgeons , Child , Craniosynostoses/diagnostic imaging , Craniosynostoses/surgery , Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , United States
5.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(1): 46-50, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32833840

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Craniofacial anomalies are congenital disorders that affect the cranium and facial bones, with cleft lip and palate being the most common. These anomalies are often associated with abnormal development of pharyngeal arches and can result in the development of class III malocclusion and severe maxillary retrusion. Current treatment includes orthodontic decompensation and Le Fort I osteotomy to correct the maxillomandibular relationship. However, the traditional Le Fort I (LFI) advancement does not fully address the lack of skeletal volume in the midface. The high winged Le Fort I osteotomy (HWLFI) is an excellent surgical option for simultaneous correction of the midface deficiency and malocclusion while restoring optimal esthetic convexity. A retrospective chart review was conducted to include all cleft and craniofacial patients who underwent HWLFI advancement from 2002 to 2018. Patients had a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Patient data and complications were reviewed. Standardized facial photographs were analyzed for esthetic improvement, occlusion, and beneficial salutary effects on the midface. Forty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at surgery was 18.9 years. The mean follow-up was 32 months. Early complications included infection (9.3%) and temporary nerve paresthesia (2.3%). Late complications included infection (6.5%), wound dehiscence (4.3%), and painful hardware (2.3%). One patient (2.3 percent) had clinically significant relapse that required surgery. Postoperatively, patients demonstrated excellent midface projection and correction of the skeletal malocclusion. The HWLFI advancement significantly improves both the malocclusion and esthetic concerns of cleft and craniofacial patients by reestablishing maximal midfacial support. Important advantages of the HWLFI are avoidance of alloplastic implant use and extensive and potentially unstable surgical procedures that increase orbital volume.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Cephalometry , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/surgery , Esthetics, Dental , Humans , Maxilla , Osteotomy, Le Fort , Retrospective Studies
6.
J Clin Ethics ; 32(2): 165-172, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34129532

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Despite the need for trained physician ethicists, fellowships in clinical ethics are limited and primarily offered to those who have completed a graduate degree. The standardization of credentialing for clinical ethics consultants (CECs) and the restructuring of undergraduate medical education allow innovative models to train CECs that can provide an expanded opportunity for formal ethics training at an earlier stage. METHODS: At the University of Michigan Medical School we developed, implemented, and evaluated a pre-doctoral clinical ethics fellowship program from 2017 to 2019 for senior medical students, designed to meet established competencies for CECs. Consultation notes from the beginning and end of the fellowship program were randomly selected for each fellow and independently rated by two faculty ethicists who used the validated Ethics Consultation Quality Assessment Tool (ECQAT). Inter rater reliability and trends in scores over time were calculated. RESULTS: Three students successfully completed the fellowship at the University of Michigan Medical School, conducted at least 50 formal ethics consultations, and spent approximately 40 hours a week on service for a minimum of six months. All students finished the fellowship with teaching and policy development experience, first-authored peer-reviewed manuscripts, and national presentations. The fellows demonstrated improvement in their ECQAT overall holistic rating score; all ended their fellowship with a holistic score of adequate or above. There was 92 percent agreement between raters with respect to the acceptability of the fellows' ethics consult notes. Two fellows have taken and passed the Healthcare Ethics Consultant-Certification (HEC-C) exam offered by the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH). CONCLUSIONS: Integration of a pre-doctoral fellowship model that meets professional certification standards for clinical ethics consultation creates an opportunity for medical students to become trained CECs early in their career.


Subject(s)
Physicians , Students, Medical , Ethics, Clinical , Fellowships and Scholarships , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , United States
7.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(11): 1810-1816, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32958379

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate endovascular treatment of head and neck arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) based on the Yakes AVM classification and correlate treatment approach with clinical and angiographic outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was performed in patients who underwent endovascular treatment of head and neck AVMs between January 2005 and December 2017. Clinical and operative records, imaging, and postoperative courses of patients were reviewed. Clinical stage was determined according to the Schobinger classification. AVM architecture and treatment approaches were determined according to the Yakes classification. Primary outcomes were clinical and angiographic treatment success rates and complication rates, with analysis according to the Yakes classification. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients (15 females) were identified, with a mean age of 30.6 years. Downgrading of the Schobinger clinical classification was achieved in all patients. Lesions included 8 Yakes type IIa, 5 type IIb, 1 type IIIa and IIIb, and 14 type IV. Lesions were treated using an intra-arterial, nidal, or transvenous approach, using ethanol and liquid embolic agents. Arteriovenous shunt eradication of >90% was achieved in 22 of 28 patients (79%), including 9 of 13 (69%) of Yakes type IV lesions and 13 of 15 (87%) of the other types. There were 5 significant complications in 79 procedures (6%), including 4 of 50 (8%) in Yakes type IV lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Schobinger stage was downgraded in all patients. Arteriovenous shunt eradication of >90% was achieved in most patients. Yakes type IV lesions required more sessions, and shunt eradication was higher in the Yakes II and III groups.


Subject(s)
Arteriovenous Malformations/therapy , Embolization, Therapeutic , Endovascular Procedures , Ethanol/administration & dosage , Head/blood supply , Neck/blood supply , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arteriovenous Malformations/classification , Arteriovenous Malformations/diagnostic imaging , Child , Child, Preschool , Embolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Embolization, Therapeutic/instrumentation , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Ethanol/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
8.
Transpl Int ; 33(3): 260-269, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31674693

ABSTRACT

The first uterus transplantation was performed in 2000. As key milestones are reached (long-lasting graft survival in 2011, and first birth from a transplanted womb in 2014), the ethical debate around uterus transplant evolves. We performed a systematic review of articles on uterus transplantation. Ethical themes were extracted and categorized according to four bioethical principles. Papers were divided into time periods separated by key events in uterus transplant history: Phase I (first technical achievement, 2002-2011), Phase II (clinical achievement, 2012-2014), and Phase III (after the first childbirth, 2015-2018). Eighty-one articles were included. The majority of ethics papers were published in Phase III (65%, P < 0.0001), that is after the first birth. Eighty percent of papers discussed nonmaleficence making it the most discussed principle. The first birth acted as a pivotal point: nonmaleficence was discussed by a lower proportion of articles (P = 0.0073), as was beneficence (P = 0.0309). However, discussion of justice increased to become the most discussed principle of the time period (P = 0.0085). The ethical debate surrounding uterus transplantation has evolved around landmark events that signify scientific progress. As safety and efficacy become evident, the focus of ethical debate shifts from clinical equipoise to socioeconomic challenges and equitable access to uterus transplantation.


Subject(s)
Social Justice , Uterus , Beneficence , Ethics, Medical , Female , Humans , Uterus/transplantation
9.
J Craniofac Surg ; 31(8): 2139-2143, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33136843

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although shared decision-making is essential to patient-centered healthcare, its role in pediatric plastic surgery remains unclear. The objective of this study was to define the preferred level of involvement in surgical decision-making among children, caregivers, and surgeons. METHODS: The authors surveyed pediatric plastic surgery patients (n = 100) and their caregivers regarding their preferences on child involvement during surgical decision-making. Fleiss' kappa was used to assess agreement between groups. Bivariate Chi-square tests and multinomial logistic regression were used to assess the relationship between decision-making preferences and select demographic factors. RESULTS: Only 34% of children and their caregivers agreed upon their decision-making preferences (k = 0.04). The majority of children (40%) and caregivers (67%) favored shared decision-making between the patient, caregiver, and surgeon. Only 16% of children preferred physician-driven decisions, while 20% of children desired complete autonomy. Children's preferences were significantly associated with their age; the relative risk of children deferring to caregivers or surgeons over a shared approach was lower for adolescents and teens compared to children under 10 years old (relative risk = 0.20; 95% confidence interval: 0.054-0.751; P = 0.02). Caregiver's preferences did not change based on the child's age, but rather were related to the child's gender. Caregivers were more likely to choose the option that gave the child more autonomy when the child was male. CONCLUSIONS: While most caregivers preferred a shared approach to decision-making, children desired greater autonomy, particularly with increasing age. Since there was limited agreement between caregivers and children, surgeons must be cognizant of differing preferences when discussing treatment plans to optimize both patient and parent satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Surgery, Plastic , Adolescent , Caregivers , Child , Clinical Decision-Making , Female , Humans , Male , Parents , Surgeons , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
J Craniofac Surg ; 31(6): 1608-1612, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32371692

ABSTRACT

Facial differences associated with cleft lips are often stigmatizing and can negatively impact psychosocial development and quality of life. However, little is known regarding patients' responses to societal expectations of appearance, or how these responses may impact utilization of revision surgery. Thus, patients with cleft lips at least 8 years of age (n = 31) were purposively sampled for semi-structured interviews. After verbatim transcription, first cycle coding proceeded with a semantic approach, which revealed patterns that warranted second cycle coding. The authors utilized an eclectic coding design to capture deeper meanings in thematic analysis. Additionally, survey data from a separate study were examined to evaluate participants' interest in improving appearance. Three major themes emerged, all of which reflected a desire to "save face" when interacting with society: (1) Cultural Mantras, which included societal mottos that minimized the importance of appearance; (2) Toughening Up, wherein the participants downplayed the difficulty of having a cleft; and (3) Deflection, wherein the participants took pride in facial features unrelated to their clefts. Despite these efforts to "save face," 78% of participants expressed interest in improving their appearance in the separate survey data.In conclusion, children with cleft lips try to "save face" when interacting with society by depreciating appearance, making light of clefts, and focusing on non-cleft related features. Paradoxically, many desired improvements of their appearance in an earlier survey. Awareness of these coping strategies is critical, as they may negatively impact surgeon-patient communication and inhibit patients from expressing interest in revision surgery.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip/surgery , Face/surgery , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adaptation, Psychological , Adolescent , Child , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Male , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Reoperation , Social Stigma , Young Adult
11.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 57(3): 288-295, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31648534

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Routine postoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis remains controversial due to the hazards of radiation exposure. The extent to which postoperative head CTs are performed remains unknown. Therefore, we sought to measure the use of postoperative CTs in this population. DESIGN: The authors reviewed insurance claims from OptumInsight, using Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify procedures and postoperative imaging. Multilevel logistic regression was used to describe the odds of undergoing postoperative CTs, adjusting for patient and provider covariates. PARTICIPANTS: Craniosynostosis patients who underwent reconstruction between 2001 and 2017 were reviewed. Patients older than 5 years at surgery, postoperative lengths of stay >15 days, syndromic diagnoses, operative complications within 30 days of surgery, and cranial bone grafting merited exclusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Odds of postoperative head CTs after cranial vault reconstruction. RESULTS: In this cohort (n = 1150), 326 (28.4%) patients underwent postoperative head CTs. The number of CTs ranged from 0 to 14. Older age at surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 1.32, P = .002), increasing years of follow-up (OR: 1.12, P < .001), and increasing comorbidities (OR: 1.21, P = .017) were associated with postoperative CTs. After adjusting for patient factors, provider factors accounted for 31.3% of variation in imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Over a quarter of patients underwent head CTs following reconstruction, and provider factors accounted for a large percentage of the variation. Given the risks of radiation, neurosurgeons and craniofacial surgeons face a critical need to establish postoperative imaging protocols to reduce unnecessary imaging in these vulnerable patients.


Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Aged , Humans , Infant , Insurance Claim Review , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies , Skull/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
12.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 57(2): 161-168, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31382774

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Preference-sensitive surgical decisions merit shared decision-making, as decision engagement can reduce decisional conflict and regret. Elective cleft-related procedures are often preference sensitive, and therefore, we sought to better understand decision-making in this population. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews were conducted to elicit qualitative data. A hierarchical codebook was developed through an iterative process in preparation for thematic analysis. Thematic analysis was performed to examine differences between patients and caregivers. SETTING: Multidisciplinary cleft clinic at a tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with cleft lip aged 8 and older (n = 31) and their caregivers (n = 31) were purposively sampled. Inability to converse in English, intellectual disability, or syndromic diagnoses resulted in exclusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preferences surrounding surgical decision-making identified during thematic analysis. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 12.7 (standard deviation: 3.1). Most had unilateral cleft lip and palate (43.8%). Three themes emerged: Insufficient Understanding of Facial Difference and Treatment, Diversity of Surgical Indications, and Barriers to Patient Autonomy. Almost half of caregivers believed their children understood their clefts, but most of these children failed to provide information about their cleft. Although many patients and caregivers acknowledged that surgery addressed function and/or appearance, patients and caregivers exhibited differences regarding the necessity of surgery. Furthermore, a large proportion of patients believed their opinions mattered in decisions, but less than half of caregivers agreed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with clefts desire to participate in surgical decisions but have limited understanding of their facial difference and surgical indications. Cleft surgeons must educate patients and facilitate shared decision-making.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Surgeons , Caregivers , Child , Humans
14.
J Craniofac Surg ; 30(2): 458-464, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30640851

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive approaches for the treatment of single-suture craniosynostosis are sometimes touted as equivalent to cranial vault reconstruction. While techniques for sagittal synostosis have been reviewed previously, evidence regarding open and less invasive surgical techniques for metopic, coronal, and lambdoid synostosis has yet to be reviewed. METHODS: Systematic searches were performed using Embase.com and PubMed. Included studies reported short- or long-term outcomes, compared at least 2 standard techniques, discussed single-suture coronal, metopic, or lambdoid craniosynostosis, and enrolled at least 20 study participants. Two authors screened titles and abstracts, and also performed full text review and data extraction. Given heterogeneous outcomes, qualitative synthesis was performed after data extraction. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 2348 articles. Of these, 313 were removed as duplicates, and 1935 were excluded during title/abstract review. After full text review of 100 articles, 19 were selected for data extraction. The heterogeneity of outcomes precluded meta-analysis and required qualitative synthesis. While short-term outcomes indicated decreased morbidity of minimally invasive techniques, only 2 articles presented long-term reoperation rates. One study reported higher reoperation rates in the less invasive technique, and the second reported no reoperations in the median follow-up period of 33 months. CONCLUSION: Studies comparing long-term outcomes between different surgical techniques for single-suture craniosynostosis remain deficient. The development of standardized outcome measures is essential, and prospective, multicenter studies are necessary to assess the long-term efficacy of these procedures.


Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses/surgery , Craniotomy , Comparative Effectiveness Research , Cranial Sutures/pathology , Cranial Sutures/surgery , Craniotomy/adverse effects , Craniotomy/methods , Humans , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology
15.
J Craniofac Surg ; 30(8): 2526-2529, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31609944

ABSTRACT

While many studies have examined potential risk factors for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, there have been no publications to date investigating the role of ethnicity in the United States. The current study was undertaken as the first multi-center investigation to examine the relationship between ethnicity and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis, looking at both overall prevalence as well as potential correlation between ethnicity and pattern of affected suture site. A chart review of patients diagnosed with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis treated at four major children's hospitals was performed to obtain ethnicity data. Analysis was preformed based on ethnic group as well as suture site affected. To account for potentialOne regional selection bias, the KID database (1997-2012) was utilized to identify all cases of craniosynostosis on a national level. This data was analyzed against birth rates by ethnicity obtained from CDC WONDER natality database.Amongst the 2112 cases of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis at all institutions, Caucasians and African Americans were consistently the predominant ethnic groups. There was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of affected suture type with African Americans more likely to present with unicoronal synostosis and Caucasians more likely to present with metopic synostosis (P = 0.005). The national data revealed that there were more cases of craniosynostosis in Caucasians and fewer in African Americans than expected when compared to population birth rates. Our findings demonstrate that the Caucasian race is associated with increased rates of synostosis.


Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses/epidemiology , Craniosynostoses/surgery , Ethnicity , Humans , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sutures , United States/epidemiology , White People
16.
J Craniofac Surg ; 30(2): 429-432, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30640849

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A longstanding dictum exists to avoid surgical manipulation of the temporalis muscle out of concern for an exceedingly high rate of muscle atrophy and recurrent temporal hollowing. The authors challenge this surgical myth, considering such advice to be erroneous. The authors hypothesize that elevation of the temporalis muscle, if performed using standard muscle flap principles, will demonstrate excellent results. METHODS: To assess temporalis response to surgical manipulation, the authors reviewed patients who underwent calvarial vault remodeling by the senior author for craniosynostosis between 1988 and 2011. Nonsyndromic patients with single-suture synostosis and 5 years of follow-up were eligible for inclusion. The medical record was used to measure rates of reoperation, recurrent temporal hollowing, and persistent temporalis overcorrection. RESULTS: Of the cohort reviewed, 196 patients met inclusion criteria. Ten patients (5.1%) exhibited recurrent bitemporal constriction. One patient (0.5%) underwent a revision temporalis turnover flap, and 2 patients (1.0%) underwent soft tissue augmentation. The overall reoperation rate was 1.5%. Temporalis overcorrection, in an attempt to prophylactically rectify the expected atrophy after temporalis manipulation, persisted in 11 patients (5.6%). Three of these patients required treatment with steroid injections, Botox injections, or operative muscle debulking. The overall reoperation rate for temporalis overcorrection was 1.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' low reoperation rates for recurrent deformity, in combination with persistent temporalis overcorrection in 5.6% of patients, should dispel the myth that manipulation of the temporalis invariably results in atrophy. The muscle may be surgically manipulated, as long as plastic surgery principles are followed.


Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses/surgery , Muscular Atrophy , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Postoperative Complications , Reoperation , Temporal Muscle , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscular Atrophy/etiology , Muscular Atrophy/surgery , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/pathology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Reoperation/methods , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Flaps/surgery , Temporal Muscle/pathology , Temporal Muscle/surgery
17.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 56(1): 7-14, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29715061

ABSTRACT

Facial photography presents a unique ethical dilemma, as faces are difficult to deidentify for publication. We performed a review of the literature to examine current guidelines for the publication of facial photographs. We also reviewed societies' websites, journal requirements, and ethical and legal aspects of confidentiality. Most articles emphasized the importance of consent for photography and publication. Masking is not appropriate, but some journals continue to allow masking. Most legislation allows patients to restrict the uses of photographs. In the end, it is imperative to protect patient privacy by obtaining consent for photograph publication after full disclosure of risks, and specific recommendations are provided regarding a comprehensive consent process.


Subject(s)
Confidentiality , Informed Consent , Publishing , Esthetics , Face , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Photography
18.
J Craniofac Surg ; 29(1): 56-61, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29068967

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A lasting correction of trigonocephaly is difficult to achieve, as a durable correction requires significant expansion to overcome galeal restriction and soft tissue recoil of the scalp. High rates of relapse have been reported throughout the literature. The specific aim of this study was to determine if the senior author's method of "hypercorrection" decreases relapse and the need for subsequent revisional surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent operative correction of metopic craniosynostosis between 1988 and 2011 were reviewed. All patients underwent the "hypercorrection" technique performed by the senior author. Hypercorrection consisted of a fronto-orbital advancement of 2.5 to 3.5 cm and a concomitant hyperexpansion of bitemporal projection. Split cranial bone grafting ensured adequate coverage of the significantly expanded cranial vault. Only patients who had at least 5 years of follow-up were included for review of outcomes. Relapse was defined as recurrence of bitemporal constriction or lateral orbital retrusion, requiring surgical correction. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients met criteria. Mean age at the time of surgery was 11 months. Mean follow-up was 9.0 years. During this time, 2 patients exhibited relapse requiring camouflage procedures. Cranial bone defects were found in 4 patients (7%), 3 of whom underwent cranial bone grafting, while 1 underwent methylmethacrylate placement at an outside institution. One patient underwent fat grafting for areas of soft tissue irregularity. No patients exhibited persistent sequelae of hypercorrection significant enough to require repeat fronto-orbital advancement. CONCLUSION: Surgical hypercorrection of trigonocephaly seems to minimize relapse and the need for revision in long-term follow-up and is therefore an important technique to consider.


Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Skull/surgery , Adipose Tissue/transplantation , Bone Transplantation , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Frontal Bone/surgery , Humans , Infant , Male , Methylmethacrylate , Orbit/surgery , Recurrence , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
19.
J Craniofac Surg ; 29(1): 36-39, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29040146

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The necessity of imaging for patients with craniosynostosis is controversial. Lambdoid synostosis is known to be associated with additional anomalies, but the role of imaging in this setting has not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative imaging on intraoperative and postoperative management among patients undergoing operative intervention for lambdoid craniosynostosis. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing cranial vault remodeling for lambdoid craniosynostosis between January 2006 and 2014 was conducted. Patient demographics, age at computed tomography scan, age at surgery, results of the radiologic evaluation, operative technique, and modification of the diagnosis following the radiologic studies were analyzed. A pediatric neuroradiology and the surgical team interpreted the radiographs. The primary outcome was change in intraoperative or postoperative management based on imaging results. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients were diagnosed with lambdoid synostosis. Of these patients, 81.8% had abnormalities on imaging relevant to operative planning. The most common anomalies were Chiari I malformation (45%) and venous anomalies of the posterior fossa (36%). Preoperative imaging altered the management of 9 (81.8%) patients. Closer follow-up was required for 6 patients (54%). Suboccipital decompression was performed in 4 patients (36%). Venous anomalies were found in 4 patients (36%). The diagnosis was changed from positional plagiocephaly to lambdoid synostosis in 2 patients (18%). CONCLUSIONS: Given the frequency and significance of radiographic abnormalities in the setting of lamboid synostosis, preoperative imaging should be considered during the operative planning phase as it can affect postoperative and intraoperative management.


Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Patient Care Planning , Preoperative Care/methods , Skull , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Arnold-Chiari Malformation/diagnosis , Child , Craniosynostoses/diagnosis , Craniosynostoses/surgery , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Postoperative Period , Retrospective Studies , Skull/diagnostic imaging , Skull/surgery
20.
J Craniofac Surg ; 29(7): 1697-1701, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30059422

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical care represents an important source of opioid prescribing and chronic use, but rates of prolonged opioid use following pediatric procedures remain unclear. The authors describe the rates and risk factors for new persistent opioid use in patients after common cleft operations. METHODS: The authors examined claims from the Truven Marketscan databases from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014. The authors included opioid-naive patients ages 8 to 25, who underwent 1 of 10 cleft-related procedures. Patients were considered opioid-naïve if they had no opioid prescription fills in the 11 months prior to the perioperative period. The authors obtained a random sample of age-matched, nonsurgical patients from the same dataset to be used as a control group. Included cleft patients had no procedural codes in the 6 months following surgery. All included patients filled an opioid prescription during the perioperative period, defined as 30 days before and 14 days after surgery. The primary outcome was new persistent opioid use, which is defined as continued opioid prescription fills between 90 and 180 days after the procedure. RESULTS: This cohort included 2039 cleft patients and 2100 control patients. The incidence of new persistent opioid use following surgery was 4.4% and 0.1% in the control group. Higher odds of opioid use 3 months beyond surgery were associated with distractor placement (OR 5.34, CI 2.00-14.24, P = 0.001). Increasing age (OR 1.11, CI 1.04-1.17, P = 0.001) and presence of a gastrointestinal comorbidity (OR 7.37, CI 1.49-36.54, P = 0.014) were also associated with new persistent use. CONCLUSIONS: New persistent opioid use occurs after cleft-related procedures and could lead to chronic use in children, adolescents, and young adults.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Cleft Palate/surgery , Opioid-Related Disorders/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Child , Databases, Factual , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL