ABSTRACT
Bioplastics were first introduced as environmentally friendly materials, with properties similar to those of conventional plastics. A bioplastic is defined as biodegradable if it can be decomposed into carbon dioxide under aerobic degradation, or methane and CO2 under anaerobic conditions, inorganic compounds, and new cellular biomass, by the action of naturally occurring microorganisms. This definition however does not provide any information on the environmental conditions, timescale and extent at which decomposition processes should occur. With regard to the aquatic environment, recognized standards have been established to assess the ability of plastics to undergo biodegradation; however, these standards fail to provide clear targets to be met to allow labelling of a bioplastic as biodegradable. Moreover, these standards grant the user an extensive leeway in the choice of process parameters. For these reasons, the comparison of results deriving from different studies is challenging. The authors analysed and discussed the degree of biodegradability of a series of biodegradable bioplastics in aquatic environments (both fresh and salt water) using the results obtained in the laboratory and from on-site testing in the context of different research studies. Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), CO2 evolution, surface erosion and weight loss were the main parameters used by researchers to describe the percentage of biodegradation. The results showed a large variability both in weight loss and BOD, even when evaluating the same type of bioplastics. This confirms the need for a reference range of values to be established with regard to parameters applied in defining the biodegradability of bioplastics.
Subject(s)
Biodegradation, Environmental , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/metabolism , Biodegradable Plastics/metabolism , Plastics/metabolism , Environmental Monitoring/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Lower pole renal stones are associated with the lowest stone-free status of any location in the urinary tract during retrograde intrarenal surgery. Prior work has suggested displacing lower pole stones to a more accessible part of the kidney to improve stone-free status. We sought to prospectively compare the efficacy of laser lithotripsy in situ vs after displacement during retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2017 and May 2022 patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole stones were randomized into an in situ or displacement group. Demographics, comorbidities, and operative parameters were documented. Primary outcome was stone-free status, determined by combination of abdominal x-ray and renal ultrasound at 30-day follow-up. Secondary outcomes included operative time, 30-day complications, emergency department visits, and readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients (69 per group) were enrolled and analyzed. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Stone-free status significantly favored the displacement group over the in situ group (95% vs 74%, P = .003, n=62 in each group). Operative time, total laser energy usage, 30-day complications, and 30-day emergency department visits or hospital readmissions were similar between groups. On multivariate analysis only study group allocation was significantly associated with stone-free status (P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: Basket displacement of lower pole stones results in a significantly higher stone-free status compared to in situ lithotripsy. The technique is simple, atraumatic, and requires no additional equipment costs and little additional operative time, making it a practical tool in the treatment of lower pole stones.
Subject(s)
Kidney Calculi , Lithotripsy, Laser , Lithotripsy , Humans , Prospective Studies , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Kidney/surgery , Lithotripsy/methods , Lithotripsy, Laser/methods , Treatment Outcome , Ureteroscopy/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of non-narcotic analgesics and preoperative counseling in managing postoperative pain and narcotic use following ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (URS). METHODS: Adult patients at a single academic center undergoing URS for nephrourolithiasis were recruited. After informed consent, subjects were randomized into three groups: NARC-15 tablets oxycodone-acetaminophen 5/325 mg (A-OXY), 2. NSAID-15 tablets ibuprofen (IBU) 600 mg, 3. CNSL-15 tablets A-OXY, 15 tablets IBU, and preoperative counseling from the surgeon to avoid narcotic if possible. Patients who did not receive an intraoperative stent were excluded. At the time of stent removal subjects completed the Universal Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ), and a pill count was performed. USSQ pain indices were the primary study endpoint. RESULTS: Of 115 patients enrolled, 104 met the primary endpoint and were included in the analysis. No significant differences were noted in patient demographic, clinical, or operative characteristics. No differences were noted in median USSQ pain indices. The CNSL group used a significantly lower median number of A-OXY pills compared to the NARC group (2.4 vs. 5.4, p = 0.001) and less IBU compared to the NSAID group (3.1 vs. 5.9, p = 0.008). No differences in median total pill count, office calls, medication requests, nor ED visits were noted. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that patients can achieve equivalent postoperative analgesic satisfaction with non-narcotics compared to opiates following URS. Further, counseling patients on postoperative pain before surgery can reduce the total number of postoperative narcotic and non-narcotic medications taken. We suggest surgeons strongly consider omission of narcotic prescriptions following non-complicated URS.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic , Urinary Calculi , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Adult , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Humans , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Narcotics/therapeutic use , Oxycodone/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Ureteroscopy , Urinary Calculi/drug therapyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION To assess the relationship between pain after ureteral stent removal and patient and procedural factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A validated survey designed to assess the relationship between quality of life and treatment decisions in kidney stone disease was randomly distributed to patients with a history of a ureteral stent in seven medical centers across North America participating in an endourology research collaborative between July 2016 and June 2018. The primary outcome was increased pain after ureteral stent removal. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 327 surveys were analyzed. Twenty seven percent of patients reported increased pain in the hours after ureteral stent removal. Patients with a stent ≤ 7 days were significantly more likely to experience pain after stent removal compared to those with a stent > 7 days (33.3% versus 22.8%, p = 0.04). Female gender (OR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.42-4.10) was associated with increased pain after stent removal, while increasing age was inversely associated (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.36-0.74). After adjustment, patients with a stent > 7 days were significantly less likely to report pain in the hours after removal (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.35-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one in four patients will experience increased pain after ureteral stent removal. Female patients, younger patients, and patients with a stent ≤ 7 days were more likely to experience an increase in pain immediately following stent removal. Understanding factors associated with post-stent removal pain may be helpful in counseling patients at high risk stent removal morbidity.
Subject(s)
Device Removal/adverse effects , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Prosthesis Failure , Stents , Ureter/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Self Report , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Bladder cancer management options include open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal or extracorporeal urinary diversion. The existing literature shows no difference in the major complication rate between open radical cystectomy and extracorporeal urinary diversion. However, the emerging popularity of intracorporeal urinary diversion has exposed the need to compare a completely intracorporeal method to alternative approaches. To our knowledge the robotic intracorporeal advantage regarding major complications has not yet been established in an evaluation of all 3 modalities. We compared outcomes and complications of open, intracorporeal and extracorporeal cystectomy techniques at a high volume institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried a prospectively maintained database for patients who underwent radical cystectomy from 2011 to 2018 for an oncologic indication. Perioperative and pathological outcomes, and 30 and 90-day major complications were assessed. Statistical analyses were done using the Pearson chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis and Kaplan-Meier tests, and multivariable regression. RESULTS: A total of 948 patients met the study criteria, including 272, 301 and 375 treated with open radical cystectomy, intracorporeal urinary diversion and extracorporeal urinary diversion, respectively. Median followup was 26 months. Intracorporeal urinary diversion cases had lower estimated blood loss (p <0.001), shorter hospitalization (p <0.001) and a lower ileus rate (p=0.023) than extracorporeal urinary diversion and open radical cystectomy cases. Importantly, intracorporeal urinary diversion was associated with lower 30 and 90-day major complication rates vs extracorporeal urinary diversion and open radical cystectomy (90-day Clavien-Dindo III-V 16.9% vs 24.8% and 26.1%, respectively, p=0.015). There was no significant difference in the readmission rate according to the surgical approach. Multivariable predictors of increased 90-day major complications were patient age, the Charlson Comorbidity Index and operative time. On multivariable analysis intracorporeal urinary diversion was associated with reduced 90-day major complications (OR 0.58, p=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: In a 3-way comparison intracorporeal urinary diversion demonstrated a lower major complication rate and perioperative benefits compared to extracorporeal urinary diversion and open radical cystectomy.
Subject(s)
Cystectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery , Urinary Diversion/methods , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
AIMS: To investigate the main reasons for use of opioids during acute episodes of renal colic and for ureteral stent symptoms post-operatively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A survey assessing the impact of decreased quality of life and use of opioid pain medication was distributed to patients with a history of ureteral stent at seven academic centers between July 2016 and June 2018. RESULTS: A total of 365 surveys were completed. Opioid use for stone (63.9%) and stent-related pain (39.0%) was common among respondents. When assessing whether patients used more opioids for stone or stent-related pain, 47.7% reported using more for stone pain while 15.0% reported using more for stent pain. 22.6% of patients required opioids for stent-related pain and not stone pain. Increasing patient age was found to be negatively associated with using opioids for stent-related pain (OR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.3 - 0.6). Increasing age was also found to be negatively associated with opioid use for stone pain (OR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4 - 0.8). Patients with a greater number of prior stones had 3.2 times the odds of using opioids for stone pain, in our adjusted model (95% CI: 2.1 - 4.7). CONCLUSION: Patients with more prior stone episodes are more likely to have used opioids for their most recent episode. Although ureteral stents have been shown to be associated with a decreased quality of life, we showed that the use of opioids for stent-related pain is less than that for stone pain. Younger patients are less likely to tolerate a stent without opioid analgesics.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Renal Colic/drug therapy , Stents/adverse effects , Ureteral Calculi/therapy , Acute Disease , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We determined the effect of 5α-reductase inhibitors on disease reclassification in men with prostate cancer optimally selected for active surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective review we identified 635 patients on active surveillance between 2002 and 2015. Patients with favorable cancer features on repeat biopsy, defined as absent Gleason upgrading, were included in the cohort. Patients were stratified by those who did or did not receive finasteride or dutasteride within 1 year of diagnosis. The primary end point was grade reclassification, defined as any increase in Gleason score or predominant Gleason pattern on subsequent biopsy. This was assessed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS: At diagnosis 371 patients met study inclusion criteria, of whom 70 (19%) were started on 5α-reductase inhibitors within 12 months. Median time on active surveillance was 53 vs 35 months in men on vs not on 5α-reductase inhibitors (p <0.01). Men on 5α-reductase inhibitors received them for a median of 23 months (IQR 6-37). On actuarial analysis there was no significant difference in grade reclassification for 5α-reductase inhibitor use in patients overall or in the very low/low risk subset. The overall percent of patients who experienced grade reclassification was similar at 13% vs 14% (p = 0.75). After adjusting for baseline clinicopathological features 5α-reductase inhibitors were not significantly associated with grade reclassification (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.31-1.80, p = 0.62). Furthermore, no difference in adverse features on radical prostatectomy specimens was observed in treated patients (p = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Among our cohort of men on active surveillance 5α-reductase inhibitor use was not associated with a significant difference in grade reclassification with time.
Subject(s)
5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Watchful Waiting , Adult , Aged , Drug Administration Schedule , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Proportional Hazards Models , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We compare intermediate term clinical outcomes among men with favorable risk and intermediate/high risk prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 635 men with localized prostate cancer have been on active surveillance since 2002 at a high volume academic hospital in the United States. Median followup is 50.5 months (IQR 31.1-80.3). Time to event analysis was performed for our clinical end points. RESULTS: Of the cohort 117 men (18.4%) had intermediate/high risk disease. Overall 5 and 10-year all cause survival was 98% and 94%, respectively. Cumulative metastasis-free survival at 5 and 10 years was 99% and 98%, respectively. To date no cancer specific deaths had been observed. Overall freedom from intervention was 61% and 49% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Overall cumulative freedom from failure of active surveillance, defined as metastasis or biochemical failure after local therapy with curative intent, was 97% and 91% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Of the men 21 (9.9%) experienced biochemical failure after deferred treatment and the 5-year progression-free probability was 92%. Compared to men with favorable risk disease those with intermediate/high risk cancer experienced no difference in metastases, surveillance failure or curative intervention. However, patients at higher risk were at significantly increased risk for all cause mortality, likely reflecting patient selection factors. These conclusions may be limited by the small number of events and the duration of our study. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with localized prostate cancer who are on active surveillance demonstrated a low rate of active surveillance failure, prostate cancer specific mortality and metastases regardless of baseline risk.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Watchful Waiting , Aged , Cohort Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Progression-Free Survival , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Risk Assessment , Survival RateABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare neonatal outcomes following URS, stent, or PCN in pregnant women presenting with suspected renal colic. METHODS: Women undergoing a procedure for suspected renal colic during pregnancy at a large multi-center institution between 2008 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed and categorized by initial intervention. Neonatal outcomes were recorded and linked to maternal and obstetric data. Groups were compared by a Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA, or Fisher's Exact test, followed by pairwise post-hoc testing as appropriate (α = 0.05). Multivariate analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: 95 patients were analyzed, of whom 32 were managed with PCN, 47 with stent, and 16 with URS. Maternal baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for lower gravidity and parity in the stent group. Rates of premature delivery did not differ, but gestational age at delivery was lower in the PCN group versus the stent and URS groups (p = 0.006 and p = 0.025, respectively). Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission rates were higher in the PCN group versus the stent and URS groups (p = 0.006 and 0.036, respectively). Respiratory distress syndrome significantly differed between groups (p = 0.041). Neonatal birth weight, Apgar scores, and other complications did not significantly differ. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated higher rates of NICU admissions and lower gestational age at delivery for neonates born to mothers managed with PCN compared to stent and URS. Larger multi-institutional studies are warranted to further explore these associations.
ABSTRACT
Objective: National guidelines recommend periprocedural antibiotics before percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), yet it is not clear which is superior. We conducted a randomized trial to compare two guideline-recommended antibiotics: ciprofloxacin (cipro) vs cefazolin, on PCNL outcomes, focusing on the development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. Methods: Adult patients who were not considered high risk for surgical or infectious complications and undergoing PCNL were randomized to receive either cipro or cefazolin perioperatively. All had negative preoperative urine cultures. Demographic and perioperative data were collected, including SIRS criteria, intraoperative urine culture, duration of hospitalization, and need for intensive care. SIRS is defined by ≥2 of the following: body temperature <96.8°F or >100.4°F, heart rate >90 bpm, respiratory rate >20 per minute, and white blood cell count <4000 or >12,000 cells/mm3. Results: One hundred forty-seven patients were enrolled and randomized (79 cefazolin and 68 cipro). All preoperative characteristics were similar (p > 0.05), except for mean age, which was higher in the cipro group (64 vs 57 years, p = 0.03). Intra- and postoperative findings were similar, with no difference between groups (p > 0.05), except a longer mean hospital stay in the cefazolin group (2 hours longer, p = 0.02). There was no difference between SIRS episodes in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Despite the relatively broader coverage for urinary tract pathogens with ciprofloxacin, this prospective randomized trial did not show superiority over cefazolin. Our findings therefore support two appropriate options for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing PCNL who are nonhigh risk for infectious complications.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Kidney Calculi , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous , Postoperative Complications , Adult , Humans , Middle Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/drug therapy , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/etiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Anesthesia choice during the procedural management of suspected renal colic during pregnancy may vary based on available resources and patient or provider preferences, as there are no specific recommendations. Our objective was to evaluate whether preterm birth (<37 weeks) was associated with anesthesia type, anesthesia timing by trimester, or procedure type. METHODS: We retrospectively identified pregnant patients who required procedural management with ureteral stent, percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN), or ureteroscopy (URS) for suspected renal colic based on laboratory and imaging findings from 2009-2021 at our center. Analyzed data included anesthesia type (local analgesia only, monitored anesthesia care [MAC], spinal anesthesia, or general anesthesia), trimester of procedure, procedure type, and obstetric outcomes including preterm birth. RESULTS: The study cohort included 96 patients who underwent 231 total procedures, including primary URS, PCN, stent, as well as PCN and stent change. The median gestational age was 38.7 (37.1-39.5) weeks, and preterm birth rate was 15.8%. The most common anesthetic used across all procedures and trimesters was MAC. PCN was associated with the use of less invasive analgesia or anesthesia, whereas endoscopic procedures were more commonly performed with spinal or general anesthesia. Using multivariable logistic regression, procedure type was associated with preterm birth, but not anesthesia type or timing by trimester. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia type and timing were not associated with preterm birth, and selection may be influenced by resources, clinical scenario, or patient and provider preferences.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To identify the differences in radiation exposure per suspected stone episode between percutaneous nephrostomy tube (PCN), stent, and primary ureteroscopy (URS).The incidence of nephrolithiasis in pregnancy is low; however, repercussions for both mother and fetus can be significant. In cases of suspected obstructing nephrolithiasis, intervention may be required, including ureteral stent, PCN, or URS, with the potential for multiple subsequent procedures that often utilize fluoroscopy. METHODS: Pregnant patients who required an intervention (stent, PCN, or URS) for suspected obstructing nephrolithiasis were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was total fluoroscopy exposure per suspected stone episode. Secondary outcomes included fluoroscopic exposure per procedure and number of procedures required. RESULTS: After excluding patients with renal anomalies and incomplete radiation data, 78 out of 100 patients were included in the analysis. Forty patients (51.3%) underwent initial stent placement, 22 (28.2%) underwent initial PCN placement, and 16 (20.5%) underwent primary URS. Total mean radiation exposure per stone episode was significantly higher in patients who underwent PCN, (286.9 mGy vs 3.7 mGy (stent) and 0.2 mGy (URS), P <.001). In addition, patients who underwent initial PCN placement had significantly more procedures (P <.001) and mean radiation exposure per procedure was higher (P <.001). More than 40% of PCNs experienced dysfunction, and mean duration between PCN exchanges was 16.5 days. CONCLUSION: In pregnant patients with suspected obstructing nephrolithiasis requiring intervention, initial PCN placement was associated with a significantly higher number of procedures, radiation exposure per procedure, and total radiation exposure per suspected stone episode compared to stent and URS.
Subject(s)
Nephrolithiasis , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous , Radiation Exposure , Ureteroscopy , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Nephrolithiasis/therapy , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Ureter , Ureteroscopy/methodsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic (LPN) and robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) may offer similar advantages for nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). We evaluated the perioperative outcomes and complications of LPN versus RPN and sought to evaluate if one technique may have more favorable outcomes over another based on tumor characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent LPN and RPN by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. The surgeon almost exclusively performed LPN from February 2009 to January 2011 and RPN from January 2011 to January 2012. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative outcomes, short term renal functional data, and complications were reviewed. Operative time (OT), warm ischemia time (WIT), and estimated blood loss (EBL) were evaluated for each technique when tumor characteristics were divided by size, location, distance to collecting system, and overall tumor complexity based on nephrometry scoring. RESULTS: Of 39 laparoscopic cases and 30 robotic cases, there were no significant differences in perioperative outcomes, short term renal functional data, or complications between the two groups except for WIT which was shorter in the LPN group (p = 0.006). For medium complexity tumors, OT was less for LPN compared to RPN (p = 0.04); for high complexity tumors, EBL was reduced for RPN compared to LPN cases (p = 0.003). When tumor characteristics were individualized, LPN may be superior to RPN for WIT for small, anterior and exophytic tumors, and tumors located > 5 mm from the collecting system. LPN and RPN appear more equivocal for WIT in posteriorly located tumors. Reduced EBL may be a benefit with RPN for larger tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Although WIT was less in patients undergoing LPN compared to RPN, perioperative outcomes and complications remain similar. RPN may be beneficial for approaching more difficult, posterior tumors, whereas LPN may be a better technique for WIT for simple, accessible renal tumors. Reduced EBL may be a benefit for RPN for highly complex tumors.
Subject(s)
Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy , Nephrectomy , Robotics , Aged , Blood Loss, Surgical , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Nephrectomy/adverse effects , Operative Time , Organ Sparing Treatments , Retrospective Studies , Warm IschemiaABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: We assessed the impact of the IsoPSA® test for prostate cancer risk assessment on provider patient management decisions in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: A total of 38 providers, including advanced practice providers, fellowship trained oncologists and general urologists in the Cleveland Clinic health system including both community-based practices and academic locations, enrolled 900 men being evaluated for prostate cancer; 734 met inclusion criteria (age ≥50 years, total serum prostate specific antigen [PSA] ≥4 and <100 ng/ml and no history of prostate cancer) and IsoPSA indication for use. A standard template was used to document biopsy recommendation prior to and after receiving IsoPSA results. The primary outcome was the number of biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging recommendation changes occurring after IsoPSA testing. RESULTS: IsoPSA testing resulted in a 55% (284 vs 638) net reduction in recommendations for prostate biopsy for men with total PSA ≥4 ng/ml. Additionally, a 9% reduction in recommendations for magnetic resonance imaging was observed. There was strong concordance between IsoPSA results and provider recommendations for prostate biopsy, with 87% of patients with an IsoPSA index above the threshold recommended for biopsy and 92% of patients with an IsoPSA index below the threshold not recommended for biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world clinical setting, providers from diverse training backgrounds and practice settings readily adopted IsoPSA with substantial reductions in the rate of recommended prostate biopsies in patients with elevated PSA values (≥4 ng/ml). There was a high concordance between recommendation for or against prostate biopsy and the IsoPSA result.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with an increased risk of nephrolithiasis and is often treated with metformin. The relationship between metformin and nephrolithiasis formation remains unclear, as studies have demonstrated conflicting results. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of stone-forming patients at our stone clinic prior to the initiation of stone-directed medical management. Patients were grouped based on diabetic status and diabetic medication regimen. Outcomes evaluated were 24-hour urinary parameters and specimen stone type using univariate Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-squared analyses. Multivariate analyses controlling for metabolic syndrome components and HbA1c were performed. RESULTS: Data were available for 505 patients, of whom 147 were diabetic and 358 were not. On multivariate analyses controlling for HbA1c and other comorbidities, diabetic patients on metformin still had worse urinary parameters, including urine pH, than non-diabetic patients (pH=-0.33, -0.37, p<0.05). Patients with DM on metformin did not exhibit significant differences in 24-hour urine findings compared to patients with DM not on metformin (p>0.05 for all urinary parameters). CONCLUSIONS: Stone-forming patients with DM on metformin were associated with urinary abnormalities similar to those not on metformin. Cohort studies comparing urinary parameters of patients prospectively started on metformin are necessary to further elucidate metformin's role, if any, in combatting nephrolithiasis.
ABSTRACT
Kidney stone cultures can be beneficial in identifying bacteria not detected in urine, yet how stone cultures are performed among endourologists, under what conditions, and by what laboratory methods remain largely unknown. Stone cultures are not addressed by current clinical guidelines. A comprehensive REDCap electronic survey sought responses from directed (n = 20) and listserv elicited (n = 108) endourologists specializing in kidney stone disease. Questions included which clinical scenarios prompt a stone culture order, how results influence post-operative antibiotics, and what microbiology lab protocols exist at each institution with respect to processing and resulting stone cultures. Logistic regression statistical analysis determined what factors were associated with performing stone cultures. Of 128 unique responses, 11% identified as female and the mean years of practicing was 16 (range 1-46). A specific 'stone culture' order was available to only 50% (64/128) of those surveyed, while 32% (41/128) reported culturing stone by placing a urine culture order. The duration of antibiotics given for a positive stone culture varied, with 4-7 days (46%) and 8-14 days (21%) the most reported. More years in practice was associated with fewer stone cultures ordered, while higher annual volume of percutaneous nephrolithotomy was associated with ordering more stone cultures (p < 0.01). Endourologists have differing practice patterns with respect to ordering stone cultures and utilizing the results to guide post-operative antibiotics. With inconsistent microbiology lab stone culture protocols across multiple institutions, more uniform processing is needed for future studies to assess the clinical benefit of stone cultures and direct future guidelines.
Subject(s)
Kidney Calculi , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous , Female , Humans , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous/methods , Kidney Calculi/urine , Urinalysis , Bacteria , Multicenter Studies as TopicABSTRACT
Purpose: Radiation exposure from fluoroscopy poses risks to patients and surgeons. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has traditionally required fluoroscopy, however, the use of ultrasound (US) has decreased radiation exposure. US guidance in supine PCNL (S-PCNL) may further reduce radiation exposure. In this study, we investigate patient and operative factors affecting fluoroscopy time (second), total radiation dose (mGy), and effective dose (ED, mSv) in patients undergoing US-guided S-PCNL or prone PCNL (P-PCNL). Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing US-guided PCNL in prone and supine positions. Patients with multiple access tracts, pre-existing renal access, or fluoroscopic renal access were excluded. Patient demographic and radiologic and operative data were collected, and compared between the two groups. Results: Ninety-nine patients were included: 45 P-PCNL and 54 S-PCNL. There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. Operative time, access location, tract length, and total radiation dose (mGy) also did not differ. S-PCNL was associated with lower ED (2.92 ± 0.32 mSv vs 5.3 ± 0.7 mSv, p = 0.0014) despite increased fluoroscopy time (86.32 ± 7.7 seconds vs 51.00 ± 5.1 seconds, p = 0.004), and was more likely a mini-PCNL (35.2% vs 15.9%, p = 0.032). In multivariate analysis, S-PCNL remained associated with reduced ED compared with P-PCNL (p = 0.002), whereas body mass index (p < 0.001) and staghorn calculi (p < 0.001) were independently associated with increased ED. Conclusions: We demonstrated that ED in US-guided PCNL is increased in the prone position compared with supine position, and in overweight patients regardless of position. US-guided S-PCNL may decrease radiation exposure to patients and surgeons compared with US-guided P-PCNL.
Subject(s)
Kidney Calculi , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous , Radiation Exposure , Fluoroscopy/adverse effects , Humans , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous/adverse effects , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/adverse effects , Prone Position , Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Supine PositionABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Patients with upper-tract carcinoma in situ (UT-CIS) that have failed treatment with BCG are recommended for radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). We describe a cohort of patients with BCG-refractory UT-CIS that were treated with docetaxel, a novel agent in the approach to topical therapy. METHODS: Patients with pathologically proven UT-CIS from 2012 to 2020 with an imperative indication for organ preservation and history of BCG-refractory disease were included. Each patient underwent ureteroscopy with biopsy and selective cytology pre- and postinduction, and after each maintenance course. Complete response (CR) was defined as the absence of visualized lesions on ureteroscopy, negative selective cytology, and absence of clinical progression. No response (NR) was defined as persistence of lesions after induction or absence of visualized lesions with persistently positive cytology. RESULTS: Seven patients and 10 renal units were treated. Six of the 10 renal units had initial CR (60%). Three patients with NR went on to have RNU, one of which subsequently died due to cancer-specific mortality. One patient with bilateral disease had NR in 10 renal unit and cure in the other. This patient subsequently developed recurrence in his remaining renal unit. A second patient had CR in both kidneys for 6 years, but 1 year after finishing maintenance regimen developed HG disease in 1 ureter. Average follow-up was 33 months. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates efficacy of docetaxel as a treatment option for patients with UT-CIS with a contraindication to RNU after failing BCG. Response rates of 60% appear to be similar to those of BCG-refractory bladder CIS.