Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Nurs Educ Perspect ; 42(1): 56-58, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31335492

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Faculty frustration with poor student writing ability and inconsistency among faculty on grading elements of assigned papers triggered the college administration to appoint a writing task force. The first goal was to develop a writing rubric. To measure the effectiveness of the rubric, faculty designed a research study but encountered failure early. Researchers could not achieve interrater reliability using the rubric and were unable to move forward. However, even a failed research study does not necessarily result in failure. Positive lessons were learned, a rubric contract was implemented, and our processes were innovated for improved faculty/student communication.


Subject(s)
Educational Measurement , Writing , Faculty , Humans , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Health Care Manage Rev ; 40(4): 324-36, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25120195

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The problem of interest in this study is the challenge of consistent implementation of evidence-based infection prevention practices at the unit level, a challenge broadly characterized as "change implementation failure." The theoretical literature suggests that periodic top-down communications promoting tacit knowledge exchanges across professional subgroups may be effective for enabling change in health care organizations. However, gaps remain in understanding the mechanisms by which top-down communications enable practice change at the unit level. Our study sought to both validate the theoretical literature and address this gap. PURPOSE: Correspondingly, this study posed two research questions. (1) What is the impact of periodic "top-down" communications on practice change at the unit level? (2) What are the "unit-level" communication dynamics enabling practice changes? Whereas this article focuses on addressing the first question, the second question has been addressed in an earlier Health Care Management Review article (Rangachari et al., 2013). METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in two intensive care units at an academic health center. Both units had low baseline adherence to central line bundle (CLB) and higher-than-expected catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Periodic top-down communication interventions were conducted over 52 weeks to promote CLB adherence in both units. Simultaneously, the study examined (a) unit-level communication dynamics related to CLB through weekly "communication logs," completed by unit physicians, nurses, and managers, and (b) unit outcomes, that is, CLB adherence and CRBSI rates. FINDINGS: Both units showed increased adherence to CLB and significant, sustained declines in CRBSIs. Results showed that the interventions cumulatively had a significant negative (desired) impact on "catheter days," that is, central catheter use. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Results help validate the theoretical literature and identify evidence-based management strategies for practice change at the unit level. They suggest that periodic top-down communications have the potential to modify interprofessional knowledge exchanges and enable practice change at the unit level, leading to significantly improved outcomes and reduced costs.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Communication , Infection Control/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers , Evidence-Based Practice , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Organizational Innovation , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies
3.
Health Care Manage Rev ; 40(1): 65-78, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24153028

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many hospitals are unable to consistently implement evidence-based practices. For example, implementation of the central line bundle (CLB), known to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs), is often challenging. This problem is broadly characterized as "change implementation failure." PURPOSE: The theoretical literature on organizational change has suggested that periodic top-down communications promoting tacit knowledge exchanges across professional subgroups may be effective for enabling learning and change in health care organizations. However, gaps remain in understanding the mechanisms by which top-down communications enable practice change at the unit level. Addressing these gaps could help identify evidence-based management strategies for successful practice change at the unit level. Our study sought to address this gap. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in two intensive care units within an academic health center. Both units had low baseline adherence to CLB and higher-than-expected CRBSIs. Periodic top-down quality improvement communications were conducted over a 52-week period to promote CLB implementation in both units. Simultaneously, the study examined (a) the content and frequency of communication related to CLB through weekly "communication logs" completed by unit physicians, nurses, and managers and (b) unit outcomes, that is, CLB adherence rates through weekly chart reviews. FINDINGS: Both units experienced substantially improved outcomes, including increased adherence to CLB and statistically significant (sustained) declines in both CRBSIs and catheter days (i.e., central line use). Concurrently, both units indicated a statistically significant increase in "proactive" communications-that is, communications intended to reduce infection risk-between physicians and nurses over time. Further analysis revealed that, during the early phase of the study, "champions" emerged within each unit to initiate process improvements. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The study helps identify evidence-based management strategies for successful practice change at the unit level. For example, it underscores the importance of (a) screening each unit for change champions and (b) enabling champions to emerge from within the unit to foster change implementation.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Knowledge Management , Organizational Innovation , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Communication , Evidence-Based Practice/organization & administration , Humans , Prospective Studies
4.
Headache ; 53(6): 962-9, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23463958

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: This study assessed the relationship between health care workers' self-reported experience of headaches/migraines, their overall quality of life, and treatment outcomes. METHODS: The study sample consisted of adults employed by a self-insured hospital system located in the Southeast United States. Study participants responded to a web-based survey disseminated via work email accounts. The survey measured headache medication use, health care service utilization, and impacts on quality of life and treatment optimization using standardized instruments. RESULTS: We received responses from 2453 employees (response rate 33.8%), of which 84.4% reported headaches, suggesting that those with headaches were more likely to complete the survey. Forty percent of respondents reported mild to severe disability due to headaches, and approximately 65% used prescription or over-the-counter medications to treat headaches. Approximately 45% of participants taking headache medications reported unsatisfactory treatment. Among all respondents, those with mild, moderate, or severe migraine disability were 2.35, 1.7, or 2.08 times more likely to take headache medications than those with little or no migraine disability. Among those taking headache medications for treatment, respondents with nonclinical job titles, presenting better physical health status, or reporting little or no migraine disability were more likely to achieve treatment optimization. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing the potential over response by employees who have headaches, our study remains suggestive of a care improvement opportunity in the health care workforce.


Subject(s)
Headache/diagnosis , Headache/psychology , Health Personnel/psychology , Patient Care/trends , Quality of Life/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Headache/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Self Report/standards , Young Adult
5.
J Headache Pain ; 13(2): 121-7, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22127427

ABSTRACT

Migraine is under diagnosed and suboptimally treated in the majority of patients, and also associated with decreased productivity in employees. The objective of this retrospective study is to assess the antimigraine medication use and associated resource utilization in employed patients. Patients with primary diagnosis of migraine or receiving antimigraine prescription drugs were identified from an employer-sponsored health insurance plan in 2010. Medical utilization and health care costs were determined for the year of 2010. Generalized linear regression was applied to evaluate the association between health care costs and the use of antimigraine medications by controlling covariates. Of 465 patients meeting the study criteria, nearly 30% that had migraine diagnosis were prescribed antimigraine medications, and 20% that had migraine diagnosis were not prescribed antimigraine medications. The remaining 50% were prescribed antimigraine medications but did not have migraine diagnosis. Patients with antimigraine medication prescriptions showed lower frequency of emergency department visits than those without antimigraine medication prescriptions. Regression models indicated an increase in migraine-related health care costs by 86% but decreases in all-cause medical costs and total health care costs by 42 and 26%, respectively, in the antimigraine medication use group after adjusting for covariates. Employed patients experienced inadequate pharmacotherapy for migraine treatment. After controlling for covariates, antimigraine prescription drug use was associated with lower total medical utilization and health care costs. Further studies should investigate patient self-reported care and needs to manage headache and develop effective intervention to improve patient quality of life and productivity.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/economics , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Health Care Costs , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Migraine Disorders/economics , Adult , Drug Utilization Review , Efficiency , Employment , Female , Humans , Male
7.
Med Educ ; 43(6): 565-72, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19493181

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Despite only modest evidence linking personality-type variables to medical specialty choice, stereotypes involving empathy and 'emotional connectedness' persist, especially between primary care providers and surgeons or subspecialists. This paper examines emotional intelligence (EI) and specialty choice among students at three US medical schools. METHODS: Results from three independent studies are presented. Study 1 used the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) administered to a single cohort of 84 Year 4 medical students. Study 2 used the Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS) and Davis' Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) administered to three cohorts (n = 250) of Year 3 medical students. Study 3 used the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-I) administered to two cohorts of Year 1 medical students (n = 292). Results were linked to specialty choice data retrieved from the National Residency Match Program (NRMP). Classifications of specialty choice included: (i) primary care (family practice, internal medicine, paediatrics) versus non-primary care (all others), and (ii) primary care, hospital-based specialties (anaesthesiology, emergency medicine, pathology, radiology), and technical and surgical specialties (neurology, obstetrics and gynaecology, ophthalmology, and all surgical fields). CONCLUSIONS: Across all three studies - and using both classifications of specialty choice - no significant differences in EI were found between students entering primary care and non-primary care specialties. Limitations are acknowledged, and future directions for research involving EI are identified.


Subject(s)
Career Choice , Curriculum , Emotional Intelligence , Specialization , Students, Medical/psychology , Cohort Studies , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Empathy , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Medicine/statistics & numerical data , United States
8.
Educ Health (Abingdon) ; 22(3): 331, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20029768

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Beginning medical students' beliefs about the medical profession have been well studied internationally but have only been minimally studied in the United States (U.S.) recently. Up-to-date research on U.S. medical students' beliefs is warranted so educators can employ these predispositions as a baseline for curriculum and student professional development. METHODS: We conducted focus groups with a first-year class (n=189) of U.S. medical students at the beginning of their academic year. In an iterative theming process, investigators worked in dyads and subsequently as a group to develop a list of preliminary themes expressed in the focus groups. Investigators individually sorted preliminary themes into similar categories. All sorted preliminary themes and categories were placed in a matrix from which final themes were derived. FINDINGS: Investigators found eight themes for the question "Why pursue a career in medicine?" and six themes for "What makes a good doctor?". Students expected medicine to be intellectually and personally fulfilling, they expected to be respected by the community, indicated that early experiences with medicine impacted their career choices, and anticipated that a medical career would yield financial security. A good doctor was described as a committed, smart, decisive leader who enthusiastically partners with patients via effective interpersonal skills. DISCUSSION: Beginning U.S. medical students hold multi-faceted beliefs about medicine that are similar to international medical students' beliefs. Themes related to patient-centeredness, decisive leadership, and intellectual curiosity have particular utility in curriculum and professional development and should not be ignored. Administrators seeking to expand the physician workforce should consider early experiences, status, and monetary rewards.


Subject(s)
Attitude , Career Choice , Physicians/standards , Students, Medical/psychology , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , United States , Young Adult
9.
J Cult Divers ; 15(4): 174-80, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19202719

ABSTRACT

To better understand similarities and differences in Black and White women's perceptions about obesity, we conducted race-matched focus groups with thirty physician-referred, obese women. Participants completed demographic questionnaires and body image assessments. Analysis yielded some common themes. Unique themes for Black women included disagreement with the thin ideal and their own and family members' satisfaction with their weight; dislike of physical activity because of perspiration and appearance; program access barriers; and difficulties with clothing. White women desired support during weight loss from other obese individuals. Results support education and intervention programs that respond to specific needs of each group.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health/ethnology , Black or African American/ethnology , Obesity/ethnology , White People/ethnology , Black or African American/education , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Body Image , Causality , Clothing/psychology , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Exercise/psychology , Female , Focus Groups , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Services Accessibility , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Middle Aged , Nursing Methodology Research , Obesity/etiology , Obesity/prevention & control , Patient Education as Topic , Personal Satisfaction , Self-Assessment , Social Perception , Southeastern United States , Surveys and Questionnaires , White People/education , White People/statistics & numerical data
10.
Fam Med ; 39(8): 578-84, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17764043

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study's purpose was to examine attitudes of family physicians and gastroenterologists toward family physician performance of lower endoscopy in general practice. METHODS: A mailed survey was sent to 1,563 board-certified physicians in Georgia (1,303 family physicians, 260 gastroenterologists). Respondents were asked to describe their practice of lower endoscopy procedures and colorectal (CRC) screening preferences. RESULTS: Fifty-one percent (801) of the surveys were returned. For CRC screening, family physicians recommend fecal occult blood testing most frequently (51.7%), while gastroenterologists recommended colonoscopy most frequently (89.5%). Most family physicians believe that family physicians should perform flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) (81.4%) and colonoscopy (CS) (71.3%). A total of 71.2% of surveyed gastroenterologists believe that family physicians should perform FS, but only a minority (4.5%) believe that family physicians should perform screening CSs. Approximately 28% (186) of family physicians report performing FS (mean=.8 FS per month). Only 3.7 % (25) of family physicians reported performing CS (mean=8.2 CSs per month). CONCLUSIONS: Although most family physicians believe that they should perform lower endoscopy, only a minority of gastroenterologists believe family physicians should perform CS. Our results show that family physician performance of lower endoscopic CRC screening is limited in general practice. Future research might consider exploring these issues from both the gastroenterologist and family physician perspective.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Gastroenterology/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Mass Screening , Physicians, Family/education , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perception
11.
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph ; 13(3): 443-57, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17356212

ABSTRACT

This paper provides key insights into the construction and evaluation of interpersonal simulators--systems that enable interpersonal interaction with virtual humans. Using an interpersonal simulator, two studies were conducted that compare interactions with a virtual human to interactions with a similar real human. The specific interpersonal scenario employed was that of a medical interview. Medical students interacted with either a virtual human simulating appendicitis or a real human pretending to have the same symptoms. In Study I (n = 24), medical students elicited the same information from the virtual and real human, indicating that the content of the virtual and real interactions were similar. However, participants appeared less engaged and insincere with the virtual human. These behavioral differences likely stemmed from the virtual human's limited expressive behavior. Study II (n = 58) explored participant behavior using new measures. Nonverbal behavior appeared to communicate lower interest and a poorer attitude toward the virtual human. Some subjective measures of participant behavior yielded contradictory results, highlighting the need for objective, physically-based measures in future studies.


Subject(s)
Interpersonal Relations , User-Computer Interface , Computer-Assisted Instruction , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Female , Humans , Male , Observer Variation
12.
Radiol Manage ; 29(3): 40-3, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17608294

ABSTRACT

This article encompasses the basics of branding and how it relates to radiology organizations. It also provides tools to help develop your brand. To effectively use branding as a component of your marketing strategy, it is important to follow 3 basic principles: focus on where you excel, understand the existing markets, and be consistent. You do not need to be a large hospital, imaging center, or department to create a brand identity.


Subject(s)
Economic Competition , Marketing of Health Services/methods , Radiology Department, Hospital/organization & administration , Radiology/organization & administration , Names , Organizational Case Studies , Radiology/economics , Radiology Department, Hospital/economics , United States
14.
Am J Surg ; 191(6): 806-11, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16720154

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: At most institutions, medical students learn communication skills through the use of standardized patients (SPs), but SPs are time and resource expensive. Virtual patients (VPs) may offer several advantages over SPs, but little data exist regarding the use of VPs in teaching communication skills. Therefore, we report our initial efforts to create an interactive virtual clinical scenario of a patient with acute abdominal pain to teach medical students history-taking and communication skills. METHODS: In the virtual scenario, a life-sized VP is projected on the wall of an examination room. Before the virtual encounter, the student reviews patient information on a handheld tablet personal computer, and they are directed to take a history and develop a differential diagnosis. The virtual system includes 2 networked personal computers (PCs), 1 data projector, 2 USB2 Web cameras to track the user's head and hand movement, a tablet PC, and a microphone. The VP is programmed with specific answers and gestures in response to questions asked by students. The VP responses to student questions were developed by reviewing videotapes of students' performances with real SPs. After obtaining informed consent, 20 students underwent voice recognition training followed by a videotaped VP encounter. Immediately after the virtual scenario, students completed a technology and SP questionnaire (Maastricht Simulated Patient Assessment). RESULTS: All participants had prior experience with real SPs. Initially, the VP correctly recognized approximately 60% of the student's questions, and improving the script depth and variability of the VP responses enhanced most incorrect voice recognition. Student comments were favorable particularly related to feedback provided by the virtual instructor. The overall student rating of the virtual experience was 6.47 +/- 1.63 (1 = lowest, 10 = highest) for version 1.0 and 7.22 +/- 1.76 for version 2.0 (4 months later) reflecting enhanced voice recognition and other technological improvements. These overall ratings compare favorably to a 7.47 +/- 1.16 student rating for real SPs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite current technological limitations, virtual clinical scenarios could provide students a controllable, secure, and safe learning environment with the opportunity for extensive repetitive practice with feedback without consequence to a real or SP.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Medical History Taking/methods , User-Computer Interface , Communication , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Educational Measurement , Female , Humans , Male , Patient Simulation , Physician-Patient Relations , Students, Medical , Teaching/methods
15.
Acad Med ; 77(7): 738-9, 2002 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12114156

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the migrant health initiative is to give medical students the opportunity to provide clinical services, at appropriate levels of training, to a population that reflects a different ethnic and economic background than medical students typically see in the clinical setting. This initiative integrates concepts of cultural competency with experiential learning. DESCRIPTION: The migrant health initiative provides an infrastructure for a cultural competency educational program in the first two years of medical school within an essentials of clinical medicine course (ECM). The ECM course emphasizes the impacts of family, society, and community on the delivery of patient health care. Experience in the provision of clinical care to migrant workers provides an exceptional opportunity to expose students to a medically underserved, diverse group of people and to provide care to persons with a different language. The program was developed from grass-roots initiatives of students and the region's Area Health Education Center (AHEC). Historically, migrant workers provide the majority of the labor for harvesting onions in southeast Georgia. In April 2000, the regional AHEC organized a one-day clinic for migrant workers, staffed by one local physician and allied health students. Care was provided to over 400 laborers. As a result of the response by the migrant workforce, the AHEC developed a partnership with the local community to expand the health care services to this underserved group. Five medical students, working with the school's associate dean for curriculum and local AHEC, had observed a migrant health clinic organized by the AHEC and were seeking ongoing community service opportunities. Based on the interest and enthusiasm of the students, a faculty-supervised migrant health elective was developed for first- and second-year students. The number of students who wanted to take the elective exceeded the available opportunities. The ECM course will be enhanced with an integrated and longitudinal curriculum that focuses on migrant health care; the revised ECM course will provide students with the knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors to care for individuals from different cultures. First-year students will be able to volunteer to work in the program. Second-year students will participate in at least one migrant health clinic, traveling only three hours but providing a different world with medical care. In addition, the opportunities for medical students to participate in a community health initiative and to work with nursing and allied health students will enhance their public health knowledge and their team and leadership skills. DISCUSSION: The partnership between students, faculty, and the community provides the mechanism to thoughtfully develop and integrate cultural issues and experiences into the curriculum. Students have recently received a Caring for Community five-year grant from the Association of American Medical Colleges. Program expansions will continue into the third-year medicine clerkship and include a senior elective. The program expansions will result in a migrant health initiative that will be coordinated; comprehensive; and expand student knowledge, skills, and experiences in cultural health care.


Subject(s)
Community Health Services , Cultural Diversity , Professional Competence , Faculty, Medical , Georgia , Humans , Internship and Residency , Medically Underserved Area , Residence Characteristics , Students, Medical , Transients and Migrants
16.
Acad Med ; 77(11): 1164-5, 2002 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431943

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this project was to teach students how to work effectively with patients in the area of health-behavior change. As part of the patient-doctor course, first-year medical students worked with diabetic patients who were selected by their primary physicians. In preparation for their patient interactions, students were taught basic communication concepts and the role of the relationship in improving patient outcomes, and continuity issues were addressed as students learned to collaboratively develop behavioral-change plans with their patients and then followed their patients' progress over the course of the year. DESCRIPTION: An educational research trial was conducted to compare the traditional community placement track (shadowing) with the health-coaches track. Students were randomly assigned to the two educational tracks. Health coaches were assigned in pairs to a family medicine patient with diabetes. Under supervision by the patient's medical provider, student pairs worked with the patient in an area of health-behavior change (i.e., weight loss, smoking cessation, exercise, or adherence to medication regimen). Students were required to have at least six patient contacts over the course of a year, consisting of at least three face-to-face visits and including one home visit. Didactic sessions with health coaches taught by either a behavioral consultant or health educator covered the basics of diabetes and behavior-change areas appropriate to respective patients. Students were also given reading assignments from communication and health-behavior change literature and handouts for patients. Behavior-change specialists were available as needed for consultation. In support of the health coaching process, students participated in eight small-group discussion sessions (eight students each) led by a behavioral change specialist. Small-group sessions lasted approximately 90 minutes each and contained didactic and experiential elements. Topics were: "Getting Started" (interviewing, the patient's story), "Fundamentals of a Home Visit," "Changing Behaviors" (stages of change, relapse prevention), "Home Visit Feedback" (report and reflections), "Challenging Patients to Change" (difficulties, challenging irrational ideas), "Giving Direct Guidance," "Non-verbal Skills," "Ending and Celebrating" (terminating the helping relationship). Evaluation methods included a pre- and post-physician belief scale completed by students, pre- and post-provider's evaluation of patient, and a patient-completed health behavior questionnaire. As available, patients' HbA1C levels were compared pre- and post-intervention. DISCUSSION: As expected, initially some health coach students complained about their perceived increased workloads compared with the workloads of students in the shadowing track. Some students also expressed reservations about their abilities to be effective with their patients, but these complaints diminished as students made contact with patients. For many, this opportunity to establish continuity relationships with patients helped students begin to understand difficulties inherent in effecting health-behavior change. Some students expressed appreciation for the opportunity to discuss their increased self-awareness about communication as well as relationship difficulties and strengths during the small-group sessions. Data analysis is under way. Lessons learned from this project influenced a major first-year curriculum revision the following year, resulting in increased emphasis on basic communication skills and the use of small groups to reach a variety of curricular objectives.


Subject(s)
Communication , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Family Practice/education , Physician-Patient Relations , Students, Medical , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Health Behavior , Humans
17.
Acad Med ; 77(11): 1164, 2002 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431944

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this project was to design structured training activities to emphasize key points about patient-physician communication. Effective communication has been shown to enhance patient satisfaction, compliance with treatment, and medical decisions and outcomes. Basic communication skills and behavioral-change interview skills are taught. DESCRIPTION: Communication is a core "building block" of a four-semester, two-year Essentials of Clinical Medicine Course (ECM), which is in its second year of existence. Four interactive lab sessions have been designed, each with structured learning exercises. At the beginning of each session, students work in groups of 30 completing activities based on videos developed by the Bayer Institute for HealthCare Communication.(1) Subsequently, two groups of three students each work with a behavioral or physician facilitator. A formal training and administration manual for all activities has been developed and an evaluation system developed and implemented. Session 1, "Initial Interview Skills," teaches opening, mirroring, and encouraging non-interrogation activities. Session 2, "Empathic Responses," includes activities entitled "Cue Detection," "Accurate Empathy," and "Getting the Story Straight." In Session 3, "Obtaining an HPI," students view an exemplary medical interview, then role-play computerized cases(2) and practice the HPI data collection based on clinical facts taken from the computerized cases. During the Session 4, "Putting It All Together," students interview a standardized patient (SP) for five to seven minutes and receive and give feedback from peers, SPs, and facilitators. Subsequent to the communication lab, students conduct six physician-supervised patient interviews practicing their medical interviewing skills and write-ups. Two subsequent small-group sessions include "group" interviews of SPs in which students assess readiness for behavioral change (e.g., quitting smoking, losing weight) and also learn to conduct more "difficult' health-promotion conversations (e.g., sexual behavior, alcohol use). Evaluation methods include the use of a professional behavior evaluation form completed by communication facilitators and small-group leaders. This assessment form consists of ratings on: reliability and responsibility, relationships with others, self-improvement and adaptability, upholding professional standards, and communication skills dimensions. A formal interview-behavior checklist is used during the training and in the feedback sessions. Finally, SP OSCEs of communication and behavioral-change interviewing occur at the end of the first year of training. DISCUSSION: The communication labs have been well received by students. Students have reported increased understanding of their upcoming roles as physicians, have stated they have gained insights about the importance of connecting with patients in order to give them proper medical treatment, and have requested additional training in communication. Students have reported increased confidence in their interviewing skills prior to interactions with "actual" patients, and clinical preceptors have reported increased levels of preparedness among students who have participated in the structured learning experience. Future plans include adding communication training with problem patients, and about end-of-life and other challenging issues.


Subject(s)
Communication , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Physician-Patient Relations , Humans
18.
Fam Med ; 34(10): 750-4, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12448645

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the relationship between patient satisfaction and physicians' scores on a test of emotional intelligence. METHODS: Faculty and resident physicians at a southern medical school completed the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQi). Patient subjects were recruited at the conclusion of an office visit and completed a patient satisfaction survey. Spearman rank order correlations and t tests were used to examine the relationship between global, composite, and subscale scores on the EQi and patient satisfaction. Race, gender, and resident/faculty status were compared via t tests. RESULTS: When patient satisfaction scores were used to dichotomize physicians into two groups, those with 100% satisfied patients and those with less than 100% satisfaction, only one subscale of EQi, "happiness," was related to higher satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest a limited relationship between physicians'scores on a test of emotional intelligence and patient satisfaction. Implications for physician training programs are offered in light of recent focus on physician-patient communication in medical education. Application of emotional intelligence concepts to physician skills and patient attitudes needs further research that may lead to further educational opportunities.


Subject(s)
Affect , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Physician-Patient Relations , Physicians/psychology , Communication , Data Collection , Empathy , Family Practice/education , Female , Health Services Research , Humans , Male , Personality Inventory , Physicians/classification , United States
19.
Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci ; 42(5): 21-3, 2003 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14510519

ABSTRACT

This paper is a retrospective report describing outcomes for six male rhesus monkeys, each with a history of persistent self-injurious behavior (SIB), after their social introduction to female rhesus monkeys. Pairing procedures for five of the six male primates were implemented after surgical vasectomy. One male had previous pairing experience with a female prior to vasectomy resulting in an unplanned pregnancy. This male was re-socialized with his former female partner after surgery. The SIB-related medical histories of the males before and after the pairings are presented. One goal for promoting pair-housing of chronic SIB male monkeys with female monkeys was to determine whether this intervention would function to reduce or eliminate the expression of SIB and thus provide enhanced socialization opportunities for previously singly housed animals.


Subject(s)
Behavior, Animal , Macaca mulatta/psychology , Self-Injurious Behavior , Socialization , Vasectomy/veterinary , Animals , Female , Housing, Animal , Male , Retrospective Studies , Self-Injurious Behavior/prevention & control , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Self-Injurious Behavior/therapy , Vasectomy/psychology
20.
Qual Manag Health Care ; 23(1): 43-58, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24368720

ABSTRACT

Many hospitals are unable to successfully implement evidence-based practices. For example, implementation of the central line bundle (CLB), proven to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs), is often challenging. This problem is broadly characterized as a "change implementation failure." A prospective study was conducted in 2 intensive care units (ICUs), a medical ICU (MICU) and a pediatric ICU (PICU), within an academic health center. Both units had low baseline adherence to CLB and higher-than-expected CRBSIs. The study sought to promote CLB implementation in both units through periodic quality improvement (QI) interventions over a 52-week period. Simultaneously, it examined (1) the content and frequency of communication related to CLB through weekly "communication logs" completed by physicians, nurses, and managers, and (2) outcomes, that is, CLB adherence rates through weekly medical record reviews. The aim of the study was 2-fold: (1) to examine associations between QI interventions and communication content and frequency at the unit level, and (2) to examine associations between communication content and frequency and outcomes at the unit level. The periodic QI interventions were expected to increase CLB adherence and reduce CRBSIs through their influence on communication content and frequency. A total of 2638 instances of communication were analyzed. Both units demonstrated a statistically significant increase in "proactive" communications-that is, communication intended to reduce infection risk between physicians and nurses over time. Proactive communications increased by 68% in the MICU (P < .05) and 61% in the PICU (P < .05). During the same timeframe, both units increased CLB adherence to 100%. Both units also demonstrated statistically significant declines in (1) catheter days: 34% decline in the MICU (P < .05) and 30% in the PICU (P < .05); and (2) CRBSI rates: 63% decline in the MICU (P < .05) and 100% in the PICU (P < .10). Direct costs savings from reduced CRBSIs in 1 year were estimated to be at least $840 000. Periodic QI interventions were effective in reframing interprofessional communication dynamics and enabling practice change. The prospective design provides insights into communication content and frequency associated with collective learning and culture change. The study identifies evidence-based management strategies for positive practice change at the unit level.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Evidence-Based Medicine , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Interdisciplinary Communication , Academic Medical Centers , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Quality Improvement , Risk Assessment , Role , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL