Temporal patterning of neuroblasts controls Notch-mediated cell survival through regulation of Hid or Reaper.

Temporal patterning of neural progenitors is one of the core mechanisms generating neuronal diversity in the central nervous system. Here, we show that, in the tips of the outer proliferation center (tOPC) of the developing Drosophila optic lobes, a unique temporal series of transcription factors not only governs the sequential production of distinct neuronal subtypes but also controls the mode of progenitor division, as well as the selective apoptosis of Notch(OFF) or Notch(ON) neurons during binary cell fate decisions. Within a single lineage, intermediate precursors initially do not divide and generate only one neuron; subsequently, precursors divide, but their Notch(ON) progeny systematically die through Reaper activity, whereas later, their Notch(OFF) progeny die through Hid activity. These mechanisms dictate how the tOPC produces neurons for three different optic ganglia. We conclude that temporal patterning generates neuronal diversity by specifying both the identity and survival/death of each unique neuronal subtype.

Mechanisms of growth and homeostasis in the Drosophila wing.

Animal shape and size is controlled with amazing precision during development. External factors such as nutrient availability and crowding can alter overall animal size, but individual body parts scale reproducibly to match the body even with challenges from a changing environment. How is such precision achieved? Here, we review selected research from the last few years in Drosophila--arguably the premier genetic model for the study of animal growth--that sheds light on how body and tissue size are regulated by forces intrinsic to individual organs. We focus on two topics currently under intense study: the influence of pattern regulators on organ and tissue growth and the role of local competitive interactions between cells in tissue homeostasis and final size.

Maintenance of imaginal disc plasticity and regenerative potential in Drosophila by p53.

Following irradiation (IR), the DNA damage response (DDR) activates p53, which triggers death of cells in which repair cannot be completed. Lost tissue is then replaced and re-patterned through regeneration. We have examined the role of p53 in co-regulation of the DDR and tissue regeneration following IR damage in Drosophila. We find that after IR, p53 is required for imaginal disc cells to repair DNA, and in its absence the damage marker, γ-H2AX is persistently expressed. p53 is also required for the compensatory proliferation and re-patterning of the damaged discs, and our results indicate that cell death is not required to trigger these processes. We identify an IR-induced delay in developmental patterning in wing discs that accompanies an animal-wide delay of the juvenile-adult transition, and demonstrate that both of these delays require p53. In p53 mutants, the lack of developmental delays and of damage resolution leads to anueploidy and tissue defects, and ultimately to morphological abnormalities and adult inviability. We propose that p53 maintains plasticity of imaginal discs by co-regulating the maintenance of genome integrity and disc regeneration, and coordinating these processes with the physiology of the animal. These findings place p53 in a role as master coordinator of DNA and tissue repair following IR.

Compensatory proliferation in Drosophila imaginal discs requires Dronc-dependent p53 activity.

BACKGROUND: The p53 transcription factor directs a transcriptional program that determines whether a cell lives or dies after DNA damage. Animal survival after extensive cellular damage often requires that lost tissue be replaced through compensatory growth or regeneration. In Drosophila, damaged imaginal disc cells can induce the proliferation of neighboring viable cells, but how this is controlled is not clear. Here we provide evidence that Drosophila p53 (dp53) has a previously unidentified role in coordinating the compensatory growth response to tissue damage. RESULTS: We find that dp53, the sole p53 ortholog in Drosophila, is required for each component of the response to cellular damage, including two separate cell-cycle arrests, changes in patterning gene expression, cell proliferation, and growth. We demonstrate that these processes are regulated by dp53 in a manner that is independent of DNA-damage sensing but that requires the initiator caspase Dronc. Our results indicate that once induced, dp53 amplifies and sustains the response through a positive feedback loop with Dronc and the apoptosis-inducing factors Hid and Reaper. CONCLUSIONS: How cell death and cell proliferation are coordinated during development and after stress is a fundamental question that is critical for an understanding of growth regulation. Our data suggest that dp53 may carry out an ancestral function that promotes animal survival through the coordination of responses leading to compensatory growth after tissue damage.

Parallel Activin and BMP signaling coordinates R7/R8 photoreceptor subtype pairing in the stochastic Drosophila retina.

Drosophila color vision is achieved by comparing outputs from two types of color-sensitive photoreceptors, R7 and R8. Ommatidia (unit eyes) are classified into two subtypes, known as 'pale' or 'yellow', depending on Rhodopsin expression in R7 and R8. Subtype specification is controlled by a stochastic decision in R7 and instructed to the underlying R8. We find that the Activin receptor Baboon is required in R8 to receive non-redundant signaling from the three Activin ligands, activating the transcription factor dSmad2. Concomitantly, two BMP ligands activate their receptor, Thickveins, and the transcriptional effector, Mad. The Amon TGFß processing factor appears to regulate components of the TGFß pathway specifically in pale R7. Mad and dSmad2 cooperate to modulate the Hippo pathway kinase Warts and the growth regulator Melted; two opposing factors of a bi-stable loop regulating R8 Rhodopsin expression. Therefore, TGFß and growth pathways interact in postmitotic cells to precisely coordinate cell-specific output.

Preimplantation HLA haplotyping using tri-, tetra-, and pentanucleotide short tandem repeats for HLA matching.

PURPOSE: To aid couples wishing to conceive children who are HLA matched to a sibling in need of a hematopoietic progenitor cell transplant, we developed a preimplantation HLA haplotype analysis of embryos that utilizes tri-, tetra-, and pentanucleotide STR markers. METHODS: For preimplantation HLA genotyping, we use polymorphic STR markers located across the HLA and flanking regions, selecting exclusively tri-, tetra-, and pentanucleotide repeats. These markers can be resolved using either capillary electrophoresis (CE) or polyacrylamide gels. RESULTS: We have developed 43 reliable STR markers for preimplantation HLA matching. Selected STR markers enabled unambiguous identification of embryos whose HLA haplotypes were matched with the affected patient using polyacrylamide gel or capillary electrophoresis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of tri-, tetra-, and pentanucleotide repeat markers and polyacrylamide gels for STR genotyping in HLA matching is a simple and cost effective approach to clinical testing.