ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Opioid-reduced multimodal analgesia has been used clinically for many years to decrease the perioperative complications associated with opioid drugs. We aimed to assess the clinical effects of opioid-reduced anesthesia during thoracoscopic sympathectomy. METHODS: Surgical patients (n = 151) with palmar hyperhidrosis were randomly divided into control (Group C, 73 patients) and test (Group T, 78 patients) groups. All patients were administered general anesthesia using a laryngeal mask. In Group C, patients received propofol, fentanyl, and cisatracurium for anesthesia induction, and maintenance was achieved with propofol and remifentanil, along with mechanical ventilation during the operation. In Group T, anesthesia was induced with propofol, dezocine, and dexmedetomidine (DEX) and maintained with propofol, DEX, and an intercostal nerve block, along with spontaneous breathing throughout the operation. Perioperative complications related to opioid use include hypotension, bradycardia, hypertension, tachycardia, hypoxemia, nausea, vomiting, urine retention, itching, and dizziness were observed. To assess the impact of these complications, we recorded and compared vital signs, blood gas indices, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, adverse events, and patient satisfaction between the two groups. RESULTS: Perioperative complications related to opioid use were similar between groups. There were no significant differences in the type of perioperative sedation, analgesia index, respiratory and circulatory indicators, blood gas analysis, postoperative VAS scores, adverse reactions, propofol dosage, postoperative recovery time, and patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: In minimally invasive surgeries such as thoracoscopic sympathectomy, opioid-reduced anesthesia was found to be safe and effective; however, this method did not demonstrate clinical advantages. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Register: ChiCTR2100055005, on December 30, 2021.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Hyperhidrosis , Sympathectomy , Thoracoscopy , Humans , Female , Male , Hyperhidrosis/surgery , Adult , Prospective Studies , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Thoracoscopy/methods , Sympathectomy/methods , Young Adult , Propofol/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, General/methods , Atracurium/administration & dosage , Atracurium/analogs & derivatives , Patient Satisfaction , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Remifentanil/administration & dosage , Nerve Block/methods , Tetrahydronaphthalenes , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sufentanil in combination with dezocine or esketamine is often used for postoperative analgesia. However, there is a lack of clinical evidence of efficacy. This study compares the analgesic effects of esketamine and dezocine combined with sufentanil for relieving pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC). METHODS: A total of 58 patients were randomly assigned to the esketamine group (ES group) and dezocine group (DE group). In the ES group, 1.5 mg/kg esketamine was used. In the DE group, 0.3 mg/kg dezocine was used. Primary outcome measures were Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score at 4 h, 8 h, 24 h and 48 h after surgery. The second outcome measures were Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in the serum 10 minutes before anesthesia induction, and at 24 h and 48 h after surgery. RESULTS: The VAS scores at 4 h, 8 h, 24 h and 48 h after the surgery in the ES group vs DE group were 2.70 vs 3.50(P=0.013),2.35 vs 3.15(P=0.004),1.69 vs 2.58(P=0.002), and 1.50 vs 2.26(P=0.002), respectively. The serum IL-6 concentrations 10 minutes before anesthesia induction, and at 24 h and 48 h after surgery in the ES group and DE group were 34.39 and 34.12(P=0.901),112.33 and 129.60(P=0.014), and 89.69 and 108.46(P<0.001), respectively. The CRP levels in serum 10 minutes before anesthesia induction, and at 24 h and 48 h after the surgery in the ES group and DE group were 5.99 and 5.86(P=0.639), 28.80 and 35.37(P<0.001), and 23.17 and 30.11(P<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: For postoperative pain after LC, 1.5mg/kg esketamine provided better analgesia and reduced inflammation levels than 0.3mg/kg dezocine. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the China Clinical Research Information Center in 31/05/2023 : https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/home (Registration number: ChiCTR2300072011).
Subject(s)
Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Ketamine , Sufentanil , Tetrahydronaphthalenes , Humans , Sufentanil/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Interleukin-6 , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Double-Blind MethodABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the application of Dezocine combined with psychological care in the postoperative pain management. METHODS: This is a retrospective study. A total of 186 HFS patients who underwent Microvascular Decompression (MVD) at First People's Hospital of Zunyi between January 2020 and January 2022 were selected as the study subjects. Patients were divided into two groups based on different treatment interventions. The control group (n = 93) received routine perioperative care without preemptive analgesia, while the observation group (n = 93) received preemptive analgesia and combined psychological care on the basis of the control group's intervention. RESULTS: At 30 min post-laryngeal mask removal (T3), no significant difference in Ramsay Sedation Scale scores existed between control and observation groups (p > 0.05). The observation group showed significantly lower RSS scores at immediate mask removal (T2) and VAS scores at T3 compared to controls (p < 0.05). Following intervention, the observation group had notably lower SAS and SDS scores than controls (p < 0.05). Baseline (T0) and 5 min pre-removal (T1) exhibited no significant differences in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) values between groups (p > 0.05). However, at T2 and T3, the observation group displayed significantly lower MAP and HR values than controls (p < 0.05). No significant differences in pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) values existed between groups at any time point (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared to standard perioperative care alone, Dezocine combined with preemptive analgesia and psychological care effectively reduces postoperative pain during the awakening period, lowers the risk of immediate extubation-related agitation, and maintains stable hemodynamics in the postoperative period.
ABSTRACT
The relieving role of dezocine in pain after surgery was previously reported, while the potential mechanism was not completely clear. Therefore, the current research probed into the regulatory mechanism of dezocine in pain after surgery. A postoperative pain model was established by performing plantar incision surgery on the juvenile Sprague-Dawley rats. After the rats were treated with dezocine or SC79 (Akt1 activator), the paw withdrawal threshold and paw withdrawal latency of rats were detected to evaluate the mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia. After the plantar tissue, dorsal root ganglions, and spinal cord of rats were collected, the expressions of Akt1, p-Akt1, GSK-3ß, and p-GSK-3ß in the tissues were determined by western blot to evaluate the activation state of the Akt1/GSK-3ß pathway. After surgery, the paw withdrawal threshold and paw withdrawal latency of rats were lessened, whereas the ratios of p-Akt1/Akt1 and p-GSK-3ß/GSK-3ß were augmented in rat plantar tissue, dorsal root ganglions, and spinal cord. After treatment with dezocine alone, the paw withdrawal threshold and paw withdrawal latency of postoperative rats were elevated, but ratios of p-Akt1/Akt1 and p-GSK-3ß/GSK-3ß were reduced. After co-treatment with dezocine and SC79, SC79 reversed the effects of dezocine on elevating the paw withdrawal threshold and paw withdrawal latency, and reducing the ratios of p-Akt1/Akt1 and p-GSK-3ß/GSK-3ß in postoperative rats. Dezocine ameliorated the postoperative hyperalgesia in rats via repressing the hyper-action of Akt1/GSK-3ß pathway.
Subject(s)
Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic , Hyperalgesia , Pain, Postoperative , Tetrahydronaphthalenes , Animals , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/pharmacology , Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta , Hyperalgesia/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Dezocine, a synthetic opioid, introduced in 1970s as an analgesic, was redeveloped for relieving moderate to severe pain by Yangtze River Pharmaceutical Group in China in 2009. To date, dezocine occupies 45% of China's opioid analgesic market. Along with dezocine being a dominated painkiller, a certain amount of research was conducted to elucidate dezocine's action. In this review we summarize the current knowledge on the receptor, preclinical and clinical pharmacology of dezocine. Briefly, preclinical data show that dezocine is effective under varying pain conditions, particularly chronic neuropathic pain and cancer pain, through activation of opioid receptors, and inhibition of norepinephrine reuptake. Clinical data establish the effectiveness of dezocine either as a primary analgesic for postoperative pain management or a supplement for balanced analgesia. The receptor profile of dezocine is different from known pure µ agonists, and allows it to be used in combination with other opioids for additivity in efficacy or lower incidence of adverse effects.
Subject(s)
Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic , Tetrahydronaphthalenes , Analgesics/pharmacology , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/pharmacology , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/therapeutic use , Humans , Pain , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/pharmacology , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/therapeutic useABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To find out the reasons why patients still need to use rescue analgesics frequently after gastrointestinal tumor surgery under the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (IV-PCA), and the different abdominal surgery patients using the difference of analgesics. METHODS: A total of 970 patients underwent abdominal operation for gastrointestinal tumors were included. According whether patients used dezocine frequently for rescue analgesics within 2 days after surgery, they assigned into two groups: RAN group (Patients who did not frequently use rescue analgesia, 406 cases) and RAY group (Patients who frequently used rescue analgesia, 564 cases). The data collected included patient's characteristics, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), nausea and vomiting (PONV), and postoperative activity recovery time. RESULTS: No differences were observed in the baseline characteristics. Compared with the RAN group, patients in the RAY group had a higher proportion of open surgery, upper abdominal surgery, VAS score at rest on the first 2 days after surgery and PONV, and a slower recovery of most postoperative activities. Under the current use of IV-PCA background, the proportion of rescue analgesics used by patients undergoing laparotomy and upper abdominal surgery was as high as 64.33% and 72.8%, respectively. Regression analysis showed that open surgery (vs laparoscopic surgery: OR: 2.288, 95% CI: 1.650-3.172) and the location of the tumor in the upper abdomen (vs lower abdominal tumor: OR: 2.738, 95% CI: 2.034-3.686) were influential factors for frequent salvage administration. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient population, with our IV-PCA prescription for postoperative pain control, patient who underwent open upper abdominal surgery required more rescue postoperative analgesia.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/adverse effects , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid , Humans , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/chemically inducedABSTRACT
Peripheral nerve blocks are the regional techniques in orthopedic surgeries to control postoperative pain and have early discharge from hospital. However, anesthesia protocols for foot and ankle surgeries of institutes do not include multimodal analgesics including peripheral nerve blocks. The objective of the study was to compare spinal anesthesia with peripheral nerve block against general anesthesia with peripheral nerve block for elective foot and ankle surgeries. Patients have treated for elective foot and ankle surgery under general anesthesia (using propofol, 0.05 mg/kg dezocine, and 1% sevoflurane; GA cohort, n = 112) or spinal anesthesia (using 0.5% bupivacaine, propofol, and 0.05 mg/kg dezocine; SA cohort, n = 132) or patients have treated for elective for foot and ankle surgery under general anesthesia (GL cohort, n = 115) or spinal anesthesia (SL cohort, n = 160) with the use of peripheral nerve block (the sciatic nerve blocks and adductor canal nerve blocks using 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone). Propofol was administered in fewer amounts if anesthesia was used with the peripheral nerve block. Patients of the GL cohort were transferred to ward 36 minutes (mean) earlier than those of the SL cohort. None of the patients of the GL and the SL cohorts have received intraoperative opioid(s) for the management of pain. Patients of the GL and the SL cohorts have reported postoperative falls within 1 day after surgeries during movement. Patients of the SL cohort experienced more frequently difficulty with sleeping. Patients of the GL and the GA cohorts have reported nausea and vomiting. Only patients of the GL cohort were required usage of vasoactive drugs. The study provides information to anesthesiologists and surgeons regarding anesthesia techniques for elective foot and ankle surgeries for better surgical outcomes (Technical Efficacy Stage: 4).
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Spinal , Propofol , Anesthesia, General , Ankle/surgery , Bupivacaine , Humans , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Peripheral Nerves , Propofol/therapeutic use , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the application value and safety of peripheral prostate nerve block (PPNB) combined with dezocine in transrectal prostate biopsy. METHODS: Using a random number table, we divided 97 patients undergoing prostate biopsy in our hospital from October 2018 to October 2020 into an experimental group (n = 49) and a control group (n = 48), the former anesthetized by PPNB combined with dezocine and the latter by PPNB only. We compared the hemodynamic indexes before operation, during puncturing and at 5 minutes after operation, the pain scores during the movement of the probe in the rectum, at puncturing and at 5 minutes after surgery, and the adverse reactions to anesthesia between the two groups of patients. RESULTS: The heart rate was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control during puncturing and at 5 minutes after operation (P < 0.05), while the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) were remarkably higher in the former than in the latter group during puncturing (P < 0.05). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for pain was markedly lower in the experimental group than in the control during the movement of the probe in the rectum, at puncturing and at 5 minutes after surgery (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence rate of adverse reactions to anesthesia between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: PPNB combined with dezocine for prostate biopsy is more conducive to maintaining the stability of the patient's hemodynamics, and has a good analgesic effect and a high safety.
Subject(s)
Nerve Block , Prostate , Male , Humans , Prostate/pathology , Anesthetics, Local , Lidocaine , Biopsy , PainABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clinically, the coadministration of opioids to enhance antinociception and decrease tolerance has attracted increasing research attention. We investigated the effects of dezocine, a mu- and kappa-opioid receptor agonist/antagonist, on morphine tolerance and explored the involvement of opioid receptor expression in a rat model of bone cancer pain. METHODS: Thermal nociceptive thresholds were measured after the subcutaneous injection of morphine (10 mg/kg) alone or combined with dezocine (10 or 1 mg/kg) for 7 consecutive days. Real-time PCR and western blot analysis were used to examine opioid receptor expression in the periaqueductal gray (PAG) and spinal cord. RESULTS: The analgesic effect was significantly decreased after 4 days of morphine administration. We observed that low-dose dezocine significantly attenuated morphine tolerance without reducing the analgesic effect of morphine. Low-dose dezocine coadministration significantly reversed the downregulated expression of mu (MOR) and delta (DOR) opioid receptors in the PAG and the upregulated expression of kappa (KOR) and DOR in the spinal cord induced by morphine. Moreover, low-dose dezocine coadministered with morphine significantly inhibited KOR expression in both the PAG and spinal cord. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of low-dose dezocine with morphine may prevent or delay the development of morphine tolerance in a rat model of bone cancer pain. The regulation of opioid receptor expression in the PAG and spinal cord may be part of the mechanism.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/pharmacology , Cancer Pain/drug therapy , Drug Tolerance , Morphine/pharmacology , Receptors, Opioid/drug effects , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/pharmacology , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Animals , Bone Neoplasms/complications , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/administration & dosage , Cancer Pain/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Down-Regulation/drug effects , Drug Interactions , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Female , Hot Temperature , Hyperalgesia/physiopathology , Morphine/administration & dosage , Pain Measurement/drug effects , Pain Threshold , Periaqueductal Gray/metabolism , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Receptors, Opioid/metabolism , Receptors, Opioid, delta/metabolism , Receptors, Opioid, kappa/drug effects , Receptors, Opioid, kappa/metabolism , Receptors, Opioid, mu/metabolism , Spinal Cord/metabolism , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/administration & dosage , Up-Regulation/drug effectsABSTRACT
Dezocine is an opioid analgesic with both µ-receptor agonist and antagonist activities. Administration of opioids influences the immune system through immune cells. Dendritic cells (DC) play crucial functions in inducing T cell response and mediating immune functions. DC surface displays several different opioid receptors whose expression is induced during DC maturation. We aimed to explore the effects of dezocine on DCs and T cells, as well as on tumor treatment. Mice were intraperitoneally administrated with increasing doses of dezocine (0.75, 1.25 and 2.0 mg/kg). Mouse bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) were then isolated from the bone marrow. The BMDC surface markers were evaluated by flow cytometry. T cell proliferation was assessed by the carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester assay. The number of mature DCs were increased by dezocine treatment in both human umbilical cord blood and mouse peripheral blood, suggesting that dezocine enhanced BMDC maturation. Dezocine-treated BMDCs promoted CD8+ T cell proliferation and cytotoxicity, while dezocine treatment inhibited tumor metastasis in mice. We therefore conclude that the administration of dezocine promotes BMDC maturation and inhibits tumor metastasis through elevating CD8+ T cell proliferation and cytotoxicity.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/therapeutic use , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , Dendritic Cells/drug effects , Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental/drug therapy , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/therapeutic use , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Apoptosis/drug effects , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/pharmacology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Female , Humans , Lymphocyte Activation/drug effects , Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental/immunology , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/pharmacology , Umbilical Cord/cytologyABSTRACT
The current experiment was carried out to explore the effects of dezocine combined with ropivacaine infiltration anesthesia on the anesthesia recovery time and pain factors of patients with open hepatectomy. A prospective randomized controlled method was used to select 92 patients with open liver cancer resection in our hospital from August 2017 to November 2019. The patients were divided into a study group (n=46) and a control group (n=46) using a computer-generated random number table. Both groups underwent general anesthesia, based on this, the study group was treated with ropivacaine infiltration anesthesia 10 minutes before skin incision, and dezocine was given intravenously 0.5 h before surgery, the control group was anesthetized with ropivacaine 10 minutes before the incision, and was given a saline injection 0.5 h before the operation. Compared the recovery of anesthesia (recovery time of spontaneous breathing, time to open eyes, time to extubation), the incidence of adverse reactions, and cellular immune function indicators (peripheral blood CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, NK cell levels), stress response indicators [serum blood glucose (Glu), norepinephrine (NE), adrenaline (E)], pain factors [serum dopamine (DA), neuropeptide Y (NPY), substance P (SP)] before induction of anesthesia (T0), completion of surgery (T1), 12 hours after surgery (T2), and 24 hours after surgery (T3) between the two groups, and the degree of pain (VAS score) at T2 and T3 were compared between the two groups. The levels of CD4+, CD4+/CD8+, and NK cells in peripheral blood at T1, T2, and T3 in the study group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05); serum Glu, NE, and E levels in the study group at T1, T2, and T3 were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05); serum DA, NPY, and SP levels in the study group at T1, T2, and T3 were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05); the VAS scores of the study group at T2 and T3 were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05); the time of spontaneous breathing recovery, eyes opening and extubation in the study group were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05); the incidence of restlessness (4.35%), transient hypertension (6.52%), and cough (2.17%) in the study group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Dezocine and ropivacaine infiltration anesthesia can significantly shorten the recovery time of anesthesia and inhibit pain factor secretion in patients with open hepatectomy and can reduce the body's stress response after surgery, reduce immune function fluctuations, and can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions to anesthesia, and help promote patients' postoperative recovery.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia Recovery Period , Anesthesia, General , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/pharmacology , Liver/immunology , Liver/surgery , Pain/etiology , Ropivacaine/pharmacology , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/pharmacology , Aged , Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/blood , Pain Measurement , Ropivacaine/adverse effects , Stress, Physiological , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective randomized controlled study was to evaluate whether pretreatment with a small dose of dezocine could prevent remifentanil-induced cough in general anesthesia induction. TRIAL DESIGN: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. METHODS: A total of 210 patients receiving elective operative hysteroscopy from December 2018 to April 2019 were enrolled in the present study. They were randomly equally separated into dezocine group (n = 105) and control group (n = 105). Patients were intravenously pre-administrated with dezocine 0.03 mg/kg (diluted to 5 mL) or the same volume of normal saline 1 min prior to remifentanil infusion. One minute later, intravenous injection of propofol 1.5 mg/kg and cisatracurium 0.1 mg/kg were given to all patients for induction of general anesthesia. The counts of coughs occurred during the anesthesia induction period were recorded and the severity of cough was scaled. RESULTS: There were 7 cases of mild cough in dezocine group and 18 cases of mild cough, 12 cases of moderate cough and 4 cases of severe cough in control group. The incidence rate of cough was significantly lower and the severity of cough was obviously relieved in dezocine group compared to control group (6.67% vs. 32.38%, P < 0.001). The two groups were not significantly different in heart rate and mean arterial pressure before the induction, before and after the intubation, and in operating time and postoperative visual analog scale pain scores. CONCLUSION: This study recommends the efficacy and safety of a pretreatment with a small dose of dezocine in reducing remifentanil-induced cough during general anesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2000032035 . Date of registration: Retrospectively registered on 2020/04/18.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Anesthesia, General , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/therapeutic use , Cough/prevention & control , Remifentanil/adverse effects , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/administration & dosage , Cough/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Hysteroscopy , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Remifentanil/administration & dosage , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sufentanil is one of the opioids currently used to induce general anesthesia, and cough is one of the most common complications. Many drugs have been used to prevent sufentanil-induced cough (SIC), and dezocine is one of them. Dezocine is an analgesic, acting as partial antagonist of κ-receptors and agonist of µ-receptors. The purpose of our meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of dezocine on SIC. METHODS: We searched multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases (CNKI) to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria. This meta-analysis focused on the incidence and severity of SIC after dezocine intervention, as well as adverse effects. This meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO with reference number ID: CRD 42020144943. RESULTS: Five randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified, including 890 patients. Each study was a comparison of dezocine with an equal volume of 0.9% saline. When the injection dose of dezocine was 0.1 mg/kg, the incidence (pooled risk ratio (RR) = 0.03, [95% CI: 0.02 to 0.07], P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) and severity (mild: RR = 0.07, [95% CI: 0.03 to 0.18], P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%; moderate: RR = 0.05, [95% CI: 0.02 to 0.16], P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%; severe: RR = 0.04, [95% CI: 0.01 to 0.16], P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) of SIC were significantly decreased. There were no statistically significant differences in vital signs between the two groups based on the results of the pooled analysis. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that dezocine significantly reduced the incidence and severity of SIC in the induction of general anesthesia, but had no significant effect on vital signs. More high-quality RCTs are needed to complement existing conclusions.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/therapeutic use , Cough/prevention & control , Sufentanil/adverse effects , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/therapeutic use , Adult , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/adverse effects , Cough/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/adverse effectsABSTRACT
In order to prepare asymmetrically (R)-(+)-1-(5-bromopentyl)-1-methyl-7-methoxy-2-tetralone (3a), a key intermediate of dezocine, 17 cinchona alkaloid-derived catalysts were prepared and screened for the enantioselective alkylation of 1-methyl-7-methoxy-2-tetralone with 1,5-dibromopentane, and the best catalyst (C7) was identified. In addition, optimizations of the alkylation were carried out so that the process became practical and effective.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Emergence agitation (EA) is a common phenomenon in preschool children during emergence from general anesthesia. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of dezocine for emergence agitation in preschool children anesthetized with sevoflurane-remifentanil. METHODS: A total of 100 preschool children, scheduled for elective laparoscopic repair of an inguinal hernia by high ligation of the hernia sac under sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia were randomized into two groups: Group C (n = 50) received Ringer's lactate 10 mL and Group D received Ringer's lactate 10 mL containing dezocine 0.1 mg/kg, postoperatively. RESULTS: Incidence of EA, defined as a score ≥ 3 on Aono's four point scale or Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) score ≥ 10 in the PACU (10% vs. 76%) and the percentage of patients with severe EA (PAED score ≥ 13) (12% vs. 76%) were significantly lower in Group D compared to Group C (P < 0.05). Mean Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) score was significantly lower in Group D compared to Group C (1.2 ± 0.5 vs. 5.2 ± 0.6; P < 0.05). Patients need for fentanyl (18% vs. 4%) or propofol rescue (20% vs. 0) was significantly greater in Group C compared to Group D. No significant differences in other relative aspects after surgery between groups. CONCLUSION: Administration of dezocine 0.1 mg/kg decreased the incidence and severity of EA in preschool children that had undergone laparoscopic repair of an inguinal hernia by high ligation of the hernia sac under sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: A single dose of dezocine suppresses emergence agitation in preschool children anesthetized with sevoflurane-remifentanil effectively: A double-blind, prospective, randomized, controlled study, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ID: ChiCTR-IOR-16010033), retrospectively registered on November 21, 2016.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia Recovery Period , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/administration & dosage , Methyl Ethers/administration & dosage , Piperidines/administration & dosage , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Psychomotor Agitation/drug therapy , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Inhalation/adverse effects , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Methyl Ethers/adverse effects , Piperidines/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/chemically induced , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Prospective Studies , Psychomotor Agitation/etiology , Remifentanil , SevofluraneABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium is a common complication following various operative procedures with an incidence rate of 10-77 %. AIM: To analyze various risk factors for postoperative delirium after spine surgery in the middle- and old-aged patients. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 451 patients (226 males and 225 females, an average age of 65.1 ± 18.3 years) who underwent spinal surgery in our hospital between January 2010 and August 2015. Patients who had features of acute onset and fluctuating course and any two of the other features were diagnosed with delirium. Cognitive tests consisting of Clinical Dementia Rating and Global Deterioration Scale were performed to evaluate delirium. T tests were used for statistical analysis of the difference between the two groups, and logistic regression analyses were used for determining the risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 42 (9.3 %) patients were diagnosed with delirium. Delirious and non-delirious patients had no difference in age, gender, BMI, education level, drug treatment, comorbid disease history, surgical history, preoperative blood pressure, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, use of surgical implants, surgical site, use of fentanyl and propofol, and preoperative VAS score. Intraoperative hypotension and use of dezocine were related to postoperative delirium (P = 0.03 and P = 0.07). The multiple regression equation was Y = -0.11 + 0.52 × X 0 + 0.21 × X 1, where X 0 = amount of dezocine, X 1 = instances of intraoperative hypotension. CONCLUSION: Postoperative delirium commonly occurs after spine surgery. Intraoperative hypotension <80 mmHg and intraoperative use of dezocine represent valuable new predictors of the risk of delirium.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/adverse effects , Emergence Delirium/etiology , Hypotension/complications , Spine/surgery , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Emergence Delirium/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Status and Dementia Tests , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Postoperative Period , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Opioid induced bowel dysfunction is the most common side effect of preoperatively administrated morphine, fentanyl and its derivative. However, the influence of dezocine on intestinal mobility is rarely reported. This study was designed to investigate the effects of dezocine, morphine and sufentanil on both intestinal smooth muscle contraction and propulsion in rats. METHODS: Contractile tension and frequency of isolated rat small intestine smooth muscle were measured using tension transducer after incubation with different concentrations of dezocine, morphine and sufentanil. The propulsive rate of methylene blue in rat intestinal tract was measured 30 minutes after intraperitoneal injection of morphine, sufentanil and dezocine. Percent of change in contractile tension and contraction frequency compared to baseline level were calculated to evaluate muscle contraction. Propulsive rate of methylene blue was calculated as the percentage of methylene blue moving distance in intestinal tract compared to the length of the small intestine. RESULTS: Morphine and sufentanil significantly increased the contractile tension of isolated small intestine smooth muscle at high doses. The contraction frequency did not change significantly among the 3 tested doses. Increasing the dose of dezocine from 1.7 mg.L(-1) to 10.2 mg.L(-1) did not change either the contractile tension or the contraction frequency. The propulsive rate of methylene blue in intestinal tract was significantly decreased after the treatment with morphine, sufentanil and dezocine (45.6%, 43.7%, and 42.1% respectively) compared to control group(57.1%), while the difference among the 3 drug groups were not significant. CONCLUSION: Morphine and sufentanil may dose dependently increase the contractile tension and contraction ability of isolated rat small intestine smooth muscle, while dezocine has no significant effect on intestine smooth muscle contraction. However, all these opioids might impair small intestinal propulsion.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/pharmacology , Gastrointestinal Motility/drug effects , Morphine/pharmacology , Sufentanil/pharmacology , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/pharmacology , Animals , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Male , Muscle Contraction/drug effects , Muscle, Smooth/drug effects , Muscle, Smooth/physiology , Rats , Rats, Sprague-DawleyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: When morphine and dezocine are mixed together, the clinical interactions with analgesic effects and adverse events remain unknown. The authors aimed to investigate the efficacy of low concentrations of dezocine in combination with morphine for postoperative pain. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial. SETTING: Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, China. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty patients undergoing thoracotomy were randomized into 3 groups to investigate the analgesic efficacy of different ratios of morphine and dezocine. INTERVENTIONS: The morphine group (Group M) received morphine (1 mg/mL) alone for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA); the morphine+dezocine 1 group (Group MD1) received morphine (1 mg/mL) combined with dezocine (0.05 mg/mL) at a ratio of 20:1 for PCA; the morphine+dezocine 2 group (Group MD2) received morphine (1 mg/mL) combined with dezocine (0.1 mg/mL) at a ratio of 10:1 for PCA. Cumulative morphine consumption, verbal rating scores (VRS), and adverse events were evaluated throughout a 48-hour postoperative period. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cumulative morphine requirements were (1) statistically higher in Group M than in Group MD2 at 24 and 48 hours after surgery and (2) statistically higher in Group M than Group MD1 at 48 hours after surgery. Postoperative VRS for evaluating pain were similar among the 3 groups. The incidence of postoperative nausea and pruritus was statistically higher in Group M than in Groups MD1 and MD2. The incidence of dizziness was not significantly different among groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of morphine and dezocine at the concentrations [morphine (mg/mL)]/[dezocine (mg/mL)] of 1/0.05 (ratio 20:1) and 1/0.1 (ratio 10:1) may enhance postoperative analgesia after thoracotomy.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/administration & dosage , Morphine/administration & dosage , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Tetrahydronaphthalenes/administration & dosage , Thoracotomy/adverse effects , Adult , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/methods , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
This commentary discusses the issues related to the current pharmacotherapy using super long-acting opioids (for the potential convenience for both patients and medical providers) for opioid addiction and argues for the potential to use a non-scheduled short-acting opioid to taper off opioids to reduce total number of patients on opioids and ultimately reduce opioid-related death. This article also proposes to develop short-acting opioids for addiction management instead of the current long-acting regimen. The authors further suggest that dezocine, a previously FDA approved medication for perioperative pain management and a non-scheduled opioid, be brought back to clinical practice in the US as a potential alternative addiction management medication, especially for those who are highly motivated to quit opioids completely using a taper off strategy.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Opioid-Related Disorders , Humans , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapyABSTRACT
Anhedonia and motivational impairments are cardinal features of depression, against which conventional antidepressants demonstrate limited efficacy. Preclinical investigations and extant clinical trial data substantiate the promise of opioid receptor modulators in addressing anhedonia, depression, and anxiety. While synthetic opioid agents like dezocine are conventionally employed for analgesia, their distinctive pharmacological profile has engendered interest in their potential antidepressant properties and translational applications. Herein, we present a case in which persistent bupropion treatment was ineffective. However, the incidental administration of a single low-dose intravenous injection of dezocine resulted in a rapid and sustained amelioration of depressive symptoms, particularly anhedonia and motivational deficits. Our findings posit a potentially novel role for the "legacy drug" dezocine.