Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spinal Haemangioblastoma: A Retrospective Single-Centre Experience from the United Kingdom.

INTRODUCTION: Haemangioblastoma is a benign, vascular tumour of the central nervous system. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly being used as a treatment for spinal lesions to avoid complex surgery, especially in patients with multi-focal tumours associated with von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (VHL). Here, we present the outcomes of patients treated in our centre using a CyberKnife VSI (Accuray, Inc.). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients treated at our institution was conducted. Assessment of radiological response was based upon RANO criteria. Solid and overall tumour progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The development of a symptomatic new or enlarging cyst was included in the definition of progression when determining overall PFS. RESULTS: Fourteen tumours in 10 patients were included. Seven patients were male, and nine had VHL. Nine (64%) tumours had an associated cyst. The median (IQR) age at treatment was 45.5 (43.5-53) years. The median gross tumour volume was 0.355cc. Patients received a mean marginal prescribed dose of 9.6 Gy in a single fraction (median maximum dose: 14.3 Gy), which was constrained by spinal cord tolerance. Mean follow-up was 15.4 months. Radiologically, 11 (78.6%) tumours were stable or regressed and three (21.4%) progressed. Eight patients' symptoms improved or were stable, and two worsened, both of which were secondary to cyst enlargement. The 1-year solid-tumour and overall PFS was 92.3% and 75.7%, respectively. All patients were alive at the most recent follow-up. One patient developed grade 1 back pain following treatment. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: SRS appears to be a safe and effective treatment for spinal haemangioblastoma. Prospective trials with longer follow-up are required to establish the optimum management.

The Nottingham Expectation and Complication score following Surgery (NECS): an universal scale for surgical outcome audit and peer comparison.

BACKGROUND: Consultant Outcomes Publication (COP) is an NHS England initiative for promoting improvements in quality of care. However, at present outcomes are commonly expressed as mortality rates which do not necessarily reflect the performance of surgeons. We developed the Nottingham Expectation and Complication score following Surgery (NECS) to determine the success of surgical treatment from both the clinical perspective and the practical expectations agreed between surgeons and patients during the consent process. METHOD: This was a pilot study to trial the use of the NECS score. It is a simple expression of overall outcome comprising three clinical domains: S - surgical outcome, T - surgical/technical complications and M - medical complications recorded by the treating clinician, and practical outcome determined by a joint clinical/patient assessment. 107 elective neurosurgical patients were included in this prospective study. 95 completed questionnaires were included. RESULTS: 75% patients achieved the best possible treatment score (S3T3M4). Of the 25% of patients who did not achieve this ideal outcome, the most common cause was either medical deterioration 18%, or technical complications of surgery discussed during the consent process 17%, or both. Surgeons rated their outcomes as expectations exceeded in 2% of cases, met in 92%, partially met in 5% and failed in 1%. Patients rated their outcomes as expectations exceeded in 37%, met in 37%, partially met in 18%, and 5% reported that their expectations were not met or they were worse than before the operation. Bivariate correlation analysis (Pearson's r coefficient) between overall 'expectation score' of patients and surgeons showed moderate correlation with r = .25 (p = .014). CONCLUSION: NECS score can be used as an indicator to assess technical performance and patient satisfaction. It provides a more balanced quality indicator of the surgical service delivery than COP. It also offers additional advantages for auditing/planning improving care and may serve as an appraisal/revalidation tool.

A simple method to ease insertion and removal of vertebral body distractor pins in anterior cervical surgery.

Soft tissue injuries and visceral perforation are rare but potentially lethal complications of anterior cervical spine surgery. We describe a cheap and simple technique for guarding para-vertebral soft tissues, making insertion and removal of vertebral body distractor screws easier and safer with or without an assistant.

Aspergillus niger infection in an immunosuppressed patient confined solely to the brain.

A 68-year-old woman with a background of hypertension, stroke and rheumatoid arthritis presented to her local hospital after a 4-week history of gradual deterioration and increasing confusion with new onset right-sided weakness. Her initial CT scan revealed a rim enhancing mass lesion with surrounding oedema in the left parietal lobe for which she underwent CT stealth-guided biopsy. Microbiology culture of the 2 biopsy samples yielded Aspergillus niger and she was started on the antifungal agent voriconazole. MRI 2 weeks after the procedure also demonstrated radiological findings consistent with intracranial aspergillosis. She later developed leucopenia with neutrophils of 1.5×109/L and her methotrexate and voriconazole were stopped. Voriconazole was changed to oral posaconazole. She did not undergo surgical resection and has continued to improve clinically on posaconazole, with recovery in her white cell count.