Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula and Graft Stenoses: Randomized Trial Comparing Drug-eluting Balloon Angioplasty with Conventional Angioplasty.

Purpose To compare lesion primary patency and restenosis rates between drug-eluting balloon (DEB) percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and conventional balloon PTA (cPTA) in the treatment of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and arteriovenous graft (AVG) stenosis. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, 119 participants (mean age, 59.2 years; 79 men, 40 women) with failing AVFs (n = 98) or AVGs (n = 21) were randomly assigned to undergo either DEB PTA (n = 59) or cPTA (n = 60) from January 2012 to May 2013. Primary end points were lesion primary patency and restenosis rates at 6 months; secondary outcomes were anatomic and clinical success after PTA, circuit primary patency at 6 months and 1 year, and lesion primary patency at 1 year. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator, and hazard ratio was calculated by using Cox proportional hazards regression. Complication rates were assessed in both groups. Results Estimated lesion primary patency in the DEB PTA and cPTA arms was 0.81 and 0.61, respectively, at 6 months (P = .03) and 0.51 and 0.34, respectively, at 1 year (P = .04). Estimated circuit primary patency in the DEB PTA and cPTA arms was 0.76 and 0.56, respectively, at 6 months (P = .048) and 0.45 and 0.32, respectively, at 1 year (P = .16). Restenosis rate was 34.0% (16 of 47) for DEB PTA and 62.9% (22 of 35) for cPTA at 6 months (P = .01). No major complications were noted. Conclusion Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty was effective in prolonging lesion primary patency of dialysis access stenoses at 6 months and 1 year. © RSNA, 2018.

Cost-Effectiveness of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for Treating Below-the-Knee Arteries in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: The SINGA-PACLI Trial.

PURPOSE: Drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) has been studied as a potentially superior option compared to conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in treating below-the-knee (BTK) arteries in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). The aim of this study is to examine the cost-effectiveness of DCBA versus PTA in BTK arteries based on a randomized controlled trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective economic study was embedded in a randomized controlled trial of 138 patients with CLTI. Resource use and health outcomes were assessed at baseline, and at 3, 6 and 12 months post-intervention. Costs were calculated from a societal perspective and health outcomes measured using quality-adjusted life years with probabilistic sensitivity analysis performed to account for subject heterogeneity. RESULTS: Compared with participants randomized to receive PTA, participants randomized to DCBA gained an average baseline-adjusted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of .012 while average total costs were USD$1854 higher; this translates to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$154,500 additional cost per QALY gained. However, the estimate of ICER had substantial variance with only 48% of bootstrap ICERs meeting a benchmark threshold of US$57,705 (the average gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of Singapore). CONCLUSION: The use of DCBA in BTK arteries in CLTI patients was not cost-effective compared with PTA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2, Randomized trial.

Recurrent Stenoses in Arteriovenous Fistula (AVF) for Dialysis Access: cuttIng ballooN angioplaSTy combined wITh paclitaxel drUg-coaTed balloon angioplasty, an observatIONal study (INSTITUTION Study).

PURPOSE: To study the safety and efficacy of cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) followed by paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty for recurrent venous lesions in arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-arm cohort study of CBA followed by PCB angioplasty for recurrent AVF stenoses between September 2017 and April 2019. In total, 44 participants were recruited. Target lesions were included if they had recurred within 12 months post-angioplasty, were > = 0.5 cm upstream from the arteriovenous anastomosis, and did not involve the central veins. Up to two non-target lesions per circuit/participant with the same definition were allowed. Lesions were considered separate when there was an intervening 2-cm segment of normal vessel. Technical success was defined as complete lesion effacement on angioplasty. End-points of target and circuit patency were evaluated clinically at 3, 6, and 12 months post-procedure. RESULT: Technical success was 96% (42/44): Two participants were excluded from analysis due to the need for high-pressure balloon angioplasty as the target lesions did not efface with CBA. The median follow-up duration was 337.5 days. Mean stenosis pre- and post-angioplasty was 69.0% (51.6-84.8) and 20.8% (0-44.8), respectively. The target lesion primary, primary assisted and circuit patency for the entire study population (n = 42) were 61.6 ± 7.8%, 92.7 ± 4.0%, and 54.7 ± 7.9%, respectively, at 12 months. For participants without non-target lesions (n = 22), the rates were 77.3 ± 8.9%, 90.9 ± 6.1%, and 60.7 ± 11.0%, respectively, at 12 months. CONCLUSION: CBA followed by PCB angioplasty appears safe and feasible for treatment of recurrent venous lesions in dysfunctional AVFs.