Sex-differential cognitive performance on MCCB of youth with BD-II depression.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidences have shown sex-differential cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder (BD) and differences in cognitions across BD subtypes. However, the sex-specific effect on cognitive impairment in BD subtype II (BD-II) remains obscure. The aim of the current study was to examine whether cognitive deficits differ by gender in youth with BD-II depression. METHOD: This cross-sectional study recruited 125 unmedicated youths with BD-II depression and 140 age-, sex-, and education-matched healthy controls (HCs). The Chinese version of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) was used to assess cognitive functions. Mood state was assessed using the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (24-HDRS) and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) was conducted. RESULT: ​Compared with HCs, patients with BD-II depression had lower scores on MCCB composite and its seven cognitive domains (all p < 0.001). After controlling for age and education, MANCOVA revealed significant gender-by-group interaction on attention/vigilance (F = 6.224, df = 1, p = 0.013), verbal learning (F = 9.847, df = 1, p = 0.002), visual learning (F = 4.242, df = 1, p = 0.040), and composite (F = 8.819, df = 1, p = 0.003). Post hoc analyses suggested that males performed worse in the above-mentioned MCCB tests than females in BD-II depression. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated generalized cognitive deficits in unmedicated youths with BD-II depression. Male patients performed more serious cognitive impairment on attention/vigilance, verbal learning, and visual learning compared to female patients.

Cognitive impairment in major depressive disorder with non-suicidal self-injury: Association with the functional connectivity of frontotemporal cortex.

BACKGROUND: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) may be related to serious cognitive impairment in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), but the specific mechanism is still unclear. This study attempts to identify the neurobiological process alterations of cognitive impairment in MDD patients with NSSI by examining the functional connectivity of the frontotemporal cortex in MDD patients with or without NSSI. METHOD: Thirty MDD patients with NSSI, 36 MDD patients without NSSI, and 35 healthy controls (HC) were included in the study. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) was used to comprehensively assess the cognitive function of the subjects and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to detect the functional connectivity of the frontotemporal cortex and its brain regions of interest. RESULTS: MDD patients with or without NSSI had multi-domain cognitive impairments. MDD patients with NSSI showed the lowest score in performance of attention/alertness and the weakest functional connectivity of frontotemporal when compared with the MDD patients without NSSI and the HC. In addition, the functional connectivity of the bilateral frontotemporal cortex was positively correlated with verbal learning and working memory in MDD patients with NSSI. CONCLUSION: In MDD patients, the appearance of NSSI is often accompanied by further impairment of attention/alertness and a decline in functional connectivity of the frontotemporal cortex. The impairment of verbal learning and working memory was associated with decreased functional connectivity of the frontotemporal cortex in MDD patients with NSSI.