ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) frequently contaminate hospital environments. We performed a multicenter, cluster-randomized, crossover trial of 2 methods for monitoring of terminal cleaning effectiveness. METHODS: Six intensive care units (ICUs) at 3 medical centers received both interventions sequentially, in randomized order. Ten surfaces were surveyed each in 5 rooms weekly, after terminal cleaning, with adenosine triphosphate (ATP) monitoring or an ultraviolet fluorescent marker (UV/F). Results were delivered to environmental services staff in real time with failing surfaces recleaned. We measured monthly rates of MDRO infection or colonization, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridioides difficile, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, and MDR gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB) during a 12-month baseline period and sequential 6-month intervention periods, separated by a 2-month washout. Primary analysis compared only the randomized intervention periods, whereas secondary analysis included the baseline. RESULTS: The ATP method was associated with a reduction in incidence rate of MDRO infection or colonization compared with the UV/F period (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.876; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.807-0.951; Pâ =â .002). Including the baseline period, the ATP method was associated with reduced infection with MDROs (IRR 0.924; 95% CI, 0.855-0.998; Pâ =â .04), and MDR-GNB infection or colonization (IRR 0.856; 95% CI, 0.825-0.887; Pâ <â .001). The UV/F intervention was not associated with a statistically significant impact on these outcomes. Room turnaround time increased by a median of 1 minute with the ATP intervention and 4.5 minutes with UV/F compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive monitoring of ICU terminal room cleaning with an ATP modality is associated with a reduction of MDRO infection and colonization.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci , Adenosine Triphosphate , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Humans , Intensive Care Units , VancomycinABSTRACT
Persistent Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) has been associated with increased mortality. Enhanced microbial detection with new blood culture technology may improve detection of S. aureus in patients with SAB. We performed a 24-month retrospective study of hospitalized adults with SAB and an infectious diseases consult comparing two time periods pre- (January to December 2018) and postimplementation (January to December 2019) in which the VersaTREK and BacT/Alert Virtuo blood culture systems were used, respectively. Measurements included SAB duration, time to positivity, source of bacteremia, antimicrobial therapy, and mortality. A total of 416 episodes of SAB occurred during the study period: 176 (42%) pre- and 240 (58%) postimplementation. Patients in both periods had similar clinical characteristics; however, patients in the postimplementation period were more likely to have intermediate (3 to 6 days; 23% versus 40%; P < 0.001) and prolonged SAB duration (>7 days; 4% versus 14%; P < 0.001). Combination antistaphylococcal therapy was more frequent postimplementation (6.3% pre- versus 15.8% postimplementation; P = 0.003), and the median time to source control was shorter (4 versus 2 days; P = 0.02). Median time to positivity for the index blood culture was shorter postimplementation (17.8 h pre- versus 13.3 h postimplementation; P < 0.001). There was no difference in 90-day all-cause readmissions (51% versus 44%; P = 0.11) or mortality (32% versus 32%; P = 0.95). An increased frequency of prolonged SAB with increased use of combination antistaphylococcal therapy was noted with implementation of a new blood culture system, likely secondary to the blood culture media; however, no differences on adverse outcomes were noted.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Staphylococcal Infections , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Blood Culture , Culture Media , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcus aureusABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and factors associated with post-discharge prophylactic antibiotic use after spinal fusion and whether use was associated with decreased risk of surgical site infection (SSI). METHODS: Persons aged 10-64 years undergoing spinal fusion between 1 January 2010 and 30 June 2015 were identified in the MarketScan Commercial Database. Complicated patients and those coded for infection from 30 days before to 2 days after the surgical admission were excluded. Outpatient oral antibiotics were identified within 2 days of surgical discharge. SSI was defined using ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes within 90 days of surgery. Generalized linear models were used to determine factors associated with post-discharge prophylactic antibiotic use and with SSI. RESULTS: The cohort included 156 446 fusion procedures, with post-discharge prophylactic antibiotics used in 9223 (5.9%) surgeries. SSIs occurred after 2557 (1.6%) procedures. Factors significantly associated with post-discharge prophylactic antibiotics included history of lymphoma, diabetes, 3-7 versus 1-2 vertebral levels fused, and non-infectious postoperative complications. In multivariable analysis, post-discharge prophylactic antibiotic use was not associated with SSI risk after spinal fusion (relative risk 0.98; 95% CI 0.84-1.14). CONCLUSIONS: Post-discharge prophylactic oral antibiotics after spinal fusion were used more commonly in patients with major medical comorbidities, more complex surgeries and those with postoperative complications during the surgical admission. After adjusting for surgical complexity and infection risk factors, post-discharge prophylactic antibiotic use was not associated with decreased SSI risk. These results suggest that prolonged prophylactic antibiotic use should be avoided after spine surgery, given the lack of benefit and potential for harm.
Subject(s)
Spinal Fusion , Surgical Wound Infection , Adolescent , Adult , Aftercare , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Child , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Predictors associated with the decision of blood culture ordering among hospitalized patients with abnormal body temperature are still underexplored, particularly non-clinical factors. In this study, we evaluated the factors affecting blood culture ordering in febrile and hypothermic inpatients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 15,788 adult inpatients with fever (≥ 38.3â) or hypothermia (< 36.0â) from January 2016 to December 2017. We evaluated the proportion of febrile and hypothermic episodes with an associated blood culture performed within 24h. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to determine independent predictors associated with blood culture ordering among febrile and hypothermic inpatients. RESULTS: We identified 21,383 abnormal body temperature episodes among 15,788 inpatients (13,093 febrile and 8,290 hypothermic episodes). Blood cultures were performed in 36.7% (7,850/ 21,383) of these episodes. Predictors for blood culture ordering among inpatients with abnormal body temperature included fever ≥ 39â (adjusted odd ratio [aOR] 4.17, 95% confident interval [CI] 3.91-4.46), fever (aOR 3.48, 95% CI 3.27-3.69), presence of a central venous catheter (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.30-1.43), systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) plus hypotension (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.26-1.40), SIRS (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.20-1.31), admission to stem cell transplant / medical oncology services (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.14), and detection of abnormal body temperature during night shift (aOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.09) or on the weekend (aOR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.08). CONCLUSION: Blood culture ordering for hospitalized patients with fever or hypothermia is multifactorial; both clinical and non-clinical factors. These wide variations and gaps in practices suggest opportunities to improve utilization patterns.
Subject(s)
Hypothermia , Adult , Blood Culture , Fever/diagnosis , Humans , Hypothermia/diagnosis , Hypothermia/epidemiology , Inpatients , Retrospective Studies , Systemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeABSTRACT
The bioMérieux BacT/Alert Virtuo blood culture system used in combination with resin-containing media may enhance the growth of microorganisms. Our objective was to assess the impact of transitioning to the Virtuo system in comparison to the VersaTREK blood culture system at a tertiary care medical center. We retrospectively reviewed all blood cultures performed at a 1,250-bed academic medical center between January and December 2018 (VersaTREK) and January and December 2019 (Virtuo). Blood culture positivity rates and contamination rates were compared before and after Virtuo implementation. Of 101,438 blood cultures performed during the study period, 48,839 (48.1%) were processed preimplementation and 52,599 (51.9%) postimplementation. The blood culture positivity rate increased from 8.1% preimplementation to 11.7% postimplementation (P < 0.001). Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated species in both time periods and had a higher recovery rate postimplementation (1.5% of all blood cultures obtained preimplementation versus 3.4% postimplementation; P < 0.001). A higher recovery rate in the postimplementation period was also noted for coagulase-negative staphylococci (1.9% preimplementation versus 2.7% postimplementation; P < 0.001), as well as modest but statistically significant changes for Escherichia coli (0.8% versus 1.0%; P < 0.001), Klebsiella pneumoniae (0.4% versus 0.5%; P = 0.005), and Candida albicans. (0.1% versus 0.2%; P = 0.038). The inpatient blood culture contamination rate was higher postimplementation (1.5% preimplementation versus 1.9% postimplementation; P < 0.001). The Virtuo blood culture system was associated with a higher observed proportion of positive blood cultures than the VersaTREK system. Future studies are needed to assess whether an increased rate of positive blood cultures is associated with changes in clinical outcomes.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Blood Culture , Bacteremia/diagnosis , Culture Media , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcus aureus , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) are frequently admitted for invasive infections. Medications for OUD (MOUD) may improve outcomes in hospitalized patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort of 220 admissions to a tertiary care center for invasive infections due to OUD, we compared 4 MOUD treatment strategies: methadone, buprenorphine, methadone taper for detoxification, and no medication to determine whether there were differences in parenteral antibiotic completion and readmission rates. RESULTS: The MOUDs were associated with increased completion of parenteral antimicrobial therapy (64.08% vs 46.15%; odds ratio [OR] = 2.08; 95% CI, 1.23-3.61). On multivariate analysis, use of MOUD maintenance with either buprenorphine (OR = 0.38; 95% CI, .17-.85) or methadone maintenance (OR = 0.43; 95% CI, .20-.94) and continuation of MOUD on discharge (OR = 0.35; 95% CI, .18-.67) was associated with lower 90-day readmissions. In contrast, use of methadone for detoxification followed by tapering of the medication without continuation on discharge was not associated with decreased readmissions (OR = 1.87; 95% CI, .62-5.10). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term MOUDs, regardless of selection, are an integral component of care in patients hospitalized with OUD-related infections. Patients with OUD should have arrangements made for MOUDs to be continued after discharge, and MOUDs should not be discontinued before discharge.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Invasive Fungal Infections/drug therapy , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Opiate Substitution Treatment/methods , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Bacterial Infections/etiology , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Buprenorphine/therapeutic use , Continuity of Patient Care , Drug Users/psychology , Drug Users/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Invasive Fungal Infections/epidemiology , Invasive Fungal Infections/etiology , Invasive Fungal Infections/prevention & control , Male , Medication Adherence/psychology , Methadone/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Opiate Substitution Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Opioid-Related Disorders/complications , Opioid-Related Disorders/psychology , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/psychology , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Persons who inject drugs (PWID) are at risk of invasive infections; however, hospitalizations to treat these infections are frequently complicated by against medical advice (AMA) discharges. This study compared outcomes among PWID who (1) completed a full course of inpatient intravenous (IV) antibiotics, (2) received a partial course of IV antibiotics but were not prescribed any antibiotics on AMA discharge, and (3) received a partial course of IV antibiotics and were prescribed oral antibiotics on AMA discharge. METHODS: A retrospective, cohort study of PWID aged ≥18 years admitted to a tertiary referral center between 01/2016 and 07/2019, who received an infectious diseases consultation for an invasive bacterial or fungal infection. RESULTS: 293 PWID were included in the study. 90-day all-cause readmission rates were highest among PWID who did not receive oral antibiotic therapy on AMA discharge (nâ =â 46, 68.7%), compared with inpatient IV (nâ =â 43, 31.5%) and partial oral (nâ =â 27, 32.5%) antibiotics. In a multivariate analysis, 90-day readmission risk was higher among PWID who did not receive oral antibiotic therapy on AMA discharge (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR],â 2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-3.82) and not different among PWID prescribed oral antibiotic therapy on AMA discharge (aHR,â .99; 95% CI, .62-1.62). Surgical source control (aHR,â .57; 95% CI, .37-.87) and addiction medicine consultation (aHR,â .57; 95% CI, .38-.86) were both associated with reduced readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Our single-center study suggests access to oral antibiotic therapy for PWID who cannot complete prolonged inpatient IV antibiotic courses is beneficial.
Subject(s)
Drug Users , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complicationsABSTRACT
Importance: Obesity increases the risk of both cesarean delivery and surgical-site infection. Despite widespread use, it is unclear whether prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy reduces surgical-site infection after cesarean delivery in obese women. Objective: To evaluate whether prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy, initiated immediately after cesarean delivery, lowers the risk of surgical-site infections compared with standard wound dressing in obese women. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter randomized trial conducted from February 8, 2017, through November 13, 2019, at 4 academic and 2 community hospitals across the United States. Obese women undergoing planned or unplanned cesarean delivery were eligible. The study was terminated after 1624 of 2850 participants were recruited when a planned interim analysis showed increased adverse events in the negative pressure group and futility for the primary outcome. Final follow-up was December 18, 2019. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to either undergo prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy, with application of the negative pressure device immediately after repair of the surgical incision (n = 816), or receive standard wound dressing (n = 808). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was superficial or deep surgical-site infection according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. Secondary outcomes included other wound complications, composite of surgical-site infections and other wound complications, and adverse skin reactions. Results: Of the 1624 women randomized (mean age, 30.4 years, mean body mass index, 39.5), 1608 (99%) completed the study: 806 in the negative pressure group (median duration of negative pressure, 4 days) and 802 in the standard dressing group. Superficial or deep surgical-site infection was diagnosed in 29 participants (3.6%) in the negative pressure group and 27 (3.4%) in the standard dressing group (difference, 0.36%; 95% CI, -1.46% to 2.19%, P = .70). Of 30 prespecified secondary end points, 25 showed no significant differences, including other wound complications (2.6% vs 3.1%; difference, -0.53%; 95% CI, -1.93% to 0.88%; P = .46) and composite of surgical-site infections and other wound complications (6.5% vs 6.7%; difference, -0.27%; 95% CI, -2.71% to 2.25%; P = .83). Adverse skin reactions were significantly more frequent in the negative pressure group (7.0% vs 0.6%; difference, 6.95%; 95% CI, 1.86% to 12.03%; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Among obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy, compared with standard wound dressing, did not significantly reduce the risk of surgical-site infection. These findings do not support routine use of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in obese women after cesarean delivery. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03009110.
Subject(s)
Bandages , Cesarean Section/adverse effects , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Obesity , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bandages/adverse effects , Blister/etiology , Body Mass Index , Cesarean Section/methods , Female , Humans , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/adverse effects , Pregnancy , Pregnancy ComplicationsABSTRACT
The opioid epidemic has increased hospital admissions for serious infections related to opioid abuse. Our findings demonstrate that addiction medicine consultation is associated with increased treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), greater likelihood of completing antimicrobial therapy, and reduced readmission rates among patients with OUD and serious infections requiring hospitalization.
Subject(s)
Addiction Medicine , Opioid-Related Disorders/complications , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/etiology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Opioid-Related Disorders/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Young AdultABSTRACT
There is limited knowledge on the incidence, diagnostic yield, and cost associated with inappropriate repeat urine cultures. The factors that affect repeat urine culturing practices are not well understood. We conducted a retrospective study of adult inpatients who had ≥1 urine culture performed during their hospitalization between January 2015 and February 2018. We analyzed the proportion of inappropriate repeat urine cultures performed <48 h after the index culture. We defined an inappropriate repeat urine culture to be a repeat urine culture performed following a negative index culture or a repeat urine specimen obtained from the same urinary catheter. Overall, 28,141 urine cultures were performed on 21,306 patients. There were 2,060 (7.3%) urine cultures repeated in <48 h. Of these, 1,120 (54.4%) urine cultures were inappropriate. Predictors for inappropriate repeat urine cultures included collection of the initial urine sample for culture in the emergency department (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.70 to 6.78), male gender (aOR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.42 to 1.84), congestive heart failure (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.38), and a longer hospital stay (aOR, 1.01 per day; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.01). A patient with an index urine culture obtained from an indwelling catheter (aOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.80) was less likely to have an inappropriate repeat culture. Among 1,120 negative index urine cultures, only 4.7% of repeat cultures were positive for bacteriuria. The estimated laboratory charges for inappropriate repeat urine cultures were $16,800 over the study period. Among inpatients, over half of all urine cultures repeated in <48 h were inappropriate. This offers an opportunity for diagnostic stewardship and optimization of antimicrobial use.
Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Urinalysis/methods , Urinary Tract Infections/diagnosis , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Aged , Bacteriuria/diagnosis , Bacteriuria/microbiology , Comorbidity , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Administrative claims data are commonly used for sepsis surveillance, research, and quality improvement. However, variations in diagnosis, documentation, and coding practices for sepsis and organ dysfunction may confound efforts to estimate sepsis rates, compare outcomes, and perform risk adjustment. We evaluated hospital variation in the sensitivity of claims data relative to clinical data from electronic health records and its impact on outcome comparisons. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Retrospective cohort study of 4.3 million adult encounters at 193 U.S. hospitals in 2013-2014. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sepsis was defined using electronic health record-derived clinical indicators of presumed infection (blood culture draws and antibiotic administrations) and concurrent organ dysfunction (vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, doubling in creatinine, doubling in bilirubin to ≥ 2.0 mg/dL, decrease in platelets to < 100 cells/µL, or lactate ≥ 2.0 mmol/L). We compared claims for sepsis prevalence and mortality rates between both methods. All estimates were reliability adjusted to account for random variation using hierarchical logistic regression modeling. The sensitivity of hospitals' claims data was low and variable: median 30% (range, 5-54%) for sepsis, 66% (range, 26-84%) for acute kidney injury, 39% (range, 16-60%) for thrombocytopenia, 36% (range, 29-44%) for hepatic injury, and 66% (range, 29-84%) for shock. Correlation between claims and clinical data was moderate for sepsis prevalence (Pearson coefficient, 0.64) and mortality (0.61). Among hospitals in the lowest sepsis mortality quartile by claims, 46% shifted to higher mortality quartiles using clinical data. Using implicit sepsis criteria based on infection and organ dysfunction codes also yielded major differences versus clinical data. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in the accuracy of claims data for identifying sepsis and organ dysfunction limits their use for comparing hospitals' sepsis rates and outcomes. Using objective clinical data may facilitate more meaningful hospital comparisons.
Subject(s)
Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Organ Failure/diagnosis , Multiple Organ Failure/epidemiology , Quality Indicators, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/epidemiology , Adult , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Organ Failure/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/mortality , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor myofascial pain is common, but physical examination methods to assess pelvic floor muscles are defined poorly. We hypothesized that a simple, transvaginal pelvic floor examination could be developed that would be highly reproducible among providers and would adequately screen for the presence of pelvic floor myofascial pain. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a simple, reproducible pelvic floor examination to screen for pelvic floor myofascial pain. STUDY DESIGN: A screening examination was developed by Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery subspecialists and women's health physical therapists at our institution and tested in a simulated patient. We recruited 35 new patients who underwent examinations by blinded, paired, independent examiners. Agreement was calculated with the use of percent agreement and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The final examination protocol begins with examination of the following external sites: bilateral sacroiliac joints, medial edge of the anterior superior iliac spine, and cephalad edge of the pubic symphysis (self-reported pain: yes/no). The internal examination follows with palpation of each muscle group in the center of the muscle belly, then along the length of the muscle proceeding counter-clockwise: right obturator internus, right levator ani, left levator ani, left obturator internus (pain on a scale of 0-10). Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Correlation was high at each external (0.80-0.89) and internal point (0.63-0.87; P<.0001). CONCLUSION: Our newly developed, standardized, reproducible examination incorporates assessment of internal and external points to screen for pelvic floor myofascial pain. The examination is straightforward and reproducible and allows for easy use in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Gynecological Examination/methods , Myofascial Pain Syndromes/diagnosis , Pain Measurement/methods , Pelvic Floor Disorders/diagnosis , Pelvic Pain/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clinical Protocols , Female , Gynecological Examination/standards , Humans , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/standards , Young AdultSubject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cross Infection , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Hospitals , Health Services Research , India/epidemiologyABSTRACT
There is limited knowledge on the yield of performing multiplex nucleic acid testing (NAT) on multiple lower respiratory tract specimens from a single patient with a single instance of infection. We evaluated the performance characteristics of multiplex NAT assays performed concurrently on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and bronchial wash (BW) specimens to detect respiratory pathogens. A retrospective study of admitted patients from March 2013 through December 2016 was performed. Individual performance characteristics of BAL and BW specimens were compared to positive results from either set of specimens. Only contemporaneous BAL and BW specimens (received by the laboratory within 4 h of each other) were included. The final cohort included 170 patients, with 184 contemporaneous BAL and BW specimens submitted for multiplex NAT (median age, 58 years; 62% male). Of the patients with positive NAT results, 38 of 40 BW specimens tested positive (overall percent agreement with combined testing, 98.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 95.5 to 98.9%), and 34 of 40 BAL specimens tested positive (overall percent agreement with combined testing, 96.7%; 95% CI, 93.0 to 96.7%). Assays performed on BW specimens identified 4 additional specimens and had a higher positive percent agreement (95.0%) with combined testing results compared to those performed on BAL specimens (85.0%). There was exact concordance in 174 specimens (94.6%; negative and positive for respiratory pathogens, 144 and 34 specimens, respectively). We observed high concordance (95%) between multiplex NAT results from contemporaneous BAL and BW specimens. Performance characteristics of BW specimen testing were equivalent to those of BAL specimen testing. The benefit of performing additional testing should be carefully considered against the potential complications and health care costs.
Subject(s)
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/virology , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Retrospective Studies , Viruses/classification , Viruses/genetics , Viruses/isolation & purificationABSTRACT
Health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are a burden on the health care system. Clinical laboratories play a key role in reducing this burden, as the timely identification of MRSA colonization or infection facilitates infection control practices that are effective at limiting invasive MRSA infections. The Xpert MRSA NxG assay recently received FDA clearance for the direct detection of MRSA from nasal swabs. This multicenter study evaluated the clinical performance characteristics of the Xpert MRSA NxG assay with prospectively collected rayon nasal swabs (n = 1,103) and flocked swab (ESwab) nasal specimens (n = 846). Culture-based identification methods and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were used as the reference standards for comparison. According to the reference method, the positivity rates for MRSA in the population evaluated were 11.1% (122/1,103) for rayon swabs and 11.6% (98/846) for flocked swabs. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the rayon swabs were 91.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.6 to 94.9%) and 96.9% (95% CI, 95.7 to 97.8%), respectively, across eight testing sites. The flocked swab specimens were 92.9% sensitive (95% CI, 86.0 to 96.5%) and 97.6% specific (95% CI, 96.2 to 98.5%) for MRSA detection across six testing sites. The sensitivity and specificity of the combined flocked and rayon swab data were 91.8% (95% CI, 87.4 to 94.8%) and 97.2% (95% CI, 96.3 to 97.9%), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) for rayon swabs was 78.7%, versus 83.5% for ESwabs. The negative predictive values (NPVs) for rayon swabs and ESwab specimens were 98.9% and 99.1%, respectively. In conclusion, the Xpert MRSA NxG assay is a sensitive and specific assay for the direct detection of MRSA from nasal swab specimens.
Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Nasal Cavity/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Female , Humans , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Middle Aged , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Sensitivity and Specificity , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Many septic patients receive care that fails the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' SEP-1 measure, but it is unclear whether this reflects meaningful lapses in care, differences in clinical characteristics, or excessive rigidity of the "all-or-nothing" measure. We compared outcomes in cases that passed versus failed SEP-1 during the first 2 years after the measure was implemented. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Seven U.S. hospitals. PATIENTS: Adult patients included in SEP-1 reporting between October 2015 and September 2017. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 851 sepsis cases in the cohort, 281 (33%) passed SEP-1 and 570 (67%) failed. SEP-1 failures had higher rates of septic shock (20% vs 9%; p < 0.001), hospital-onset sepsis (11% vs 4%; p = 0.001), and vague presenting symptoms (46% vs 30%; p < 0.001). The most common reasons for failure were omission of 3- and 6-hour lactate measurements (228/570 failures, 40%). Only 86 of 570 failures (15.1%) had greater than 3-hour delays until broad-spectrum antibiotics. Cases that failed SEP-1 had higher in-hospital mortality rates (18.4% vs 11.0%; odds ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.19-2.80; p = 0.006), but this association was no longer significant after adjusting for differences in clinical characteristics and severity of illness (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.85-2.18; p = 0.205). Delays of greater than 3 hours until antibiotics were significantly associated with death (adjusted odds ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.04-3.62; p = 0.038), whereas failing SEP-1 for any other reason was not (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.70-1.72; p = 0.674). CONCLUSIONS: Crude mortality rates were higher in sepsis cases that failed versus passed SEP-1, but there was no difference after adjusting for clinical characteristics and severity of illness. Delays in antibiotic administration were associated with higher mortality but only accounted for a small fraction of SEP-1 failures. SEP-1 may not clearly differentiate between high- and low-quality care, and detailed risk adjustment is necessary to properly interpret associations between SEP-1 compliance and mortality.
Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality/trends , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Sepsis/mortality , Sepsis/therapy , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Disease Management , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections are responsible for a large proportion of deaths among geriatric patients. Japan is a rapidly aging society; however, little is known about the epidemiology of bloodstream infections in geriatric patients in Japanese institutions. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥65 years old with a bloodstream infection in a Japanese tertiary care hospital in 2013. We defined inadequate empiric antimicrobial therapy as either antimicrobial treatment that was ineffective against subsequently isolated organisms or treatment initiated after notification of a positive culture. Predictors of inadequate antimicrobial therapy and 30-day mortality among geriatric patients with bloodstream infections were evaluated. RESULTS: We identified 275 patients with a bloodstream infection, of which 42.2% of cases (116/275) were healthcare-associated, hospital-onset. The most common source of bloodstream infection was hepatobiliary (28.0%). Inadequate empiric antimicrobial therapy occurred in 29.8% of the patients. Factors associated with inadequate empiric therapy included a history of surgery prior to bloodstream infection during index hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-9.12). In 275 patients, 38 (13.8%) died within 30 days after the first positive blood culture. Predictors of 30-day mortality was Pitt bacteremia score >6 (aOR 9.80; 95% CI 4.72-20.36). CONCLUSION: Inadequate empiric antimicrobial therapy occurred in approximately one-third of episodes of bloodstream infection in geriatric patients. Severity at the time of bloodstream infection was likely to have contributed to mortality. The initiation of adequate empiric antimicrobial therapy may have important implications for antimicrobial stewardship even in the elderly population.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/mortality , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/mortality , Health Services for the Aged , Aged , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/blood , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Confidence Intervals , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Odds Ratio , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: An antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) is one of the core elements needed to optimize antimicrobial use. Although collaboration at the national level to address the importance of ASPs and antimicrobial resistance has occurred in the Asia Pacific region, hospital-level ASP implementation in this region has not been comprehensively evaluated. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of ASPs in inpatient settings in the Asia Pacific region from January 2005 through March 2016. The impact of ASPs on various outcomes, including patient clinical outcomes, antimicrobial prescription outcomes, microbiological outcomes, and expenditure were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-six studies were included for a systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled risk ratio for mortality from ASP before-after trials and 2-group comparative studies were 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], .88-1.19) and 0.69 (95% CI, .56-.86), respectively. The pooled effect size for change in overall antimicrobial and carbapenem consumption (% difference) was -9.74% (95% CI, -18.93% to -.99%) and -10.56% (95% CI, -19.99% to -3.03%), respectively. Trends toward decreases in the incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms and antimicrobial expenditure (range, 9.7%-58.1% reduction in cost in the intervention period/arm) were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: ASPs in inpatient settings in the Asia Pacific region appear to be safe and effective to reduce antimicrobial consumption and improve outcomes. However, given the significant variations in assessing the efficacy of ASPs, high-quality studies using standardized surveillance methodology for antimicrobial consumption and similar metrics for outcome measurement are needed to further promote antimicrobial stewardship in this region.
Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Antimicrobial Stewardship/economics , Antimicrobial Stewardship/legislation & jurisprudence , Asia , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/mortality , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , InpatientsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of surgical site infections (SSIs) on health care costs following common ambulatory surgical procedures throughout the cost distribution. BACKGROUND: Data on costs of SSIs following ambulatory surgery are sparse, particularly variation beyond just mean costs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of persons undergoing cholecystectomy, breast-conserving surgery, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and hernia repair from December 31, 2004 to December 31, 2010 using commercial insurer claims data. SSIs within 90 days post-procedure were identified; infections during a hospitalization or requiring surgery were considered serious. We used quantile regression, controlling for patient, operative, and postoperative factors to examine the impact of SSIs on 180-day health care costs throughout the cost distribution. RESULTS: The incidence of serious and nonserious SSIs was 0.8% and 0.2%, respectively, after 21,062 anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, 0.5% and 0.3% after 57,750 cholecystectomy, 0.6% and 0.5% after 60,681 hernia, and 0.8% and 0.8% after 42,489 breast-conserving surgery procedures. Serious SSIs were associated with significantly higher costs than nonserious SSIs for all 4 procedures throughout the cost distribution. The attributable cost of serious SSIs increased for both cholecystectomy and hernia repair as the quantile of total costs increased ($38,410 for cholecystectomy with serious SSI vs no SSI at the 70th percentile of costs, up to $89,371 at the 90th percentile). CONCLUSIONS: SSIs, particularly serious infections resulting in hospitalization or surgical treatment, were associated with significantly increased health care costs after 4 common surgical procedures. Quantile regression illustrated the differential effect of serious SSIs on health care costs at the upper end of the cost distribution.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Wound Infection/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , United States , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus colonization has been identified as a key modifiable risk factor in the reduction of surgical site infections (SSI) related to elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We investigated the incidence of SSIs and cost-effectiveness of a universal decolonization protocol without screening consisting of nasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine before elective TJA compared to a program in which all subjects were screened for S aureus and selectively treated if positive. METHODS: We reviewed 4186 primary TJAs from March 2011 through July 2015. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on the decolonization regimen used. Before May 2013, 1981 TJA patients were treated under a "screen and treat" program while the subsequent 2205 patients were treated under the universal protocol. We excluded the 3 months around the transition to control for treatment bias. Outcomes of interest included SSI and total hospital costs. RESULTS: With a universal decolonization protocol, there was a significant decrease in both the overall SSI rate (5 vs 15 cases; 0.2% vs 0.8%; P = .013) and SSIs caused by S aureus organisms (2 vs 10; 0.09% vs 0.5%; P = .01). A cost analysis accounting for the cost to administer the universal regimen demonstrated an actual savings of $717,205.59. TJA complicated by SSI costs 4.6× more to treat than that of an uncomplicated primary TJA. CONCLUSION: Our universal decolonization paradigm for elective TJA is effective in reducing the overall rate of SSIs and promoting economic gains for the health system related to the downstream savings accrued from limiting future reoperations and hospitalizations.