The clinical and immunological significance of GAD-specific autoantibody and T-cell responses in type 1 diabetes.

Antigen-specific interventions are desirable approaches in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) as they can alter islet-specific autoimmunity without systemic side effects. Glutamic acid decarboxylase of 65 kDa (GAD65) is a major autoantigen in type 1 diabetes (T1D) and GAD-specific autoimmunity is a common feature of T1D in humans but also in mouse models of the disease. In humans, administration of the GAD65 protein in an alum formulation has been shown to reduce C-peptide decline in recently diagnosed patients, however, these observations were not confirmed in subsequent phase II/III clinical trials. As GAD-based immune interventions in different formulations have successfully been employed to prevent the establishment of T1D in mouse models of T1D, we sought to analyze the efficacy of GAD-alum treatment and the effects on the GAD-specific immune response in two different mouse models of T1D. Consistent with the latest clinical trials, mice treated with GAD-alum were not protected from diabetes, although GAD-alum induced a GAD-specific Th2-deviated immune response in transgenic rat insulin promoter-glycoprotein (RIP-GP) mice. These observations underline the importance of a thorough, preclinical evaluation of potential drugs before the initiation of clinical trials.

GAD treatment and insulin secretion in recent-onset type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The 65-kD isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) is a major autoantigen in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. This trial assessed the ability of alum-formulated GAD (GAD-alum) to reverse recent-onset type 1 diabetes in patients 10 to 18 years of age. METHODS: We randomly assigned 70 patients with type 1 diabetes who had fasting C-peptide levels above 0.1 nmol per liter (0.3 ng per milliliter) and GAD autoantibodies, recruited within 18 months after receiving the diagnosis of diabetes, to receive subcutaneous injections of 20 microg of GAD-alum (35 patients) or placebo (alum alone, 35 patients) on study days 1 and 30. At day 1 and months 3, 9, 15, 21, and 30, patients underwent a mixed-meal tolerance test to stimulate residual insulin secretion (measured as the C-peptide level). The effect of GAD-alum on the immune system was also studied. RESULTS: Insulin secretion gradually decreased in both study groups. The study treatment had no significant effect on change in fasting C-peptide level after 15 months (the primary end point). Fasting C-peptide levels declined from baseline levels significantly less over 30 months in the GAD-alum group than in the placebo group (-0.21 vs. -0.27 nmol per liter [-0.62 vs. -0.81 ng per milliliter], P=0.045), as did stimulated secretion measured as the area under the curve (-0.72 vs. -1.02 nmol per liter per 2 hours [-2.20 vs. -3.08 ng per milliliter per 2 hours], P=0.04). No protective effect was seen in patients treated 6 months or more after receiving the diagnosis. Adverse events appeared to be mild and similar in frequency between the two groups. The GAD-alum treatment induced a GAD-specific immune response. CONCLUSIONS: GAD-alum may contribute to the preservation of residual insulin secretion in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes, although it did not change the insulin requirement. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00435981.)