The heterogeneous syndrome of non-infectious causes of persistent fever in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancy: another opportunity for stewardship?

Although occult fungal, viral and multidrug-resistant bacterial infections can cause persistent fever in neutropenic patients with hematologic cancer, a variety of non-infectious entities should be considered in case-by-case basis in the context of negative diagnostic workup for infection.

Analysis of Risk Factors for Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Carboplatin Plus Etoposide Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is an oncologic emergency requiring immediate empiric antibiotic therapy. Although carboplatin plus etoposide combination chemotherapy is associated with a relatively high frequency of FN, the risk factors are unclear. Hence, this retrospective study aimed to identify predictive markers of carboplatin/etoposide-induced FN. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who received combination chemotherapy with carboplatin (area under the concentration curve: 5 mg/mL·min, day 1) and etoposide (80 or 100 mg/m2, days 1-3) between July 2007 and June 2022. FN was assessed during the 21 days after initiation of carboplatin and etoposide therapy according to the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology's definition. Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables were used to compare the two groups. Statistical significance was set at p values <0.05. Explanatory variables with p values <0.05 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 176 eligible patients, the incidence of FN during the first cycle of chemotherapy was 25.0% (44/176). Multivariate analysis revealed that co-administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) and body mass index (BMI) were significantly associated with FN (p = 0.0035 and 0.0011, respectively). Patients with both co-administration of PPIs or PCABs and a BMI ≤22.509 kg/m2 presented with significantly higher frequencies of FN compared with the other patients (13/24 [54.2%] vs. 31/152 [20.4%] patients; odds ratio: 4.56, 95% confidence interval: 1.70-12.48; p = 0.00147). CONCLUSION: Patients who received carboplatin plus etoposide for SCLC with co-administration of PPIs or PCABs and a BMI ≤22.509 kg/m2 more frequently present with FN than those without the two factors.

Mecapegfilgrastim for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in children and adolescents with rhabdomyosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma: a prospective, single-arm, pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The chemotherapy regimens recommended for both rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and Ewing sarcoma (ES) patients are myelosuppressive and can reduce the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and subsequently increase the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). However, only a few studies have focused on the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) drugs in pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS and ES. Our objective was to investigate the efficacy and safety of mecapegfilgrastim, a biosimilar of pegfilgrastim, in prophylaxis of FN for pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS or ES. METHODS: In this single-arm, single-center, prospective study, pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS or ES were enrolled to receive either VAC (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, dactinomycin) regimen or VDC (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin) regimen in a 3-week cycle, followed by treatment with mecapegfilgrastim (100 µg/kg, maximum 6 mg) given at 24 h after completing chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of FN. Secondary endpoints included the incidence rate of grade 4 neutropenia, duration of ANC ≤ 0.5 × 109/L, incidence rate of chemotherapy delay or reduction, use of antibiotics, and safety profile. RESULTS: In total, 2 of the 30 (6.7%, 95% CI: 0.82-22.07) patients experienced FN after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Eight (26.7%, 95% CI: 12.28-45.89) patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia after receiving prophylactic mecapegfilgrastim. Eight patients experienced ANC ≤ 0.5 × 109/L with a median duration of 4.5 days; among them, 6 patients reached the lowest point of their ANC level on day 7, and 5 of them recovered by day 10. No dose reductions, delays, or discontinuation of chemotherapy was reported. Twenty-one (70.0%) patients received antibiotics during the treatment period. No patient experienced FN in the 0-5 years and the 13-18 years groups, and 2 patients experienced FN in the 6-12 years group. Two patients, 6 patients, and no patient experienced grade 4 neutropenia in the 0-5 years, 6-12 years, and 13-18 years groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Mecapegfilgrastim showed acceptable efficacy and safety profile in pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS or ES. Further randomized studies with large sample size are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered at Chictr.org.cn (No.ChiCTR1900022249). Registered on March 31, 2019.

Optimized high-dose granulocyte transfusions for the treatment of infections in neutropenic patients: A single-center retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte transfusions for patients with prolonged neutropenia and severe infections has been a controversial practice. Previous studies suggest a benefit of high-dose granulocyte transfusions (≥0.6 × 109/kg), although, until recently, the consistent production of high-dose units has been challenging. Here, we present our experience and results utilizing high-dose granulocyte transfusions at a large, tertiary academic medical center for the treatment of infections in adult, neutropenic patients. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: A retrospective chart review (2018-2021) was conducted for all patients who received high-dose granulocyte transfusions from donors stimulated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and dexamethasone. Gathered parameters included patient demographics, clinical history, infection status, dose, clinical outcomes, pre- and post-absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and transfusion times including time between granulocyte collection, administration, and posttransfusion ANC count. Gathered parameters were summarized using descriptive statistics, outcomes were assessed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves/log-rank/regression testing. RESULTS: Totally 28 adult, neutropenic patients refractory to antimicrobial agents and/or G-CSF received a total of 173 granulocyte concentrates. Median ANC increased from 0.7 × 109/L pre-transfusion to 1.6 × 109/L posttransfusion. The mean granulocyte yield was 77.4 × 109 resulting in an average dose per kilogram of 0.90 × 109 ± 0.30 × 109 granulocytes. Composite day 42 survival and microbial response was 42.9% (n = 12/28) without significant adverse reactions. DISCUSSION: Here, we demonstrate the successful and safe implementation of high-dose granulocyte transfusions for neutropenic patients. Given the rapid and consistent production, distribution, and improved granulocyte quality, further investigations to determine the clinical efficacy of G-CSF primed granulocyte transfusions is now possible.

Screening for multidrug-resistant organisms in high-risk hospitalized patients with hematologic diseases.

OBJECTIVES: Patients treated for hematologic malignancies are at higher risk for blood stream infections (BSI) and multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) are increasingly involved. Studies showed a significant association between rectal colonization status and a higher risk of subsequent MDRO BSI. The objective of our study was to probe the practice of surveillance cultures in Belgian hematology centers. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to the 13 hematology centers participating in the acute leukemia board of the Belgian Hematology Society. 21 questions probed for the method of surveillance cultures, MDRO screened, antimicrobial prophylaxis, and empirical therapy and their relationship with colonization status. RESULTS: All centers completed the questionnaire in full. Routine gastrointestinal surveillance cultures in hematologic patients are taken in 10 hospitals. Organisms tested for included mostly ESBL (n = 9) and carbapenem-resistant (n = 8) Enterobacterales. All centers with a screening strategy adapt empiric antibiotic therapy based on MDRO colonization. Prophylaxis strategies are variable, only two centers adapt prophylaxis upon documentation of fluoroquinolone resistance. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the Belgian centers perform routine surveillance cultures and adapt empiric therapy for neutropenic fever accordingly. Other reasons for testing include to gain insight into local epidemiology and to prevent in-hospital transmission. In general, there was significant variability in surveillance dimensions.

Novel biomarkers to identify complicated course of febrile neutropenia in hematological patients receiving intensive chemotherapy.

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common consequence of intensive chemotherapy in hematological patients. More than 90% of the patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) develop FN, and 5%-10% of them die from subsequent sepsis. FN is very common also in autologous stem cell transplant recipients, but the risk of death is lower than in AML patients. In this review, we discuss biomarkers that have been evaluated for diagnostic and prognostic purposes in hematological patients with FN. In general, novel biomarkers have provided little benefit over traditional inflammatory biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein and procalcitonin. The utility of most biomarkers in hematological patients with FN has been evaluated in only a few small studies. Although some of them appear promising, much more data is needed before they can be implemented in the clinical evaluation of FN patients. Currently, close patient follow-up is key to detect complicated course of FN and the need for further interventions such as intensive care unit admission. Scoring systems such as q-SOFA (Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) or NEWS (National Early Warning Sign) combined with traditional and/or novel biomarkers may provide added value in the clinical evaluation of FN patients.

The long-term impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program in febrile neutropenia: an 8 years follow up.

PURPOSE: To describe the long-term effects of an ASP among febrile neutropenia (FN) patients. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study was conducted between 2015 and 2023 at a tertiary care hospital in Istanbul, Türkiye. The ASP was implemented for FN patients, and the effects were assessed before and after the ASP interventions, which included FN clinical pathways and regular multi-disciplinary meetings with relevant healthcare workers. RESULTS: A total of 489 FN episodes of 290 patients were included, 42% were female, and the mean age was 56 years (SD: 15, range: 18-89 years). After the intervention, the rate of appropriate antimicrobial therapy at the levels of starting (p = 0.005), switching (p < 0.001), and de-escalation/discontinuation, (p < 0.001) significantly increased. Another positive impact of the ASP was a significant reduction in candidemia (from 4.88 to 0.74, p = 0.004), as well as a significant reduction in the 90-day mortality rate (from 19 to 5%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, having a gram-negative bloodstream infection, prolonged days with fever, and a high risk for neutropenia were found to be significant predictors of 90-day mortality, while follow-up with ASP significantly reduced mortality. CONCLUSION: Implementation of ASP led to reduced candidemia and LOS without increasing mortality, even in a country with a high rate of antimicrobial resistance. Implementation of sustainable ASP for FN patients is critical in combating antimicrobial resistance.

Febrile neutropenia induced by adjuvant radiotherapy for a patient with breast cancer accompanied with reversible splenial lesion syndrome (RESLES, TypeI): a case report.

BACKGROUND: Reversible splenial lesion syndrome (RESLES) is known as a neuro-imaging syndrome with recurrent but reversible lesion of the corpus callosum, characterized by nonspecific but usually mild encephalopathies and specific imaging manifestations.There are few published reports in the field of oncology. CASE PRESENTATION: A 33-year-old female with right breast cancer and with no particular family history was admitted to hospital with high fever and severe headache, after receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. Blood routine test upon admission suggested neutropenia, considering myelosuppression associated with radiotherapy. There were no definite findings of common pathogenic microorganism, and no imaging indication of certain infectious sites other than a likely reversible corpus callosum syndrome suggested by brain MRI, which was relieved after systemic antibiotic therapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor injection. CONCLUSIONS: Reversible splenial lesion syndrome is a kind of clinical-imaging syndrome with multiple clinical manifestations and etiologies. This breast cancer patient after postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy develops a complication of RESLES that rings an alarm bell to the oncologists not to easily recognize the corpus callosum lesion as infarction or metastasis. Meanwhile, the potential pathogenic mechanisms need to be explored further.

Achieving white blood cell equity: are the safety profiles of biosimilar and reference pegfilgrastims comparable?

Biosimilars can provide choices for patients and may provide cost savings; however, their uptake has been slow in the USA, in part due to limited knowledge. To provide additional confidence in US pegfilgrastim biosimilars, this narrative review compared the safety profiles of biosimilar pegfilgrastims, currently approved or filed for approval in the USA, with the EU- and US-approved reference pegfilgrastims. Headache and bone pain were common to biosimilars and reference products and occurred at a similar incidence. Clinical trial data on the safety profiles of biosimilar pegfilgrastims and reference products have demonstrated similarity and comparability, with no unexpected safety outcomes. Overall, the safety profiles of biosimilar pegfilgrastims and reference pegfilgrastims demonstrated a high degree of similarity and comparability.

Pegfilgrastim is a biologic drug (one made in living cells such as bacteria) that is given to some patients being treated for cancer. Pegfilgrastim is prescribed to reduce a patient's risk of infection due to a weakened immune system caused by various chemotherapy treatment plans. A biosimilar is a type of biologic medicine that is highly similar to a US FDA-approved reference biologic, and is often cheaper, making it more widely available to patients. As of March 2023, there are eight pegfilgrastim biosimilars (six approved and two awaiting approval by the FDA). This review compared the side effects for the reference pegfilgrastim with the biosimilar pegfilgrastims. The side effects in general and the side effects from treatment were similar for the reference pegfilgrastim and for the biosimilar pegfilgrastims, with the most common side effects being headache and bone pain. Serious side effects such as allergic reactions or problems with the spleen were very low and were also similar between the reference pegfilgrastim and the biosimilar pegfilgrastims. These results show that the safety of the biosimilar pegfilgrastims was similar to the reference pegfilgrastim, with no unexpected side effects. With comparable safety to their reference product, biosimilars have the potential to improve patient access to more affordable treatment options.

Rates of febrile neutropenia and its causes in the real world.

Aim: Characterize febrile neutropenia in the real-world and explore potentially modifiable risk factors.Patients & methods: Characteristics of patient presenting with febrile neutropenia after systemic cancer treatment were investigated, with a thorough evaluation of potential risk factors.Results: The rate of febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization was comparable with clinical trials (mean absolute difference 2%, 95% CI: -1-4%; p = 0.29). The in-hospital mortality rate was 6%. Most cases resulted from low-risk regimens (50%) and 18.2% presented no apparent risk factors. 42.4% of patients presented modifiable factors potentially involved in the occurrence of febrile neutropenia.Conclusion: Febrile neutropenia rate in contemporary real-world evidence is comparable with clinical trials. Appropriate G-CSF administration and avoidance of potentially harmful drug-interactions represent potential areas for improvement.

[Box: see text].

Application of the Weighted-Incidence Syndromic Combination Antibiogram (WISCA) to guide the empiric antibiotic treatment of febrile neutropenia in oncological paediatric patients: experience from two paediatric hospitals in Northern Italy.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines about febrile neutropenia in paediatric patients are not homogeneous; the best empiric treatment of this condition should be driven by local epidemiology. The Weighted-Incidence Syndromic Combination Antibiogram (WISCA) addresses the need for disease-specific local susceptibility evidence that could guide empiric antibiotic prescriptions based on outcome estimates of treatment regimens obtained as a weighted average of pathogen susceptibilities. This study developed a WISCA model to inform empirical antibiotic regimen selection for febrile neutropenia (FN) episodes in onco-haematological paediatric patients treated at two Italian paediatric tertiary centres. METHODS: We included blood cultures from patients with a bloodstream infection and neutropenia admitted to the Paediatric Haematology-Oncology wards in Padua and Genoa Hospitals from 2016 to 2021. WISCAs were developed by estimating the coverage of 20 antibiotics as monotherapy and of 21 combined regimens with a Bayesian probability distribution. RESULTS: We collected 350 blood cultures, including 196 g-negative and 154 g-positive bacteria. Considering the most used antibiotic combinations, such as piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin, the median coverage for the pool of bacteria collected in the study was 78%. When adding a glycopeptide, the median coverage increased to 89%, while the replacement of piperacillin-tazobactam with meropenem did not provide benefits. The developed WISCAs showed that no monotherapy offered an adequate coverage rate for the identified pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: The application of WISCA offers the possibility of maximizing the clinical utility of microbiological surveillance data derived from large hospitals to inform the choice of the best empiric treatment while contributing to spare broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN): healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in commercially insured patients in the US.

PURPOSE: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a known side effect of chemotherapy, often requiring hospitalization. Economic burden increases with an FN episode and estimates of cost per episode should be updated from real-world data. METHODS: A retrospective claims analysis of FN episodes in patients with non-myeloid malignancies from 2014 to 2021 was performed in IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database. FN episodes were defined as having same-day claims for neutropenia and fever or infection, plus antibiotic in outpatient settings, following a claim for chemotherapy; index date was defined as the first claim for neutropenia/fever/infection. Patients receiving bone marrow/stem cell transplant and CAR-T therapy were excluded, as were select hematologic malignancies or COVID-19. Healthcare utilization and costs were evaluated and described overall, by episode type (w/wo hospitalization), index year, malignancy type, NCI comorbidity score, and age group. RESULTS: 7,033 FN episodes were identified from 6,825 patients. Most episodes had a hospitalization (91.2%) and 86% of patients had ≥1 risk factor for FN. Overall, FN episodes had a mean (SD) FN-related cost of $25,176 ($39,943). Episodes with hospitalization had higher average FN-related costs versus those without hospitalization ($26,868 vs $7,738), and costs increased with comorbidity score (NCI=0: $23,095; NCI >0-2: $26,084; NCI ≥2: $26,851). CONCLUSIONS: FN continues to be associated with significant economic burden, and varied by cancer type, comorbidity burden, and age. In this analysis, most FN episodes were not preceded by GCSF prophylaxis. The results of this study highlight the opportunity to utilize GCSF in appropriate oncology scenarios.

Leveraging G-CSF prescribing in the outpatient setting: considerations beyond clinical factors-a questionnaire study.

PURPOSE: This study aims to delineate G-CSF treatment practices, assess decision criteria, and measure their implementation in ambulatory settings for patients with breast (BC), lung (LC), or gastrointestinal cancers (GIC), beyond standard recommendations. METHODS: In this non-interventional, cross-sectional, multicenter study, clinical cases were presented using conversational interfaces (chatbots), simulating a conversation with one or more virtual interlocutors through voice or text exchange. The clinical simulations were configured by four parameters: types of cancer, risk of FN related to chemotherapy and comorbidities, access to care, and therapy setting (adjuvant/neoadjuvant/metastatic). RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 102 physicians. Most practitioners (84.5%) reported prescribing G-CSF, regardless of tumor type. G-CSF was prescribed more frequently for adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy than for metastatic cases. The type of chemotherapy was cited as the first reason for prescribing G-CSF, with access to care being the second. Regarding the type of chemotherapy, physicians do not consider this factor alone, but combined with comorbidities and age (56.7% of cases). Pegfilgrastim long-acting was prescribed in most cases of BC and LC (70.1% and 86%, respectively), while filgrastim short-acting was named in the majority of cases of GIC (61.7%); 76.3% of physicians prescribed G-CSF as primary prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that recommended practices are broadly followed. In the majority of cases, G-CSF is prescribed as primary prophylaxis. In addition, physicians seem more inclined to prescribe G-CSF to adjuvant/neoadjuvant patients rather than metastatic patients. Finally, the type of chemotherapy tends to be a more significant determining factor than the patient's background.

Enhancing patient-centered care: a randomized study on G-CSF administration preferences in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia poses a significant risk to cancer patients, with pegfilgrastim being commonly used for its prevention. While pegfilgrastim can be administered via prefilled syringe or pen device, patient preferences and experiences with these delivery methods remain unclear. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, open-label, randomized, observational trial (NCT05910164) at the Rafael Institute, France, comparing patient preferences for pegfilgrastim administration using a prefilled syringe versus a prefilled pen device. Patients undergoing chemotherapy and requiring pegfilgrastim were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to receive either syringe or pen first, with crossover administration. Questionnaires assessed patient preferences, learning experiences, autonomy, pain levels, emotional responses, satisfaction with nursing care, and empowerment. RESULTS: Among 150 randomized patients (mean age 58 years; 69% female), both groups showed a preference for the pen device, with significantly higher mean scores favoring pen administration (4.94 ± 1.70 vs. 4.27 ± 1.84; p = 0.00106). Patients reported significantly lower perceived pain with pen administration and stronger positive emotions compared to syringe use. Satisfaction with nursing care was higher with syringe use. Empowerment levels were similar across groups but significantly stronger when using the pen in complete autonomy. CONCLUSION: A preference for pegfilgrastim administration via the pen device was observed, though this may have been influenced by the administration sequence and the absence of syringe self-administration. The insights gained can help inform clinical decision-making and improve patient-centered care in managing chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05910164 on June 15, 2023.

Granulocyte transfusions in life-threatening infections of children with hemato-oncological diseases.

Granulocytes are the most important cells for host defense during infections. Granulocyte suspension transfusions (GTx) may be given as additional treatment in severely neutropenic patients with life-threatening infections when antimicrobial therapy is inadequate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of GTx for the treatment of children with hemato-oncological disease, febrile neutropenia and serious life-threatening infections. Patients who underwent GTx between July 2020 and September 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Hematologic and clinical response rates, adverse effects, characteristics of infection episodes and survival data of the patients were analyzed. During the study period, 60 patients received a total of 313 GTx for 81 infection episodes with a median number of GTx/infection episode of 3 (range 1-29). The median neutrophil count per bag was 20.8 (range 7.9-68.3) × 109 and the median neutrophil count per kg body weight was 0.82 (range 0.17-9.2) × 109. Clinical response was 85 %. Clinical response decreased significantly as the duration of neutropenia increased (p = 0.002). Hematologic response was calculated in 198 GTx (GTx given with pre-transfusion neutrophil count ≤ 0.5 × 109/L); hematologic response rate was 34 %. The infection-related mortality was 15 % and overall survival rate was 87 % and 70 % on days 30 and 90, respectively. No serious side effects were observed in any patient. Granulocyte transfusions appear to be safe and effective supportive treatment in neutropenic children with hematologic/oncologic diseases and severe infections.

Serum interleukin-33 and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 in pediatric leukemia with febrile neutropenia.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between interleukin-33 (IL-33) and its receptor Soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) levels and bacterial infections during febrile neutropenia (FN) in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In this prospective, case-control study, participants were divided into 3 groups: ALL patients with FN (Group A), ALL patients without neutropenia and fever (Group B), and healthy children without infection and chronic disease (Group C). There were 30 cases in each group. Blood samples for IL-33 and sST2 have been drawn from patients in Group A before the initiation of treatment and on days 1 and 5 of treatment, and from patients in Groups B and C at initiation. At admission, mean IL-33 level (39.02 ± 26.40 ng/L) in Group B and mean sST2 level (185.3 ± 371.49 ng/ml) in Group A were significantly higher than the other groups (p = 0.038, p < 0.001, respectively). No difference was observed in the mean IL-33 and sST2 levels in the 5-day follow-up of patients in Group A (p = 0.82, p = 0.86, respectively). IL-33 and sST2 levels were not associated with fever duration, neutropenia duration or length of hospitalization. While C-reactive protein (CRP) was significantly higher in patients with positive blood culture (p = 0.021), IL-33 (p = 0.49) and sST2 (p = 0.21) levels were not associated with culture positivity.  Conclusion: IL-33 and sST2 levels were not found valuable as diagnostic and prognostic markers to predict bacterial sepsis in patients with FN. What is Known: • Neutropenic patients are at high risk of serious bacterial and viral infections, but the admission symptom is often only fever. • Febrile neutropenia has a high mortality rate if not treated effectively. What is New: • Febrile neutropenia is not only caused by bacterial infections. Therefore, new biomarkers should be identified to prevent overuse of antibiotics. • Specific biomarkers are needed to diagnose bacterial sepsis in the early phase of febrile neutropenia.

Risk factors for resistant gram-positive bacteremia in febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gram-positive bacteria are frequently resistant to empirical beta-lactams in febrile neutropenic patients with cancer. As microbiology and antibiotic susceptibility changes, we reevaluated the risk factors for resistant Gram-positive bacteremia in febrile neutropenic patients with cancer. METHODS: Episodes of bacteremic febrile neutropenia in Seoul National University Hospital from July 2019 to June 2022 were reviewed. Resistant Gram-positive bacteria were defined as a pathogen susceptible only to glycopeptide or linezolid in vitro (e.g., methicillin-resistant staphylococci, penicillin-resistant viridans streptococci, and ampicillin-resistant enterococci). Episodes were compared to identify independent risk factors for resistant Gram-positive bacteremia. RESULTS: Of 225 episodes, 78 (34.7%) involved resistant Gram-positive bacteremia. Multivariate analysis revealed that breakthrough bacteremia while being administered antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 6.794; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.130-14.749; P < 0.001) and catheter-related infection (aOR 4.039, 95% CI 1.366-11.946; P = 0.012) were associated with resistant Gram-positive bacteremia. Chronic liver disease (aOR 0.231, 95% CI 0.059-0.905; P = 0.035) and hypotension at bacteremia (aOR 0.454, 95% CI 0.218-0.945; P = 0.035) were inversely associated with resistant Gram-positive bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: Resistant Gram-positive bacteria should be considered in breakthrough bacteremia and catheter-related infection in febrile neutropenic patients with cancer.

Prognostic performance of IL-6 and IL-10 in febrile pediatric hematology/oncology patients with normal procalcitonin.

INTRODUCTION: It is important to predict adverse outcomes in febrile children with hematology/oncology diseases. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a promising biomarker for the prediction of infection severity, but further studies have revealed its performance in excluding adverse outcomes of infection. IL-6 and IL-10 were reported to have a close association with those infection outcomes. The aim of the study was to investigate the performance of IL-6 and IL-10 in febrile pediatric hematology/oncology patients with normal PCT. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary children's hospital in China over the past ten years. Inflammatory biomarkers, including IL-6, IL-10, PCT and C-reactive protein (CRP), were detected at the onset of infection. Separate analyses were conducted in patients with neutropenia and without neutropenia. RESULTS: In total, 5987 febrile cases were enrolled. For patients with neutropenia, IL-6, IL-10 and PCT were significantly increased in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI), gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) and severe sepsis (SS), but only IL-6 and IL-10 were predictive of GNB and SS. For patients without neutropenia, IL-6, IL-10 and PCT were significantly increased in patients with BSI, GNB and SS, but no biomarkers were predictive of adverse outcomes. All biomarkers failed to exclude patients with fever of unknown origin or upper respiratory infection/bronchitis in patients with neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: IL-6 and IL-10 could be predictors for GNB and SS in febrile patients with neutropenia and had some association with unfavorable outcomes in febrile patients without neutropenia. All biomarkers failed to exclude patients with fever of unknown origin or upper respiratory infection/bronchitis.

Clinical impact of a change in antibiotics or the addition of glycopeptide antibiotics for persistent febrile neutropenia after autologous stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: A change in empirical antibiotics or the addition of glycopeptide antibiotics is often applied in cases of persistent febrile neutropenia (FN) despite the administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics. However, the clinical benefit of these approaches remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of a change in antibiotics or the addition of glycopeptide antibiotics for persistent FN after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). We retrospectively reviewed the records of 208 patients who received auto-HCT at our institution between 2007 and 2019. FN that lasted for 4 days or longer was defined as persistent FN. We compared the time to defervescence between patients whose initial antibiotics were changed and/or who additionally received glycopeptide antibiotics, and those without these antibiotic modifications. RESULTS: Among patients who fulfilled the criteria of persistent FN (n = 125), changes in antibiotics were not significantly associated with the time to defervescence in a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72, p = 0.27). On the other hand, the addition of glycopeptide antibiotics was paradoxically associated with a delay in defervescence (HR 0.56, p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Although there may be differences in patient backgrounds, no significant differences were observed in either a univariate or multivariate analysis. Since neither a change in antibiotics nor the addition of glycopeptide antibiotics was associated with earlier defervescence in persistent FN after auto-HCT, routine antibiotic modifications might not be necessary in this setting.

Association between inappropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy and mortality in gram-negative bloodstream infections in patients with febrile neutropenia and hematological malignancy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy has been associated with high mortality in patients with gram-negative bacilli bloodstream infections during febrile neutropenia following chemotherapy for hematological malignancies. The aim of this study is to determine this association in our hospital. METHODS: A single center, retrospective, cohort study of bloodstream infection due to gram-negative bacilli and febrile neutropenia was conducted. Clinical characteristics, microbiological etiology, antimicrobial resistance profile, empirical and targeted antibiotic therapy, intensive care unit admission, persistent bacteremia and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 171 episodes of bloodstream infection due to gram-negative bacilli, empirical antimicrobial therapy was inappropriate in 43 episodes (25.1 %). There was a significant difference in mortality at 7 and 30 days between patients who received appropriate versus inappropriate empirical treatment (4.6 % versus 13.9 %, p = 0.04; 15.6 % versus 32.5 %, p = 0.016). Inappropriate empirical treatment (RR, 2.97 [95 % CI, 1.01-8.74]), shock at the time of febrile neutropenia diagnosis (RR, 6.5 [95 % CI, 1.83-23.05]) carbapenem-resistant microorganism (RR, 3.73 [95 % CI, 1.14-12.24]) and persistent bacteremia (RR, 84.6 [95 % CI, 11.3-629.4]) were associated with an increased mortality at 7 and 30 days. In the multivariate analysis, shock (RR, 4.85 [95 % CI, 2.10-11.65]) and persistent bacteremia was independently associated with increased 30-day mortality, but inappropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy was not an independent prognostic determinant (RR, 1.66 [0.53-4.82]). CONCLUSION: Shock at the time of febrile neutropenia diagnosis contributes to mortality in patients with gram-negative bacilli bloodstream infection, in this scenario, appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy should be encouraged.