ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Early diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) and universal access to drug-susceptibility testing (DST) are critical elements of the WHO End TB Strategy. Current rapid tests (e.g., Xpert® MTB/RIF and Ultra-assays) can detect rifampicin resistance-conferring mutations, but cannot detect resistance to Isoniazid and second-line anti-TB agents. Although Line Probe Assay is capable of detecting resistance to second-line anti-TB agents, it requires sophisticated laboratory infrastructure and advanced skills which are often not readily available in settings replete with TB. A rapid test capable of detecting Isoniazid and second-line anti-TB drug resistance is highly needed. METHODS: We conducted a diagnostic accuracy study to evaluate a new automated Xpert MTB/XDR 10-colour assay for rapid detection of Isoniazid and second-line drugs, including ethionamide, fluoroquinolones, and injectable drugs (Amikacin, Kanamycin, and Capreomycin). Positive Xpert MTB/RIF respiratory specimens were prospectively collected through routine diagnosis and surveillance of drug resistance at the Central TB Reference Laboratory in Tanzania. Specimens were tested by both Xpert XDR assay and LPA against culture-based phenotypic DST as the reference standard. FINDINGS: We analysed specimens from 151 TB patients with a mean age (SD) of 36.2 (12.7) years. The majority (n = 109, 72.2%) were males. The sensitivity for Xpert MTB/XDR was 93.5% (95% CI, 87.4-96.7); for Isoniazid, 96.6 (95% CI, 92.1-98.6); for Fluoroquinolone, 98.7% (95% Cl 94.8-99.7); for Amikacin, 96.6%; and (95% CI 92.1-98.6) for Ethionamide. Ethionamide had the lowest specificity of 50% and the highest was 100% for Fluoroquinolone. The diagnostic performance was generally comparable to that of LPA with slight variations between the two assays. The non-determinate rate (i.e., invalid M. tuberculosis complex detection) of Xpert MTB/XDR was 2·96%. CONCLUSION: The Xpert MTB/XDR demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for detecting resistance to Isoniazid, Fluoroquinolones, and injectable agents. This assay can be used in clinical settings to facilitate rapid diagnosis of mono-isoniazid and extensively drug-resistant TB.
Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents , Isoniazid , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Humans , Tanzania , Isoniazid/pharmacology , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Adult , Female , Male , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Middle Aged , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Young Adult , Adolescent , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/microbiology , Prospective Studies , Aged , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methodsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. We qualitatively evaluated the implementation of an Evidence-Based Multiple Focus Integrated Intensified TB Screening package (EXIT-TB) in the East African region, aimed at increasing TB case detection and number of patients receiving care. OBJECTIVE: We present the accounts of participants from Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, and Ethiopia regarding the implementation of EXIT-TB, and suggestions for scaling up. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive design was used to gather insights from purposefully selected healthcare workers, community health workers, and other stakeholders. A total of 27, 13, 14, and 19 in-depth interviews were conducted in Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, and Ethiopia respectively. Data were transcribed and translated simultaneously and then thematically analysed. RESULTS: The EXIT-TB project was described to contribute to increased TB case detection, improved detection of Multidrug-resistant TB patients, reduced delays and waiting time for diagnosis, raised the index of TB suspicion, and improved decision-making among HCWs. The attributes of TB case detection were: (i) free X-ray screening services; (ii) integrating TB case-finding activities in other clinics such as Reproductive and Child Health clinics (RCH), and diabetic clinics; (iii), engagement of CHWs, policymakers, and ministry level program managers; (iv) enhanced community awareness and linkage of clients; (v) cooperation between HCWs and CHWs, (vi) improved screening infrastructure, (vii) the adoption of the new simplified screening criteria and (viii) training of implementers. The supply-side challenges encountered ranged from disorganized care, limited space, the COVID-19 pandemic, inadequate human resources, inadequate knowledge and expertise, stock out of supplies, delayed maintenance of equipment, to absence of X-ray and GeneXpert machines in some facilities. The demand side challenges ranged from delayed care seeking, inadequate awareness, negative beliefs, fears towards screening, to financial challenges. Suggestions for scaling up ranged from improving service delivery, access to diagnostic equipment and supplies, and infrastructure, to addressing client fears and stigma. CONCLUSION: The EXIT-TB package appears to have contributed towards increasing TB case detection and reducing delays in TB treatment in the study settings. Addressing the challenges identified is needed to maximize the impact of the EXIT-TB intervention.
Subject(s)
Mass Screening , Tuberculosis , Humans , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Qualitative Research , Africa, Eastern , Program EvaluationABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: East Africa countries (Tanzania, Kenya, and Uganda) are among tuberculosis high burdened countries globally. As we race to accelerate progress towards a world free of tuberculosis by 2035, gaps related to screening and diagnosis in the cascade care need to be addressed. METHODS: We conducted a three-year (2015-2017) retrospective study using routine program data in 21 health facilities from East Africa. Data abstraction were done at tuberculosis clinics, outpatient departments (OPD), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and diabetic clinics, and then complemented with structured interviews with healthcare providers to identify possible gaps related to integration, screening, and diagnosis of tuberculosis. Data were analyzed using STATA™ Version 14.1. RESULTS: We extracted information from 49,454 presumptive TB patients who were registered in the 21 facilities between January 2015 and December 2017. A total of 9,565 tuberculosis cases were notified; 46.5% (4,450) were bacteriologically confirmed and 31.5% (3,013) were HIV-infected. Prevalence of tuberculosis among presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis cases was 17.4%. The outcomes observed were as follows: 79.8% (7,646) cured or completed treatment, 6.6% (634) died, 13.3% (1,270) lost to follow-up or undocumented and 0.4% (34) treatment failure. In all countries, tuberculosis screening was largely integrated at OPD and HIV clinics. High patient load, weak laboratory specimen referral system, shortage of trained personnel, and frequent interruption of laboratory supplies were the major cited challenges in screening and diagnosis of tuberculosis. CONCLUSION: Screening and diagnostic activities were frequently affected by scarcity of human and financial resources. Tuberculosis screening was mainly integrated at OPD and HIV clinics, with less emphasis on the other health facility clinics. Closing gaps related to TB case finding and diagnosis in developing countries requires sustainable investment for both human and financial resources and strengthen the integration of TB activities within the health system.