HIV Gag-specific immune response mediated by double negative (CD3(+)CD4(-)CD8(-)) T cells in HIV-exposed seronegative individuals.

Double negative (DN) T cells are CD3(+), CD4(-), CD8(-) cells with either T-cell receptors (TCR) αß or TCR γδ whose importance on protection against HIV infection is unknown. Since HIV-exposed seronegative individuals correspond to an ideal group in whom correlates of protection are expected, the role of these cells was studied in 13 HIV-serodiscordant couples in a stable relationship and reporting unprotected sexual intercourses. HIV-specific immune responses mediated by DN T-cells were evaluated by measuring intracellular IFNγ and MIP1ß (CCL4) production in response to HIV-Gag peptides. Thirty-five healthy controls not exposed to HIV were tested similarly and used to define a threshold for positive responses. Interestingly, Gag-specific DN T-cell responses were found in 3/13 (23%) HIV-exposed seronegative individuals (Group A), involving both DN/αß(+) and DN/γδ(+) T-cells through MIP1ß and IFNγ production. 4/13 (30%) of partners infected with HIV (Group B) also showed Gag-specific responses but were mediated exclusively by DN/γδ(+) T-cells, mainly through IFNγ production. DN T-cells in Group A individuals can display differential HIV-specific immune responses, which might contribute to the low susceptibility to infection with HIV shown by individuals in Group A.

No major differences in the functional profile of HIV Gag and Nef-specific CD8+ responses between long-term nonprogressors and typical progressors.

The mechanism explaining the failure of HIV-specific CD8(+) T cell responses to successfully control HIV replication remains elusive. A total of 83 drug-naive HIV-infected individuals, 27 of whom were long-term nonprogressors (LTNP), was examined. The ability of CD8(+) T lymphocytes to produce three different cytokines (MIP-1beta, TNF-alpha, IL-2) in response to HIV Gag and Nef peptides and to polyclonal stimuli and the ability of HIV-specific CD8(+) T cells to expand in vitro were evaluated by multiparameter flow cytometry. In response to polyclonal stimulation, LTNP presented significantly higher levels of several CD8(+) T cell subsets than progressors. While most patients presented detectable Gag and Nef-specific CD8(+) responses, no significant differences in any of the CD8(+) functional T cell subsets were recognized when comparing LTNP and progressors. HIV responses were dominated by cells producing only MIP-1beta or TNF-alpha, being similar in LTNP and progressors. However, expansion of HIV-specific CD8(+) T cells was more frequent in LTNP than progressors, especially for cells producing MIP-1beta. LTNP show higher levels of CD8(+) responses against polyclonal stimuli than progressors. However, HIV-specific CD8(+) responses do not differ between them except for a more preserved ability of cells from LTNP to expand in vitro.