Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Policy Polit Nurs Pract ; 23(1): 5-14, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34986064

ABSTRACT

We sought to evaluate if better work environments or staffing were associated with improvements in care quality, patient safety, and nurse outcomes across hospitals caring for different proportions of patients who are economically disadvantaged. Few actionable approaches for hospitals with quality and resource deficits exist. One solution may be to invest in the nurse work environment and staffing. This cross-sectional study utilized secondary data from 23,629 registered nurses in 503 hospitals from a four-state survey collected in 2005-2008. Each 10% increase in the proportion of patients who are economically disadvantaged was associated with 27% and 22% decreased odds of rating unit-level care quality as excellent and giving an "A" safety grade, respectively. Each 10% increase was also associated with 9%, 25%, and 11% increased odds of job dissatisfaction, intent to leave, and burnout, respectively. The work environment had the largest association with each outcome. Accounting for the nurse work environment lessened or eliminated the negative outcomes experienced at hospitals serving high proportions of patients who are economically disadvantaged. Leaders at hospitals serving high proportions of patients who are economically disadvantaged, as well as state and federal policymakers, should work to improve quality, safety, and nurse outcomes by strengthening nurse work environments. Improving work environments highlights the role of nursing in the health care system, and policies focused on work environments are needed to improve the experiences of patients and nurses, especially at hospitals that care for many patients who are economically disadvantaged.


Subject(s)
Nursing Staff, Hospital , Patient Safety , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitals , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Quality of Health Care
2.
J Contin Educ Nurs ; 45(10): 439-50; quiz 451-2, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25280192

ABSTRACT

Nurse residency programs are designed to increase competence and skill, and ease the transition from student to new graduate nurse. These programs also offer the possibility to positively influence the job satisfaction of new graduate nurses, which could decrease poor nursing outcomes. However, little is known about the impact of participation in a nurse residency program on new graduate nurses' satisfaction. This review examines factors that influence job satisfaction of nurse residency program participants. Eleven studies were selected for inclusion, and seven domains influencing new graduate nurses' satisfaction during participation in nurse residency programs were identified: extrinsic rewards, scheduling, interactions and support, praise and recognition, professional opportunities, work environment, and hospital system. Within these domains, the evidence for improved satisfaction with nurse residency program participation was mixed. Further research is necessary to understand how nurse residency programs can be designed to improve satisfaction and increase positive nurse outcomes.


Subject(s)
Inservice Training/methods , Internship, Nonmedical/methods , Job Satisfaction , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Education, Nursing, Continuing , Humans , Inservice Training/organization & administration , Internship, Nonmedical/organization & administration
3.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 25(7): 535-43, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26376673

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As nurses are the principal care provider in the hospital setting, the completion or omission of nursing care is likely to have a sizable impact on the patient care experience. However, this relationship has not been explored empirically. AIM: To describe the prevalence and patterns of missed nursing care and explore their relationship to the patient care experience. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used secondary nurse and patient survey data from 409 adult non-federal acute care US hospitals in four states. Descriptive statistics were calculated and linear regression models were conducted at the hospital level. Regression models included controls for hospital structural characteristics. RESULTS: In an average hospital, nurses missed 2.7 of 12 required care activities per shift. Three-fourths (73.4%) of nurses reported missing at least one activity on their last shift. This percentage ranged from 25 to 100 across hospitals. Nurses most commonly reported not being able to comfort or talk with patients (47.6%) and plan care (38.5%). 6 out of 10 patients rated hospitals highly. This proportion ranged from 33% to 90% across hospitals. At hospitals where nurses missed more care (1 SD higher=0.74 items), 2.2% fewer patients rated the hospital highly (p<0.001); a coefficient equivalent to a one-quarter SD change. CONCLUSIONS: Missed nursing care is common in US hospitals and varies widely. Most patients rate their hospital care experience highly, but this also varies widely across hospitals. Patients have poorer care experiences in hospitals where more nurses miss required nursing care. Supporting nurses' ability to complete required care may optimise the patient care experience. As hospitals face changing reimbursement landscapes, ensuring adequate nursing resources should be a top priority.


Subject(s)
Hospitals/standards , Medical Errors/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Nursing Staff, Hospital/standards , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL