Mature results of MM-011: a phase I/II trial of liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine, dexamethasone, and lenalidomide combination therapy followed by lenalidomide maintenance for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

A previous interim report of MM-011, the first study that combined lenalidomide with anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by lenalidomide maintenance for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), showed promising safety and activity. We report the long-term outcomes of all 76 treated patients with follow-up ≥ 5 years. This single-center phase I/II study administered lenalidomide (10 mg on days 1-21 of every 28-day cycle), intravenous liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m(2) on day 1), dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1-4), and intravenous vincristine (2 mg on day 1). After 4-6 planned induction cycles, lenalidomide maintenance therapy was given at the last tolerated dose until progression, with or without 50 mg prednisone every other day. The median number of previous therapies was 3 (range, 1-7); 49 (64.5%) patients had refractory disease. Forty-three (56.6%) patients received maintenance therapy. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred during induction and maintenance therapy in 48.7% and 25.6% of patients, respectively. Four (5.3%) treatment-related deaths occurred during induction. Responses were seen in 53.0% (at least partial response) and 71.2% (at least minor response) of patients. Overall, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 10.5 and 19.0 months, respectively; in patients with refractory disease these values were 7.5 and 11.3 months, respectively. Lenalidomide with anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by maintenance lenalidomide provided durable control in patients with RRMM (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00091624).

Responses to romidepsin in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and prior treatment with systemic chemotherapy.

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) are a group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas that typically present in the skin but can progress to systemic involvement. The optimal treatment for patients who relapse from or are refractory to systemic chemotherapy remains unclear. Romidepsin is a potent, class-I selective histone deacetylase inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with CTCL who have had ≥1 prior systemic therapy. Here, we present a subanalysis of two phase-2 trials (NCT00106431, NCT00007345) of romidepsin in patients with CTCL who had prior treatment with systemic chemotherapy. Patients with prior chemotherapy were able to achieve durable responses to romidepsin, and response rates were similar to those in patients who were chemotherapy naïve. Overall, no new safety signals emerged in patients who had received prior chemotherapy. The data presented here suggest that romidepsin is safe and effective in patients with CTCL who received prior systemic chemotherapy.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of a single dose of phenylephrine 10 mg compared with placebo in adults with acute nasal congestion due to the common cold.

BACKGROUND: Although nonprescription oral phenylephrine 10 mg has been judged "generally recognized as safe and effective" by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), its efficacy as a nasal decongestant has been questioned. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed available data on the efficacy of oral phenylephrine 10 mg as a nasal decongestant. METHODS: Three sources were used to identify potentially relevant publications--the bibliography of the phenylephrine section of the 1976 FDA monograph on over-the-counter cold, cough, allergy, bronchodilator, and antiasthmatic products; a 2004 Cochrane Review of nasal decongestants for the common cold; and a search of MEDLINE from 1966 through January 2007 using the term phenylephrine nasal. To be included in the analyses, studies had to have a single-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled design; involve an orally administered product in which phenylephrine 10 mg was the sole active ingredient; enroll patients with acute nasal congestion due to the common cold; evaluate nasal airway resistance (NAR) as the efficacy end point; and have sufficient data in the study report to allow reanalysis and/or meta-analysis of phenylephrine 10 mg versus placebo. Reanalysis of individual studies and fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analyses were performed. Statistical significance at 30 and 60 minutes after dosing (the primary time points) and a >or=20% reduction in NAR from baseline were considered indicative of a clinically meaningful difference. RESULTS: Fifteen potentially relevant studies were identified, of which 8 met the inclusion criteria. Data from 7 crossover studies involving a total of 113 subjects were reanalyzed and then pooled for meta-analysis; results from the initial phase of the eighth study, a parallel-group trial involving 50 subjects, were included in the reanalysis of individual studies but not in the meta-analyses. Significant differences in favor of phenylephrine were seen in 4 of the 8 studies (P or=20% with phenylephrine. CONCLUSION: These meta-analyses of 7 crossover studies and the reanalysis of a parallel-group study support the effectiveness of a single oral dose of phenylephrine 10 mg as a decongestant in adults with acute nasal congestion associated with the common cold.

Supplementation of test meals with fat-free phytosterol products can reduce cholesterol micellarization during simulated digestion and cholesterol accumulation by Caco-2 cells.

Phytosterols have been shown to reduce cholesterol absorption in humans. Supplementing phytosterols in fat-free formulations, however, has yielded controversial results. In the present study, we investigated the effect of supplementing test meals with different fat-free phytosterol products on cholesterol incorporation into mixed micelles during simulated digestion and accumulation of micellar cholesterol by Caco-2 cells: control orange juice (OJ), orange juice supplemented with either multivitamin/multimineral tablets (MVT), multivitamin/multimineral tablets containing phytosterols (MVT+P), and phytosterol powder (PP). These combinations were added to Ensure-based test meals and spiked with cholesterol of natural isotopic composition or 13C2-cholesterol to differentiate external from endogenous cholesterol. After simulated gastric/small intestinal digestion, micelle fractions were analyzed for cholesterol enzymatically (n = 6-20/product) and by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (n = 12/product) and added to Caco-2 cells to determine the accumulation of 13C2-cholesterol (n = 10-24/product). As compared to OJ, PP and MVT+P significantly decreased cholesterol micellarization (determined enzymatically) by 70 +/- 39 (mean +/- SD) and 70 +/- 39%, respectively (P < 0.001, Bonferroni). The stable isotope experiments revealed that both PP and MVT+P reduced cholesterol micellarization [by 25 +/- 12 (P = 0.055) and 21 +/- 8% (P = 0.020), respectively, Fisher's protected LSD test] and Caco-2 cell accumulation (by 28 +/- 8 and 10 +/- 8%, respectively; P < 0.010, Bonferroni). OJ+P did not inhibit micellarization or accumulation of cholesterol by Caco-2 cells. This study shows that fat-free phytosterol-containing products can significantly inhibit cholesterol micellarization and Caco-2 cell bioaccessibility, albeit to different extents depending on individual formulations. This is most likely explained by inhibition of cholesterol micellarization.

Safety, Tolerability, and Sensorimotor Effects of Extended-release Dalfampridine in Adults With Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of dalfampridine extended release (D-ER) in a pilot study of adults with cerebral palsy (CP) and limited ambulatory ability, and to explore drug effects on sensorimotor function. METHODS: An initial double-blind, single-dose crossover study was performed in 11 individuals randomized 1:1 to receive D-ER (10 mg) or placebo, followed by a 2-day washout period and the opposite treatment, with evaluation for safety and tolerability. A twice daily dosing, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study was then performed. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 1 of 2 sequences: 1 week of D-ER (10 mg BID) or placebo, followed by a 1-week washout and 1 week of the opposite treatment. Key inclusion criteria were age 18 to 70 years, body mass index 18.0 to 30.0 kg/m2, diagnosis of CP, and ability to perform all study procedures. Key exclusion criteria were severe CP, moderate or severe renal impairment, history of nonfebrile seizures, and prior dalfampridine use. Primary outcomes were safety profile and tolerability. Exploratory functional outcomes comprised changes in upper and lower extremity sensorimotor function (grip and pinch strength tests), manual dexterity (Box and Block Tests), and walking speed (Timed 25-Foot Walk). The most pronounced measured functional deficit in each individual was defined as the exploratory primary functional end point. Full crossover data were analyzed by using a mixed effects model. FINDINGS: Among the 24 total participants who were randomized to treatment and completed the twice daily dosing phase study, their mean age was 38.6 years (range, 20-62 years), 54% were women, and 83% had spastic CP. Adverse events were consistent with previous D-ER trials, most commonly headache (13% D-ER, 4% placebo), fatigue (13% D-ER, 0% placebo), insomnia (8% D-ER, 4% placebo), diarrhea (4% D-ER, 4% placebo), and nausea (4% D-ER, 4% placebo). The mixed model analysis of full crossover data identified no significant difference between D-ER and placebo in the primary functional analysis (the most pronounced deficit; P = 0.70) or in the secondary analyses (hand strength [P = 0.48], manual dexterity [P = 0.13], or walking speed [P = 0.42]). IMPLICATIONS: In this preliminary study of adults with CP, a BID dose of 10-mg D-ER was generally safe and well tolerated. The exploratory functional assessments for upper and lower sensorimotor deficits did not establish that the study population was markedly responsive to D-ER relative to placebo. These findings do not provide the proof-of-concept that would support further evaluation of D-ER as a potential intervention to improve function in adults with CP. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01468350.

Clinical Efficacy of Romidepsin in Tumor Stage and Folliculotropic Mycosis Fungoides.

BACKGROUND: Tumor stage and folliculotropic mycosis fungoides are uncommon subtypes of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) with an aggressive disease course. Romidepsin is a histone deacetylase inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with CTCL who have received ≥ 1 previous systemic therapy. In the present study, we examined the efficacy and safety of romidepsin in patients from the pivotal, single-arm, open-label, phase II study of relapsed or refractory CTCL with cutaneous tumors and/or folliculotropic disease involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with CTCL who had received ≥ 1 previous systemic therapy received romidepsin at 14 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles. Responses were determined by a composite endpoint (assessments of the skin, blood, and lymph nodes). Patients with cutaneous tumors and/or folliculotropic disease involvement were identified by review of diagnosis and histology reports. RESULTS: The objective response rate to romidepsin was 45% in patients with cutaneous tumors (n = 20) and 60% in patients with folliculotropic disease involvement (n = 10). CONCLUSION: Romidepsin is active in subtypes of CTCL with less favorable outcomes, such as tumor stage and folliculotropic mycosis fungoides.

Clinically significant responses achieved with romidepsin across disease compartments in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a rare heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas that arises in the skin but can progress to systemic disease (lymph nodes, blood, viscera). Historically, in clinical trials of CTCL there has been little consistency in how responses were defined in each disease "compartment"; some studies only assessed responses in the skin. The histone deacetylase inhibitor romidepsin is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of CTCL in patients who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. Phase II studies that led to approval used rigorous composite end points that incorporated disease assessments in all compartments. The objective of this analysis was to thoroughly examine the activity of romidepsin within each disease compartment in patients with CTCL. Romidepsin was shown to have clinical activity across disease compartments and is suitable for use in patients with CTCL having skin involvement only, erythroderma, lymphadenopathy and/or blood involvement.

Clinically meaningful reduction in pruritus in patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma treated with romidepsin.

Patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) frequently experience severe pruritus that can significantly impact their quality of life. Romidepsin is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with CTCL who have received at least one prior systemic therapy, with a reported objective response rate of 34%. In a phase 2 study of romidepsin in patients with CTCL (GPI-04-0001), clinically meaningful reduction in pruritus (CMRP) was evaluated as an indicator of clinical benefit by using a patient-assessed visual analog scale. To determine the effect of romidepsin alone, confounding pruritus treatments including steroids and antihistamines were prohibited. At baseline, 76% of patients reported moderate-to-severe pruritus; 43% of these patients experienced CMRP, including 11 who did not achieve an objective response. Median time to CMRP was 1.8 months, and median duration of CMRP was 5.6 months. Study results suggest that the clinical benefit of romidepsin may extend beyond objective responses.

Assessment of the Gould-Shih procedure for sample size re-estimation.

The power of a clinical trial is partly dependent upon its sample size. With continuous data, the sample size needed to attain a desired power is a function of the within-group standard deviation. An estimate of this standard deviation can be obtained during the trial itself based upon interim data; the estimate is then used to re-estimate the sample size. Gould and Shih proposed a method, based on the EM algorithm, which they claim produces a maximum likelihood estimate of the within-group standard deviation while preserving the blind, and that the estimate is quite satisfactory. However, others have claimed that the method can produce non-unique and/or severe underestimates of the true within-group standard deviation. Here the method is thoroughly examined to resolve the conflicting claims and, via simulation, to assess its validity and the properties of its estimates. The results show that the apparent non-uniqueness of the method's estimate is due to an apparently innocuous alteration that Gould and Shih made to the EM algorithm. When this alteration is removed, the method is valid in that it produces the maximum likelihood estimate of the within-group standard deviation (and also of the within-group means). However, the estimate is negatively biased and has a large standard deviation. The simulations show that with a standardized difference of 1 or less, which is typical in most clinical trials, the standard deviation from the combined samples ignoring the groups is a better estimator, despite its obvious positive bias.

Design and sample size estimation in clinical trials with clustered survival times as the primary endpoint.

Many clinical trials involve the collection of data on the time to occurrence of the same type of multiple events within sample units, in which ordering of events is arbitrary and times are usually correlated. To design a clinical trial with this type of clustered survival times as the primary endpoint, estimating the number of subjects (sampling units) required for a given power to detect a specified treatment difference is an important issue. In this paper we derive a sample size formula for clustered survival data via Lee, Wei and Amato's marginal model. It can be easily used to plan a clinical trial in which clustered survival times are of primary interest. Simulation studies demonstrate that the formula works very well. We also discuss and compare cluster survival time design and single survival time design (for example, time to the first event) in different scenarios.

Addition of ibuprofen to pseudoephedrine and chlorpheniramine in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis experience many nasal and concomitant nonnasal symptoms. Many patients also experience headaches and facial pain, pressure, or discomfort. Standard over-the-counter therapy with antihistamines and nasal decongestants often does not completely relieve all symptoms associated with allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: To establish the contribution of ibuprofen when used with pseudoephedrine and chlorpheniramine, a standard over-the-counter regimen, to relieve the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: In this 7-day, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial, qualified subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups that received combined ibuprofen/pseudoephedrine/chlorpheniramine (200/30/2 mg or 400/60/4 mg), combined pseudoephedrine/chlorpheniramine (30/2 mg), or placebo. Therapy began when the subject experienced a minimum of moderate allergy-associated pain, and it continued 3 times a day for 7 consecutive days. RESULTS: Mean pain intensity reduction in both ibuprofen/pseudoephedrine/chlorpheniramine treatment groups was 40% greater than in the placebo group and 33% greater than in the pseudoephedrine/chlorpheniramine treatment group (P < .001). Mean changes from baseline in total and nonpain symptom scores for both ibuprofen/pseudoephedrine/chlorpheniramine doses were significantly greater than for placebo (P < .001) and pseudoephedrine/chlorpheniramine (P < .001-.05) but were not different from each other. Ibuprofen enhanced the chlorpheniramine and pseudoephedrine effects, resulting in incremental 33% to 34% pain relief and 17% to 22% allergy symptom relief compared with pseudoephedrine/chlorpheniramine. CONCLUSIONS: In both doses of the triple combination, ibuprofen added to the effects of chlorpheniramine and pseudoephedrine, resulting in superior relief of pain and all nonpain allergy symptoms compared with pseudoephedrine/chlorpheniramine treatment. Furthermore, the superior efficacy of the lower dose of the triple combination allowed for a decrease in the incidence of adverse effects.