Impact of educational level and travel burden on breast cancer stage at diagnosis in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

We describe the characteristics of cases of breast cancer among women assisted at hospitals affiliated to the public health system in the state of São Paulo (Brazil), analysing the effects of level of education and travel burden to point of treatment. We conducted a retrospective analysis of invasive breast cancer among women diagnosed between 2000 and 2015. Data were extracted from the hospital-based cancer registries of Fundação Oncocentro de São Paulo-FOSP. The outcome was clinical stage at diagnosis (stage III-IV versus I-II). The explanatory variables were educational level and travel burden. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated. Multiple imputations were used for missing educational level (31%). The study included 81,669 women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2015. The mean age of patients at diagnosis was 56.8 years (standard deviation 13.6 years). 38% of patients were at an advanced stage at diagnosis (stage III-IV). Women with lower levels of education and those who received cancer care in municipalities other than where they lived were more likely to be diagnosed at an advanced stage. In conclusion, promotion of breast cancer awareness and improving pathways to expedite breast cancer diagnosis and treatment could help identify breast tumors at earlier stages.

Survival analysis of young adults from a Brazilian cohort of non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The influence of age at diagnosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognosis is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To compare in a Brazilian cohort of NSCLC patients of different age groups: 1) The overall survival; 2) Clinical features and treatment options. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using a hospital-based registry, for NSCLC patients registered in years 2000-2009. Patients were grouped into three age groups: Young adults (YA: < 40 years), middle-aged (MA: 40-64 years) and elderly (E: ≥ 65 years). Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate overall survival and Cox regression for hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: 17,422 NSCLC patients were included: 370 YA (2.1%), 8,697 MA (49.9%) and 8,355 E (48.0%). Compared with older age groups, the YA group had a higher proportion of females, patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma and metastatic disease (63.2%). Overall survival was longer in YA in the entire cohort and in all clinical stages (CSs) (p < 0.001). For YA, higher education level was a good prognosis factor (compared with illiterate and incomplete elementary); advanced or metastatic disease (compared with early-stage disease) and treatment based in radiotherapy or chemotherapy (CT) (without surgery), compared with treatment combinations with surgery, were poor prognostic factors. Young men (but not women) had lower HR of death compared with older groups; YA had lower HR of death in all CSs compared with patients from older groups. A higher percentage of YA were treated with surgery or CT in early-stage disease compared with older groups. Besides that, YA and MA patients treated with surgery or CT had a better prognosis than elderlies. Conclusions: In this Brazilian cohort of NSCLC patients, most young individuals were diagnosed with metastatic disease. YA presented longer survival than older age groups in all CSs, but mainly in CS I/II and III, where some patients may achieve long remissions or cure.