ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Conventional surveillance methods are poorly sensitive for monitoring appendiceal cancers (AC). This study investigated the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in evaluating systemic therapy response and recurrence after surgery for AC. METHODS: Patients from two specialized centers who underwent tumor-informed ctDNA testing (Signatera) were evaluated to determine the association between systemic therapy and ctDNA detection. In addition, the accuracy of ctDNA detection during surveillance for the diagnosis of recurrence after complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for grade 2-3 ACs with peritoneal metastases (PM) was investigated. RESULTS: In this cohort of 94 patients with AC, most had grade 2-3 tumors (84.0%) and PM (84.0%). Fifty patients completed the assay in the presence of identifiable disease, among which ctDNA was detected in 4 of 7 (57.1%), 10 of 16 (62.5%), and 19 of 27 (70.4%) patients with grade 1, 2, and 3 diseases, respectively. Patients who had recently received systemic chemotherapy had ctDNA detected less frequently (7 of 16 [43.8%] v 26 of 34 [76.5%]; odds ratio, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.82]; P = .02). Among 36 patients with complete CRS for grade 2-3 AC-PM, 16 (44.4%) developed recurrence (median follow-up, 19.6 months). ctDNA detection was associated with shorter recurrence-free survival (median 11.3 months v not reached; hazard ratio, 14.1 [95% CI, 1.7 to 113.8]; P = .01) and showed high accuracy for the detection of recurrence (sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 85.0%). ctDNA was more sensitive than carcinoembryonic antigen (62.5%), CA19-9 (25.0%), and CA125 (18.8%) and was the only elevated biomarker in four (25%) patients with recurrence. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a reduced ctDNA detection frequency after systemic therapy and accurate recurrence assessment after CRS. These findings underscore the role of ctDNA as a predictive and prognostic biomarker for grade 2-3 AC-PM management.
Subject(s)
Appendiceal Neoplasms , Circulating Tumor DNA , Humans , Circulating Tumor DNA/blood , Circulating Tumor DNA/genetics , Male , Female , Appendiceal Neoplasms/genetics , Appendiceal Neoplasms/blood , Appendiceal Neoplasms/pathology , Appendiceal Neoplasms/therapy , Appendiceal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Aged , Adult , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/blood , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Dynamic operations platforms allow for cross-platform data extraction, integration, and analysis, although application of these platforms to large-scale oncology enterprises has not been described. This study presents a pipeline for automated, high-fidelity extraction, integration, and validation of cross-platform oncology data in patients undergoing treatment for rectal cancer at a single, high-volume institution. METHODS: A dynamic operations platform was used to identify patients with rectal cancer treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2016 and 2022 who had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging and preoperative treatment details available in the electronic health record (EHR). Demographic, clinicopathologic, tumor mutation, radiographic, and treatment data were extracted from the EHR using a methodology adaptable to any disease site. Data accuracy was assessed by manual review. Accuracy before and after implementation of synoptic reporting was determined for MRI data. RESULTS: A total of 516 patients with localized rectal cancer were included. In the era after institutional adoption of synoptic reports, the dynamic operations platform extracted T (tumor) category data from the EHR with 95% accuracy compared with 87% before the use of synoptic reports, and N (lymph node) category with 88% compared with 58%. Correct extraction of pelvic sidewall adenopathy was 94% compared with 78%, and extramural vascular invasion accuracy was 99% compared with 89%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation data were 99% accurate for patients who had synoptic data sources. CONCLUSION: Using dynamic operations platforms enables automated cross-platform integration of multiparameter oncology data with high fidelity in patients undergoing multimodality treatment for rectal cancer. These pipelines can be adapted to other solid tumors and, together with standardized reporting, can increase efficiency in clinical research and the translation of actionable findings toward optimizing patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Aged , Electronic Health Records , Adult , Reproducibility of Results , Neoplasm StagingABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with millions of deaths around the world. One of the important causes of death associated with COVID-19 was pulmonary thromboembolism. The risk for venous thromboembolism was markedly increased in patients with COVID-19 especially those admitted to the intensive care unit. The aims of our study were to measure the protein C and S levels in COVID-19-infected patients in comparison with the normal population and to assess the correlation of protein C and S levels in the plasma to the severity of infection. Methods: This was a case-control study measuring the protein C and S levels in patients infected with COVID-19 at the time of diagnosis compared to the normal population. The study included one hundred participants, sixty of them are patients with COVID-19, and forty of them are normal healthy adults. The patient group was subclassified into three subgroups according to disease severity: mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19 infections. Results: The activity of protein C in the patient group serum was significantly lower than that in the control group serum (79.35 ± 26.017 vs 97.43 ± 15.007; p < 0.001). Protein S is also significantly decreased in patients' serum when compared to the control group (70.233 ± 22.476 vs 91 ± 14.498; p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant decrease in the levels of protein C and S associated with the increase in disease severity (p < 0.05). However, protein S showed no statistically significant difference between the moderate and severe disease subgroups. Conclusion: The study concluded that the levels of protein C and S activities were both decreased in patients with COVID-19 when compared to the healthy population. It also concluded that the decrease in their levels is statistically significant in relation to the disease severity.