Does Wound VAC Temporization Offer Patient-Reported Outcomes Similar to Single-Stage Excision Reconstruction After Myxofibrosarcoma Resection?

BACKGROUND: Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) temporization is a promising technique to achieve local control in aggressive soft tissue sarcomas. Despite its previously reported efficacy, adoption of VAC temporization remains limited, primarily due to the scarce literature on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) supporting its efficacy. This study compared the postoperative PROs after VAC temporization or single-stage (SS) excision and reconstruction for patients undergoing surgical resection for myxofibrosarcoma management. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of myxofibrosarcoma patients who underwent surgical resections at our institution from 2016 to 2022 was performed. Postoperative PROs collected prospectively for those treated with VAC temporization or SS excision/reconstruction were compared using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and three Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) questionnaires: Global Health Short-Form Mental (SF Mental), Global Health Short-Form Physical (SF Physical), and Physical Function Short-Form 10a (SF 10a). Absolute and differential (postoperative minus preoperative) scores at the 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year time points were compared. RESULTS: The analysis included 79 patients (47 treated with VAC temporization and 32 treated with SS excision/reconstruction). All outcomes were similar between the groups except for physical function 1 year after surgery, in which the differential PROMIS SF 10a scores were higher in the SS group (p = 0.001). All the remaining absolute and differential PROMIS and VAS pain scores were similar between the groups at all time points. Postoperative complications did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: The PROs for physical and mental health, physical function, and pain were similar between the myxofibrosarcoma patients who had VAC temporization and those who had SS excision/reconstruction after surgical resection.

Wound vacuum-assisted closure temporization after tumor resection of soft tissue sarcomas-A cost analysis in a propensity-score matched population.

BACKGROUND: Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) temporization is a technique associated with high local control rates used in myxofibrosarcoma. We sought to compare the costs and postoperative outcomes of VAC temporization and single-stage (SS) excision/reconstruction. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with myxofibrosarcoma surgically treated at our institution between 2000 and 2022. Variables of interest included total, direct, and indirect costs for initial episode of care, 90 days and 1 year after initial admission, and postoperative outcomes. Costs were compared between the VAC temporization and SS groups. RESULTS: After matching, 13 patients in the SS group and 23 in the VAC group were analyzed. We found no difference in median and mean total inpatient costs, between the VAC temporization and SS group. While total 90-day and 1-year costs were higher in the VAC group compared to the SS group, mean costs were similar. There were no differences in postoperative complications between groups. A subanalysis of the entire cohort (n = 139) revealed lower local recurrence and overall death rates in the VAC temporization group. CONCLUSION: VAC temporization had similar inpatient costs and postoperative outcomes to SS excision/reconstruction. While median 90-day and 1-year costs were higher in the VAC group, mean costs did not differ.

What Factors Are Associated With Implant Revision in the Treatment of Pathologic Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures?

BACKGROUND: Limiting reoperation or revision after operative stabilization or endoprosthetic reconstruction of a pathologic subtrochanteric femur fracture reduces morbidity, but how best to achieve this remains controversial. Endoprosthetic reconstruction offers durable mechanical stability but may not be most appropriate in patients who are frail or who are not expected to survive more than a few months. For that reason, cumulative incidence survival (looking at the endpoint of reoperation or revision with death as a competing risk) and factors associated with revision after surgical stabilization or reconstruction-both of which remain poorly characterized to date-would help surgeons make better decisions on behalf of these patients. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We analyzed patients who were operatively treated for pathologic subtrochanteric femur fracture, and we asked: (1) What is the cumulative incidence of reoperation and revision at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery for pathologic subtrochanteric femur fracture in patients undergoing each treatment type with death as a competing risk? (2) What are the factors associated with implant revision after operative treatment of pathologic subtrochanteric femur fracture? (3) What is the overall survival of patients in this population after surgery? (4) How do clinical and surgical factors along with the frequency of complications compare in this population by operative treatment? METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2020, 422 patients underwent surgery for completed proximal femur pathologic fractures. After excluding patients with non-subtrochanteric femur fractures (71% [301]), fractures caused by primary tumors of bone (< 1% [2]), and insufficient data (1% [6]), we included 113 patients who underwent operative treatment of completed pathologic subtrochanteric femur fractures. Our study period spanned 20 years because although implant trends may have shifted, the overall operative objective for pathologic subtrochanteric femur fractures-restoring function and alleviating pain, regardless of the extent of bony union-have remained relatively unchanged during this period. Median follow-up time was 6 months (range 1 month to 20.6 years). Intramedullary nailing (IMN) was performed in 68% (77) of patients, proximal femur replacement (PFR) was performed in 19% (22), and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was performed in 12% (14) of patients. IMN was performed in patients with a poor prognosis but in whom fracture stabilization was felt to be advantageous. In instances of complex fractures in which adequate reduction could not be achieved, ORIF was generally performed. PFR was generally performed in patients with a better prognosis in which long-term implant survival and patient function were prioritized. We found a higher proportion of women in the IMN group (73% versus 32% in PFR and 50% in ORIF; p = 0.001). Rapid growth tumors (Katagiri classification) were found in 25% of patients with IMN, 27% with PFR, and 43% with ORIF. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of reoperation or revision surgery after initial stabilization. Competing risk analysis with death as a competing event was performed to estimate the cumulative incidence for reoperation and revision. Factors associated with revision surgery were identified using the Cox proportional hazards model, which rendered HRs. All analyses were adjusted to control for potential confounders. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence for reoperation at 2 years was 5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4% to 6%) for IMN, 15% (95% CI 9% to 22%) for PFR, and 32% (95% CI 15% to 50%) for ORIF (p = 0.03). The cumulative incidence for revision at 2 years was 4% (95% CI 3% to 4%) for IMN, 4% (95% CI 2% to 6%) for PFR, and 33% (95% CI 15% to 51%) for ORIF (p = 0.01). Factors associated with revision surgery were radioresistant tumor histology (HR 8.5 [95% CI 1.2 to 58.9]; p = 0.03) and ORIF (HR 6.3 [95% CI 1.5 to 27.0]; p = 0.01). The 3-month, 1-year, and 2-year overall survival was 80% (95% CI 71% to 87%), 35% (95% CI 26% to 45%), and 28% (95% CI 19% to 36%), respectively. Thirty-day postoperative complications did not differ by fixation type, but 90-day readmission was highest after ORIF (3 of 14 versus 4 of 22 in PFR and 4% [3 of 77] in IMN; p = 0.03) Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was more common after salvage PFR (2 of 6) than primary PFR (1 of 22) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Primary PFR may be preferred for pathologic subtrochanteric femur fractures arising from radioresistant tumor types, as the cumulative incidence of revision was no different than for IMN while restoring function, alleviating pain, and offering local tumor control, and it less commonly develops PJI than salvage PFR. In complex fractures not amenable to IMN, surgeons should consider performing a PFR over ORIF because of the lower risk of revision and the added benefit of replacing the pathologic fracture altogether and offering immediate mechanical stability with a cemented endoprosthesis. Future studies might evaluate the extent of bone loss from local tumor burden, and this could be quantified and analyzed in future studies as a covariate as it may clarify when PFR is advantageous in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Prognostic and predictive factors in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma: A long-term study from a large tertiary care urban center.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) is an aggressive type of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with high rates of metastatic disease and local recurrence. We sought to identify risk factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and overall death, and assess their impact on overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS). METHODS: A total of 386 cases of UPS treated at our institution from 1980 to 2020 were included. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identifying risk factors for death, local recurrence, and/or metastasis. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, we assessed OS, LRFS, and MFS. RESULTS: Sixty-six (17%) and 121 (30%) patients with UPS developed local recurrence or metastasis, respectively. Lymph node (LN) involvement was present in 13.5% of patients. The most affected organ in patients with metastatic disease was the lungs (76.9%). Age ≥ 60 (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.42) and size ≥7 cm (HR = 1.52) were some of the significant risk factors for overall death. LN involvement was an important risk factor for both LR (HR = 2.79) and distant metastasis (HR = 5.73). CONCLUSIONS: UPS displays high rates of metastatic disease and local recurrence. Using a tumor size cutoff value of 7 cm yields superior prognostic value than the standard STS T-score thresholds. Lymphovascular invasion is an important risk factor for the development of metastasis.

Postoperative Outcomes of Total Humerus Replacement for Oncologic Reconstruction of the Upper Limb: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Total humerus replacement (THR) is a reconstruction procedure performed after resection of massive humeral tumors. However, there is limited literature on the rates of failure and functional outcomes of this implant. Our study aimed to determine the main failure modes, implant survival, and postoperative functional outcomes of THR. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the PubMed and Embase databases was conducted. We registered our study on PROSPERO (448684) and used the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist for quality assessment. The Henderson classification was used to assess endoprosthesis failure and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score for functional outcomes. Weighted means and standard deviations were calculated. RESULTS: Ten studies comprising 171 patients undergoing THR were finally included. The overall failure rate was 32.2%. Tumor progression (12.6%) and prosthetic infections (9.4%) were the most common failure modes, followed by soft-tissue failures (5.9%), aseptic loosening (3.5%), and structural failure (1.8%). Two-year, 5-year, and 10-year implant survival rates for the entire cohort were 86%, 81%, and 69.3%. Ten-year implant survival for primary THRs was 78.3%, compared with 38.6% for revision THRs (p = 0.049). The mean MSTS score at the last follow-up was 77%. Patients whose implants did not fail had a higher MSTS score (79.3%) than those with failed implants (71.4%) (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: One-third of THR will fail, mostly due to tumor progression and prosthetic infection. Overall functional scores were acceptable, with MSTS scores displaying great hand and elbow function but limited shoulder function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Myositis ossificans mimicking bone surface osteosarcoma: case report with literature review.

Myositis ossificans, a benign tumor composed of spindle cells and osteoblasts, can clinically and radiologically mimic osteosarcoma. While recognition and accurate diagnosis of myositis ossificans can be a challenge, this is critical as it may allow a conservative surgical approach to maximize functional outcomes. Herein, we present a patient with surface myositis ossificans confirmed genetically by the presence of COL1A1::USP6 gene fusion, along with a literature review. Due to the enhanced visualization of the bone matrix, computed tomography (CT) imaging may be a superior imaging modality to magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Staged biopsies with samples obtained from the periphery and center of the lesions may allow pathologists to discern the zonal distribution histologically. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry fluorescence in situ hybridization and molecular testing can aid in the distinction of myositis ossificans from mimics. Because of their resemblance to other bone tumors, these cases of myositis ossificans highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary approach integrating clinical, radiologic, and pathologic analysis and involving serial imaging, sampling, and judicious use of ancillary immunohistochemical and molecular testing.

A Prospective Study of the IlluminOss Photodynamic Nail System for Pelvic Stabilization: Treatment of Impending and Actual Fractures from Metastatic Bone Disease, Multiple Myeloma, and Primary Bone Lymphoma.

Background: The stabilization of metastatic lesions in the periacetabular region can be successfully performed using percutaneous techniques. Photodynamic nails (PDNs) are among the available tools for stabilization. Data on postoperative complications and functional outcomes are, however, scarce. Methods: Patients undergoing percutaneous stabilization using PDNs (IlluminOss Medical) for impending or actual minimally displaced pathological fractures of the pelvis from metastatic bone disease, multiple myeloma, or primary bone lymphoma were enrolled prospectively. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at the 2-day, 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year time points. Functional outcomes assessed included the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function, PROMIS Pain Interference, Combined Pain and Ambulatory Function (CPAF), EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores. Pain was assessed using a VAS. Results: A total of 30 patients treated with PDNs were included. The median VAS pain score dropped from 60 points preoperatively to 30 at 6 weeks postoperatively (p = 0.004). The median CPAF score improved from 6 preoperatively to 7 postoperatively at the 6-week mark. The median EQ-VAS score showed significant improvement at 6 weeks (70 versus 50; p = 0.006). The median 2-week PROMIS Pain Interference score was significantly lower than preoperatively (64.1 versus 66.9; p = 0.03). An improvement in the median PROMIS Physical Function score was seen at 6 weeks following surgery compared with preoperatively (37 versus 30.1; p = 0.001). A significant improvement in the MSTS score was seen as soon as 2 days after surgery (77% versus 40%; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Among patients with pelvic bone metastases, multiple myeloma, or primary bone lymphoma, we found that treatment using PDNs resulted in immediate return to ambulation and rapid functional outcome improvement, with low complication rates. In this population, this technique represents a safe alternative to open surgery. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Cemented and Press-fit Femoral Stems for the Management of Oncologic Femoral Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Stem fixation in reconstruction after resection of femoral tumors is debated. Cemented stems offer immediate stability but risk aseptic loosening, while press-fit stems allow bone ingrowth but risk stress shielding and subsidence. Our retrospective review aimed to determine implant failure rates and their associated factors, as well as the rates of infection, debridement, and mortality for both fixation groups (cemented or press-fit stems) used in patients undergoing resection of femoral tumor disease and subsequent arthroplasty. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 252 patients who underwent resection of femoral tumors and subsequent arthroplasty using cemented (n = 173; 69%) or press-fit (noncemented) (n = 79; 31%) stems between 1999 and 2020. Implant failure was the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes including rates of implant infection, debridement, and mortality. Multivariable regression was done to assess risk factors for implant failures. RESULTS: The study found implant failure rates of 11% and 18% for cemented stems and press-fit stems, respectively. Lower stem to diaphyseal ratios ( P = 0.024) and younger patients ( P = 0.008) were associated with a higher risk of implant failure in cemented stems. The infection rates were 14% and 10% for cemented and press-fit stems, respectively. Debridement rates were 16% and 13% for cemented and press-fit stems, respectively, while the 1-year mortality rate was 16% for cemented stems and 1.5% for press-fit stems. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest of its kind, providing patient characteristics and outcomes in both cemented and press-fit stems in the setting of reconstruction for femoral tumors. Both methods can be effective, with outcomes dependent on patient-specific factors, such as life expectancy, activity level, and body habitus, as well as proper implant fit. Additional studies of both implants and longer follow-up are required to elucidate the optimal fixation method for each individual patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective noncomparative study.

What is the diagnostic accuracy of fluorescence-guided surgery for margin assessment in appendicular bone and soft tissue tumors? - A systematic review of clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: Fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) is a novel technique to successfully assess surgical margins intraoperatively. Investigation and adoption of this technique in orthopaedic oncology remains limited. METHODS: The PRISMA guidelines were followed for this manuscript. Our study was registered on PROSPERO (380520). Studies describing the use of FGS for resection of bone and soft tissue sarcomas (STS) on humans were included. Diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], negative predictive value [NPV] and accuracy) and margin positivity rate were the outcomes assessed. RESULTS: Critical appraisal using the Joanna Brigs Institute checklists showed significant concerns for study quality. Sensitivity of FGS ranged from 22.2 % to 100 % in three of the four studies assessing his metrics; one study in appendicular tumors in the pediatric population reported 0 % sensitivity in the three cases included. Specificity ranged from 9.38 % to 100 %. PPV ranged from 14.6 % to 70 % while NPV was between 53.3 % and 100 %. The diagnostic accuracy ranged from 21.62 % to 92.31 %. Margin positivity rate ranged from 2 % to 50 %, with six of the seven studies reporting values between 20 % and 50 %. CONCLUSIONS: FSG is a feasible technique to assess tumor margins in bone and STS. Reported performance metrics and margin positivity rates vary widely between studies due to low study quality and high heterogeneity in dying protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Microbiology, Treatment, and Postoperative Outcomes of Gram-Negative Prosthetic Joint Infections-A Systematic Review of the Literature.

INTRODUCTION: Gram-negative prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) represent 10% to 25% of all PJIs and are associated with worse outcomes than gram-positive infections. We sought to assess the microbiology, surgical treatment, and outcomes of patients with gram-negative PJIs. METHODS: A systematic review using the PubMed and Embase databases was conducted. Our study was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Included studies were assessed for quality using the STROBE checklist. The primary outcome of analysis was treatment failure. RESULTS: A total of 593 patients with gram-negative PJIs were included. Two-year survival free of treatment failure for hip and knee PJIs was 66% and 68% for acute infections, 39% and 78% for acute hematogenous infections, and 75% and 63% for chronic infections, respectively. Two-year survival free of treatment failure for acute infections treated with débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention was 65% and 67% for hip and knee PJIs, respectively. Exchange of the polyethylene during débridement, antibiotics, and implant retention was associated with higher treatment success (P = 0.045). Chronic PJIs treated with two-stage revision had a two-year treatment success rate of 87% and 65% for the hip and knee, respectively. Risk factors of treatment failure were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and C-reactive protein ≥30 mg/L in acute PJIs and female sex, knee infection, and previously revised implant in chronic PJIs. Acute PJIs caused by Pseudomonas spp. were associated with lower treatment failure rates. CONCLUSION: Gram-negative PJIs are associated with a high treatment failure rate. Patient comorbidities, preoperative biochemical tests, microorganism etiology, and PJI characteristics affected the treatment success rate.

Tumor necrosis drives prognosis in osteosarcoma: No difference in chemotherapy response and survival between chondroblastic and osteoblastic osteosarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: The percentage of tumor necrosis is a crucial prognostic factor in osteosarcoma. Many studies adopt a 90 % cutoff based on osteoblastic osteosarcoma, but these findings are generalized to all conventional subtypes, including chondroblastic osteosarcoma. We sought to answer these questions: (1) Is tumor necrosis ≥90 % associated with better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in osteoblastic and chondroblastic osteosarcoma? (2) Does the osteosarcoma subtype impact tumor necrosis? (3) Does the osteosarcoma subtype in "good" responders (tumor necrosis ≥90 %) affect OS and DFS?. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 156 patients with osteoblastic and chondroblastic osteosarcoma treated at our institution. All patients received a standardized chemotherapy protocol and underwent surgery with the goal of achieving negative margins (R0 resection). Propensity-score matching was performed to adjust for potential confounders. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling were performed. RESULTS: Patients with osteoblastic osteosarcoma and tumor necrosis ≥90 % had higher 5- and 10-year OS and DFS compared to those with necrosis <90 %. In chondroblastic osteosarcoma, a trend towards higher OS and DFS was seen in patients with tumor necrosis ≥90 %; this, however, was not significant. Chondroblastic osteosarcoma was not a risk factor for either tumor necrosis <90 % (p = 0.89) or tumor necrosis <70 % (p = 0.57). Patients with osteoblastic or chondroblastic osteosarcoma that were deemed "good" responders (tumor necrosis ≥90 %) had similar OS and DFS at the 5- and 10-year marks. CONCLUSION: Conventional osteosarcoma subtype was not a risk factor for "poor" response. Survival outcomes (OS and DFS) were similar for osteoblastic and chondroblastic osteosarcoma with good response to chemotherapy.

Outcomes of Long Bones Treated With Carbon-Fiber Nails for Oncologic Indications: International Multi-institutional Study.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary nail fixation is commonly used for prophylactic stabilization of impending and fixation of complete pathological fractures of the long bones. However, metallic artifacts complicate imaging evaluation for bone healing or tumor progression and postoperative radiation planning. Carbon-fiber implants have gained popularity as an alternative, given their radiolucency and superior axial bending. This study evaluates incidences of mechanical and nonmechanical complications. METHODS: Adult patients (age 18 years and older) treated with carbon-fiber nails for impending/complete pathological long bone fractures secondary to metastases from 2013 to 2020 were analyzed for incidences and risk factors of mechanical and nonmechanical complications. Mechanical complications included aseptic screw loosening and structural failures of host bone and carbon-fiber implants. Deep infection and tumor progression were considered nonmechanical. Other complications/adverse events were also reported. RESULTS: A total of 239 patients were included; 47% were male, and 53% were female, with a median age of 68 (IQR, 59 to 75) years. Most common secondary metastases were related to breast cancer (19%), lung cancer (19%), multiple myeloma (18%), and sarcoma (13%). In total, 17 of 30 patients with metastatic sarcoma received palliative intramedullary nail fixation for impending/complete pathological fractures, and 13 of 30 received prophylactic nail stabilization of bone radiated preoperatively to manage juxta-osseous soft-tissue sarcomas, where partial resection of the periosteum or bone was necessary for negative margin resection. 33 (14%) patients had complications. Mechanical failures included 4 (1.7%) structural host bone failures, 7 (2.9%) implant structural failures, and 1 (0.4%) aseptic loosening of distal locking screws. Nonmechanical failures included 8 (3.3%) peri-implant infections and 15 (6.3%) tumor progressions with implant contamination. The 90-day and 1-year mortalities were 28% (61/239) and 53% (53/102), respectively. The literature reported comparable failure and mortality rates with conventional titanium treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Carbon-fiber implants might be an alternative for treating impending and sustained pathological fractures secondary to metastatic bone disease. The seemingly comparable complication profile warrants further cohort studies comparing carbon-fiber and titanium nail complications.

Salvage of a Fractured Proximal Ulnar Osteoarticular Allograft Using a Medial Femoral Condyle Free Flap: A Case Report.

CASE: We present the case of a 47-year-old paraplegic woman who underwent resection of an intermediate-grade chondrosarcoma in the proximal ulna, which was initially reconstructed with an osteoarticular allograft. However, after more than 25 years without complications, she sustained an intra-articular fracture of the allograft, which was then successfully treated using a vascularized medial femoral condyle (MFC) flap and anterolateral thigh flap. The patient has subsequently recovered her baseline elbow function, has no pain, and can use her wheelchair without restrictions. CONCLUSION: Free MFC flaps are viable options to salvage osteoarticular allografts that are affected by intra-articular fractures.

A PEEK into carbon fiber: A practical guide for high performance composite polymeric implants for orthopaedic oncology.

Introduction: The use of carbon fiber implants in orthopaedic oncology has increased within recent years. The most widely used type of polymer is carbon fiber polyether ether ketone (CF-PEEK). Its radiolucency enables targeted radiotherapy and artifact-free tumor surveillance, which provides major advantages over metallic hardware. We aim to summarize the unique benefits within orthopaedic oncology, clinical pitfalls, and recent advancements. Methods: Four representative patient cases from a single tertiary academic medical center were treated with carbon fiber implants (n = 2 nails, n = 2 plates) from 2021 to 2022. Results: There were no adverse events noted during intraoperative implantation or postoperative follow up. All patients reported improvements in pain and no difficulties in ambulation. There were no instances of catastrophic failure or implant loosening. Conclusion: CF implants offer a diverse array of advantages regarding its radiolucency, low scatter density, and bioinert profile. Nonetheless, further research is required to understand the long-term surgical outcomes and robustness of CF implants. Multi institutional trials could address important aspects of durability and stability over extended periods, feasibility and ease-of-use for different anatomical sites and bone quality, as well as cost-effectiveness in post-operative imaging, healthcare resource utilization, and revision rates. Providing orthopaedic surgeons with valuable insight will enable thorough clinically supported, informed decision making regarding optimal use of implants.