ABSTRACT
The last international guidelines on HER2 determination in breast cancer have been updated in 2018 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists, on the basis of a twenty-year practice and results of numerous clinical trials. Moreover, the emerging HER2-low concept for 1+ and 2+ non amplified breast cancers lead to refine French practices for HER2 status assessment. The GEFPICS group, composed of expert pathologists, herein presents the latest French recommendations for HER2 status evaluation in breast cancer, taking into account the ASCO/CAP guidelines and introducing the HER2-low concept. In the era of personalized medicine, HER2 status assessment remains one of the most important biomarkers in breast cancer and its quality guaranties the optimal patients' care. French pathologists' commitment in theranostic biomarker quality is more than ever required to provide the most efficient cares in oncology.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Biomarkers, Tumor , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Receptor, ErbB-2/geneticsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Detection of genetic alterations in the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain is a major concern in the management of non-small cell lung cancer because it conditions access to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In practice, it is possible to characterize only well-documented mutations or to sequence all relevant EGFR exons and also other targets of theranostic interest. This prospective study compares the targeted EGFR characterization on Idylla platform (Biocartis) and a more extensive one by next generation sequencing using Ion Torrent technology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 100 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour samples were tested simultaneously by both techniques under the conditions recommended by the suppliers. The comparison covered all technical and practical aspects of the laboratory. RESULTS: At least one EGFR mutation of interest for tyrosine kinase inhibitors for 9 and 7 samples was detected respectively by sequencing and by the Idylla system. For three samples, EGFR sensitive mutations to tyrosine kinase inhibitors were detected only by next-generation sequencing. In addition, for 37 samples, mutations of clinical interest outside EGFR were characterized by sequencing and communicated to the prescriber. CONCLUSION: Idylla technology allows the rapid characterization of a majority of EGFR variants. The result can be optimized by careful analysis of the amplification curves with the Idylla Explore tool or by increasing the amount of initial material. A complementary new generation sequencing analysis for non-contributory results by Idylla should also be recommended.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , DNA Mutational Analysis , ErbB Receptors/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Mutation , Prospective Studies , TechnologyABSTRACT
Human olfactomedin-4 (OLFM4) is a secreted protein involved in a variety of cellular functions including proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and cell adhesion. OLFM4 expression has been studied in several tumor types including gastric, colorectal, lung, and endometrioid cancers where it has been suggested to be an independent favorable or unfavorable prognostic marker. For breast cancer, the clinical significance of OLFM4 is still unclear. In the present study, SWATH-MS is used as a tool for the robust identification and quantification of breast tissue proteins. SWATH-MS data show that OLFM4 expression is higher in DCIS than in invasive breast cancer. In-depth analysis of the breast tumor proteome show that OLFM4 is a favorable pronostic marker. Serum OLFM4 levels in peripheral blood are also analyzed by ELISA in 825 cases, including 94 cases of healthy individuals, 61 cases of non-invasive breast tumor (DCIS) and 670 cases of breast cancer (BC). It is found that serum OLFM4 levels are significantly higher in the DCIS cohort and in the breast cancer cohort compared with the healthy controls. This result suggests that circulating OLFM4 could be an interesting biomarker of early breast cancer. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD014194.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/metabolism , Proteomics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/blood , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/blood , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/immunology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cohort Studies , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/blood , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/genetics , Humans , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , PrognosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity and lack of targeted therapies represent the two main impediments to precision treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and therefore, molecular subtyping and identification of therapeutic pathways are required to optimize medical care. The aim of the present study was to define robust TNBC subtypes with clinical relevance. METHODS: Gene expression profiling by means of DNA chips was conducted in an internal TNBC cohort composed of 238 patients. In addition, external data (n = 257), obtained by using the same DNA chip, were used for validation. Fuzzy clustering was followed by functional annotation of the clusters. Immunohistochemistry was used to confirm transcriptomics results: CD138 and CD20 were used to test for plasma cell and B lymphocyte infiltrations, respectively; MECA79 and CD31 for tertiary lymphoid structures; and UCHL1/PGP9.5 and S100 for neurogenesis. RESULTS: We identified three molecular clusters within TNBC: one molecular apocrine (C1) and two basal-like-enriched (C2 and C3). C2 presented pro-tumorigenic immune response (immune suppressive), high neurogenesis (nerve infiltration), and high biological aggressiveness. In contrast, C3 exhibited adaptive immune response associated with complete B cell differentiation that occurs in tertiary lymphoid structures, and immune checkpoint upregulation. External cohort subtyping by means of the same approach proved the robustness of these results. Furthermore, plasma cell and B lymphocyte infiltrates, tertiary lymphoid structures, and neurogenesis were validated at the protein levels by means of histological evaluation and immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSION: Our work showed that TNBC can be subcategorized in three different subtypes characterized by marked biological features, some of which could be targeted by specific therapies.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Cluster Analysis , Computational Biology , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Metabolomics/methods , Molecular Sequence Annotation , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Transcriptome , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Tumor BurdenABSTRACT
Neoadjuvant therapy is an increasing treatment option in the management of breast cancer. The tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy, especially the pathological complete response, is a validated endpoint frequently used in clinical trials. However, there is still a lack of standardization for the surgical specimen management in the neoadjuvant setting. This leads to heterogeneity in the specimen handling and might lead to significant bias for the prognostic assessment of patients or in clinical trials. The GEFPICS group, composed of expert breast cancer pathologists, herein presents guidelines for the management of breast and axillary specimen before treatment (management of biopsy, items of the pathological report) and after neoadjuvant therapy (specimen handling, histological assessment of response, items of the pathological report and response grading systems).
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast/pathology , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Specimen Handling/standards , Biomarkers, Tumor , Biopsy/methods , Biopsy/standards , Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/standards , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor , Female , France , Humans , Lymph Nodes/drug effects , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Medical Records/standards , Microscopy , Neoplasm, Residual/pathology , Prognosis , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Specimen Handling/methods , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Burden/drug effectsABSTRACT
To date, there is no available targeted therapy for patients who are diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). The aim of this study was to identify a new specific target for specific treatments. Frozen primary tumors were collected from 83 adjuvant therapy-naive TNBC patients. These samples were used for global proteome profiling by iTRAQ-OFFGEL-LC-MS/MS approach in two series: a training cohort (n = 42) and a test set (n = 41). Patients who remains free of local or distant metastasis for a minimum of 5 years after surgery were classified in the no-relapse group; the others were in the relapse group. OPLS and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to select candidate markers, which were validated by immunohistochemistry. Three proteins were identified in the training set and validated in the test set by Kaplan-Meier method and immunohistochemistry (IHC): TrpRS as a good prognostic markers and DP and TSP1 as bad prognostic markers. We propose the establishment of an IHC test to calculate the score of TrpRS, DP, and TSP1 in TNBC tumors to evaluate the degree of aggressiveness of the tumors. Finally, we propose that DP and TSP1 could provide therapeutic targets for specific treatments.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Tryptophan-tRNA Ligase/genetics , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Desmoplakins/genetics , Desmoplakins/metabolism , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Isocitrate Dehydrogenase/genetics , Isocitrate Dehydrogenase/metabolism , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Receptor, ErbB-2/deficiency , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Receptors, Estrogen/deficiency , Receptors, Estrogen/genetics , Receptors, Progesterone/deficiency , Receptors, Progesterone/genetics , Survival Analysis , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Thrombospondin 1/genetics , Thrombospondin 1/metabolism , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Tryptophan-tRNA Ligase/metabolismABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Triple-negative breast cancers need to be refined in order to identify therapeutic subgroups of patients. METHODS: We conducted an unsupervised analysis of microarray gene-expression profiles of 107 triple-negative breast cancer patients and undertook robust functional annotation of the molecular entities found by means of numerous approaches including immunohistochemistry and gene-expression signatures. A triple-negative external cohort (n=87) was used for validation. RESULTS: Fuzzy clustering separated triple-negative tumours into three clusters: C1 (22.4%), C2 (44.9%) and C3 (32.7%). C1 patients were older (mean=64.6 years) than C2 (mean=56.8 years; P=0.03) and C3 patients (mean=51.9 years; P=0.0004). Histological grade and Nottingham prognostic index were higher in C2 and C3 than in C1 (P<0.0001 for both comparisons). Significant event-free survival (P=0.03) was found according to cluster membership: patients belonging to C3 had a better outcome than patients in C1 (P=0.01) and C2 (P=0.02). Event-free survival analysis results were confirmed when our cohort was pooled with the external cohort (n=194; P=0.01). Functional annotation showed that 22% of triple-negative patients were not basal-like (C1). C1 was enriched in luminal subtypes and positive androgen receptor (luminal androgen receptor). C2 could be considered as an almost pure basal-like cluster. C3, enriched in basal-like subtypes but to a lesser extent, included 26% of claudin-low subtypes. Dissection of immune response showed that high immune response and low M2-like macrophages were a hallmark of C3, and that these patients had a better event-free survival than C2 patients, characterized by low immune response and high M2-like macrophages: P=0.02 for our cohort, and P=0.03 for pooled cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: We identified three subtypes of triple-negative patients: luminal androgen receptor (22%), basal-like with low immune response and high M2-like macrophages (45%), and basal-enriched with high immune response and low M2-like macrophages (33%). We noted out that macrophages and other immune effectors offer a variety of therapeutic targets in breast cancer, and particularly in triple-negative basal-like tumours. Furthermore, we showed that CK5 antibody was better suited than CK5/6 antibody to subtype triple-negative patients.
Subject(s)
Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor , Cluster Analysis , Computational Biology , Female , Humans , Immunity, Innate , Immunohistochemistry , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Middle Aged , Molecular Sequence Annotation , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Transcriptome , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Tumor BurdenABSTRACT
Biomarker assessment of breast cancer tumor samples is part of the routine workflow of pathology laboratories. International guidelines have recently been updated, with special regards to the pre-analytical steps that are critical for the quality of immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization procedures, whatever the biomarker analyzed. Fixation and specimen handling protocols must be standardized, validated and carefully tracked. Cooperation and training of the personnel involved in the specimen workflow (e.g. radiologists, surgeons, nurses, technicians and pathologists) are of paramount importance. The GEFPICS' update of the recommendations herein details and comments the different steps of the pre-analytical process. Application of these guidelines and participation to quality insurance programs are mandatory to ensure the correct evaluation of oncotheranostic biomarkers.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Immunohistochemistry/methods , In Situ Hybridization/methods , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Receptors, Steroid/analysis , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Fixatives , France , Histological Techniques , Humans , Prognosis , Quality Control , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Receptors, Progesterone/analysis , Specimen Handling/methodsABSTRACT
International guidelines on HER2 determination in breast cancer have just been updated by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and College of American Pathologists (CAP), on the basis of more than ten-year practice, results of clinical trials and concordance studies. The GEFPICS group, composed of expert pathologists in breast cancer, herein presents these recommendations, adapted to the French routine practice. These guidelines highlight the possible diagnosis difficulties with regards to HER2 status determination, such as intra-tumor heterogeneity, special histological subtypes and biomarker re-evaluation during metastatic relapse. Pre-analytical issues and updated scoring criteria (especially for equivocal cases) are detailed, in order to decrease the occurrence of false negative cases. In the era of personalized medicine, pathologists are more than ever involved in the quality of oncotheranostic biomarker evaluation.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , False Negative Reactions , Female , France , Humans , Immunohistochemistry/methods , In Situ Hybridization , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Neoplasm Metastasis/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , PrognosisABSTRACT
Expression of hormone receptor (HR) for estrogens (ER) and progesterone (PR) and HER2 remains the cornerstone to define the therapeutic strategy for breast cancer patients. We aimed to compare phenotypic profiles between matched primary and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the ESME database, a National real-life multicenter cohort of MBC patients. Patients with results available on both primary tumour and metastatic disease within 6 months of MBC diagnosis and before any tumour progression were eligible for the main analysis. Among the 16,703 patients included in the database, 1677 (10.0%) had available biopsy results at MBC diagnosis and on matched primary tumour. The change rate of either HR or HER2 was 27.0%. Global HR status changed (from positive = either ER or PR positive, to negative = both negative; and reverse) in 14.2% of the cases (expression loss in 72.5% and gain in 27.5%). HER2 status changed in 7.8% (amplification loss in 45.2%). The discordance rate appeared similar across different biopsy sites. Metastasis to bone, HER2+ and RH+/HER2- subtypes and previous adjuvant endocrine therapy, but not relapse interval were associated with an HR discordance in multivariable analysis. Loss of HR status was significantly associated with a risk of death (HR adjusted = 1.51, p = 0.002) while gain of HR and HER2 discordance was not. In conclusion, discordance of HR and HER2 expression between primary and metastatic breast cancer cannot be neglected. In addition, HR loss is associated with worse survival. Sampling metastatic sites is essential for treatment adjustment.
ABSTRACT
In Europe, patients who may benefit from an HER2 targeted drug are currently selected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). In situ hybridization (ISH) techniques should be used for complementary assessment of ambiguous 2+ IHC cases and for the calibration of the IHC technique. Eligibility to an HER2 target treatment is defined by an HER2 positive status being IHC test 3+ or 2+ amplified. Reliable detection of HER2 status is essential to the appropriate usage of HER2 targeted drugs because its specificity is limited to tumors overexpressing HER2. It is essential that the IHC evaluation of the HER2 status of a mammary carcinoma is optimized and reliable. This GEFPICS' guidelines look over the different steps of the IHC technique, the controls and, the rules for interpretation. Once acquired, this knowledge must be perpetuated by the observation of rules of good technical practice (internal and external controls, quality assurance programs).
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , France , Humans , Immunohistochemistry/standards , In Situ Hybridization/standards , Quality Control , RecordsABSTRACT
Targeted therapies and, more precisely, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been a major improvement in the therapeutic management of EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Earlier administration of these TKIs throughout tumor progression is imperative to improve patient outcomes. Consequently, studies have focused on refining the characterization of biomarkers, especially concerning the resistance mutation p.Thr790Met of EGFR. Herein, we developed peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-mediated PCR clamping followed by pyrosequencing, favoring enrichment of the mutated fraction. A preamplification step was first added to increase the amplifiable DNA fraction. Throughout the application of our method on DNA extracted from FFPE samples of 46 patients with NSCLC who had relapsed under first-generation EGFR TKI, we evaluated a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 100%. All 19 patients who were positive for the p.Thr790Met mutation with NGS were also found to be positive with our protocol. The only discordant case was a sample with no mutation detected with NGS, but which was positive with PNA. This protocol allows for the detection of the p.Thr790Met mutation with a sensitivity of 0.5% which will permit earlier detection and an improvement of therapeutic management.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The identification of pretherapeutic somatic BRCA variants can have considerable clinical impact given that they affect response to the new poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-targeted therapy. One major issue with this type of testing is the identification of splicing variants of uncertain significance (VUS) on degraded somatic messenger RNA. It is therefore important to be able to quickly characterize these splice variants. OBJECTIVE: As part of PARP inhibitor targeted therapy, we have investigated a method for the direct confirmation of potential pathogenic somatic splice variants of BRCA1 found in fixed tumor samples. Previously these VUS have commonly only been tested by in silico analysis. METHODS: Five BRCA1 variants affecting splicing were characterized from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) ovarian carcinoma tissues by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Three patient samples had already been functionally characterized and were used as controls. Total somatic RNA from samples was extracted, reverse-transcribed, and amplified with several primer pairs encompassing the target exon. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were analyzed by capillary gel electrophoresis to assess possible changes in size due to splicing alterations. Finally, we confirmed our results by cloning, followed by Sanger sequencing, and analyzed the expression of the aberrant forms. RESULTS: Our molecular approach made it possible to visualize the splicing outcomes of three variants (c.5194-2A>G, c.5434C>G, and c.547+1G>A) already identified and present in databases and/or identified with prediction tools (ClinVar, UMD, ARUP Utah database, and Human Splice Finder splices sites prediction) and to confirm their exon skipping consequences, their expression in tumors, and thus their pathogenicity. The c.4484+5G>A variant was not found in databases and was predicted to have no impact on splicing, but was found to display altered processing in tumor tissue. This variant also had a major detrimental impact on transcriptional expression. CONCLUSION: In a break from purely in silico approaches, we propose a simple and rapid pretherapeutic functional analysis of somatic BRCA1 variants potentially involved in splicing alterations. This approach will allow more ovarian cancer patients to benefit from new therapies targeting PARP.
Subject(s)
Alternative Splicing , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Aged , Cell Line, Tumor , Female , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Precision Medicine , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Tissue Embedding , Tissue Fixation , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Malignant mesothelioma (MM) still represents a devastating disease that is often detected too late, while the current effect of therapies on patient outcomes remains unsatisfactory. Invasiveness biomarkers may contribute to improving early diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment for patients, a task that could benefit from the development of high-throughput proteomics. To limit potential sources of bias when identifying such biomarkers, we conducted cross-species proteomic analyzes on three different MM sources. Data were collected firstly from two human MM cell lines, secondly from rat MM tumors of increasing invasiveness grown in immunocompetent rats and human MM tumors grown in immunodeficient mice, and thirdly from paraffin-embedded sections of patient MM tumors of the epithelioid and sarcomatoid subtypes. Our investigations identified three major invasiveness biomarkers common to the three tumor sources, CAPG, FABP4, and LAMB2, and an additional set of 25 candidate biomarkers shared by rat and patient tumors. Comparing the data to proteomic analyzes of preneoplastic and neoplastic rat mesothelial cell lines revealed the additional role of SBP1 in the carcinogenic process. These observations could provide new opportunities to identify highly vulnerable MM patients with poor survival outcomes, thereby improving the success of current and future therapeutic strategies.
ABSTRACT
Recent findings suggest that S100A4, a protein involved in communication between stromal cells and cancer cells, could be more involved than previously expected in cancer invasiveness. To investigate its cumulative value in the multistep process of the pathogenesis of malignant mesothelioma (MM), SWATH-MS (sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragmentation spectra), an advanced and robust technique of quantitative proteomics, was used to analyze a collection of 26 preneoplastic and neoplastic rat mesothelial cell lines and models of MM with increasing invasiveness. Secondly, proteomic and histological analyses were conducted on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of liver metastases vs. primary tumor, and spleen from tumor-bearing rats vs. controls in the most invasive MM model. We found that S100A4, along with 12 other biomarkers, differentiated neoplastic from preneoplastic mesothelial cell lines, and invasive vs. non-invasive tumor cells in vitro, and MM tumors in vivo. Additionally, S100A4 was the only protein differentiating preneoplastic mesothelial cell lines with sarcomatoid vs. epithelioid morphology in relation to EMT (epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition). Finally, S100A4 was the most significantly increased biomarker in liver metastases vs. primary tumor, and in the spleen colonized by MM cells. Overall, we showed that S100A4 was the only protein that showed increased abundance in all situations, highlighting its crucial role in all stages of MM pathogenesis.
ABSTRACT
We report three different cases in location with an original occurrence in the oesophagus. The gross appearance showed polypoid pedonculated masses with a whitish cut surface, arising from the submucosa. On microscopic examination, the tumor consisted of spindle cell dispersed in a loose fibromyxoid stroma containing numerous blood vessels and inflammatory cells with abundant eosinophils. At immunohistochemistry, the cells were strongly positive for CD34. Inflammatory fibroid polyp is a rare benign lesion of the gastro-intestinal tract. The pathogenesis of this lesion remains throat and unclear. Diagnosis on biopsy is difficult with various histologic pattern and because the inflammatory fibroid polyp share common pathologic features with digestive spindle cells tumor.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Intestinal Polyps/pathology , Leiomyoma/pathology , Cell Division , Connective Tissue/pathology , Edema/pathology , Eosinophils/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Inflammation/pathology , Intestinal Mucosa/pathology , Intestinal Mucosa/surgery , Intestinal Polyps/genetics , Intestinal Polyps/surgery , Leiomyoma/genetics , Leiomyoma/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , PolyploidyABSTRACT
Senescence is a tumor-suppressive mechanism induced by telomere shortening, oncogenes, or chemotherapy treatment. Although it is clear that this suppressive pathway leads to a permanent arrest in primary cells, this might not be the case in cancer cells that have inactivated their suppressive pathways. We have recently shown that subpopulations of cells can escape chemotherapy-mediated senescence and emerge as more transformed cells that induce tumor formation, resist anoikis, and are more invasive. In this study, we characterized this emergence and showed that senescent cells favor tumor growth and metastasis, in vitro and in vivo. Senescence escape was regulated by secreted proteins produced during emergence. Among these, we identified thrombospondin-1 (TSP1), a protein produced by senescent cells that prevented senescence escape. Using SWATH quantitative proteomic analysis, we found that TSP1 can be detected in the serum of patients suffering from triple-negative breast cancer and that its low expression was associated with treatment failure. The results also indicate that senescence escape is explained by the emergence of CD47low cells that express a reduced level of CD47, the TSP1 receptor. The results show that CD47 expression is regulated by p21waf1. The cell cycle inhibitor was sufficient to maintain senescence since its downregulation in senescent cells increased cell emergence. This leads to the upregulation of Myc, which then binds to the CD47 promoter to repress its expression, allowing the generation of CD47low cells that escape the suppressive arrest. Altogether, these results uncovered a new function for TSP1 and CD47 in the control of chemotherapy-mediated senescence.
Subject(s)
CD47 Antigen/metabolism , Thrombospondin 1/metabolism , Animals , Cellular Senescence , Humans , MiceABSTRACT
Pretherapeutic determination of tumor resistance to chemotherapy is a main challenge, hindered by the low number of mechanisms characterized at the same time, the small size of the clinical specimens and the heterogeneity of the techniques or the lack of true quantification. The aim of the present study was to determine in real time quantitative RT-PCR, tumor cell expression of several transcripts involved in cancer cell resistance with a unique cDNA sample from a tumor biopsy. The technique had to be suitable in clinical practice for determination of several factors involved in resistance to a given drug family, for example, fluoropyrimidines resistance factors: thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), thymidine kinase (TK), dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS). A frame-shifted artificial construct was designed specifically to work within the same conditions. We validated our technique by quantifying expressions of these 5 genes starting from tissue samples of colorectal carcinoma and the surrounding normal mucosa of 33 different patients. That real time quantitative RT-PCR technique using the frame-shifted artificial construct as a standard provided a real comparison and quantification of different resistance factors. Tumor resistance phenotype determination based on that approach will be investigated in a control study.