High flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus non-invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute-moderate hypercapnic respiratory failure: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Although cumulative studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC) in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, randomized trials to compare HFNC with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as initial treatment in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients with acute-moderate hypercapnic respiratory failure are limited. The aim of this randomized, open label, non-inferiority trial was to compare treatment failure rates between HFNC and NIV in such patients. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with AECOPD with a baseline arterial blood gas pH between 7.25 and 7.35 and PaCO2 ≥ 50 mmHg admitted to two intensive care units (ICUs) at a large tertiary academic teaching hospital between March 2018 and December 2022 were randomly assigned to HFNC or NIV. The primary endpoint was the rate of treatment failure, defined as endotracheal intubation or a switch to the other study treatment modality. Secondary endpoints were rates of intubation or treatment change, blood gas values, vital signs at one, 12, and 48 h, 28-day mortality, as well as ICU and hospital lengths of stay. RESULTS: 225 total patients (113 in the HFNC group and 112 in the NIV group) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The failure rate of the HFNC group was 25.7%, while the NIV group was 14.3%. The failure rate risk difference between the two groups was 11.38% (95% CI 0.25-21.20, P = 0.033), which was higher than the non-inferiority cut-off of 9%. In the per-protocol analysis, treatment failure occurred in 28 of 110 patients (25.5%) in the HFNC group and 15 of 109 patients (13.8%) in the NIV group (risk difference, 11.69%; 95% CI 0.48-22.60). The intubation rate in the HFNC group was higher than in the NIV group (14.2% vs 5.4%, P = 0.026). The treatment switch rate, ICU and hospital length of stay or 28-day mortality in the HFNC group were not statistically different from the NIV group (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: HFNC was not shown to be non-inferior to NIV and resulted in a higher incidence of treatment failure than NIV when used as the initial respiratory support for AECOPD patients with acute-moderate hypercapnic respiratory failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: chictr.org (ChiCTR1800014553). Registered 21 January 2018, http://www.chictr.org.cn.

Risk for newly diagnosed diabetes after COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that patients recovering after a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection may have a variety of acute sequelae including newly diagnosed diabetes. However, the risk of diabetes in the post-acute phase is unclear. To solve this question, we aimed to determine if there was any association between status post-coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection and a new diagnosis of diabetes. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies assessing new-onset diabetes after COVID-19. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were all searched from inception to June 10, 2022. Three evaluators independently extracted individual study data and assessed the risk of bias. Random-effects models estimated the pooled incidence and relative risk (RR) of diabetes compared to non-COVID-19 after COVID-19. RESULTS: Nine studies with nearly 40 million participants were included. Overall, the incidence of diabetes after COVID-19 was 15.53 (7.91-25.64) per 1000 person-years, and the relative risk of diabetes after COVID-19 infection was elevated (RR 1.62 [1.45-1.80]). The relative risk of type 1 diabetes was RR=1.48 (1.26-1.75) and type 2 diabetes was RR=1.70 (1.32-2.19), compared to non-COVID-19 patients. At all ages, there was a statistically significant positive association between infection with COVID-19 and the risk of diabetes: <18 years: RR=1.72 (1.19-2.49), ≥18 years: RR=1.63 (1.26-2.11), and >65 years: RR=1.68 (1.22-2.30). The relative risk of diabetes in different gender groups was about 2 (males: RR=2.08 [1.27-3.40]; females: RR=1.99 [1.47-2.80]). The risk of diabetes increased 1.17-fold (1.02-1.34) after COVID-19 infection compared to patients with general upper respiratory tract infections. Patients with severe COVID-19 were at higher risk (RR=1.67 [1.25-2.23]) of diabetes after COVID-19. The risk (RR=1.95 [1.85-2.06]) of diabetes was highest in the first 3 months after COVID-19. These results remained after taking confounding factors into account. CONCLUSIONS: After COVID-19, patients of all ages and genders had an elevated incidence and relative risk for a new diagnosis of diabetes. Particular attention should be paid during the first 3 months of follow-up after COVID-19 for new-onset diabetes.

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis: characteristics and rapid diagnostic approach in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is a common type of autoimmune encephalitis. Patients with this condition are frequently very ill but are often misdiagnosed in the Emergency Department (ED). The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of anti-NMDAR patients in the ED and to identify any associations with a diagnosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively obtained cohort of ED patients from May 2011 to December 2017. We identified patients diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis in this cohort and extracted key patient characteristics and clinical data, including patient gender, age, presentation, modified Rank Score (m-RS), laboratory test results, significant treatments, and mortality. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis were identified. 54 (62.1%) were female, 23 (26.4%) were < 18 years old, 14 (16.1%) had teratoma, and 45 (51.7%) had an m-RS ≥ 4. Fever, altered mental status, and seizures were the most common symptoms, with a > 50% incidence of each symptom in the cohort. The sensitivity of CSF oligoclonal band (OB) testing was 78.9%. 22 (25.3%) were admitted to the ICU, 20 (23.0%) patients were intubated, but only one patient died (1.1%). 47 (54.0%) were misdiagnosed prior to ED arrival. All patients underwent immunotherapy as first-line treatment for anti-NMDAR encephalitis. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients presenting to the ED were female and were likely to be misdiagnosed prior to arrival. Patients with symptoms of fever, altered mental status, and seizures need a lumbar puncture, including CSF OB testing, for definitive diagnosis.

Role of anti-allergic agents on attenuating transfusion reactions in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anti-allergic agents (e.g. dexamethasone, chlorpheniramine or promethazine) are commonly administered to patients prior to blood product transfusions. However, the use of these agents is largely experience-based instead of evidence-based. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the evidence behind using anti-allergic agents to attenuate transfusion reactions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese Biomedical literature (CMB) databases were all queried for related articles. Data from groups treated with and without anti-allergic agents were collected for meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3. Baseline characteristics and univariate statistics between groups were compared using SPSS 19.0. RESULTS: Eight eligible articles (six case control studies and two randomized controlled trials, all with high risks of bias) were identified (22060 total cases). Administered anti-allergic agents in these studies only included dexamethasone, chlorpheniramine or promethazine. Baseline characteristics showed no significant age or gender differences between treatment or control groups. There were no significant differences between the pooled experimental or control groups (for each of the three medications) in terms of fever, pruritis, rash, airway spasm or overall transfusion reaction rates. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence that dexamethasone, chlorpheniramine or promethazine can prevent transfusion reactions. Avoiding the arbitrary use of such anti-allergic agents before blood transfusions may potentially avoid needless adverse drug reactions.

The impact of SARS and COVID-19 on major trauma in Hong Kong.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been enormously disruptive and harmful to people around the world, but its impact on other illnesses and injuries has been more variable. To evaluate the ramification of infectious disease outbreaks on major traumatic injuries, we compared changes in the incidence of major trauma cases during the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) period with COVID-19 in 2020. METHODS: Data were analyzed from the trauma registry of a major, tertiary-care teaching hospital in Hong Kong. Patients presenting with major traumatic injuries during the first six months of 2001-03 and 2018-20 were retrieved for analysis. Patient characteristics, injury mechanism, admitting service, and emergency department (ED)/hospital lengths of stay (LOS) were recorded. Raw and adjusted survival rates (using the modified Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS)) were recorded. RESULTS: The number of trauma cases fell dramatically during 2003 and 2020 compared with previous years. In both 2003 and 2020, the number of trauma registry patients fell by 49% in April (compared to the preceding reference years of 2001/02 and 2018/19, respectively). Patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were also different during the outbreak years. Comparing 2003 to 2020 relative to their respective reference baselines, the percentages of injuries that happened at home, patients without co-morbidities, and patients' mean age all increased in 2003 but decreased in 2020. Work-place injuries drastically dropped in 2003, but not in 2020. Average ED LOS dropped in 2003 by 36.4 min (95% CI 12.5, 60.3) but declined by only 14.5 min (95% CI -2.9, 32.1) in 2020. Both observed and expected 30-day mortality declined in 2020 vs. 2003 (observed 4.5% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.001, OR 0.352, 95% CI 0.187, 0.661) (expected 4.5% vs 11.6%, p = 0.002, OR 0.358, 95% CI 0.188, 0.684). CONCLUSION: Major trauma cases dropped by half during both the peak of the 2003 SARS and 2020 COVID-19 pandemics in Hong Kong, suggesting a trend for future pandemic planning. If similar findings are seen at other trauma centers, proactive personnel and resource allocations away from trauma towards medical emergency systems may be more appropriate for future pandemics.

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus non-invasive ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients after extubation: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy is being increasingly used to prevent post-extubation hypoxemic respiratory failure and reintubation. However, evidence to support the use of HFNC in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure after extubation is limited. This study was conducted to test if HFNC is non-inferior to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in preventing post-extubation treatment failure in COPD patients previously intubated for hypercapnic respiratory failure. METHODS: COPD patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure who were already receiving invasive ventilation were randomized to HFNC or NIV at extubation at two large tertiary academic teaching hospitals. The primary endpoint was treatment failure, defined as either resumption of invasive ventilation or switching to the other study treatment modality (NIV for patients in the NFNC group or vice versa). RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were randomly assigned to the HFNC group or NIV group. After secondary exclusion, 44 patients in the HFNC group and 42 patients in the NIV group were included in the analysis. The treatment failure rate in the HFNC group was 22.7% and 28.6% in the NIV group-risk difference of - 5.8% (95% CI, - 23.8-12.4%, p = 0.535), which was significantly lower than the non-inferior margin of 9%. Analysis of the causes of treatment failure showed that treatment intolerance in the HFNC group was significantly lower than that in the NIV group, with a risk difference of - 50.0% (95% CI, - 74.6 to - 12.9%, p = 0.015). One hour after extubation, the mean respiratory rates of both groups were faster than their baseline levels before extubation (p < 0.050). Twenty-four hours after extubation, the respiratory rate of the HFNC group had returned to baseline, but the NIV group was still higher than the baseline. Forty-eight hours after extubation, the respiratory rates of both groups were not significantly different from the baseline. The average number of daily airway care interventions in the NIV group was 7 (5-9.3), which was significantly higher than 6 (4-7) times in the HFNC group (p = 0.006). The comfort score and incidence of nasal and facial skin breakdown of the HFNC group was also significantly better than that of the NIV group [7 (6-8) vs 5 (4-7), P < 0.001] and [0 vs 9.6%, p = 0.027], respectively. CONCLUSION: Among COPD patients with severe hypercapnic respiratory failure who received invasive ventilation, the use of HFNC after extubation did not result in increased rates of treatment failure compared with NIV. HFNC also had better tolerance and comfort than NIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION: chictr.org ( ChiCTR1800018530 ). Registered on 22 September 2018, http://www.chictr.org.cn/usercenter.aspx.

The association between levosimendan and mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Levosimendan is increasingly being used in patients with sepsis or septic shock because of its potential to improve organ function and reduce mortality. We aimed to determine if levosimendan can reduce mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock via meta-analysis. EVIDENCE SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: We comprehensively searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception through 1 October 2022. Literature evaluating the efficacy of levosimendan in patients with sepsis or septic shock was included. DATA EXTRACTION AND OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Two reviewers extracted data and assessed study quality. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate an odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and P -values for 28-day mortality (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes included changes in indexes reflecting cardiac function before and after treatment, changes in serum lactate levels in the first 24 h of treatment, and the mean SOFA score during the study period. Safety outcomes included rates of tachyarrhythmias and total adverse reactions encountered with levosimendan. RESULTS: Eleven randomized controlled trials were identified, encompassing a total of 1044 patients. After using levosimendan, there was no statistical difference between groups for 28-day mortality (34.9% and 36.2%; OR: 0.93; 95% CI [0.72-1.2]; P  = 0.57; I 2  = 0%; trial sequential analysis-adjusted CI [0.6-1.42]) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and more adverse reactions seemed to occur in the levosimendan group, although the septic shock patient's heart function and serum lactate level improved. CONCLUSION: There was no association between the use of levosimendan and 28-day mortality and SOFA scores in patients with septic shock, though there was statistically significant improvement in cardiac function and serum lactate.

A novel predictor of unsustained return of spontaneous circulation in cardiac arrest patients through a combination of capnography and pulse oximetry: a multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND: Unsustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is a critical barrier to survival in cardiac arrest patients. This study examined whether end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) and pulse oximetry photoplethysmogram (POP) parameters can be used to identify unsustained ROSC. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter observational prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with cardiac arrest from 2013 to 2014. Patients' general information, ETCO2, and POP parameters were collected and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The included 105 ROSC episodes (from 80 cardiac arrest patients) comprised 51 sustained ROSC episodes and 54 unsustained ROSC episodes. The 24-hour survival rate was significantly higher in the sustained ROSC group than in the unsustained ROSC group (29.2% vs. 9.4%, P<0.05). The logistic regression analysis showed that the difference between after and before ROSC in ETCO2 (ΔETCO2) and the difference between after and before ROCS in area under the curve of POP (ΔAUCp) were independently associated with sustained ROSC (odds ratio [OR]=0.931, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.881-0.984, P=0.011 and OR=0.998, 95% CI 0.997-0.999, P<0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of ΔETCO2, ΔAUCp, and the combination of both to predict unsustained ROSC were 0.752 (95% CI 0.660-0.844), 0.883 (95% CI 0.818-0.948), and 0.902 (95% CI 0.842-0.962), respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with unsustained ROSC have a poor prognosis. The combination of ΔETCO2 and ΔAUCp showed significant predictive value for unsustained ROSC.

Incidence and diagnostic validity of difficult airway in emergency departments in China: a cross-sectional survey.

Background: The difficult airway is a topic of concern for any physician performing intubation. Severe adverse events which can happen because of an unexpected difficult airway emphasize the importance of prediction. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of difficult airways in emergency departments in mainland China and ascertain the predictive value of common assessment formulas. Methods: This study was a multicentral, cross-sectional investigation of patients intubated in emergency departments in mainland China between March 1-30, 2021. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for patient characteristics. Diagnostic values were analyzed by sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, the area under the curve, and corresponding P values. Results: Nine hundred and eighty-five patients in 41 hospitals were enrolled in the study. Elderly male patients occupied most of the intubated patients. The difficult face mask ventilation rate (8.2%) was higher, but the difficult glottic exposure (6.8%) and intubation (2.1%) rates were low, while there was widespread use of enhanced visualization equipment (80.6%). Four combined emergency applicable evaluation methods showed a certain predictive value for the difficult airway with a sensitivity [0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47-0.89], specificity (0.79; 95% CI: 0.76-0.81), and the area under the curve (0.75; 95% CI: 0.64-0.87, P<0.01). Conclusions: Despite an insufficient predictive ability for current difficult airway evaluation methods, there were relatively low rates of difficult airways during ED intubations in mainland China. Continuing focus on the difficult airway problems and optimizing airway assessment are required.

CLINICAL PHENOTYPES OF SEPSIS-ASSOCIATED ENCEPHALOPATHY: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY.

ABSTRACT: Background: Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a dysfunction of the central nervous system experienced during sepsis with variable clinical and pathophysiologic features. We sought to identify distinct SAE phenotypes in relation to clinical outcomes. Methods: The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database and the eICU database were used to conduct a retrospective cohort study. Adult sepsis patients were included and SAE was defined as having a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ˂15 or delirium. The following our clinical phenotypes were defined as: ischemic-hypoxic, metabolic, mixed (ischemic-hypoxic and metabolic), and unclassified. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results: The study enrolled 4,120 sepsis patients, 2,239 from MIMIC-IV (including 1,489 patients with SAE, 67%), and 1,881 from eICU (1,291, 69%). For the SAE cohort, 2,780 patients in total were enrolled (median age, 67 years; interquartile range, 56-76.8; 1,589 (57%) were male; median GCS score was 12 [8-14]; median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 6 [4-9]). The SAE phenotype distributions between the MIMIC-IV and eICU cohorts were as follows (39% vs. 35% ischemic-hypoxic, P = 0.043; 38% vs. 40% metabolic, P = 0.239; 15% vs. 15% mixed, P = 0.972; 38% vs. 40% unclassified, P = 0.471). For the overall cohort, the in-hospital mortality for patients with ischemic-hypoxic, metabolic, mixed, or unclassified phenotypes was 33.9% (95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.37), 28.4% (0.26-0.31), 41.5% (0.37-0.46), and 14.2% (0.12-0.16), respectively. In the multivariable logistic analysis, the mixed phenotype was associated with the highest risk of in-hospital mortality after adjusting for age, sex, GCS, and modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (adjusted odds ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-2.67; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Four SAE phenotypes had different clinical outcomes. The mixed phenotype had the worst outcomes. Further understanding of these phenotypes in sepsis may improve trial design and targeted SAE management.

Fresh Frozen Plasma in Cases of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Does Not Improve Outcomes.

Background: Blood products are commonly transfused in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). There exists considerable practice variation and less evidence to guide fresh frozen plasma transfusion in patients with UGIB. The aim of this study was to explore any association between fresh frozen plasma transfusion following acute UGIB and clinical outcomes. Methods: This was a prospective, observational, multicenter study conducted at 20 tertiary hospitals in China. Patients with acute UGIB with an international normalized ratio ≤ 2.0 at emergency department admission were included. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine and quantify any clinical associations. Results: A total of 976 patients (61.57 ± 15.79 years old, 73.05% male) were included, of whom 17.42% received fresh frozen plasma transfusion. The overall 90-day mortality and rebleeding rates were 10.20 and 12.19%, respectively. After adjusting for confounding factors, transfusion of fresh frozen plasma during hospitalization was associated with higher 90-day mortality [odd ratio (OR), 2.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.36-4.09; p = 0.002] but not rebleeding (OR, 1.5; 95% CI; 0.94-2.54; p = 0.085). In a subgroup analysis, patients with an international normalized ratio <1.5 who were treated with fresh frozen plasma were associated with both significantly higher 90-day mortality (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.49-5.21; p = 0.001) and rebleeding (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.16-3.52; p = 0.013), whereas in patients with an international normalized ratio between 1.5 and 2, we did not find any significant correlation. Conclusion: This study found an association between fresh frozen plasma transfusion following acute UGIB and elevated 90-day mortality. Both 90-day mortality and rebleeding risk were significantly higher in patients with an international normalized ratio < 1.5. Fresh frozen plasma transfusion in acute UGIB does not improve the poor outcomes (Chinese Clinical Trial registry, Number ChiCTR1900028676).

High-flow nasal cannula therapy with sequential noninvasive ventilation versus noninvasive ventilation alone as the initial ventilatory strategy in acute COPD exacerbations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is the recommended mode of ventilation used in acute respiratory failure secondary to an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Recent data has shown that high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) treatment can be an alternative for patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure. The purpose of this study is to evaluate HFNC with sequential NIV versus NIV alone as the initial ventilatory strategy in AECOPD. METHODS: This investigator-initiated, unblinded, single center, randomized controlled trial will be conducted in the emergency department, emergency intensive care unit, or respiratory intensive care unit of a tertiary-care urban teaching hospital. A total of 66 patients will be enrolled and randomized into the intervention group (HFNC with sequential NIV) or the control group (NIV group). The primary endpoint will be the mean difference in PaCO2 from baseline to 24 h after randomization. Secondary endpoints include the mean difference in PaCO2 from baseline to 6, 12, and 18 h, as well as the dyspnea score, overall discomfort score, rate of treatment failure, respiratory rate, rate of endotracheal intubation, length of hospital stay, and mortality. DISCUSSION: Taking the advantages of both HFNC and NIV on AECOPD patients into account, we designed this clinical trial to investigate the combination of these ventilatory strategies. This trial will help us understand how HFNC with sequential NIV compares to NIV alone in treating AECOPD patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2100054809.

Tracheal Intubation in Emergency Departments in China: A National Cross-Sectional Survey.

Background: Tracheal intubation is a necessary but risky procedure performed in emergency departments (EDs) around the world. Relatively high morbidity has been encountered in Chinese EDs, which has raised concerns about peri-intubation ED management. This study aimed to investigate intubation procedures and identify any areas for improvement in Chinese EDs. Methods: This was a questionnaire-based survey lasting 1 month (March 2021) in 41 tertiary-care hospital EDs in mainland China. The primary outcome was complications associated with intubation. Secondary outcomes were the first-pass success rate and blood pressure variations during intubation. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses were used to find possible risk factors for first-pass intubation failure. Results: In total, 1,020 replies were analyzed out of 1,080 surveys submitted (94.4% response rate). Most patients were elderly men with severe medical conditions like cardiac arrest (24.8%). In total, 97.2% of patients were given preoxygenation, and 48.1% received some form of pretreatment. Induction drugs (e.g., etomidate and ketamine) were less often used: 39.9% of intubations used sedatives, 5.5% used analgesics, and only 5.3% used muscle relaxants. The overall first-pass intubation success rate was 85.7% and was accompanied by a 19.8% adverse event rate. A marked decrease in blood pressure after intubation was also identified. Conclusion: This survey found an 85.7% tracheal intubation first-pass success rate (which is relatively high compared to other countries) and a 19.8% adverse event rate (which is also relatively high). Given the very low rate of using induction medications (5.3% used muscle relaxants), future education should focus on induction drugs and traditional intubation techniques.

Clinical Characteristics and Mortality of Non-tuberculous Mycobacterial Infection in Immunocompromised vs. Immunocompetent Hosts.

Immunosuppression and host vulnerability play a key role in non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) pathogenesis. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and mortality of NTM infections in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients. We used a retrospective dataset obtained from our large, tertiary, urban, teaching hospital which is the medical records of hospitalized patients with NTM infections between January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2020. The information including clinical manifestations, imaging, and NTM etiological data were obtained from the hospital's clinical data system. A total of 480 patients with NTM infections completed species identification. 118 hospitalized NTM patients who met ATS/IDSA NTM diagnostic criteria and had complete medical records were included in the study. The average age was 49.4 years, 57 (48.3%) were female, and 64 (54.2%) were immunosuppressed hosts. In our study, the most common species in order of frequency were: M. intracellulare, M. abscessus, M. avium, and M. kansasii among NTM patients. The most common comorbidity was history of previous tuberculosis (30.5%). Besides malignancy, the most common immunodeficiencies were adult-onset immunodeficiency induced by anti-interferon-gamma autoantibody, SLE, and vasculitis. The immunocompromised patients with NTM had more clinical symptoms, comorbidities and lower lymphocyte counts compared to immunocompetent patients. The mortality we observed in immunocompromised patients of NTM disease was significantly higher than that of immunocompetent patients (HR 3.537, 95% CI 1.526-8.362). Immunosuppressed NTM patients with lower B and CD4+ T lymphocyte counts may more frequently present with disseminated NTM infections, clinical exacerbations, and higher mortality than immunocompetent patients.

Norepinephrine use in cardiogenic shock patients is associated with increased 30 day mortality.

AIMS: Norepinephrine is recommended as a first-line vasopressor agent in the haemodynamic stabilization of cardiogenic shock. The survival benefit of norepinephrine therapy has not been demonstrated in clinical practice, however. This study aimed to explore the relationship between norepinephrine use and outcomes in cardiogenic shock patients in real-world conditions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. Cardiogenic shock patients were enrolled and categorized into a norepinephrine group or a non-norepinephrine group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to control for confounders. Cox proportional-hazards models and multivariable logistic regression were used to investigate the relationship between norepinephrine treatment and mortality. A total of 927 eligible patients were included: 552 patients in the norepinephrine group and 375 patients in the non-norepinephrine group. After PSM, 222 cases from each group were matched using a 1:1 matching algorithm. Thirty day mortality for patients treated with norepinephrine was significantly higher than for those in the non-norepinephrine group (41% vs. 30%, OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.09-2.39, P = 0.017; HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.09-2.06, P = 0.013). In the multivariable analysis, there was no significant difference between norepinephrine therapy and long-term (90 day, 180 day, or 1 year) mortality (90 day (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.82-1.74, P = 0.363), 180 day (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.80-1.70, P = 0.418), 1 year (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.79-1.66, P = 0.477). Patients in the norepinephrine group required more mechanical ventilation (84% vs. 67%, OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.70-4.25, P < 0.001) and experienced longer ICU stays (median 7 vs. 4 days, OR 7.92, 95% CI 1.40-44.83, P = 0.020) than non-norepinephrine group. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiogenic shock patients treated with norepinephrine were associated with significantly increased short-term mortality, while no significant difference was found on long-term survival rates. Future trials are needed to validate and explore this association.

Is rosuvastatin protective against sepsis-associated encephalopathy? A secondary analysis of the SAILS trial.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a common cause of death in emergency departments and sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a major complication. Rosuvastatin may play a neuroprotective role due to its protective effects on the vascular endothelium and its anti-inflammatory functions. Our study aimed to explore the potential protective function of rosuvastatin against SAE. METHODS: Sepsis patients without any neurological dysfunction on admission were prospectively enrolled in the "Rosuvastatin for Sepsis-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome" study (SAILS trial, ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00979121). Patients were divided into rosuvastatin and placebo groups. This is a secondary analysis of the SAILS dataset. Baseline characteristics, therapy outcomes, and adverse drug events were compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were eligible for our study. Of these patients, 51 were treated with rosuvastatin. There were significantly fewer cases of SAE in the rosuvastatin group than in the placebo group (32.1% vs. 57.1%, P=0.028). However, creatine kinase levels were significantly higher in the rosuvastatin group than in the placebo group (233 [22-689] U/L vs. 79 [12-206] U/L, P=0.034). CONCLUSION: Rosuvastatin appears to have a protective role against SAE but may result in a higher incidence of adverse events.

Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management Workforce Development Strategies: Delphi Consensus Study.

INTRODUCTION: Health workforce development is essential for achieving the goals of an effective health system, as well as establishing national Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management (Health EDRM). STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this Delphi consensus study was to identify strategic recommendations for strengthening the workforce for Health EDRM in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and high-income countries (HIC). METHODS: A total of 31 international experts were asked to rate the level of importance (one being strongly unimportant to seven being strongly important) for 46 statements that contain recommendations for strengthening the workforce for Health EDRM. The experts were divided into a LMIC group and an HIC group. There were three rounds of rating, and statements that did not reach consensus (SD ≥ 1.0) proceeded to the next round for further ranking. RESULTS: In total, 44 statements from the LMIC group and 34 statements from the HIC group attained consensus and achieved high mean scores for importance (higher than five out of seven). The components of the World Health Organization (WHO) Health EDRM Framework with the highest number of recommendations were "Human Resources" (n = 15), "Planning and Coordination" (n = 7), and "Community Capacities for Health EDRM" (n = 6) in the LMIC group. "Policies, Strategies, and Legislation" (n = 7) and "Human Resources" (n = 7) were the components with the most recommendations for the HIC group. CONCLUSION: The expert panel provided a comprehensive list of important and actionable strategic recommendations on workforce development for Health EDRM.

Comparing the Performance of the ABC, AIMS65, GBS, and pRS Scores in Predicting 90-day Mortality Or Rebleeding Among Emergency Department Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common problem that can cause significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to compare the performance of the ABC score (ABC), the AIMS65 score (AIMS65), the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), and the pre-endoscopic Rockall score (pRS) in predicting 90-day mortality or rebleeding among patients with acute UGIB. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study conducted at 20 tertiary hospitals in China. Data were collected between June 30, 2020 and February 10, 2021. An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis was used to compare the performance of the four scores in predicting 90-day mortality or rebleeding. RESULTS: Among the 1072 patients included during the study period, the overall 90-day mortality rate was 10.91% (117/1072) and the rebleeding rate was 12.03% (129/1072). In predicting 90-day mortality, the ABC and pRS scores performed better with an AUC of 0.722 (95% CI 0.675-0.768; P<0.001) and 0.711 (95% CI 0.663-0.757; P<0.001), respectively, compared to the AIMS-65 (AUC, 0.672; 95% CI, 0.624-0.721; P<0.001) and GBS (AUC, 0.624; 95% CI, 0.569-0.679; P<0.001) scores. In predicting rebleeding in 90 days, the AUC of all scores did not exceed 0.70. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute UGIB, ABC and pRS performed better than AIMS-65 and GBS in predicting 90-day mortality. The performance of each score is not satisfactory in predicting rebleeding, however. Newer predictive models are needed to predict rebleeding after UGIB.

Can bag-valve mask ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure reduce hypoxia during intubation? A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: Hypoxia is one of the life-threatening complications of endotracheal intubation. Supplemental oxygen and ventilation play a vital role in preventing hypoxia. Bag-valve mask (BVM) ventilation is frequently used before intubation, and its ability to improve oxygenation was recently confirmed. It is still unclear if positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) added to BVM ventilation can further reduce hypoxia during intubation. METHODS: This will be a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial to determine if PEEP combined with BVM ventilation can reduce the incidence of hypoxia during intubation compared with conventional BVM ventilation. The lowest oxygen saturation and incidence of complications will be compiled to verify the comparative effectiveness and safety of the two groups. DISCUSSION: BMV ventilation with PEEP is hoped to further reduce the incidence of hypoxia during intubation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000035156 . Registered on August 2, 2020. It had begun enrollment after passing ethical review but before registration.