Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 71(5): 1174-7, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26755494

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to characterize ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae present in 24 neonatal units (NNUs) in eight networks participating in a multicentre probiotic study and to test the hypothesis that specific strains would cluster within individual units and networks. METHODS: We performed analysis of stool samples for the presence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae at 2 weeks post-natal age and 36 weeks post-menstrual age. ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae were characterized and typed using molecular methods. RESULTS: ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (n = 71) were isolated from 67/1229 (5.5%) infants from whom we received a sample at either sampling time or both sampling times, and from infants in 18 (75%) of the 24 recruiting NNUs. Thirty-three Escherichia coli, 23 Klebsiella spp. and 6 Enterobacter spp. strains were characterized. ESBL-producing E. coli were all distinguishable within individual NNUs by antibiotic resistance genotype, serogroup (O25b), phenotype, phylotype or ST. Ten of the 33 were ST131 and 9 of the 10 ST131 isolates were ciprofloxacin resistant. Seven of the 10 ST131 isolates carried genes encoding CTX-M group 1 enzymes. ST131 isolates were isolated from centres within five of the eight NNU networks. There were clusters of indistinguishable ESBL-producing Klebsiella and Enterobacter isolates associated with specific NNUs. CONCLUSIONS: Strains of E. coli ST131 were distributed across neonatal networks in the south of England. There was no evidence of clustering of clonally related ESBL-producing E. coli strains, by contrast with Klebsiella spp. and Enterobacter spp., which did cluster within units. The possibility that ESBL-producing E. coli strains are spread by vertical transmission requires further investigation.


Subject(s)
Enterobacteriaceae Infections/epidemiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Enterobacteriaceae/classification , Enterobacteriaceae/enzymology , Genetic Variation , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Cluster Analysis , England/epidemiology , Enterobacteriaceae/genetics , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Feces/microbiology , Genotype , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Molecular Epidemiology , Molecular Typing
2.
Health Technol Assess ; 26(12): 1-82, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35195519

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mother-to-baby transmission of group B Streptococcus (Streptococcus agalactiae) is the main cause of early-onset infection. OBJECTIVES: We investigated if intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis directed by a rapid intrapartum test reduces maternal and neonatal antibiotic use, compared with usual care (i.e. risk factor-directed antibiotics), among women with risk factors for vertical group B Streptococcus transmission, and examined the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the rapid test. DESIGN: An unblinded cluster randomised controlled trial with a nested test accuracy study, an economic evaluation and a microbiology substudy. SETTING: UK maternity units were randomised to either a strategy of rapid test or usual care. PARTICIPANTS: Vaginal and rectal swabs were taken from women with risk factors for vertical group B Streptococcus transmission in established term labour. The accuracy of the GeneXpert® Dx IV GBS rapid testing system (Cepheid, Maurens-Scopont, France) was compared with the standard of selective enrichment culture in diagnosing maternal group B Streptococcus colonisation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were rates of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis administered to prevent early-onset group B Streptococcus infection and accuracy estimates of the rapid test. Secondary outcomes were maternal antibiotics for any indication, neonatal antibiotic exposure, maternal antibiotic duration, neonatal group B Streptococcus colonisation, maternal and neonatal antibiotic resistance, neonatal morbidity and mortality, and cost-effectiveness of the strategies. RESULTS: Twenty-two maternity units were randomised and 20 were recruited. A total of 722 mothers (749 babies) participated in rapid test units and 906 mothers (951 babies) participated in usual-care units. There were no differences in the rates of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing early-onset group B Streptococcus infection in the rapid test units (41%, 297/716) compared with the usual-care units (36%, 328/906) (risk ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.64). There were no differences between the groups in intrapartum antibiotic administration for any indication (risk ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 1.21). Babies born in the rapid test units were 29% less likely to receive antibiotics (risk ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.54 to 0.95) than those born in usual-care units. The sensitivity and specificity of the rapid test were 86% (95% confidence interval 81% to 91%) and 89% (95% confidence interval 85% to 92%), respectively. In 14% of women (99/710), the rapid test was invalid or the machine failed to provide a result. In the economic analysis, the rapid test was shown to be both less effective and more costly and, therefore, dominated by usual care. Sensitivity analysis indicated potential lower costs for the rapid test strategy when neonatal costs were included. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The Group B Streptococcus 2 (GBS2) trial found no evidence that the rapid test reduces the rates of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis administered to prevent early-onset group B Streptococcus infection. The rapid test has the potential to reduce neonatal exposure to antibiotics, but economically is dominated by usual care. The accuracy of the test is within acceptable limits. FUTURE WORK: The role of routine testing for prevention of neonatal infection requires evaluation in a randomised controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN74746075. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 12. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.


WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?: Group B Streptococcus is a common bacterium found in the vagina and intestines of approximately one in four women. Group B Streptococcus may be passed to the baby around birth and cause severe infection. In the UK, women are offered antibiotics in labour to protect their baby from group B Streptococcus infection when specific risk factors are present. Most women with risk factors do not carry group B Streptococcus and their babies are unnecessarily exposed to antibiotics. Most women carrying group B Streptococcus do not have risk factors and so will not be offered antibiotics to protect their babies. WHAT DID WE PLAN TO DO?: We planned to find out if, for women with risk factors, a 'rapid test' in labour resulted in fewer women receiving antibiotics compared with 'usual care'. We also wanted to establish if the test correctly identified if mothers were carrying group B Streptococcus, helped reduce infections in babies and represented value for money. WHAT DID WE FIND?: We involved 1627 women (1700 babies) from 20 hospitals randomly allocated to rapid test or usual care. Using the 'rapid test' did not reduce antibiotics provided to mothers (41% in rapid test units and 36% in usual-care units). The test correctly identified 86% of women carrying group B Streptococcus, 89% of those who did not and failed to provide a result in 14% of women. A rapid test policy resulted in 13% fewer babies receiving antibiotics. The rapid test generated no cost savings when only the mothers' care was considered, but there was potential for reduced costs when including the newborns' hospital stay. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?: The rapid test is accurate; however, using it for women with risk factors for their baby developing group B Streptococcus infection does not reduce antibiotic usage in mothers, although it does in babies. Value for money is uncertain and depends on what costs are included.


Subject(s)
Streptococcal Infections , Streptococcus agalactiae , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Mothers , Pregnancy , Streptococcal Infections/diagnosis , Streptococcal Infections/drug therapy , Streptococcal Infections/prevention & control
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 46(2): 560-7, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18039801

ABSTRACT

Stool samples were collected from infants nursed in two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in East London, United Kingdom. The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for the carriage of multiresistant Enterobacteriaceae strains (MRE; resistant to three or more classes of antibiotic) and the extent of the persistence of resistant strains following discharge. Sixty-two (50%) of 124 infants had acquired MRE by 2 weeks of postnatal age, and 69 (56%) infants had acquired MRE by discharge. The proportions of infants at 2 weeks carrying strains that were resistant to antibiotics were the following: tetracycline, 79%; amoxicillin, 78%; cephalosporins, 31%; trimethoprim, 20%; piperacillin-tazobactam, 11%; chloramphenicol, 9%; and aminoglycoside, 4%. A gestational age of less than 26 weeks was a risk factor for colonization with MRE at discharge, but not at 2 weeks. Analysis within a NICU showed that exposure of an infant to a specific antibiotic in the NICU was not a risk factor for the carriage of a strain resistant to that antibiotic. Estimates of persistence from discharge to 6 months were the following: for tetracycline, 57% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.35 to 0.87); chloramphenicol, 49% (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.83); trimethoprim, 45% (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.74); piperacillin-tazobactam, 42% (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.71); and augmentin, 34% (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.66). Strains resistant to cephalosporins or aminoglycosides showed lower levels of persistence. Nine of 34 infants (26.5%) with Escherichia coli and 4 (7.1%) of 56 infants with Klebsiella spp. at discharge carried strains indistinguishable by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA and antibiotic susceptibility patterns at 6 months. MRE were found at high frequency in the infants during their stay in the NICU and persisted in a proportion of infants.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Enterobacteriaceae/isolation & purification , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Carrier State/epidemiology , Carrier State/microbiology , DNA Fingerprinting , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Enterobacteriaceae/classification , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Enterobacteriaceae/genetics , Feces/microbiology , Female , Genotype , Gestational Age , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , London/epidemiology , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique , Risk Factors , Time Factors
4.
Sci Rep ; 7(1): 15164, 2017 11 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29123122

ABSTRACT

The microaerophylic organism Propionibacterium acnes has shown consistent association with prostate cancer (PC). Studies linking circumcision with reduced PC further support anaerobes involvement as circumcision reduces anaerobe colonisation on the glans penis. A 1988 study linked anaerobes with PC but considered them as opportunists in necrotic tumour. A hypothesis that a "Helicobacter-like" process causes PC justified this pilot study. Active surveillance patients were enrolled. Post-prostate massage urine samples were screened using the Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight (MALDI-TOF) technique for bacterial identification after culture in anaerobic and aerobic conditions. 8 out of 18 patients (41%) had either obligate anaerobic (n = 5) or microaerophilic (n = 4, one of whom also had anaerobes) organisms identified. None of 10 control samples contained obligate anaerobes. Although mean PSA was 63% higher in those with low oxygen tolerating bacteria, two high outliers resulted in this difference being non-significant. Given the substantially higher proportion of PC patients with organisms growing in a low concentration of oxygen when combined with previous studies compared to controls, the degree of significance was as high as smoking 5-9 cigarettes a day and needs further investigation. Translational research in trials combining Vitamin D and aspirin have begun as part of such investigation.


Subject(s)
Bacteria, Anaerobic/classification , Bacteria, Anaerobic/isolation & purification , Bodily Secretions/microbiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/microbiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacteria, Anaerobic/chemistry , Bacteria, Anaerobic/growth & development , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Humans , Kallikreins/blood , London , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization
5.
J Infect ; 75(1): 20-25, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28435086

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To establish risk factors for Clostridium difficile colonization among hospitalized patients in England. METHODS: Patients admitted to elderly medicine wards at three acute hospitals in England were recruited to a prospective observational study. Participants were asked to provide a stool sample as soon as possible after enrolment and then weekly during their hospital stay. Samples were cultured for C. difficile before ribotyping and toxin detection by PCR. A multivariable logistic regression model of risk factors for C. difficile colonization was fitted from univariable risk factors significant at the p < 0.05 level. RESULTS: 410/727 participants submitted ≥1 stool sample and 40 (9.8%) carried toxigenic C. difficile in the first sample taken. Ribotype 106 was identified three times and seven other ribotypes twice. No ribotype 027 strains were identified. Independent predictors of colonization were previous C. difficile infection (OR 4.53 (95% C.I. 1.33-15.48) and malnutrition (MUST score ≥2) (OR 3.29 (95% C.I. 1.47-7.35)). Although C. difficile colonised patients experienced higher 90-day mortality, colonization was not an independent risk for death. CONCLUSIONS: In a non-epidemic setting patients who have previously had CDI and have a MUST score of ≥2 are at increased risk of C. difficile colonization and could be targeted for active surveillance to prevent C. difficile transmission.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Toxins/biosynthesis , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Enterotoxins/biosynthesis , Hospitalization , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clostridioides difficile/classification , Clostridioides difficile/drug effects , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Clostridium Infections/mortality , Cross Infection/microbiology , Diarrhea/epidemiology , England/epidemiology , Feces/microbiology , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prospective Studies , Ribotyping , Risk Factors
6.
Health Technol Assess ; 20(66): 1-194, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27594381

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) and late-onset sepsis remain important causes of death and morbidity in preterm babies. Probiotic administration might strengthen intestinal barrier function and provide protection; this is supported by published meta-analyses, but there is a lack of large well-designed trials. OBJECTIVE: To test the use of the probiotic Bifidobacterium breve strain BBG-001 to prevent NEC, late-onset sepsis and death in preterm babies while monitoring probiotic colonisation of participants. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Recruitment was carried out in 24 hospitals, and the randomisation programme used a minimisation algorithm. Parents, clinicians and outcome assessors were blinded to the allocation. PARTICIPANTS: Babies born between 23 and 30 weeks' gestation and randomised within 48 hours of birth. Exclusions included life-threatening or any gastrointestinal malformation detected within 48 hours of birth and no realistic chance of survival. INTERVENTIONS: Active intervention: 1 ml of B. breve BBG-001 in one-eighth-strength infant formula Neocate(®) (Nutricia Ltd, Trowbridge, UK), (6.7 × 10(7) to 6.7 × 10(9) colony-forming units) per dose administered enterally. Placebo: 1 ml of one-eighth-strength infant formula Neocate. Started as soon as practicable and continued daily until 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were an episode of bloodstream infection, with any organism other than a skin commensal, in any baby between 72 hours and 46 weeks' postmenstrual age; an episode of NEC Bell stage ≥ 2 in any baby; and death before discharge from hospital. Secondary outcomes included stool colonisation with B. breve. RESULTS: In total, 654 babies were allocated to receive probiotic and 661 to receive placebo over 37 months from July 2010. Five babies were withdrawn; 650 babies from the probiotic group and 660 from the placebo group were included in the primary analysis. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. There was no evidence of benefit for the primary outcomes {sepsis: 11.2% vs. 11.7% [adjusted relative risk (RR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 1.29]; NEC Bell stage ≥ 2: 9.4% vs. 10.0% [adjusted RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.27]; and death: 8.3% vs. 8.5% [adjusted RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.30]}. B. breve colonisation status was available for 1186 (94%) survivors at 2 weeks' postnatal age, of whom 724 (61%) were positive: 85% of the probiotic group and 37% of the placebo group. There were no differences for subgroup analyses by minimisation criteria and by stool colonisation with B. breve at 2 weeks. No harms associated with the interventions were reported. LIMITATIONS: Cross-colonisation of the placebo arm could have reduced statistical power and confounded results; analyses suggest that this did not happen. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest trial to date of a probiotic intervention. It shows no evidence of benefit and does not support routine use of probiotics for preterm infants. FUTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS: The increasing understanding of the pathogenesis of NEC and sepsis will inform the choice of probiotics for testing and better define the target population. Future Phase III trials should incorporate monitoring of the quality and viability of the intervention and colonisation rates of participants; cluster design should be considered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN05511098 and EudraCT 2006-003445-17. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 20, No. 66. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.


Subject(s)
Bifidobacterium breve , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/prevention & control , Infant, Premature , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Sepsis/prevention & control , Double-Blind Method , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/mortality , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Sepsis/mortality
7.
J Clin Microbiol ; 42(2): 713-7, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14766841

ABSTRACT

Lactobacilli, principally the strains that are hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) producing, may have a protective effect against vaginal colonization by pathogenic species such as those that cause bacterial vaginosis. Previous reports have also suggested that H(2)O(2)-producing lactobacilli in the vagina may protect pregnant women against ascending infection of the chorioamniotic membranes and uterine cavity. We report the identification and H(2)O(2) production of lactobacilli isolated from vaginal swabs collected at 20 weeks' gestation from a population of pregnant women at high risk of preterm birth. We also report the correlation between identification and H(2)O(2) production in relation to the outcomes of chorioamnionitis and preterm birth. Lactobacilli were identified by partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. H(2)O(2) production by isolates was determined by a semiquantitative method. The most commonly isolated species were L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. vaginalis and L. jensenii. Amounts of H(2)O(2) produced by lactobacilli varied widely. The presence of lactobacilli producing high levels of H(2)O(2) in the vagina of this population of pregnant women was associated with a reduced risk of bacterial vaginosis at 20 weeks' gestation and subsequent chorioamnionitis. L. jensenii and L. vaginalis produced the highest levels of H(2)O(2). We postulate that H(2)O(2)-producing lactobacilli are able to reduce the incidence of ascending infections of the uterus and the subsequent production of proinflammatory molecules which are important in the pathogenesis of chorioamnionitis and preterm birth.


Subject(s)
Infant, Premature , Lactobacillus/isolation & purification , Vagina/microbiology , Female , Humans , Hydrogen Peroxide/metabolism , Infant, Newborn , Lactobacillus/metabolism , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Vaginosis, Bacterial/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL