Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 33
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Cancer ; 129(1): 32-38, 2023 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36309838

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women in the United States. Previous analyses show that breast cancer incidence increased from 1999 to 2018. The purpose of this article is to examine trends in breast cancer mortality. METHODS: Analysis of 1999 to 2020 mortality data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, among women by race/ethnicity, age, and US Census region. RESULTS: It was found that overall breast cancer mortality is decreasing but varies by race/ethnicity, age group, and US Census region. The largest decrease in mortality was observed among non-Hispanic White women, women aged 45 to 64 years of age, and women living in the Northeast; whereas the smallest decrease in mortality was observed among non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander women, women aged 65 years or older, and women living in the South. CONCLUSION: This report provides national estimates of breast cancer mortality from 1999 to 2020 by race/ethnicity, age group, and US Census region. The decline in breast cancer mortality varies by demographic group. Disparities in breast cancer mortality have remained consistent over the past two decades. Using high-quality cancer surveillance data to estimate trends in breast cancer mortality may help health care professionals and public health prevention programs tailor screening and diagnostic interventions to address these disparities.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , United States/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , White People , Black or African American , Ethnicity , Asian
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(16): 421-425, 2023 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37079478

ABSTRACT

Non-Hispanic Asian (Asian) and non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NHPI) persons represent growing segments of the U.S. population (1). Epidemiologic cancer studies often aggregate Asian and NHPI persons (2,3); however, because Asian and NHPI persons are culturally, geographically, and linguistically diverse (2,4), subgroup analyses might provide insights into the distribution of health outcomes. To examine the frequency and percentage of new cancer cases among 25 Asian and NHPI subgroups, CDC analyzed the most current 2015-2019 U.S. Cancer Statistics data.* The distribution of new cancer cases among Asian and NHPI subgroups differed by sex, age, cancer type, and stage at diagnosis (for screening-detected cancers). The percentage of cases diagnosed among females ranged from 47.1% to 68.2% and among persons aged <40 years, ranged from 3.1% to 20.2%. Among the 25 subgroups, the most common cancer type varied. For example, although breast cancer was the most common in 18 subgroups, lung cancer was the most common cancer among Chamoru, Micronesian race not otherwise specified (NOS), and Vietnamese persons; colorectal cancer was the most common cancer among Cambodian, Hmong, Laotian, and Papua New Guinean persons. The frequency of late-stage cancer diagnoses among all subgroups ranged from 25.7% to 40.3% (breast), 38.1% to 61.1% (cervical), 52.4% to 64.7% (colorectal), and 70.0% to 78.5% (lung). Subgroup data illustrate health disparities among Asian and NHPI persons, which might be reduced through the design and implementation of culturally and linguistically responsive cancer prevention and control programs, including programs that address social determinants of health.


Subject(s)
Asian , Health Status Disparities , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Neoplasms , Pacific Island People , Female , Humans , Asian/statistics & numerical data , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Pacific Island People/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/pathology , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S./statistics & numerical data , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Social Determinants of Health/statistics & numerical data , Culturally Competent Care/ethnology
3.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 29(2): 1019-1030, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34490527

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the surgical patterns of American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there are disparities in breast cancer surgery and radiation therapy between non-Hispanic AI/AN (NH-AI/AN) women and non-Hispanic White (NHW) women. METHODS: Data from the National Program of Cancer Registries of the Centers for Disease Control and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results were used for this cross-sectional study. Female patients with invasive breast cancer diagnosed 2010-2015 were stratified by race/ethnicity, surgical procedure, radiation, and region. Percentage distributions of mastectomy and lumpectomy were compared overall and by region and stage. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2015 there were 3292 NH-AI/AN women and 165,225 NHW women diagnosed with breast cancer. For early stage (AJCC stage 1 and 2), NH-AI/AN women had overall significantly higher percentage of mastectomy (41% vs 34.4%, p < 0.001) and significantly lower percentage of lumpectomy (59% vs 65.6%) compared with NHW women, without significant differences in post-lumpectomy radiation (71% vs 70%). There were regional variations, notably in the Northern Plains, where the percentage of mastectomy for early-stage disease was 48.9% for NH-AI/AN women versus 35.9% for NHW women, and in Alaska with 47% for NH-AI/AN women versus 33.3% for NHW women (p < 0.001). There were no overall significant differences in type of surgery or radiation for late-stage disease between groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to show disparities in surgical management of NH-AI/AN women with breast cancer. For early-stage disease, NH-AI/AN women undergo a higher percentage of mastectomy. Future clinical directions could focus on the factors that drive awareness, decision-making, and access to breast conservation.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Indians, North American , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Incidence , Mastectomy , Mastectomy, Segmental , United States/epidemiology , American Indian or Alaska Native
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(2): 43-47, 2022 Jan 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35025856

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer is commonly diagnosed among women, accounting for approximately 30% of all cancer cases reported among women.* A slight annual increase in breast cancer incidence occurred in the United States during 2013-2017 (1). To examine trends in breast cancer incidence among women aged ≥20 years by race/ethnicity and age, CDC analyzed data from U.S. Cancer Statistics (USCS) during 1999-2018. Overall, breast cancer incidence rates among women decreased an average of 0.3% per year, decreasing 2.1% per year during 1999-2004 and increasing 0.3% per year during 2004-2018. Incidence increased among non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander women and women aged 20-39 years and decreased among non-Hispanic White women and women aged 50-64 and ≥75 years. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force currently recommends biennial screening mammography for women aged 50-74 years (2). These findings suggest that women aged 20-49 years might benefit from discussing potential breast cancer risk and ways to reduce risk with their health care providers. Further examination of breast cancer trends by demographic characteristics might help tailor breast cancer prevention and control programs to address state- or county-level incidence rates† and help prevent health disparities.


Subject(s)
Age Distribution , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Race Factors/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Registries , SEER Program , United States/epidemiology
5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(50): 1583-1588, 2022 Dec 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36520660

ABSTRACT

Cancer survivors (persons who have received a diagnosis of cancer, from the time of diagnosis throughout their lifespan)* have increased risk for severe COVID-19 illness and mortality (1). This report describes characteristics of deaths reported to CDC's National Vital Statistics System (NVSS), for which cancer was listed as the underlying or a contributing cause (cancer deaths) during January 1, 2018-July 2, 2022. The underlying causes of death, including cancer and COVID-19, were examined by week, age, sex, race and ethnicity, and cancer type. Among an average of approximately 13,000 weekly cancer deaths, the percentage with cancer as the underlying cause was 90% in 2018 and 2019, 88% in 2020, and 87% in 2021. The percentage of cancer deaths with COVID-19 as the underlying cause differed by time (2.0% overall in 2020 and 2.4% in 2021, ranging from 0.2% to 7.2% by week), with higher percentages during peaks in the COVID-19 pandemic. The percentage of cancer deaths with COVID-19 as the underlying cause also differed by the characteristics examined, with higher percentages observed in 2021 among persons aged ≥65 years (2.4% among persons aged 65-74 years, 2.6% among persons aged 75-84 years, and 2.4% among persons aged ≥85 years); males (2.6%); persons categorized as non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) (3.4%), Hispanic or Latino (Hispanic) (3.2%), or non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black) (2.5%); and persons with hematologic cancers, including leukemia (7.4%), lymphoma (7.3%), and myeloma (5.8%). This report found differences by age, sex, race and ethnicity, and cancer type in the percentage of cancer deaths with COVID-19 as the underlying cause. These results might guide multicomponent COVID-19 prevention interventions and ongoing, cross-cutting efforts to reduce health disparities and address structural and social determinants of health among cancer survivors, which might help protect those at disproportionate and increased risk for death from COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms , Vital Statistics , Male , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Ethnicity , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.
6.
Cancer ; 126(10): 2250-2266, 2020 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32162329

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Cancer Society, the National Cancer Institute, and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries collaborate to provide annual updates on cancer occurrence and trends in the United States and to address a special topic of interest. Part I of this report focuses on national cancer statistics, and part 2 characterizes progress in achieving select Healthy People 2020 cancer objectives. METHODS: For this report, the authors selected objectives-including death rates, cancer screening, and major risk factors-related to 4 common cancers (lung, colorectal, female breast, and prostate). Baseline values, recent values, and the percentage change from baseline to recent values were examined overall and by select sociodemographic characteristics. Data from national surveillance systems were obtained from the Healthy People 2020 website. RESULTS: Targets for death rates were met overall and in most sociodemographic groups, but not among males, blacks, or individuals in rural areas, although these groups did experience larger decreases in rates compared with other groups. During 2007 through 2017, cancer death rates decreased 15% overall, ranging from -4% (rural) to -22% (metropolitan). Targets for breast and colorectal cancer screening were not yet met overall or in any sociodemographic groups except those with the highest educational attainment, whereas lung cancer screening was generally low (<10%). Targets were not yet met overall for cigarette smoking, recent smoking cessation, excessive alcohol use, or obesity but were met for secondhand smoke exposure and physical activity. Some sociodemographic groups did not meet targets or had less improvement than others toward reaching objectives. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring trends in cancer risk factors, screening test use, and mortality can help assess the progress made toward decreasing the cancer burden in the United States. Although many interventions to reduce cancer risk factors and promote healthy behaviors are proven to work, they may not be equitably applied or work well in every community. Implementing cancer prevention and control interventions that are sustainable, focused, and culturally appropriate may boost success in communities with the greatest need, ensuring that all Americans can access a path to long, healthy, cancer-free lives.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , American Cancer Society , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Healthy People Programs , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Mortality , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Registries , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
7.
Cancer ; 126(10): 2225-2249, 2020 05 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32162336

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The American Cancer Society, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Cancer Institute, and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries collaborate to provide annual updates on cancer occurrence and trends in the United States. METHODS: Data on new cancer diagnoses during 2001 through 2016 were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded and National Cancer Institute-funded population-based cancer registry programs and compiled by the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Data on cancer deaths during 2001 through 2017 were obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics' National Vital Statistics System. Trends in incidence and death rates for all cancers combined and for the leading cancer types by sex, racial/ethnic group, and age were estimated by joinpoint analysis and characterized by the average annual percent change during the most recent 5 years (2012-2016 for incidence and 2013-2017 for mortality). RESULTS: Overall, cancer incidence rates decreased 0.6% on average per year during 2012 through 2016, but trends differed by sex, racial/ethnic group, and cancer type. Among males, cancer incidence rates were stable overall and among non-Hispanic white males but decreased in other racial/ethnic groups; rates increased for 5 of the 17 most common cancers, were stable for 7 cancers (including prostate), and decreased for 5 cancers (including lung and bronchus [lung] and colorectal). Among females, cancer incidence rates increased during 2012 to 2016 in all racial/ethnic groups, increasing on average 0.2% per year; rates increased for 8 of the 18 most common cancers (including breast), were stable for 6 cancers (including colorectal), and decreased for 4 cancers (including lung). Overall, cancer death rates decreased 1.5% on average per year during 2013 to 2017, decreasing 1.8% per year among males and 1.4% per year among females. During 2013 to 2017, cancer death rates decreased for all cancers combined among both males and females in each racial/ethnic group, for 11 of the 19 most common cancers among males (including lung and colorectal), and for 14 of the 20 most common cancers among females (including lung, colorectal, and breast). The largest declines in death rates were observed for melanoma of the skin (decreasing 6.1% per year among males and 6.3% among females) and lung (decreasing 4.8% per year among males and 3.7% among females). Among children younger than 15 years, cancer incidence rates increased an average of 0.8% per year during 2012 to 2016, and cancer death rates decreased an average of 1.4% per year during 2013 to 2017. Among adolescents and young adults aged 15 to 39 years, cancer incidence rates increased an average of 0.9% per year during 2012 to 2016, and cancer death rates decreased an average of 1.0% per year during 2013 to 2017. CONCLUSIONS: Although overall cancer death rates continue to decline, incidence rates are leveling off among males and are increasing slightly among females. These trends reflect population changes in cancer risk factors, screening test use, diagnostic practices, and treatment advances. Many cancers can be prevented or treated effectively if they are found early. Population-based cancer incidence and mortality data can be used to inform efforts to decrease the cancer burden in the United States and regularly monitor progress toward goals.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/epidemiology , American Cancer Society , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mortality/trends , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/mortality , Registries , Sex Characteristics , United States/epidemiology , United States/ethnology
8.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(15): 433-438, 2020 Apr 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32298244

ABSTRACT

Cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx account for 3% of cancers diagnosed in the United States* each year. Cancers at these sites can differ anatomically and histologically and might have different causal factors, such as tobacco use, alcohol use, and infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) (1). Incidence of combined oral cavity and pharyngeal cancers declined during the 1980s but began to increase around 1999 (2,3). Because tobacco use has declined in the United States, accompanied by a decrease in incidence of many tobacco-related cancers, researchers have suggested that the increase in oral cavity and pharynx cancers might be attributed to anatomic sites with specific cell types in which HPV DNA is often found (4,5). U.S. Cancer Statistics† data were analyzed to examine trends in incidence of cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx by anatomic site, sex, race/ethnicity, and age group. During 2007-2016, incidence rates increased for cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx combined, base of tongue, anterior tongue, gum, tonsil, oropharynx, and other oral cavity and pharynx. Incidence rates declined for cancers of the lip, floor of mouth, soft palate and uvula, hard palate, hypopharynx, and nasopharynx, and were stable for cancers of the cheek and other mouth and salivary gland. Ongoing implementation of proven population-based strategies to prevent tobacco use initiation, promote smoking cessation, reduce excessive alcohol use, and increase HPV vaccination rates might help prevent cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx.


Subject(s)
Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/ethnology , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/ethnology , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
9.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 169(3): 595-606, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29445940

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Younger women diagnosed with breast cancer have poorer prognoses and higher mortality compared to older women. Young black women have higher incidence rates of breast cancer and more aggressive subtypes than women of other races/ethnicities. In this study, we examined recent trends and variations in breast cancer incidence among young women in the United States. METHODS: Using 2004-2013 National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data, we calculated breast cancer incidence rates and trends and examined variations in stage, grade, and tumor subtype by age and race/ethnicity among young women aged 20-49 years. RESULTS: The majority of breast cancer cases occurred in women aged 40-44 and 45-49 years (77.3%). Among women aged < 45 years, breast cancer incidence was highest among black women. Incidence trends increased from 2004 to 2013 for Asian or Pacific Islander (API) women and white women aged 20-34 years. Black, American Indian or Alaska Native, and Hispanic women had higher proportions of cases diagnosed at later stages than white and API women. Black women had a higher proportion of grade III-IV tumors than other racial/ethnic groups. Across all age groups, incidence rates for triple-negative breast cancer were significantly higher in black women than women of other races/ethnicities, and this disparity increased with age. CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer among young women is a highly heterogeneous disease. Differences in tumor characteristics by age and race/ethnicity suggest opportunities for further research into personal and cultural factors that may influence breast cancer risk among younger women.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Age Factors , Biomarkers, Tumor , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Breast Neoplasms/history , Ethnicity , Female , Healthcare Disparities , History, 21st Century , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Racial Groups , Young Adult
10.
Cancer ; 123 Suppl 24: 5037-5058, 2017 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29205308

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the first CONCORD study, 5-year survival for patients with diagnosed with rectal cancer between 1990 and 1994 was <60%, with large racial disparities noted in the majority of participating states. We have updated these findings to 2009 by examining population-based survival by stage of disease at the time of diagnosis, race, and calendar period. METHODS: Data from the CONCORD-2 study were used to compare survival among individuals aged 15 to 99 years who were diagnosed in 37 states encompassing up to 80% of the US population. We estimated net survival up to 5 years after diagnosis correcting for background mortality with state-specific and race-specific life table. Survival estimates were age-standardized with the International Cancer Survival Standard weights. We present survival estimates by race (all, black, and white) for 2001 through 2003 and 2004 through 2009 to account for changes in collecting the data for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Summary Stage 2000. RESULTS: There was a small increase in 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year net survival between 2001-2003 (84.6%, 70.7%, and 63.2%, respectively), and 2004-2009 (85.1%, 71.5%, and 64.1%, respectively). Black individuals were found to have lower 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival than white individuals in both periods; the absolute difference in survival between black and white individuals declined only for 5-year survival. Black patients had lower 5-year survival than whites at each stage at the time of diagnosis in both time periods. CONCLUSIONS: There was little improvement noted in net survival for patients with rectal cancer, with persistent disparities noted between black and white individuals. Additional investigation is needed to identify and implement effective interventions to ensure the consistent and equitable use of high-quality screening, diagnosis, and treatment to improve survival for patients with rectal cancer. Cancer 2017;123:5037-58. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Registries , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms/ethnology , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
11.
Prostate ; 75(7): 758-63, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25619191

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Black men have a higher incidence of prostate cancer than white men in the U.S., but little is known whether incidence or racial differences vary geographically. Understanding these differences may assist future studies on causes of prostate cancer. To address such, we leverage the unique resource of the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) combined with Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER). METHODS: Prostate cancer counts and population denominators by race (black, white), age, calendar year, and U.S. census division, for the period 1999-2008, were extracted from NPCR and SEER. We calculated age-standardized incidence rates (ASR) and estimated annual percent changes (EAPC) by race and census division. We assessed black-to-white incidence rate ratios (BWIRR) by census division and by calendar period. RESULTS: This analysis included 1,713,471 prostate cancer cases and 1,217 million person-years. Black ASRs ranged from 176 per 100,000 person-years in Mountain division to 259 in Middle Atlantic. BWIRRs ranged from 1.20 in Western divisions to 1.72 in Southeastern divisions. EAPCs indicated that prostate cancer incidence is not decreasing in East South Central, unlike all other divisions. White EAPCs displayed similar variations by census division, resulting in modest temporal changes in BWIRRs. CONCLUSIONS: Within the U.S., there exists significant geographic variability in prostate cancer incidence rates. Although there are large geographic differences in BWIRRs, temporal trends are fairly stable. This may indicate that primary factors affecting prostate cancer incidence rates vary geographically but affect both black and white men to a similar degree.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Kallikreins/blood , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/ethnology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Incidence , Least-Squares Analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Registries , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
12.
Cancer Causes Control ; 26(5): 751-8, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25761406

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the proportional distribution of early- and late-stage breast cancers diagnosed in years 2004-2009 among women enrolled in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) and to compare this distribution to that of geographically comparable non-enrolled women diagnosed with breast cancer. METHODS: Using data from the National Program of Cancer Registries, we compared the demographic characteristics and cancer stage distribution of women enrollees and non-enrollees by use of conditional logistic regression using the odds ratio as a measure of association. RESULTS: NBCCEDP enrollees were slightly younger and more likely to identify as African-American, API and AIAN than were non-enrollees. The proportion of late-stage breast cancer (regional and distant) decreased slightly over the study period. NBCCEDP enrollees generally were diagnosed at a later stage of breast cancer than were those not enrolled in the NBCCEDP. CONCLUSIONS: The NBCCEDP has been effective in achieving its goal of enrolling racial and ethnic populations; however, enrollees had a poorer stage distribution of breast cancer than did non-enrollees underscoring the need to expand breast cancer control efforts among low-income, underserved populations.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast/pathology , Early Detection of Cancer , Adult , Black or African American , Age Factors , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Poverty , Registries
13.
Cancer ; 120 Suppl 23: 3826-35, 2014 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25412394

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer's (AJCC) 7th edition cancer staging manual reflects recent changes in cancer care practices. This report assesses changes from the AJCC 6th to the AJCC 7th edition stage distributions and the quality of site-specific factors (SSFs). METHODS: Incidence data for renal parenchyma and pelvis and ureter cancers from 18 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries were examined, including staging trends during 2004-2010, stage distribution changes between the AJCC 6th and 7th editions, and SSF completeness for cases diagnosed in 2010. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2010, the percentage of stage I renal parenchyma cancers increased from 50% to 58%, whereas stage IV and unknown stage cases decreased (18% to 15%, and 10% to 6%, respectively). During this period, the percentage of stage 0a renal pelvis and ureter cancers increased from 21% to 25%, and stage IV and unknown stage tumors decreased (20% to 18%, and 7% to 5%, respectively). Stage distributions under the AJCC 6th and 7th editions were about the same. For renal parenchymal cancers, 71%-90% of cases had known values for 6 required SSFs. For renal pelvis and ureter cancers, 74% of cases were coded as known for SSF1 (WHO/ISUP grade) and 47% as known for SSF2 (depth of renal parenchymal invasion). SSF values were known for larger proportions of cases with reported resections. CONCLUSIONS: Stage distributions between the AJCC 6th and 7th editions were similar. SSFs were known for more than two-thirds of cases, providing more detail in the SEER database relevant to prognosis.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Pelvis , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Registries , Ureteral Neoplasms/pathology , Cohort Studies , Humans , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging/trends , Prognosis , Renal Veins , Retrospective Studies , SEER Program
14.
Am J Public Health ; 104 Suppl 3: S423-31, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24754663

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We examined geographic differences and trends in incidence and mortality of ovarian and uterine cancer in American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. METHODS: We linked mortality data (1990-2009) and incidence data (1999-2009) to Indian Health Service (IHS) records. Death (and incidence) rates for ovarian and uterine cancer were examined for AI/AN and White women; Hispanics were excluded. Analyses focused on Contract Health Service Delivery Area (CHSDA) counties. RESULTS: AI/AN and White women had similar ovarian and uterine cancer death rates. Ovarian and uterine cancer incidence and death rates were higher for AI/ANs residing in CHSDA counties than for all US counties. We also observed geographic differences, regardless of CHSDA residence, in ovarian and uterine cancer incidence and death rates in AI/AN women by IHS region; Pacific Coast and Southern Plains women had higher ovarian cancer death rates and Northern Plains women had higher uterine cancer death rates. CONCLUSIONS: Regional differences in the incidence and mortality of ovarian and uterine cancers among AI/AN women in the United States were significant. More research among correctly classified AI/AN women is needed to understand these differences.


Subject(s)
Indians, North American/statistics & numerical data , Inuit/statistics & numerical data , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Uterine Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alaska/epidemiology , Alaska/ethnology , Cause of Death , Death Certificates , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/ethnology , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Population Surveillance , Registries , United States/epidemiology , Uterine Neoplasms/ethnology , Uterine Neoplasms/mortality , White People/statistics & numerical data
15.
Int J Occup Environ Health ; 19(1): 1-10, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23582609

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The decline in asbestos use in the United States may impact mesothelioma incidence. OBJECTIVE: This report provides national and state-specific estimates of mesothelioma incidence in the United States using cancer surveillance data for the entire US population. METHODS: Data from the National Program for Cancer Registries and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program were used to calculate incidence rates and annual percent change. RESULTS: During 2003-2008, an average of 1.05 mesothelioma cases per 100 000 persons were diagnosed annually in the United States; the number of cases diagnosed each year remained level, whereas rates decreased among men and were stable among women. CONCLUSION: US population-based cancer registry data can be used to determine the burden of mesothelioma and track its decline. Even 30 years after peak asbestos use in the United States, 3200 mesothelioma cases are diagnosed annually, showing that the US population is still at risk.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Asbestos/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Mesothelioma/chemically induced , Mesothelioma/epidemiology , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , District of Columbia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Mesothelioma/ethnology , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Registries , Sex Distribution , United States/epidemiology
16.
PLoS One ; 18(5): e0284051, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37167241

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cancer survival has improved for the most common cancers. However, less improvement and lower survival has been observed in some groups perhaps due to differential access to cancer care including prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment. METHODS: To further understand contemporary relative cancer survival (one- and five- year), we used survival data from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) for cancers diagnosed during 2007-2016. We examined overall relative cancer survival by sex, race and ethnicity, age, and county-level metropolitan and non-metropolitan status. Relative cancer survival by metropolitan and non-metropolitan status was further examined by sex, race and ethnicity, age, and cancer type. RESULTS: Among persons with cancer diagnosed during 2007-2016 the overall one-year and five-year relative survival was 80.6% and 67.4%, respectively. One-year relative survival for persons living in metropolitan counties was 81.1% and 77.8% among persons living in non-metropolitan counties. We found that persons who lived in non-metropolitan counties had lower survival than those who lived in metropolitan counties, and this difference persisted across sex, race and ethnicity, age, and most cancer types. CONCLUSION: Further examination of the differences in cancer survival by cancer type or other characteristics might be helpful for identifying potential interventions, such as programs that target screening and early detection or strategies to improve access to high quality cancer treatment and follow-up care, that could improve long-term outcomes. IMPACT: This analysis provided a high-level overview of contemporary cancer survival in the United States.


Subject(s)
National Program of Cancer Registries , Neoplasms , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Rural Population , Urban Population , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Registries
17.
J Registry Manag ; 49(4): 177-189, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37260823

ABSTRACT

Background: Net and crude cancer survival statistics can be calculated using cause of death or expected survival from life tables. In some instances, using cause of death information may be advantageous. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program cause-specific cause of death variable (North American Association of Central Cancer Registries [NAACCR] item #1914) designates that a patient died of their cancer. We evaluated how miss-ingness in NAACCR item #1914 impacted survival estimates to determine fitness for use in NAACCR Cancer in North America (CiNA) products. Methods: We used CiNA survival and prevalence data (November 2020 submission) to calculate 60-month cause-specific survival among persons aged 15-99 years at time of diagnosis using NAACCR item #1914. We treated missing/unknown causes of death in 3 ways: excluded from analysis, included as dead from this cancer, or included as censored at time of last follow-up. Autopsy/death-certificate-only cases were excluded from survival analyses. We calculated the proportion of deaths with unknown/missing cause of death by registry and demographic variables. Results: Generally, 60-month cause-specific survival estimates differed by <1% between the 3 approaches when NAACCR item #1914 was missing/unknown for <3% of deaths. When applying a <3% fit-for-use standard to SEER cause-specific cause of death, data from 34 registries were included in cause-specific survival analyses. The proportion of deaths with missing/unknown cause of death varied by primary site, age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, year of diagnosis, and registry. Conclusion: We have identified missingness cut points for NAACCR item #1914, which strike a balance between scientific integrity and registry inclusiveness, to designate data in NAACCR CiNA data products as fit for use in cause-specific survival analyses.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Humans , Cause of Death , Ethnicity , Registries , SEER Program , United States , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over
18.
Cancer Med ; 10(1): 386-395, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33270992

ABSTRACT

Plasma cell myeloma (also called multiple myeloma), solitary plasmacytoma, and extramedullary plasmacytoma are primarily diseases of the elderly. Evidence suggests an association between excess body weight and multiple myeloma. Few population-based studies have examined incidence and mortality of each site in one study. We analyzed incidence and death rates by site (solitary plasmacytoma, extramedullary plasmacytoma, and multiple myeloma) by gender, age, race/ethnicity, and rural-urban status among adult males and females (aged 20 years or older) in the United States during 2003-2016. Trends were characterized as average annual percentage change (AAPC) in rates. During 2003-2016, overall incidence rates among adults were 0.45 for solitary plasmacytoma, 0.09 for extramedullary plasmacytoma, and 8.47 for multiple myeloma per 100,000 persons. Incidence rates for multiple myeloma increased during 2003-2016 among non-Hispanic whites (AAPC = 1.78%) and non-Hispanic blacks (2.98%) 20-49 years of age; non-Hispanic whites (1.17%) and non-Hispanic blacks (1.24%) 50-59 years of age; and whites non-Hispanic (0.91%), and non-Hispanic blacks (0.96%). During 2003-2016 overall myeloma (extramedullary plasmacytoma and multiple myeloma) death rates among adults was 4.77 per 100,00 persons. Myeloma death rates decreased during 2003-2016 among non-Hispanic white (AAPC = -1.23%) and Hispanic (-1.34%) women; and non-Hispanic white (-0.74%), non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native (-3.05%) men. The US population is projected to become older and will have a larger proportion of persons who have had an earlier and longer exposure to excess body weight. The potential impact of these population changes on myeloma incidence and mortality can be monitored with high-quality cancer surveillance data.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma/ethnology , Plasmacytoma/ethnology , Racial Groups , Adult , Black or African American , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , American Indian or Alaska Native , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Obesity/ethnology , Plasmacytoma/diagnosis , Plasmacytoma/mortality , Race Factors , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Rural Health , Sex Factors , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology , Urban Health , White People , Young Adult
19.
J Natl Med Assoc ; 113(3): 353-356, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32778443

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-Hispanic black women (NHB) are diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) more often than other ethnic or racial groups in the United States (US). This study describes regional differences in TNBC incidence among NHB women in the US from 2011 to 2015. METHODS: We analyzed data from the United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) that includes incidence data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programs. RESULTS: Compared to the incidence rate for NHB women in the South, rates were significantly lower in the Northeast (22.6 per 100,000), higher in the Midwest (25.5 per 100,000) and similar in the West. These regional differences might be explained by genetic admixture among people with different geographic ancestral origins. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study highlight the need to extend etiological research and evidence-based cancer prevention and control efforts to women at high risk of this disease in order to decrease cancer disparities.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Breast Neoplasms , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Female , Humans , Incidence , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/genetics , United States/epidemiology
20.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 30(9): 1607-1614, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34244156

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few population-based studies have examined incidence and mortality of cancers of the biliary tract, including intrahepatic bile duct, extrahepatic bile duct, ampulla of Vater, and overlapping or other lesions of the biliary tract in one study. METHODS: To further the understanding of recent rates of biliary tract cancers, we used population-based data, to examine incidence and mortality during 2013 to 2017. We examined how rates varied by sex, age, race/ethnicity, U.S. census region, and stage at diagnosis. RESULTS: Intrahepatic bile duct was the most common biliary tract cancer, with an incidence rate of 1.49 per 100,000 persons. Cancer incidence rates per 100,000 persons were 0.96 for extrahepatic bile duct, 0.45 for ampulla of Vater, and 0.24 for overlapping or other lesions of the biliary tract. Cancer death rates per 100,000 persons were 1.66 for intrahepatic bile duct and 0.45 for other biliary tract. Intrahepatic bile duct incidence and death rates were higher among males than females, higher among Hispanic and Asian and Pacific Islander persons compared with non-Hispanic Whites, and higher in the Northeast and in urban counties. CONCLUSIONS: This report provides national estimates of these rare biliary tract cancers. IMPACT: Key interventions targeted to high-risk populations may help reduce incidence and mortality of cancers of the biliary tract by improving primary prevention through strategies to reduce tobacco and alcohol use, control overweight and obesity, and promote hepatitis B vaccination and use of syringe service programs meant to curb the transmission of infectious diseases such as viral hepatitis.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality , Gallbladder Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Registries , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL