Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Am Heart J ; 163(5): 836-43, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22607862

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Understanding childhood obesity's root causes is critical to the creation of strategies to improve our children's health. We sought to define the association between childhood obesity and household income and how household income and childhood behaviors promote childhood obesity. METHODS: We assessed body mass index in 109,634 Massachusetts children, identifying the percentage of children who were overweight/obese versus the percentage of children in each community residing in low-income homes. We compared activity patterns and diet in 999 sixth graders residing in 4 Michigan communities with varying annual household income. RESULTS: In Massachusetts, percentage of overweight/obese by community varied from 9.6% to 42.8%. As household income dropped, percentage of overweight/obese children rose. In Michigan sixth graders, as household income goes down, frequency of fried food consumption per day doubles from 0.23 to 0.54 (P < .002), and daily TV/video time triples from 0.55 to 2.00 hours (P < .001), whereas vegetable consumption and moderate/vigorous exercise go down. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of overweight/obese children rises in communities with lower household income. Children residing in lower income communities exhibit poorer dietary and physical activity behaviors, which affect obesity.


Subject(s)
Body Mass Index , Child Behavior , Exercise/physiology , Life Style , Obesity/epidemiology , Adolescent , Attitude to Health , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diet , Family Characteristics , Health Status Disparities , Humans , Income , Male , Mass Screening/organization & administration , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Michigan/epidemiology , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity, Morbid/diagnosis , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Overweight/diagnosis , Overweight/epidemiology , Prevalence , Residence Characteristics , Risk Assessment , School Health Services , Socioeconomic Factors
2.
Milbank Q ; 90(4): 682-705, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23216427

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The Disclosure, Apology, and Offer (DA&O) model, a response to patient injuries caused by medical care, is an innovative approach receiving national attention for its early success as an alternative to the existing inherently adversarial, inefficient, and inequitable medical liability system. Examples of DA&O programs, however, are few. METHODS: Through key informant interviews, we investigated the potential for more widespread implementation of this model by provider organizations and liability insurers, defining barriers to implementation and strategies for overcoming them. Our study focused on Massachusetts, but we also explored themes that are broadly generalizable to other states. FINDINGS: We found strong support for the DA&O model among key stakeholders, who cited its benefits for both the liability system and patient safety. The respondents did not perceive any insurmountable barriers to broad implementation, and they identified strategies that could be pursued relatively quickly. Such solutions would permit a range of organizations to implement the model without legislative hurdles. CONCLUSIONS: Although more data are needed about the outcomes of DA&O programs, the model holds considerable promise for transforming the current approach to medical liability and patient safety.


Subject(s)
Health Plan Implementation/methods , Information Dissemination/methods , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Models, Organizational , Professional-Patient Relations , Truth Disclosure , Attitude of Health Personnel , Efficiency, Organizational , Humans , Liability, Legal , Malpractice , Organizational Innovation , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Social Responsibility , United States
3.
J Am Coll Nutr ; 31(3): 145-8, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23204149

ABSTRACT

Bans on the sale of tobacco products in pharmacies allow pharmacies to provide health information and services without the conflict of interest posed by concurrent tobacco sales. As health care providers, pharmacies are trusted sources of information for patients. The existence of tobacco products in pharmacies is contrary to their mission as a health care entity. By May 2012, a full 27 Massachusetts municipalities had banned the sale of tobacco products in health care institutions, including pharmacies. These bans covered 30% of the state's population.


Subject(s)
Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Marketing of Health Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Nicotiana , Pharmacies/legislation & jurisprudence , Pharmacists/psychology , Health Promotion , Humans , Massachusetts
4.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 37(11): 1836-1844, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30395501

ABSTRACT

To promote communication with patients after medical injuries and improve patient safety, numerous hospitals have implemented communication-and-resolution programs (CRPs). Through these programs, hospitals communicate transparently with patients after adverse events; investigate what happened and offer an explanation; and, when warranted, apologize, take responsibility, and proactively offer compensation. Despite growing consensus that CRPs are the right thing to do, concerns over liability risks remain. We evaluated the liability effects of CRP implementation at four Massachusetts hospitals by examining before-and-after trends in claims volume, cost, and time to resolution and comparing them to trends among nonimplementing peer institutions. CRP implementation was associated with improved trends in the rate of new claims and legal defense costs at some hospitals, but it did not significantly alter trends in other outcomes. None of the hospitals experienced worsening liability trends after CRP implementation, which suggests that transparency, apology, and proactive compensation can be pursued without adverse financial consequences.


Subject(s)
Communication , Compensation and Redress/legislation & jurisprudence , Costs and Cost Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Errors/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Liability, Legal/economics , Malpractice/economics , Malpractice/trends , Massachusetts , Patient Safety
5.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 33(1): 11-9, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24395930

ABSTRACT

Communication-and-resolution programs (CRPs) in health care organizations seek to identify medical injuries promptly; ensure that they are disclosed to patients compassionately; pursue timely resolution through patient engagement, explanation, and, where appropriate, apology and compensation; and use lessons learned to improve patient safety. CRPs have existed for years, but they are being tested in new settings and primed for broad implementation through grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. These projects do not require changing laws. However, grantees' experiences suggest that the path to successful dissemination of CRPs would be smoother if the legal environment supported them. State and federal policy makers should try to allay potential defendants' fears of litigation (for example, by protecting apologies from use in court), facilitate patient participation (for example, by ensuring access to legal representation), and address the reputational and economic concerns of health care providers (for example, by clarifying practices governing National Practitioner Data Bank reporting and payers' financial recourse following medical error).


Subject(s)
Administrative Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Communication , Health Care Sector/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Negotiating , Compensation and Redress/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Agencies/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Liability, Legal , National Practitioner Data Bank , Patient Advocacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Policy Making , Quality of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL