Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Journal subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Int J Ment Health Syst ; 14: 48, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32670399

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While effective interventions have been developed to support families where a parent has a mental illness in Adult Mental Health Services, embedding and sustaining them is challenging resulting in families not having access to support. This study developed an explanatory model of influencers that had enabled sustainability of the Let's Talk intervention in one service. METHODS: A participatory case study was used to build an explanatory model of sustainability at the service using theoretical frameworks. Qualitative and quantitative data was collected about practitioner's practice and the organisation's implementation process and capacity to support practice. A local research group worked with the researcher using a transforming data approach through description, analysis and interpretation. RESULTS: Influencers were grouped into four major categories: (1) External social, political and financial context, (2) Resources, (3) Prior organisational capacity and (4) Sustainability Factors. The last category, Sustainability factors, was divided into three subcategories: (4.1) Practitioner (4.2) Organisation and (4.3) Parent-Client. These categories form part of an explanatory model for the key influencers of continued practitioner practice and organisational capacity to support practice. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In this case study, the pre-existing organisational context along with practitioner, organisation and parent-client factors operated together to influence sustainability. The results suggest that sustainability is more likely to be supported by both linking Let's Talk to existing organisational identity, capacity, structures and relationships and by supporting mutual adaptations to improve the fit. Additionally, by understanding that setbacks are common and ongoing adjustments are needed, implementers are able to have realistic expectations of sustainability.

2.
Australas Psychiatry ; 17(3): 202-6, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19199129

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this paper are to provide an overview of recovery-focused models of care and discuss the implementation of the Strengths Model at St. Vincent's Mental Health Melbourne (SVMH), Victoria, Australia. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the Strengths Model at SVMH is discussed with particular emphasis on the process of implementation, service implications, practical challenges and dilemmas that have arisen, and proposed evaluation. Recovery-focused care is feasible and can enhance current practice of mental health services.


Subject(s)
Community Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Mental Disorders/rehabilitation , Models, Organizational , Australia , Health Services, Indigenous , Humans , Legislation, Medical , Mental Disorders/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL