ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In case of suspected hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) to drugs, a challenging area for pediatricians is detecting relevant elements in the parent-reported history, in order to reach a definite diagnosis. We analyzed the concordance between the description of the HR and the medical reports documented at the time of the event. Furthermore, we studied any correlation between clinical history variables and the prediction of true allergy. METHODS: We retrospectively collected 50 charts of children referred to our Allergy Unit, after a previous access to the Emergency Department. We compared the description of the HR at acute phase to the history told by parents. Type and timing of the HR and culprit drug were classified as "known" or "unknown." The diagnosis was confirmed or excluded at the end of the investigations. Logistic regression analysis was performed to find any significant association. RESULTS: The type of the HR was known in 74%, the timing in 28%, and the culprit drug in 98%. We showed that having had a severe HR had an increased odds of remembering the timing; being older >6 years and having had an immediate HR had an increased odds of remembering the type; time to diagnostic was lower in patients whose parents remembered the type of HR. CONCLUSION: Our paper underlines the importance of an accurate anamnesis at the time of the event. Providing the physicians with a standardized Case Report Form could be a useful tool to simplify the diagnostic work-up and minimize mistakes due to lack of memory.
Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity , Hypersensitivity , Child , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Emergency Service, Hospital , ParentsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As the process and nature of developing sensitivity to house dust mites (HDMs) remain not fully studied, our goal was to establish the pattern, nature and timeframe of house dust mite (HDM) sensitization development in patients in Ukraine as well as the period when treatment of such patients would be most effective. METHODS: The data of the multiplex allergy test Alex2 was collected from 20,033 patients. To determine age specifics of sensitization, descriptive statistics were used. Bayesian Network analysis was used to build probabilistic patterns of individual sensitization. RESULTS: Patients from Ukraine were most often sensitized to HDM allergens of group 1 (Der p 1, Der f 1) and group 2 (Der p 2, Der f 2) as well as to Der p 23 (55%). A considerable sensitivity to Der p 5, Der p 7 and Der p 21 allergens was also observed. The overall nature of sensitization to HDM allergens among the population of Ukraine is formed within the first year of life. By this time, there is a pronounced sensitization to HDM allergens of groups 1 and 2 as well as to Der p 23. Significance of sensitization to Der p 5, Der p 7 and Der p 21 allergens grows starting from the age of 3-6. Bayesian Network data analysis indicated the leading role of sensitization to Der p 1 and Der f 2. While developing the sensitivity to group 5 allergens, the leading role may belong to Der p 21 allergen. CONCLUSION: The results obtained indicate the importance of determining the sensitization profile using the multi-component approach. A more detailed study of the optimal age for AIT prescription is required as the pattern of sensitization to HDMs is formed during the first year of life.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis, which is rare, has been reported after COVID-19 vaccination, but its management is not standardized. METHOD: Members of the European Network for Drug Allergy and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology interested in drug allergy participated in an online questionnaire on pre-vaccination screening and management of allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines, and literature was analysed. RESULTS: No death due to anaphylaxis to COVID-19 vaccines has been confirmed in scientific literature. Potential allergens, polyethylene glycol (PEG), polysorbate and tromethamine are excipients. The authors propose allergy evaluation of persons with the following histories: 1-anaphylaxis to injectable drug or vaccine containing PEG or derivatives; 2-anaphylaxis to oral/topical PEG containing products; 3-recurrent anaphylaxis of unknown cause; 4-suspected or confirmed allergy to any mRNA vaccine; and 5-confirmed allergy to PEG or derivatives. We recommend a prick-to-prick skin test with the left-over solution in the suspected vaccine vial to avoid waste. Prick test panel should include PEG 4000 or 3500, PEG 2000 and polysorbate 80. The value of in vitro test is arguable. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations will lead to a better knowledge of the management and mechanisms involved in anaphylaxis to COVID-19 vaccines and enable more people with history of allergy to be vaccinated.
Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Drug Hypersensitivity , Vaccines , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy , Humans , Vaccines, Synthetic , mRNA VaccinesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nasal obstruction is a frequent symptom in both adults and children and it is a common reason to see an otorhinolaryngologist. Endoscopy of the nasal cavity and the epipharyngeal space along with anterior rhinomanometry is regarded the gold standard since many years to estimate the severity of nasal obstruction in the particular patient. Endoscopy shows anatomical reasons for an obstruction, whereas the nasal flow volume and nasal resistance can be determined using anterior rhinomanometry. Currently, there are only few data available for rhinomanometry results in children. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the application of this technique in the pediatric population for objective evaluation of nasal flow. Whether it achieves reproducible results and which clinical parameters have some influence on the results were studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 427 children (average age of 8.5 years, range 7 months through 17 years) who were admitted to evaluate nasal patency or for allergy testing were examined. After clinical examination and endoscopy of the nasal cavity and epipharyngeal space, anterior rhinomanometry was performed before and after application of decongestant nose drops separately for each nose side in 334 children. The nasal flow with a pressure of 150 Pasc was measured and served for statistical evaluation. Flow values were correlated to clinical and endoscopic parameters along with results of allergy tests (prick tests). RESULTS: Reproducible rhinomanometric measurements were possible in children age 3 years and older. However, the standard deviation and variation of measurements were significant in this cohort of patients. Statistically highest significant correlations were found between flow measurements and body height along with the age of the children (p < 0.01) and status following adenoidectomy (p < 0.05). No statistically significant correlations were found between rhinomanometry and results of prick tests. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that rhinomanometry can be applied in the pediatric population for objective evaluation of nasal obstruction and for determining the effects of decongestant nose drops. The highest correlation was found between nasal flow and children's body height, children's age and status following adenoidectomy. The correlation between nasal flow and clinically/endoscopically determined degree of nasal obstruction was lower. However, definition of normal flow values for particular age groups is challenging since the results showed high variation and standard deviation. Yet with regard to individual patient, the technique achieves reliable results in nasal provocation tests, which are widely used for allergy testing in children. When performed in children it should always be considered that there are age-specific requirements for the examination and interpretation of results in this patient cohort.
Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity , Nasal Obstruction , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Nasal Decongestants , Nasal Obstruction/diagnosis , Nasal Obstruction/etiology , Nose , Rhinomanometry/methodsABSTRACT
Allergic conjunctival diseases (ACDs) are inflammatory diseases of the conjunctiva and cornea caused predominantly by the IgE-mediated immediate hypersensitivity response. Allergic conjunctival diseases include allergic conjunctivitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC), atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC), and giant papillary conjunctivitis. In clinical practice of ACDs, an ocular allergy test using biomarker measurement is a crucial examination technique for diagnosing, evaluating severity, and determining the efficacy of medical treatment. The ocular allergy test includes the tear test for evaluating the concentration of biomarkers in tears and an ocular surface test for assessing the expression levels of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) biomarkers on the ocular surface. The clinical usefulness of several biomarkers has been demonstrated in patients with ACDs; specifically, eosinophil cationic protein and eotaxin-2 as eosinophilic inflammation biomarkers; interleukin-4 and thymus and activation regulated chemokine (CCL17/TARC) as Th2 inflammation biomarkers; eotaxin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and soluble IL-6 receptor as giant papillae biomarkers; and osteopontin and periostin as allergic inflammation and remodeling biomarkers. Furthermore, the ocular allergy test, quantitative evaluation methods using biomarkers have allowed for better understanding of the immunological and pathophysiological mechanisms of ACDs. Therefore, the search for a biomarker is important to make an ocular allergy test useful. In previous ocular allergy tests, the biomarkers for allergic inflammation in patients with chronic ACDs including VKC and AKC were substantial. However, the selection of biomarkers associated with the early phase reaction of immediate hypersensitivity and innate immunity responses needs to be addressed in future investigations.
Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Allergic/diagnosis , Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological , Biomarkers , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/immunology , Eye/immunology , Humans , Inflammation/diagnosis , Inflammation/immunologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of epidemiologic and physician-diagnosed pollen-induced AR (PiAR) in the grasslands of northern China and to study the impact of the intensity and time of pollen exposure on PiAR prevalence. METHODS: A multistage, clustered and proportionately stratified random sampling with a field interviewer-administered survey study was performed together with skin prick tests (SPT) and measurements of the daily pollen count. RESULTS: A total of 6043 subjects completed the study, with a proportion of 32.4% epidemiologic AR and 18.5% PiAR. The prevalence was higher in males than females (19.6% vs 17.4%, P = .024), but no difference between the two major residential and ethnic groups (Han and Mongolian) was observed. Subjects from urban areas showed higher prevalence of PiAR than rural areas (23.1% vs 14.0%, P < .001). Most PiAR patients were sensitized to two or more pollens (79.4%) with artemisia, chenopodium, and humulus scandens being the most common pollen types, which were similarly found as the top three sensitizing pollen allergens by SPT. There were significant regional differences in the prevalence of epidemiologic AR (from 18.6% to 52.9%) and PiAR (from 10.5% to 31.4%) among the six areas investigated. PiAR symptoms were positively associated with pollen counts, temperature, and precipitation (P < .05), but negatively with wind speed and pressure P < .05). CONCLUSION: Pollen-induced AR (PiAR) prevalence in the investigated region is extremely high due to high seasonal pollen exposure, which was influenced by local environmental and climate conditions.
Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Pollen/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/epidemiology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , China/epidemiology , Climate , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Geography, Medical , Grassland , Humans , Immunization , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Prevalence , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/diagnosis , Skin Tests , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Several methods have been developed to detect allergen-specific IgE in sera. The passive IgE sensitization assay using human IgE receptor-expressing rat cell line RBL-2H3 is a powerful tool to detect biologically active allergen-specific IgE in serum samples. However, one disadvantage is that RBL-2H3 cells are vulnerable to high concentrations of human sera. Only a few human cultured cell lines are easily applicable to the passive IgE sensitization assay. However, the use of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to generate human mast cells (MCs) has not yet been reported. METHODS: The nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB)-responsive luciferase reporter gene was stably introduced into a human iPSC line 201B7, and the transfectants were induced to differentiate into MCs (iPSC-MCs). The iPSC-MCs were sensitized overnight with sera from subjects who were allergic to cedar pollen, ragweed pollen, mites, or house dust, and then stimulated with an extract of corresponding allergens. Activation of iPSC-MCs was evaluated by ß-hexosaminidase release, histamine release, or luciferase intensity. RESULTS: iPSCs-MCs stably expressed high-affinity IgE receptor and functionally responded to various allergens when sensitized with human sera from relevant allergic subjects. This passive IgE sensitization system, which we termed the induced mast cell activation test (iMAT), worked well even with undiluted human sera. CONCLUSIONS: iMAT may serve as a novel determining system for IgE/allergens in the clinical and research settings.
Subject(s)
Basophil Degranulation Test/methods , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/cytology , Mast Cells/cytology , Mast Cells/immunology , Adult , Allergens , Cell Culture Techniques , Cell Differentiation , Cells, Cultured , Female , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Microarray platforms, enabling simultaneous measurement of many allergens with a small serum sample, are potentially powerful tools in allergy diagnostics. We report here the first study comparing a fully automated microarray system, the Microtest allergy system, with a manual microarray platform, Immuno-Solid phase Allergen Chip (ISAC), and two well-established singleplex allergy tests, skin prick test (SPT) and ImmunoCAP, all tested on the same patients. One hundred and three adult allergic patients attending the allergy clinic were included into the study. All patients were tested with four allergy test methods (SPT, ImmunoCAP, Microtest and ISAC 112) and a total of 3485 pairwise test results were analysed and compared. The four methods showed comparable results with a positive/negative agreement of 81-88% for any pair of test methods compared, which is in line with data in the literature. The most prevalent allergens (cat, dog, mite, timothy, birch and peanut) and their individual allergen components revealed an agreement between methods with correlation coefficients between 0·73 and 0·95. All four methods revealed deviating individual patient results for a minority of patients. These results indicate that microarray platforms are efficient and useful tools to characterize the specific immunoglobulin (Ig)E profile of allergic patients using a small volume of serum sample. The results produced by the Microtest system were in agreement with diagnostic tests in current use. Further data collection and evaluation are needed for other populations, geographical regions and allergens.
Subject(s)
Allergens/blood , Hypersensitivity/blood , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Protein Array Analysis/methods , Adult , Animals , Arachis/chemistry , Arachis/immunology , Betula/chemistry , Betula/immunology , Cats , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/instrumentation , Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards , Dogs , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Mites/chemistry , Mites/immunology , Phleum/chemistry , Phleum/immunology , Protein Array Analysis/instrumentation , Protein Array Analysis/standards , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a clinicopathologic disease of increasing prevalence in children and adults. The triggering antigen in EoE is often a food that initiates a cascade of Th2-associated interleukins such as interleukin-5 and interleukin-13 and chemokines such as eotaxin-3 as well as esophageal eosinophilia and mastocytosis. Amino acid-based formulas have high efficacy rates in EoE and constitute the first evidence for food-triggered esophageal eosinophilia. Animal models have demonstrated the sufficiency of food antigens in triggering both the inflammatory and remodeling complications of EoE. Food elimination diets that are followed by single food introduction with repeat biopsy have proven the efficacy of empiric and allergy testing based elimination diets in children and adults. Although the ideal allergy test for identifying food antigens in EoE remains to be elucidated, the utility of food skin prick combined with atopy patch testing has been shown in large pediatric cohorts. By comparison, smaller, non-U.S. adult cohorts have not had similar results. Currently, a positive test on food allergy evaluation suggests a food trigger for EoE but does not substitute for biopsy-based tissue evaluation after food removal and reintroduction. The higher rates of food anaphylaxis in children with EoE, potential loss of tolerance to immunoglobulin E-positive foods that can occur with food avoidance, and the high rates of other atopic diatheses in EoE subjects all support the evaluation of EoE subject by an allergist, consideration for allergy testing, and an integrated approach by allergists, gastroenterologists, and pathologists in EoE management.
Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , Eosinophilic Esophagitis/etiology , Food Hypersensitivity/complications , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Gastroenterology/methods , Humans , Immunologic Techniques , Pathology/methodsABSTRACT
The efficacy of human amniotic mesenchymal stem cell (hAMSC) ovarian injection in improving ovarian function in primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) patients has been shown in some reports. However, the safety and efficacy of hAMSC vein injection remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of hAMSC intravenous injection in cynomolgus macaques and SD rats and provided evidence for clinical trials. The hAMSCs were transplanted three times in SD rats at low, medium, and high doses. The animal behavior and biochemical and biophysical parameters were routinely monitored on a 2-month period posttransplantation, and histopathologic examinations were also performed. Experiments on the acute toxicity, allergy test, and hemolysis test showed that hAMSCs possess good biocompatibility. Our results showed that the maximum tolerated dose of hAMSCs in SD rats was 4.0 × 107 cells/kg. The maximum safe dose with three injections of hAMSCs in SD rats was 5.0 × 106 cells/kg. In addition, the results demonstrated that hAMSCs may restore POI rat ovarian function after two injections of 2.5 × 106 cells/kg or 5.0 × 106 cells/kg, which improved the disturbed estrous cycle, hormone levels, and ovarian lesions induced by pZP3. In conclusion, the preclinical results suggested that the transplantation of hAMSCs may be safe and efficacious for SD rats at doses of 5.0 × 106 cells/kg and lower.
Subject(s)
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Ovarian Cysts , Ovarian Neoplasms , Primary Ovarian Insufficiency , Female , Humans , Rats , Animals , Primary Ovarian Insufficiency/metabolism , Ovarian Cysts/metabolism , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Ovarian Neoplasms/metabolism , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/metabolismABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost, healthcare utilization, and outcomes between skin and serum-specific IgE (sIgE) allergy testing. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used IBM® MarketScan claims data, from which commercially insured individuals who initiated allergy testing between January 1 and December 31, 2018 with at least 12 months of enrollment data before and after index testing date were included. Cost of allergy testing per patient was estimated by testing pattern: skin only, sIgE only, or both. Multivariable linear regression was used to compare healthcare utilization and outcomes, including office visits, allergy and asthma-related prescriptions, and emergency department (ED) and urgent care (UC) visits between skin and sIgE testing at 1-year post testing (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The cohort included 168,862 patients, with a mean (SD) age of 30.8 (19.5) years; 100,666 (59.7%) were female. Over half of patients (56.4%, n = 95,179) had skin only testing, followed by 57,291 patients with sIgE only testing and 16,212 patients with both testing. The average cost of allergy testing per person in the first year was $430 (95% CI $426-433) in patients with skin only testing, $187 (95% CI $183-190) in patients with sIgE only testing, and $532 (95% CI $522-542) in patients with both testing. At 1-year follow-up post testing, there were slight increases in allergy and asthma-related prescriptions, and notable decreases in ED visits by 17.0-17.4% and in UC visits by 10.9-12.6% for all groups (all p < 0.01). Patients with sIgE-only testing had 3.2 fewer allergist/immunologist visits than patients with skin-only testing at 1-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Their healthcare utilization and outcomes were otherwise comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Allergy testing, regardless of the testing method used, is associated with decreases in ED and UC visits at 1-year follow-up. sIgE allergy testing is associated with lower testing cost and fewer allergist/immunologist visits, compared to skin testing.
Subject(s)
Immunoglobulin E , Insurance Claim Review , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Skin Tests , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Young Adult , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Child , Child, Preschool , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Office Visits/economics , Infant , Ambulatory Care/economics , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Atopic diseases are the most common chronic conditions in childhood. The best treatment for allergic disease is possible with early diagnosis. The purpose of the study was to assess the predictive value of total immunoglobulin E (IgE) and eosinophil levels for allergy test positivity in patients diagnosed with asthma, allergic rhinitis (AR), atopic dermatitis (AD), and food allergy (FA). METHODS: Pediatric patients between 0 and 18 years old diagnosed with asthma, AR, AD, and FA were included in the study. Demographic characteristics of the patients, total IgE, eosinophil (absolute and %) values, specific igE (SPIGE), and skin prick test (SPT) results were recorded. RESULTS: The data of 2665 patients were evaluated in the study. Of the patients, 58.6% were male, whereas 41.4% were female. The median age of the children was significantly higher both in SPT-positive and SPIGE-positive patients (p<0.001). If the criteria positivity is accepted as total IgE value is ≥104.5 (for AD: 86.5, asthma: 116.5, AR: 120.5, FA: 42.5) and absolute eosinophil ≥500 and/or eosinophil (%) ≥5%; test positivity was higher for each disease and all patients (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Total IgE and eosinophil levels can be used to identify atopy in patients with symptoms of AD, asthma, and AR. Total IgE and eosinophil values are suitable and easily obtainable parameters for better evaluation of health-care resources for the diagnosis and follow-up of atopic illnesses.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of allergy test dosage of fluorescein sodium (1%) for Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) detection in Fundus Fluorescein Angiography (FFA) examination as compared to the regular dosage (20%). METHODS: Totally 77 eyes from 42 DR patients were included in this prospective study. Capillary non-perfusion area, neovascularization, diabetic macular edema and microaneurysms were measured by FFA and compared at 1, 5 and 15 min after intravenous injection of 1% or 20% fluorescein sodium. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the proportions of capillary non-perfusion area and diabetic macular edema as well as the amount of neovascularization between the 1% and 20% fluorescein sodium groups. Yet, the 1% group had a significantly a smaller number of microaneurysms than the 20% group at 1 min (p < 0.001) and a smaller number of eyes with diabetic macular edema than the 20% group at 5 (p = 0.032) and 15 min (p = 0.015). The images from patients with clear vitreous had better quality than the images from patients with vitreous opacity (all p < 0.05, except comparison on neovascularization at 5 min: p > 0.999). All examined indexes showed high correlations between the 1% and 20% groups (r > 0.8, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that 1% fluorescein sodium could detect the changes of DR comparably to the regular dosage.
ABSTRACT
. For the COVID-19 vaccines used in Germany, severe allergic (anaphylactic) reactions after vaccination have been reported in very rare cases. While Comirnaty and Spikevax are mRNA vaccines, Vaxzevria and Jcovden comprise vector vaccines, and Nuvaxovid a recombinant spike protein vaccine. The reporting rate of anaphylaxis after mRNA vaccination was higher in females receiving their first vaccination dose, with 0.97 and 1.12 reports per 100,000 vaccinations for Comirnaty and Spikevax, respectively, compared with vaccinated males and subsequent vaccinations. The Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI) investigated 106 responses of 321 cases of confirmed anaphylactic reactions concerning subsequent allergy testing and revaccination with a COVID-19 vaccine. The collected data indicate that only a small proportion of cases (22%) were IgE-mediated reactions. A large proportion (73%) of patients could be revaccinated under precautionary measures without recurrence of anaphylaxis. The pathomechanism of the majority of anaphylactic reactions remains unclear and should be investigated in further studies.
ABSTRACT
Background Urticaria, a vascular reaction of the skin, is marked by the transient appearance of erythematous papules or plaques (wheals) of varying sizes that are blanchable and associated with severe pruritus which lasts from a few hours to days. The etiological factors for urticaria include food, drugs, bacterial foci, pollen, fungi, dust, worms, physical stimuli, stress, anxiety, insect stings, etc. Skin prick tests (SPTs) represent the cheapest and most effective method to diagnose immunoglobulin E-mediated type 1 allergic reactions such as urticaria. A history suggestive of clinical sensitivity supported by a positive test strongly implicates the allergen in the disease process. In this study, we aimed to detect the common allergens and correlate the findings of SPTs with various epidemiological characteristics of urticaria patients. Methodology A total of 100 patients with urticaria were included in this study. After receiving written and informed consent from patients, SPTs using a battery of 45 allergens were performed. Results In our study, SPT positivity was seen in 88 (88%) patients. The highest sensitization was noted toward Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (house dust mite) (30%), followed by D. farinae, Cynodon dactylon, and peanuts (each comprising 24%), and Ailanthus excelsa (20%). Conclusions Finding the causative allergen in urticaria is often a difficult and long-drawn process, both for the physician and the patient. Our study identified an allergen in 88% of patients with urticaria, thereby showing that the SPT is a cost-effective, easy, and reliable tool for diagnosing and guiding treatments in urticaria patients.
ABSTRACT
Radiocontrast media (RCM) are common elicitors of immediate and nonimmediate hypersensitivity reactions, manifesting predominantly as urticaria/anaphylaxis or exanthems, respectively. In the minority of patients with immediate hypersensitivity reactions to RCM allergy is demonstrated by positive skin tests. However, data show that assessment by an allergist/immunologist is beneficial for managing patients with previous immediate and nonimmediate hypersensitivity reactions. For future RCM-enhanced examinations in patients with previous reactions, structurally different, skin test-negative preparations should be applied. The efficacy of this strategy is confirmed by drug provocation tests or exposures confirming or excluding RCM hypersensitivity and demonstrating tolerability of alternative RCM.
Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Hypersensitivity, Immediate , Urticaria , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Anaphylaxis/prevention & control , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/etiology , Skin TestsABSTRACT
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by a compromised skin barrier due to a variety of reasons, such as hereditary predisposition, immunological overactivity, and skin microbiome disruption. There is strong evidence linking food allergies (FA) with AD in some children, and many children with AD develop asymptomatic food sensitivity. FA and AD are two frequent childhood illnesses that are closely related. Food allergies affect 30% of kids suffering from moderate and severe eczema and can cause a variety of symptoms, including dry, cracked skin, rash, itchiness, oozing, and crusted skin. While preteens and teens with AD are commonly sensitive to environmental allergens including house dust mites, mold, pollen, or dander of animals, younger kids with AD typically exhibit sensitivity to food items like peanuts, milk, or eggs. A food challenge test (FC) should be used to confirm allergies before recommending a stringent diet that could be hazardous to the patient. While elimination diets continue to be the cornerstone of the management of FA, they should only be carried out under the guidance of a specialist. Topical treatments are crucial for all individuals with AD. Early skin care with emollients, topical steroid treatment, and early introduction of highly allergenic foods are promising methods of alleviating symptoms of AD.
ABSTRACT
A 29-year-old patient presented to the hospital with worsening generalized rash for the last two days from a mental health facility. The patient was commenced on lamotrigine two weeks earlier, and he developed fever and generalized macular rash on his body. His blood tests showed deranged liver function tests (LFTs) and clotting with raised eosinophil count, and he was treated for lamotrigine-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. The patient was commenced on prednisolone 50 mg once daily with a proton pump inhibitor cover, and lamotrigine was suspended on advice from Dermatology. The patient showed improvement after 3-4 days of treatment. His skin biopsy showed prominent suppurative granulomatous folliculitis, mild perivascular chronic inflammation, and red blood cell extravasation, including the rare eosinophil. He was weaned off from prednisolone by 5 mg weekly and had complete resolution of symptoms.
ABSTRACT
Lichen planus is a chronic inflammatory cutaneous and mucosal disease mostly affecting middle-aged individuals. The etiology of lichen planus is unknown, but current literature suggests that it is an altered immune response characterized by dysregulated T-cell activation and subsequent inflammation which can be associated with conditions like allergic contact dermatitis and hepatitis C. Additionally, heavy metals like lead, tin, arsenic, and bismuth can create inflammatory and allergic reactions that can predispose to the formation of lichen planus. This report examines the case of a 64-year-old female with longstanding oral lichenoid lesions with superimposed Wickham's striae, allergic skin reactions to several medications, and a history of receiving gold-containing dental implants. As a result of her history and subsequent allergy testing, she was found to have a gold allergy. The constant mucosal irritation from her dental implants likely was associated with the development of her oral lesions, which were confirmed to be oral lichen planus. She was recommended to apply triamcinolone 0.1% ointment to her oral lesions and to follow up with her dentist for evaluation of her filings. Further, it was recommended she replaces the dental crowns with compounds lacking gold to decrease the persistent irritation. This case represents the first such instance of gold dental fillings directly having an appreciable role in the development of oral lichen planus.
ABSTRACT
Potential triggers for equine asthma are allergens from hay and straw dusts, mold spores and storage mites. The contribution of these environmental trigger factors to equine asthma is still largely uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare results of four allergy tests from healthy and asthma-affected horses, and to evaluate the clinical relevance of allergens tested positive via specific inhalation provocation test. Fifteen horses were classified using a clinical scoring system as asthmatic (n = 9) or control (n = 6). Four different allergy tests (functional in vitro test, intradermal test, Fc-epsilon receptor test, and ELISA for allergen-specific IgE) were compared. A histamine inhalation provocation test as positive control was performed in all horses and the interpleural pressure was measured. In addition, two individual allergens were chosen for the allergen inhalation provocation test based on the results of the allergy tests and inhaled in increasing concentrations, until signs of dyspnea occurred. None of the four allergy tests could differentiate reliably between controls and asthma-affected horses. There was no agreement among the results of the four allergy tests. The interpleural pressure results showed a large individual variability. A clear positive reaction on the allergen inhalation provocation test was only detected in two asthma-affected horses 6 hours after allergen inhalation with Aspergillus fumigatus and Cladosporium herbarum. In most cases a purely type I immediate reaction is unlikely to be involved in causing the clinical signs of equine asthma. Because of a delayed reaction after allergen provocation in two horses, the involvement of cell-mediated type III or IV hypersensitivity may be possible. As all allergy tests used in this study can only detect IgE-mediated hypersensitivity, these tests are probably not suitable for an etiological diagnosis of equine asthma.