A literature review to understand the burden of disease in people living with tumour-induced osteomalacia.

This study reviews publications to describe the signs, symptoms and impact of tumour-induced osteomalacia (TIO) on patients' burden of disease. TIO is associated with a spectrum of signs and symptoms imposing a significant clinical burden, but the psychosocial impact of this rare disease has been poorly researched so far. INTRODUCTION: To describe the signs, symptoms and impacts of tumour-induced osteomalacia (TIO) and summarise the state of research on the burden of disease of this ultra-rare condition. METHODS: A targeted literature review was conducted in PubMed using pre-defined search terms. Relevant articles published between 1980 and 2021 were screened for inclusion. Seventy records were selected for analysis. Data were extracted and grouped into categories and sub-categories to identify recurrent signs, symptoms and impacts of TIO and describe the burden on patients. Chord diagrams were created to analyse the relationships between different TIO outcomes and characterise the presentation of TIO. RESULTS: Although the number of articles on TIO published have been increasing over the past 20 years, most studies were case reports and case series (n = 65/70) and only few were studies with higher quality of evidence (n = 5/70). Most articles were based on data reported by clinicians (n = 67/70). Patients with TIO experienced a combination of outcomes including chronic pain, weakness, skeletal-related manifestations and limitations in mobility. Only a few studies (n = 2/70) analysed the burden of TIO on the emotional wellbeing and on the work life of the patient. CONCLUSION: Patients with TIO present with a spectrum of signs and symptoms that impose a significant burden. The impact on the psychosocial wellbeing of patients should be further investigated, as this has been poorly researched so far. Studies with high quality of evidence should be designed to further the understanding of the burden of disease of TIO from the patient's perspective.

The impact of treatment-resistant depression on the lives of carers: A mixed-methods study.

INTRODUCTION: The lived experiences of informal carers of people with depression, particularly those with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), are rarely explored, despite their vital supportive role. METHODS: This mixed-methods study explored the quality of life (QoL) and experiences of carers of individuals with symptomatic TRD (Carers-Sym-TRD; n = 79) or in remission post-TRD (Carers-Rem-TRD; n = 20). Participating carers completed quantitative surveys measuring health-related and broader QoL (EQ-5D-5L/WHOQOL-BREF) and work productivity/activity impairment (WPAI:MM-CG). Interviews were also conducted with 12 Carers-Sym-TRD and 11 Carers-Rem-TRD and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Carers-Sym-TRD had impaired QoL compared with Carers-Rem-TRD, with significantly lower EQ-5D-5L index values (median = 0.84/1.00, respectively; p = 0.020) and WHOQOL-BREF overall score (median = 63.0/70.1; p < 0.001), physical health (median = 15.3/17.3; p < 0.001), psychological health (median = 13.3/14.7; p = 0.017), social relationships (median = 13.3/14.7; p = 0.017) and environment (median = 14.5/16.5; p = 0.011) domain scores. Work productivity/activity impairment was greatest in Carers-Sym-TRD across most WPAI:MM-CG domains, with a higher degree of impairment reported on the presenteeism and work productivity domains, however, there were no significant differences between the carer groups. Interview data suggested that impacts on carers' psychological/emotional wellbeing led to physical problems, which affected cognition and daily performance; Also, successful treatment for the person with depression helped carers worry less and reclaim their independence. LIMITATIONS: Recruitment challenges limited the Carers-Rem-TRD sample; clinical validation of the patient's depression diagnosis was not confirmed for all carers. CONCLUSIONS: TRD has an extensive adverse impact on carers' lives. Carers-Sym-TRD had significantly impaired QoL across a variety of domains compared with Carers-Rem-TRD, suggesting that achieving remission not only benefits patients but also those who care for them.

The lived experience of major and treatment-resistant depression in England: a mixed-methods study.

INTRODUCTION: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common, frequently recurrent condition associated with decreased well-being and increased healthcare-related costs. Mixed-methods research provides multiple ways of illustrating the phenomenon to better understand patient experience, including where treatment is not working, referred to here as treatment-resistant depression (TRD). METHODS: A mixed-methods study investigated the experiences of people with symptomatic MDD, symptomatic TRD or TRD in remission, surveying 148 adults recruited from English clinical sites to measure symptom severity (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]), HRQoL (EQ-5D-5L/World Health Organisation Brief Assessment of QoL [WHOQOL-BREF]) and work productivity/activity impairment (WPAI:D). Interviews with 26 survey respondents were analysed thematically. Integrated datasets explored areas of convergence and divergence, with concepts mapped against the EQ-5D-5L. RESULTS: Qualitative data explained low WHOQOL-BREF domain scores and the interrelation of psychological, emotional, cognitive and physical difficulties. Tiredness, lack of energy and motivation impacted daily activities, socialising and career goals. Low work performance scores were explained by poor concentration, decision-making and motivation. Participants also described the influence of social support and housing insecurity. Only 19 % of HRQoL qualitative codes mapped to the EQ-5D-5L. Themes dominant in patients with TRD were inability to cope, self-care challenges, dissatisfaction with mental health services and treatment pessimism. LIMITATIONS: Limited data collected on people with TRD in remission. CONCLUSIONS: The EQ-5D-5L and WPAI:D likely underestimate how depression impacts the HRQoL and work of people with MDD or TRD. Qualitative data suggest increased distress for people with TRD compared to those with MDD. Clinical management and treatment access decisions should consider the broader impacts of depression and environmental factors affecting the patient's experience.

Delphi panel for consensus on the optimal management of dabrafenib plus trametinib-related pyrexia in patients with melanoma.

Purpose: Dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy (dab + tram) is indicated to treat BRAF V600 mutation-positive unresectable/metastatic melanoma and as adjuvant treatment for resected stage III disease. Dab + tram-related pyrexia may require early therapy discontinuation. A modified Delphi panel was conducted to develop consensus on the optimal management of dab + tram-related pyrexia in patients with melanoma. Methods: In all, 10 UK oncologists experienced in melanoma management participated in a three-round modified Delphi study (Round 1: one-to-one interview; Rounds 2 and 3: email survey). In each round, participants rated the extent of their agreement with statements about defining and managing dab + tram-related pyrexia. Consensus was defined as >80% agreement for critical management (CM) and >60% for non-critical management (NCM) statements. Results: All 10 participants completed Round 1; 9 completed Rounds 2 and 3. Consensus was reached on 42/66 statements (20 CM and 22 NCM). Drug-related pyrexia was agreed as being strictly an elevation of body temperature, although other symptoms may be present (89% agreement). Panelists agreed on the need for simple and generic guidance on dab + tram-related pyrexia management that does not differentiate between patient groups (100%), and that management of first and second dab + tram-related pyrexia episodes should be the same regardless of treatment intent (100%). Regarding CM, participants agreed that both dab and tram should be interrupted for pyrexia (100%) without considering the use of steroids (89%); patients on dab + tram presenting to non-oncology services with pyrexia should be directed to an oncology-specific service as soon as possible and assessed for infection (100%). NCM statements on steroid use following dab + tram interruption and when to restart dab + tram did not reach consensus. Conclusions: These consensus statements provide a framework on optimal management of dab + tram-related pyrexia in patients with melanoma which should inform future guidelines.

Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab versus placebo treatment of antibody-associated psychosis: study protocol of a randomised phase IIa double-blinded placebo-controlled trial (SINAPPS2).

BACKGROUND: Evidence is conflicting about a causal role of inflammation in psychosis and, specifically, regarding antibodies binding to neuronal membrane targets, especially N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. NMDAR, LGI1 and GABA-A antibodies were found more prevalent in people with psychosis than in healthy controls. We aim to test whether these antibodies are pathogenic and may cause isolated psychosis. The SINAPPS2 phase IIa double-blinded randomised controlled trial will test the efficacy and safety of immunoglobulin and rituximab treatment versus placebo for patients with acute psychosis symptoms as added to psychiatric standard of care. METHODS: We will screen approximately 2500 adult patients with acute psychosis to identify 160 with antibody-positive psychosis without co-existing neurological disease and recruit about 80 eligible participants to the trial in the period from September 2017 to September 2021 across the UK. Eligible patients will be randomised 1:1 either to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) followed by rituximab or to placebo infusions of 1% albumin followed by 0.9% sodium chloride, respectively. To detect a time-to-symptomatic-recovery hazard ratio of 0.322 with a power of 80%, 56 participants are needed to complete the trial, allowing for up to 12 participants to drop out of each group. Eligible patients will be randomised and assessed at baseline within 4 weeks of their eligibility confirmation. The treatment will start with IVIG or 1% albumin placebo infusions over 2-4 consecutive days no later than 7 days from baseline. It will continue 4-5 weeks later with a rituximab or sodium chloride placebo infusion and will end 2-3 weeks after this with another rituximab or placebo infusion. The primary outcome is the time to symptomatic recovery defined as symptomatic remission sustained for at least 6 months on the following Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale items: P1, P2, P3, N1, N4, N6, G5 and G9. Participants will be followed for 12 months from the first day of treatment or, where sustained remission begins after the first 6 months, for an additional minimum of 6 months to assess later response. DISCUSSION: The SINAPPS2 trial aims to test whether immunotherapy is efficacious and safe in psychosis associated with anti-neuronal membrane antibodies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, 11177045. Registered on 2 May 2017. EudraCT, 2016-000118-31. Registered on 22 November 2016. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03194815. Registered on 21 June 2017.