ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Current study aims to investigate whether serum exosomal microRNAs (miRNAs) could be potential biomarkers in predicting APs with POF at early phase. BACKGROUND: Novel biomarkers are sorely needed for early prediction of persistent organ failure (POF) in acute pancreatitis (AP) patients. METHODS: In the discovery stage, exosomal miRNAs were profiled in sera from APs with or without POF (5 vs. 5) using microarrays. POF-associated miRNA signatures then were assessed in training cohort (n=227) and further validated in three independent cohorts (n=516), including one nested case-control cohort. RESULTS: A total of 743 APs were recruited in this large-scale biomarker identification study with a nested case-control study. Data from the discovery cohort demonstrated that 90 exosomal miRNAs were significantly dysregulated in APs with POF compared with controls. One miRNA classifier (Cmi) comprising 3 miRNAs (miR-4265, 1208, 3127-5p) was identified in the training cohort, and was further evaluated in two validation cohorts for their predictive value for POF. AUCs for Cmi ranged from 0.88 to 0.90, which was statistically superior to AUCs of APACHE-II and BISAP, and outperformed BUN and creatinine in POF prediction across all cohorts (P<.05). Higher levels of Cmi indicated increased need for ICU admission, prolonged hospitalization, and elevated mortality rate, thus poor prognosis. In the nested case-control study, Cmi could help identify prediagnostic POF in post-ERCP pancreatitis cases within "golden hours" after ERCP with high efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Serum exosomal Cmi may be an early predictor for POF in AP, even within "golden hours" after AP onset. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02602808).
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Although the 9-minute mean withdrawal time (m-WT) is often reported to be associated with the optimal adenoma detection rate (ADR), no randomized trials of screening colonoscopy have confirmed the impact of a 9-minute m-WT on adenoma miss rate (AMR) and ADR. METHODS: A multicenter tandem trial was conducted in 11 centers. Seven hundred thirty-three asymptomatic participants were randomized to receive segmental tandem screening colonoscopy with a 9-minute withdrawal, followed by a 6-minute withdrawal (9-minute-first group, 9MF, n = 366) or vice versa (6-minute-first group, 6MF, n = 367). The primary outcome was the lesion-level AMR. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis revealed that 9MF significantly reduced the lesion-level (14.5% vs 36.6%, P < 0.001) and participant-level AMR (10.9% vs 25.9%, P < 0.001), advanced adenoma miss rate (AAMR, 5.3% vs 46.9%, P = 0.002), multiple adenomas miss rate (20.7% vs 56.5%, P = 0.01), and high-risk adenomas miss rate (14.6% vs 39.5%, P = 0.01) of 6MF without compromising detection efficiency ( P = 0.79). In addition, a lower false-negative rate for adenomas ( P = 0.002) and high-risk adenomas ( P < 0.05), and a lower rate of shortening surveillance schedule ( P < 0.001) were also found in 9MF, accompanying with an improved ADR in the 9-minute vs 6-minute m-WT (42.3% vs 33.5%, P = 0.02). The independent inverse association between m-WT and AMR remained significant even after adjusting ADR, and meanwhile, 9-minute m-WT was identified as an independent protector for AMR and AAMR. DISCUSSION: In addition to increasing ADR, 9-minute m-WT also significantly reduces the AMR and AAMR of screening colonoscopy without compromising detection efficiency.
Subject(s)
Adenoma , Colonoscopy , Humans , Adenoma/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adequate bowel preparation is crucial for clear mucosal visualization during colonoscopy. We aimed to comprehensively compare oral sulfate solution (OSS) and 3-L split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. METHODS: This randomized, active-controlled, noninferiority study was performed in 10 medical centers. Eligible subjects were enrolled to receive OSS or 3-L PEG in a split-dose regimen. The quality of bowel preparation, adverse reactions, and acceptability were evaluated. The quality of bowel preparation was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Safety was evaluated by adverse reactions. The study population was divided into the full analysis set (FAS), the safety set, the modified FAS (mFAS), and the per-protocol set (PPS). RESULTS: Three hundred forty-eight potentially eligible subjects were enrolled. Three hundred forty-four subjects were included in the FAS and safety set, 340 subjects were included in the mFAS, and 328 subjects were included in the PPS. Adequate bowel preparation of the OSS was not inferior to 3-L PEG in the mFAS (98.22% vs 97.66%) and the PPS (98.17% vs 98.78%). There was no significant difference in acceptability between the 2 groups (94.74% vs 94.80%, P = .9798). Overall adverse reactions were similar (50.88% vs 44.51%, P = .2370) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The split-dose OSS regimen was not inferior to the split-dose 3-L PEG regimen for the quality of bowel preparation in a Chinese adult population. The safety and acceptability of the 2 groups were similar. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05465889.).
Subject(s)
Cathartics , Polyethylene Glycols , Adult , Humans , Polyethylene Glycols/adverse effects , Sulfates , Colonoscopy/methods , Administration, OralABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although current quality indicators of colonoscopy recommend 6 minutes as the minimum standard for withdrawal time (WT), the impact of a WT longer than 6 minutes on neoplasia detection is unclear. METHODS: A multicenter randomized controlled trial involving 1027 patients was conducted from January 2018 to July 2019. Participants were randomly divided into a 9-minute (n = 514) and 6-minute (n = 513) WT group, and a timer was used to adjust the withdrawal speed. The primary outcome was the adenoma detection rate (ADR). RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis showed a significantly higher ADR in the 9-minute versus 6-minute WT group (36.6% vs. 27.1%, P = .001). Prolonging WT from 6 to 9 minutes significantly increased ADR of the proximal colon (21.4% vs. 11.9%, P < .001) as well as of the less experienced colonoscopists (36.8% vs. 23.5%, P = .001). Improvements were also observed in the polyp detection rate (58.0% vs. 47.8%, P < .001), and mean number of polyps and adenomas detected per colonoscopy (1.1 vs. 0.9, P = .002; 0.5 vs. 0.4, P = .008, respectively). The higher ADRs in 9-minute WT were also confirmed by the per-protocol (PP) analysis and subgroup analyses, with an increased rate of sessile serrated lesion detection in the 9-minute WT by PP analysis (4.0% vs. 1.3%, P = .04). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that the 9-minute WT was independently associated with increased ADR (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonging WT from 6 to 9 minutes significantly improved ADR, especially in the proximal colon and for less experienced colonoscopists. A 9-minute WT benchmark should be considered as one of the quality indicators of colonoscopy. ClinicalTrials.gov (identiï¬er, NCT03399045).
Subject(s)
Adenoma , Colonic Polyps , Colorectal Neoplasms , Polyps , Adenoma/diagnosis , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Colonoscopy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , HumansSubject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , DNA Methylation , Early Detection of Cancer , Feces , Syndecan-2 , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Prospective Studies , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Feces/chemistry , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Syndecan-2/genetics , Syndecan-2/metabolism , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Predictive Value of TestsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively estimate adenoma miss rate (AMR) and advanced AMR (AAMR) and explore associated factors. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Ovid EMBASE databases for studies published through April 2018 on tandem colonoscopies, with AMR and AAMR as the primary outcomes. We performed meta-regression analyses to identify risk factors and factors associated with outcome. Primary outcomes were AMR and AAMR and secondary outcomes were AMR and AAMR for different locations, sizes, pathologies, morphologies, and populations. RESULTS: In a meta-analysis of 43 publications and more than 15,000 tandem colonoscopies, we calculated miss rates of 26% for adenomas (95% confidence interval [CI] 23%-30%), 9% for advanced adenomas (95% CI 4%-16%), and 27% for serrated polyps (95% CI 16%-40%). Miss rates were high for proximal advanced adenomas (14%; 95% CI 5%-26%), serrated polyps (27%; 95% CI 16%-40%), flat adenomas (34%; 95% CI 24%-45%), and in patients at high risk for colorectal cancer (33%; 95% CI 26%-41%). Miss rates could be decreased by adequate bowel preparation and auxiliary techniques (P = .06; P = .04, and P = .01, respectively). The adenoma detection rate (ADR), adenomas per index colonoscopy, and adenomas per positive index colonoscopy (APPC) were independently associated with AMR (P = .02, P = .01, and P = .008, respectively), whereas APPC was the only factor independently associated with AAMR (P = .006). An APPC value greater than 1.8 was more effective in monitoring AMR (31% vs 15% for AMR P < .0001) than an ADR value of at least 34% (27% vs 17% for AMR; P = .008). The AAMR of colonoscopies with an APPC value below 1.7 was 35%, vs 2% for colonoscopies with an APPC value of at least 1.7 (P = .0005). CONCLUSIONS: In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that adenomas and advanced adenomas are missed (based on AMR and AAMR) more frequently than previously believed. In addition to ADR, APPC deserves consideration as a complementary indicator of colonoscopy quality, if it is validated in additional studies.
Subject(s)
Adenoma/diagnostic imaging , Colonic Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data , Adenoma/pathology , Colon/pathology , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Risk Factors , Tumor BurdenABSTRACT
Aims: The studies on post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) in pancreas divisum (PD) patients without chronic pancreatitis (CP) are rare. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the incidence of PEP in PD patients without CP and the risk and protective factors for PEP.Methods: Consecutive patients with symptomatic PD that underwent ERCP from January 2005 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into PD without CP group and CP group. The basic information and medical records of patients were collected. The risk and protective factors for PEP in PD patients without CP were analyzed by univariate logistic analysis.Results: A total of 89 ERCP procedures were performed in 51 PD patients without CP, and 249 procedures in 136 patients with CP. The incidence of PEP was significantly higher in PD patients without CP than those with CP (15.7% vs. 5.6%, p = .005). Female gender were independent risk factors for PEP, while dorsal duct stent placement was a protective factor.Conclusion: CP may be a protective factor against PEP in PD patients. Female was a risk factor for PEP in PD patients and dorsal duct stent placement was a preventive factor that reduced the incidence of PEP in PD patients without CP.
Subject(s)
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Pancreas/abnormalities , Pancreatitis, Chronic/etiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , China/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreas/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatitis, Chronic/epidemiology , Protective Factors , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
The intestinal tract consists of various types of cells, such as epithelial cells, Paneth cells, macrophages, and lymphocytes, which constitute the intestinal immune system and play a significant role in maintaining intestinal homeostasis by producing antimicrobial materials and controlling the host-commensal balance. Various studies have found that the dysfunction of intestinal homeostasis contributes to the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). As a novel mediator, extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been recognized as effective communicators, not only between cells but also between cells and the organism. In recent years, EVs have been regarded as vital characters for dysregulated homeostasis and IBD in either the etiology or the pathology of intestinal inflammation. Here, we review recent studies on EVs associated with intestinal homeostasis and IBD and discuss their source, cargo, and origin, as well as their therapeutic effects on IBD, which mainly include artificial nanoparticles and EVs derived from microorganisms.
Subject(s)
Extracellular Vesicles/metabolism , Homeostasis , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/pathology , Intestines/pathology , Animals , Biomarkers/metabolism , Colitis , Disease Progression , Enterocytes , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Humans , Immune System , Inflammation , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/immunology , Intestinal Mucosa/immunology , Mice , Microbiota , Models, Biological , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Nanotechnology/methods , Paneth CellsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colonoscopy insertion is painful for some patients and is one of the main barriers to screening colonoscopy. Few studies have assessed the impact of the supine position (SP) on colonoscopy insertion, especially for unsedated patients. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to clarify this issue. METHODS: Unsedated patients were randomized to SP or left horizontal position (LHP) as the starting position of colonoscopy insertion. The primary outcome measure was cecal intubation time (CIT), and the secondary outcome measures were descending colon intubation time (DIT), pain score of patients, difficulty score according to the endoscopist, and patients' acceptance of unsedated colonoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 347 patients were randomized to the SP group (175) or the LHP group (172). The CIT in the SP group was significantly shorter than that in the LHP group (275.0 seconds [interquartile range (IQR), 234.0-328.5 seconds] versus 316.0 seconds [IQR, 261.0-370.0 seconds], P < .001). The DIT was also shorter in the SP group (64.5 seconds [IQR, 52.0-86.3 seconds] versus 74.0 seconds [IQR, 62.0-92.0 seconds], P = .001). Compared with the LHP, the SP had a lower pain score (3.3 versus 3.9, P = .002), a lower difficulty score (3.1 versus 3.7, P < .001), a lower frequency of position change (7.1% versus 38.0%, P < .001), and less need for abdominal compression (39.1% versus 45.5%, P = .02). SP was the only modifiable and independent factor identified to reduce CIT and pain score and improve patients' acceptance of unsedated colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: As an economical and convenient method, SP can reduce CIT, ease pain, and improve patients' acceptance of unsedated colonoscopy. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03289442.).
Subject(s)
Colonoscopy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Operative Time , Pain, Procedural/physiopathology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Patient Positioning/methods , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Supine PositionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported that supplemental simethicone (SIM) can improve bowel preparation based on polyethylene glycol, there is no consensus as to whether SIM can ultimately increase the adenoma detection rate (ADR) during colonoscopy. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the effect of SIM on ADR during colonoscopy. METHODS: Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched to find relevant RCTs. RCTs evaluating the effect of pre-procedure SIM on the ADR during colonoscopy were finally included, and fixed effect models were applied. RESULTS: Six trials involving 1855 patients were finally included. The present meta-analysis suggested that the ADR during colonoscopy was significantly increased by supplemental SIM (27.9% vs 23.3%, P = 0.02), with a relative risk of 1.20 (95% confidence interval 1.03-1.39). Subgroup analysis suggested that supplemental SIM may be more useful to improve ADR during colonoscopy in endoscopic centers with low baseline ADR. CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental SIM for bowel preparation based on polyethylene glycol is useful to improve the ADR during colonoscopy.
Subject(s)
Adenoma/pathology , Antifoaming Agents/administration & dosage , Cathartics/administration & dosage , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Simethicone/administration & dosage , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods , Adult , Antifoaming Agents/adverse effects , Cathartics/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Simethicone/adverse effects , Therapeutic Irrigation/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic transmural drainage has been recognized as the first-line treatment for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC). Currently, three different types of stents have been extensively applied, including double pigtail plastic stent (PS), fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS), and novel lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS). Nonetheless, limited data are available about the comparison among them in terms of their clinical outcomes and safety for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of PFC. METHODS: The current retrospective study was carried on 160 PFC patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage from 2010 to 2018 at a single tertiary care center. Patients were divided into three groups based on different drainage ways: drainage using PS, FCSEMS, or LAMS. RESULTS: A total of 160 PFC patients (104 male and 56 female) were analyzed in this retrospective study, including 62 patients drained with PS, 28 with FCSEMS, and 70 with LAMS. Typically, the technical success (93.5% vs 96.4% vs 94.3%, P = 1.000) and treatment success rates (84.6% vs 85.2% vs 89.2%, P = 0.763) were similar between PS, FCSEMS, and LAMS. With regard to major adverse events, four patients (FCSEMS: n = 2 and LAMS: n = 2) with pseudoaneurysms developed severe bleeding; among them, 75% (3/4) of patients were observed within 2 weeks after intervention, and two patients in LAMS group died. CONCLUSIONS: There are no significant differences in the clinical outcomes of PFC patients treated with PS, FCSEMS, or LAMS. Nonetheless, severe (or even fatal) bleeding may occur at the early stage after metal stent placement, which should be paid particular attention to.
Subject(s)
Drainage/instrumentation , Endoscopy, Digestive System/instrumentation , Endosonography/instrumentation , Pancreas/surgery , Stents , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Adult , Drainage/adverse effects , Drainage/methods , Endoscopy, Digestive System/methods , Endosonography/adverse effects , Endosonography/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Stents/adverse effects , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/adverse effects , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colonoscopy insertion is technically challenging, time-consuming, and painful, especially for the sigmoid. Several pilot studies indicated that the (left) tilt-down position could facilitate the insertion procedure, but no formal trials have been published to demonstrate its efficacy. We performed this study to verify the benefits of the left lateral tilt-down position (LTDP) on the insertion process. METHODS: This 2-center prospective trial randomized unsedated patients to the LTDP or left lateral horizontal position (LHP) to aid insertion. The primary outcome measure was cecal intubation time (CIT). Secondary outcome measures included decending colon intubation time (DIT), pain score of insertion, acceptance of unsedated colonoscopy for future examinations, difficulty score for insertion, and the adverse event rate of colonoscopy. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-eight patients were randomized to the LTDP (128) or LHP (130) in 2 centers. The median CIT and DIT were shorter with patients positioned in LTDP than in LHP (CIT, 280.0 vs 339.5 s, P < .001; DIT, 53.0 vs 69.0 s, P < .001, respectively) and patients with high and low body mass index (BMI) benefited more from LTDP than from LHP, as opposed to patients with normal BMI. In addition, colonoscopy insertion in LTDP was less painful (3.4 ± 1.6 vs 4.0 ± 1.7, P = .02) and less difficult (3.1 ± 1.9 vs 3.7 ± 1.4, P < .001), showing a higher tendency to acceptance of unsedated colonoscopy (82.9% vs 73.8%, P = .08). The rates of adverse events were extremely low and did not differ significantly in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: LTDP for colonoscopy insertion can reduce insertion time and pain, and potentially improves patients' acceptance of unsedated colonoscopy. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02842489.).
Subject(s)
Colonoscopy/methods , Patient Positioning/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Colon/surgery , Colonoscopy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Intubation/adverse effects , Intubation/methods , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement , Patient Positioning/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Ideal bowel preparation for colonoscopy requires complete removal of fluid and foam from the colon. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is widely used for bowel preparation, with antifoaming agents such as simethicone commonly used in combination with PEG. Data on the effect of simethicone on the adenoma detection rate (ADR) were limited. This study therefore aimed to investigate whether preprocedure simethicone could increase the ADR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, endoscopist-blinded randomized controlled trial involving consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy in six centers in China. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: PEG plus simethicone or PEG alone. The primary outcome was ADR; secondary outcomes were quality of bowel preparation, measured by the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) and bubble scores. RESULTS: 583 patients were included. More adenomas were detected in the PEG plus simethicone group than in the PEG alone group (ADR 21.0â% vs. 14.3â%, Pâ=â0.04; advanced ADR 9.0â% vs. 7.0â%, Pâ=â0.38). The mean number of adenomas detected was 2.20â±â1.36 vs. 1.63â±â0.89 (Pâ=â0.02). Patients in the PEG plus simethicone group showed better bowel cleansing efficacy: BBPSâ≥â6 in 88.3â% vs. 75.2â% (Pâ<â0.001) and bubble scores of 1.00â±â1.26 vs. 3.98â±â2.50 (Pâ<â0.001). Abdominal bloating was reported less frequently in the PEG plus simethicone group (7.8â% vs. 19.7â%, Pâ<â0.001) than in the PEG alone group. CONCLUSION: Combined use of PEG and simethicone is associated with a significantly increased ADR in a Chinese population.
Subject(s)
Adenoma/diagnosis , Colon/diagnostic imaging , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colonoscopy/methods , Simethicone/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antifoaming Agents/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is one of the most frequently performed procedures for the treatment of biliary-pancreatic diseases. The most frequent complications of ERCP include pancreatitis, haemorrhage, perforation and cholangitis. While post-ERCP biliary bleeding leading to biliary obstruction is rare. CASE PRESENTATION: We herein report a case of exceptional post-ERCP cholangitis due to a blood clot in the common bile duct (CBD). This case involves a 75-year-old woman with a history of recurring upper abdominal pain. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT) revealed dilatation of the extrahepatic bile duct with stones at the lower CBD. After ERCP, clearance of stones was obtained. The post-ERCP course was symptomatic with upper abdominal pain and a significant increase in cholestatic parameters. A second CT scan demonstrated a markedly dilated biliary tree with a longitudinal high-density image at the middle CBD. The patient was successfully treated with a repeated ERCP, and a blood clot was extracted. We also present a review of the literature published between 1985 and 2016 in PubMed. Four similar cases were reported during this period from France, Turkey, the USA and the UK, separately. Our case is the first reported in China. CONCLUSIONS: Post-ERCP biliary bleeding leading to biliary obstruction is rare. We describe a rare case of post-ERCP cholangitis due to a blood clot in the common bile duct (CBD), which is consistent with most clinical presentations of similar cases already described. An analysis of the possible pathophysiological mechanisms and a review of the current literature are provided. We attempt to attract clinicians' attention to the differential diagnosis of post-ERCP obstruction. The complications might be severe or even fatal. The diagnosis of blood clot is based on clinical and laboratory data, particularly imaging. Repeated ERCP is often necessary and effective.