An Updated Meta-Analysis of Treatment in Patients with Heart Failure Complicated Ventricular Functional Mitral Regurgitation.

Background: Ventricular functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is a common morbidity in patients with heart failure (HF). In addition to guideline-directed medical therapy, mitral valve (MV) repair or replacement has become an option for such patients. However, the impact of different treatments on cardiac remodeling, function, and clinical outcomes remains unclear. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Clinical Trials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with search terms related to mitral regurgitation, mitral valve repair, surgical mitral valve replacement, mitral annuloplasty device, and MitraClip. The outcomes were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular (LV) remodeling, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and HF hospitalization. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing high-bias risk studies. The analysis was done by Review Manager 5.4 Analyzer and MedCalc Statistical Software version 19.2.6. Results: This meta-analysis included 10 studies with a total of 2533 patients (567 with transcatheter MitraClip, 823 with surgical MV repair, 651 with surgical MV replacement, and 492 with medical therapy). Our meta-analysis revealed that surgical MV repair had significant improvement in LVEF compared to the surgical MV replacement (mean differences (MD) 2.32, [95% CI 0.39, 4.25]), while transcatheter MitraClip treatment was associated with LVEF reduction (MD -4.82, [95% CI -7.29, -2.34]). In terms of LV remodeling, transcatheter MitraClip treatment was associated with improvement in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (MD -10.36, [95% CI -18.74, -1.99]). Furthermore, compared to surgical MV replacement, surgical MV repair was not associated with a reduction of all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.83, [95% CI 0.61, 1.13]) and cardiovascular death (RR 0.95, [95% CI 0.56, 1.62]), while transcatheter MitraClip was associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.87, [95% CI 0.78, 0.98]). Conclusions: Surgical MV repair was associated with significant improvement in LVEF but had no significant effect on all-cause mortality compared to surgical MV replacement. Transcatheter MitraClip was associated with better long-term survival than the non-MitraClip group, thus, transcatheter MitraClip could be considered an alternative treatment in patients with HF-complicated ventricular FMR.

Impacts of Left Atrial Appendage Treatments on Mitral Valve Diseases during Surgical Ablations.

Background: Left atrial appendages (LAAs) play an important role in regulating left atrial function, and much evidence supports the possibility that changes in left atrial structure may cause or worsen mitral regurgitation. This study intended to investigate the outcomes of patients with mitral regurgitation who underwent left atrial appendage closure (resection or endocardial closure) during isolated surgical ablations. Methods: Patients with mild or moderate mitral regurgitation who received isolated surgical ablations for atrial fibrillation (AF) in our center from 2013 to 2022 were referred. During follow-up, each clinical visit was composed of medical interrogation, a 24 h Holter, and echocardiographic evaluation. Death, atrial fibrillation, worsening of mitral regurgitation, and stroke were evaluated as outcomes. Freedom from outcomes whose results were adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting for causal effects after acquiring propensity scores. Results: A total of 456 patients were enrolled in this study. During a median follow-up of 48 months, 30 deaths and 11 cases of stroke were observed. After adjustments, no significant differences in terms of death or stroke were observed among the three groups. Patients who underwent resection or endocardial closure during surgical ablations had a higher risk of mitral regurgitation worsening during follow-up (p < 0.05). During the whole follow-up, patients who underwent left atrial appendage interventions showed significantly larger left atrial and mitral annular diameters, as well as lower tethering height than those who had left atrial appendage preserved (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Mitral regurgitation was more likely to get worse when patients with fundamental mitral diseases underwent LAA interventions during isolated surgical AF ablations. In the absence of LAA, the dilation of the left atrium and mitral annulus may ultimately lead to worsening of regurgitation.

Eligibility to COAPT trial in the daily practice: A real-world experience.

BACKGROUND: The COAPT Trial was the first ever to demonstrate a survival benefit in treating functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). That was achieved through transcatheter mitral repair in selected patients. The exact proportion of patients fulfilling COAPT selection criteria in the real-world is unknown. AIMS: To assess the applicability of COAPT criteria in real world and its impact on patients' survival. METHODS: We assessed the clinical data and follow-up results of all consecutive patients admitted for FMR at our Department between January 2016 and May 2021 according to COAPT eligibility. COAPT eligibility was retrospectively assessed by a cardiac surgeon and a cardiologist. RESULTS: Among 394 patients, 56 (14%) were COAPT eligible. The most frequent reasons for exclusion were MR ≤ 2 (22%), LVEF < 20% or >50% (19%), and non-optimized GDMT (21.3%). Among Non-COAPT patients, weighted 4-year survival was higher in patients who received MitraClip compared to those who were left in optimized medical therapy (91.5% confidence interval [CI: 0.864, 0.96] vs. 71.8% [CI: 0.509, 0.926], respectively, p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority (14%) of real-world patients with FMR referred to a tertiary hospital fulfilled the COAPT selection criteria. Among Non-COAPT patients, weighted 4-year survival was higher in patients who received MitraClip compared to those who were left in optimized medical therapy (91.5% [0.864, 0.96] vs. 71.8% [0.509, 0.926], respectively, p = 0.027).

Efficacy of Native T1 Mapping for Patients With Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Ventricular Functional Mitral Regurgitation Undergoing Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy of left ventricular (LV) myocardial damage by native T1mapping obtained with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 40 symptomatic non-ischemic heart failure (HF) patients and ventricular functional mitral regurgitation (VFMR) undergoing TEER. LV myocardial damage was defined as the native T1Z-score, which was converted from native T1values obtained with CMR. The primary endpoint was defined as HF rehospitalization or cardiovascular death over 12 months after TEER. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that the native T1Z-score was the only independent parameter associated with cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 3.40; 95% confidential interval 1.51-7.67), and that patients with native T1Z-scores <2.41 experienced significantly fewer cardiovascular events than those with native T1Z-scores ≥2.41 (P=0.001). Moreover, the combination of a native T1Z-score <2.41 and more severe VFMR (effective regurgitant orifice area [EROA] ≥0.30 cm2) was associated with fewer cardiovascular events than a native T1Z-score ≥2.41 and less severe VFMR (EROA <0.30 cm2; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of baseline LV myocardial damage based on native T1Z-scores obtained with CMR without gadolinium-based contrast media is a valuable additional parameter for better management of HF patients and VFMR following TEER.

Relationship between the severity of functional mitral regurgitation at admission and one-year outcomes in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiological distribution of functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) in heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) patients and its impact on outcomes remains unclear. We attempt to investigate the prognosis of FMR in patients with HFmrEF. METHODS: The HF center registry study is a prospective, single, observational study conducted at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, where 2330 patients with acute HF (AHF) were enrolled and 890 HFmrEF patients were included in the analysis. The patients were stratified into three categories based on the severity of FMR: none/mild, moderate, and moderate-to-severe/severe groups. Subsequently, a comparison of the clinical characteristics among these groups was conducted, along with an assessment of the incidence of the primary endpoint (comprising all-cause mortality and readmission for HF) during a one-year follow-up period. RESULTS: The one-year follow-up results indicated that the primary composite endpoint occurrence rates in the three groups were 23.5%, 32.9%, and 36.5%, respectively. The all-cause mortality rates in the three groups were 9.3%, 13.7%, and 16.4% respectively. Survival analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in the occurrence rates of the primary composite endpoint and all-cause mortality among the three groups (P < 0.05). Multifactor Cox regression revealed that moderate FMR and moderate-to-severe/severe FMR were independent risk factors for adverse clinical prognosis in HFmrEF patients, with hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of 1.382 (1.020-1.872, P = 0.037) and 1.546 (1.092-2.190, P = 0.014) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate FMR and moderate-to-severe/severe FMR independently predict an unfavorable prognosis in patients with HFmrEF.

Predictors of functional mitral regurgitation improvement in patients with left bundle branch block treated with left bundle branch area pacing.

BACKGROUND: Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and its severity are associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure patients. This study aims to analyze the predictors of FMR improvement after successful left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in patients with LVEF < 50% and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB). METHODS: Consecutive patients with LVEF < 50% and CLBBB who underwent successful LBBAP from July 2018 to July 2023 were retrospectively identified. Significant MR was defined as regurgitation of moderate severity or greater. Patients with significant FMR were included in the analysis. FMR improvement (FMRI) was defined as a reduction of at least one grade in regurgitation severity compared to baseline at 3 months or longer follow-up. RESULTS: Among the 81 identified patients, 42 patients with significant FMR preoperatively were included. After LBBAP, QRS duration significantly shortened from 170.6 ± 18.8 ms to 114.5 ± 20.2 ms (p < .001). Significant FMR improves in approximately 76.2%, and the patients were divided into an FMRI group (n = 32) and a non-FMRI group (n = 10). Univariate analysis showed that absence of persistent atrial fibrillation, typical CLBBB, and left atrium diameter at baseline were associated with improvement of FMR after LBBAP. Of these variables, only absence of persistent atrial fibrillation remains an independent predictor in the multivariate model (OR 12.436, p = .009). CONCLUSION: LBBAP is able to improve FMR in heart failure patients who had CLBBB with LVEF < 50%. Meanwhile, the absence of persistent atrial fibrillation is an independent predictor of FMR improvement.

Treatment of Moderate Functional Mitral Regurgitation during Aortic Valve Replacement: A Cohort Study.

Background: Treatment of moderate functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) during aortic valve replacement (AVR) is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different surgical strategies in patients with moderate FMR undergoing AVR. Methods: A total of 468 patients with moderate FMR undergoing AVR from January 2010 to December 2019 were retrospectively studied comparing 3 different surgical strategies, namely isolated AVR, AVR + mitral valve repair (MVr) and AVR + mitral valve replacement (MVR). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test, followed by inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis to adjust the between-group imbalances. The primary outcome was overall mortality. Results: Patients underwent isolated AVR (35.3%), AVR + MVr (30.3%), or AVR + MVR (34.4%). The median follow-up was 27.1 months. AVR + MVR was associated with better improvement of FMR during the early and follow-up period compared to isolated AVR and AVR + MVr (p < 0.001). Compared to isolated AVR, AVR + MVR increased the risk of mid-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-4.48, p = 0.046), which was sustained in the IPTW analysis (HR: 4.15, 95% CI: 1.69-10.15, p = 0.002). In contrast, AVR + MVr showed only a tendency to increase the risk of follow-up mortality (HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 0.72-3.67, p = 0.239), which was more apparent in the IPTW analysis (HR: 2.54, 95% CI: 0.98-6.56, p = 0.054). Conclusions: In patients with severe aortic valve disease and moderate FMR, isolated AVR might be more reasonable than AVR + MVr or AVR + MVR.

Outcomes of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for atrial functional mitral regurgitation: A meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) may have potential benefits in the treatment of atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR), but robust evidence is currently lacking. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the clinical outcomes of TEER for AFMR, including comparisons to ventricular functional MR (VFMR). METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through January 2023 to identify studies eligible for analysis. The primary outcome was postprocedural MR severity. Postprocedural New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class classification and all-cause mortality were also evaluated. Outcomes were stratified into short term (postprocedure to 6 months) and long term (6 months to 2 years). RESULTS: A total of eight observational studies met the inclusion criteria, enrolling 539 AFMR and 3486 VFMR patients. Postprocedural MR grade ≤2 in the AFMR group was observed in 93.7% (454/491 patients; 95% confidence interval (CI), 91.1%-96.2%, I2 = 24.3%) and 97.1% (89/93 patients; 95% CI, 92.9%-100%, I2 = 26.4%) in short- and long-term follow-up, respectively. There was no difference in the rates of postprocedural MR grade ≤2 between AFMR and VFMR either in short-term (risk ratio [RR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.95-1.06]; p = 0.90; I2 = 53%) or long-term follow-up (RR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.89-1.32]; p = 0.44; I2 = 22%). Similarly, no difference was observed between AFMR and VFMR in the rates of postprocedural NYHA class ≤2 or all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: TEER provides similar clinical outcomes for AFMR and VFMR. A high rate of MR grade ≤2 was observed in patients at both short- and long-term follow-ups. Further prospective studies with TEER versus medical therapy and/or rhythm control for AFMR are warranted.

Peak left atrial longitudinal strain is associated with all-cause mortality in patients with ventricular functional mitral regurgitation.

PURPOSE: Chronic mitral regurgitation promotes left atrial (LA) remodeling. However, the significance of LA dysfunction in the setting of ventricular functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) has not been fully investigated. Our aim was to assess the prognostic impact of peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS), a surrogate of LA function, in patients with FMR and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: Patients with at least mild ventricular FMR and LVEF < 50% under optimized medical therapy who underwent transthoracic echocardiography at a single center were retrospectively identified in the laboratory database. PALS was assessed by 2D speckle tracking in the apical 4-chamber view and the study population was divided in two groups according to the best cut-off value of PALS, using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. The primary endpoint-point was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 307 patients (median age 70 years, 77% male) were included. Median LVEF was 35% (IQR: 27 - 40%) and median effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) was 15mm2 (IQR: 9 - 22mm2). According to current European guidelines, 32 patients had severe FMR (10%). During a median follow-up of 3.5 years (IQR 1.4 - 6.6), 148 patients died. The unadjusted mortality incidence per 100 persons-years increased with progressively lower values of PALS. On multivariable analysis, PALS remained independently associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.052 per % decrease; 95% CI: 1.010 - 1.095; P = 0.016), even after adjustment for several (n = 14) clinical and echocardiographic confounders. CONCLUSION: PALS is independently associated with all-cause mortality in patients with reduced LVEF and ventricular FMR.

Identification of factors associated with progression of left atrial enlargement in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Left atrial (LA) enlargement frequently occurs in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, and this enlargement is associated with the development of heart failure, thromboembolism, or atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR). AF patients can develop LA enlargement over time, but its progression depends on the individual. So far, the factors that cause progressive LA enlargement in AF patients have thus not been elucidated, so that the aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with the progression of LA enlargement in AF patients. We studied 100 patients with persistent or permanent AF (aged: 67 ± 2 years, 40 females). Echocardiography was performed at baseline and 12 (5-30) months after follow-up. LA size was evaluated as the LA volume index which was calculated with the biplane modified Simpson's method from apical four-and two-chamber views, and then normalized to the body surface area (LAVI). The deterioration of AFMR after follow-up was defined as a deterioration in severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) by a grade of 1 or more. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that hypertension (p = .03) was an independently associated parameter of progressive LA enlargement, as was baseline LAVI. In addition, the Kaplan-Meier curve indicated that patients with hypertension tended to show greater deterioration of AFMR after follow-up than those without hypertension (log-rank p = .08). Hypertension proved to be strongly associated with progression of LA enlargement over time in patients with AF. Our findings provide new insights for better management of patients with AF to prevent the development of AFMR.

Mitral valve leaflet stiffness predicts residual mitral regurgitation after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair.

BACKGROUND: Residual regurgitation after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVR) is a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). This study sought to identify the mitral valve (MV) parameters measured by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE) and MV leaflet features that predict residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after TMVR in patients with FMR. METHODS: Consecutive patients with FMR who underwent TMVR were classified into two groups based on the degree of residual MR just after TMVR: < 2+ in the optimal MR reduction group and ≥ 2+ in the suboptimal MR reduction group. The two groups were compared with respect to 3D-TEE parameters and the MV leaflet features, including the following parameters: stiffness, defined as a leaflet that remains at a fixed angle even during diastole, and thickness, measured in both clear and rough zones. RESULTS: Thirty-four of 46 patients (74%) were classified as the optimal MR reduction group. Multivariable analysis showed that anterior mitral leaflet + posterior mitral leaflet length/anteroposterior annulus diameter (p = .044) and MV leaflet stiffness (p = .007) were independent predictors of residual MR. CONCLUSION: MV leaflet stiffness and the ratio of MV leaflet lengths to the annulus diameter may be good predictors of residual MR after TMVR in patients with FMR.

Transcatheter edge to edge repair using the ease-of-use valve clamp system for functional mitral regurgitation: a primary report.

PURPOSE: The ValveClamp system is a novel edge-to-edge mitral valve repair system designed for the ease of operation. We report the outcomes of our initial experience of treating functional mitral regurgitation (MR) with the ValveClamp system. METHODS: The subjects of this study were patients with symptomatic functional MR despite standard medical therapy, who were treated with transapical ValveClamp implantation. The patients were divided into an atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR) group and a ventricular functional mitral regurgitation (VFMR) group. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were evaluated at baseline and then at the 3-month follow up. RESULTS: Twelve patients, with a median age of 71 years (range 65-78 years), were assigned to the AFMR group (n = 5) or the VFMR group (n = 7). The device implantation rate was 100%, and 10 (83.3%) patients required implantation of only one clamp. The catheter time was less than 10 min in half of the patients, the fastest time being 5 min. There were no procedure-related complications. At the 3-month follow up, all patients were free from all-cause mortality, surgery, and rehospitalization. MR improved to ≤ 2 + in all 12 patients with MR grade 3 + or 4 + at baseline, (100%) and to ≤ 1 + in 9 of these patients (75%), with a low-pressure gradient. The left atrial diameter and the left ventricular end diastolic diameter decreased significantly in both the AFMR and VFMR groups. The left ventricular eject fraction at the 3-month follow up showed a rising trend in both the AFMR and VFMR groups, whereas PASP decreased remarkably. All 12 patients with baseline NYHA functional class III/IV (100%) showed improvement of at least 1 class, and 2 of these patients (16.7%) showed improvement of at least 2 classes. CONCLUSIONS: The ValveClamp system is simple and effective for transapical transcatheter edge to edge repair in patients with functional MR.

Arrythmia-Mediated Valvular Heart Disease.

The aging population is rising at record pace worldwide. Along with it, a steep increase in the prevalence of atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is to be expected. Similarly, both atrial functional mitral and tricuspid regurgitation (AFMR and AFTR) are increasingly observed in daily clinical practice. This article summarizes all current evidence regarding the epidemiology, prognosis, pathophysiology, and therapeutic options. Specific attention is addressed to discern AFMR and AFTR from their ventricular counterparts, given their different pathophysiology and therapeutic needs.

Atrioventricular coupling and left atrial abnormality in type 2 diabetes mellitus with functional mitral regurgitation patients verified by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients induced by left ventricular (LV) enlargement and mitral valve abnormality may aggravated the impairment in left atrial (LA) compliance. Thus, this study aimed to depict how FMR and LV dysfunction affect LA compliance in T2DM patients with FMR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 148 patients with T2DM and 49 age- and sex-matched normal controls underwent cardiac magnetic resonance examination. LA longitudinal strain and LA and LV functional indices were compared among controls and different T2DM patients. The multivariate analysis was used to identify the independent indicators of LA longitudinal strain. RESULTS: T2DM Patients without FMR had a lower total LA empty fraction (LAEF) compared with the controls (all P < 0.05). T2DM patients with mild and moderate FMR showed increased LA volume (LAV) and LV volume while decreased LAEF, LA strain, and LV ejection fraction (P < 0.05). T2DM patients with severe FMR showed markedly increased LAV and LV volume while decreased LAEF, LA strain, and LVEF (P < 0.05). In T2DM patients with FMR, reservoir strain (εs) was independently correlated with LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) (ß = - 0.334) and regurgitation degree (ß = - 0.256). The passive strain (εe) was independently correlated with regurgitation degree (ß = - 0.297), whereas the active strain (εa) was independently correlated with LVESV (ß = - 0.352) and glycated haemoglobin (ß = - 0.279). CONCLUSION: FMR may aggravate LA and LV dysfunction in T2DM patients. Regurgitation degree was an independent determinant of the εs and the εe, LVEDV was an independent determinant of the εs, and LVESV was an independent determinant of the εa in T2DM patients with FMR.

The Prevalence and Characteristics of Mitral Regurgitation in Heart Failure: A Chart Review Study.

Background: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is one of the common complications of heart failure (HF). The prevalence and characteristics of MR are rarely investigated, especially in the Chinese population. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of non-organic MR in HF patients and subgroups defined by ejection fraction. Methods: A single-center, hospital-based, and retrospective chart review study included patients with heart failure admitted to the cardiovascular department from January 2017 to April 2020. Demographic characteristics, laboratory results, and echocardiogram results before discharge were analyzed in different groups defined by left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) using logistic regression and adjusted for confounders. Results: Finally, 2418 validated HF patients (age 67.2 ± 13.5 years; 68.03% men) were included. The prevalence of MR was 32.7% in HF, 16.7% in HF with preserve EF patients, 28.4% in HF with mid-range EF patients and 49.7% in HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) patients. In the HF with preserved EF group, multivariable logistic regression showed that 4 factors associated with MR including EF (odds ratio (OR) 0.954 (0.928-0.981), p = 0.001), left ventricular posterior wall thickness in diastolic phase (LVPWd) (OR 0.274 (0.081-0.932), p = 0.038), left atrium (LA) dimension (OR 2.049 (1.631-2.576), p < 0.001) and age (OR 1.024 (1.007-1.041), p = 0.007). In the HF with midrange EF group, multivariable logistic regression showed that 3 factors associated with MR including LA dimension (OR 2.009 (1.427-2.829), p < 0.001), triglycerides (TG) (OR 0.552 (0.359-0.849), p = 0.007) and digoxin (OR 2.836 (1.624-4.951), p < 0.001). In the HFrEF group, multivariable logistic regression showed that 7 factors associated with MR including EF (OR 0.969 (0.949-0.990), p = 0.004), (OR 0.161 (0.067-0.387), p < 0.001), LA dimension (OR 2.289 (1.821-2.878), p < 0.001), age (OR 1.016 (1.004-1.027)), p = 0.009), TG (OR 0.746 (0.595-0.936), p = 0.011), diuretics (OR 0.559 (0.334-0.934), p = 0.026) and ICD (OR 1.898 (1.074-3.354), p = 0.027). Conclusions: HF patients had a high burden of MR, particularly in the HFrEF group. Worsen cardiac structure (LA dimension and LVPWd) and function (EF), age, and medical treatment strategy played essential roles in MR.

Transcatheter mitral valve repair in patient with atrial functional mitral regurgitation using novel DragonFly™ device.

We report the first case of transcatheter mitral valve repair with the novel DragonFly™ device, a transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral regurgitation (MR) repair device, in a patient with severe, symptomatic MR due to annular dilation from atrial functional disease (Carpentier type I). The patient had experienced multiple heart failure events and was unsuitable for surgery due to pulmonary dysfunction and obesity.

Mitral valve repair and concomitant maze procedure versus catheter ablation in the treatment of atrial functional mitral regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: To compare mitral valve (MV) repair and concomitant maze procedure with catheter ablation in treating patients with atrial functional mitral regurgitation (AFMR). METHODS: We retrospectively identified 126 patients with AFMR from January 2012 to December 2015. Of these patients, 60 patients underwent MV repair and concomitant maze procedure, and 66 patients received catheter ablation. Patients were followed up for 7.98 ± 2.01 years. The survival, readmission of heart failure (HF), persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), persistent moderate-severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid Regurgitation (TR), and echocardiographic data were analyzed in the follow-up. Predictors of readmission of HF were analyzed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline and echocardiographic characteristics, in-hospital mortality, and other adverse events postoperatively between two groups. The surgical group was associated with lower rates of MR > 2 + grade either at discharge (P = 0.0023) or in the follow-up (P = 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of overall survival between the two groups. The surgical group was associated with a lower rate of readmission of HF and AF in the follow-up. Univariable and multivariable analysis confirmed AF at discharge, moderate-severe MR at discharge, no MV surgery, moderate-severe TR at discharge, and LA volume as predictors of readmission of HF. Both groups experienced significant reverse cardiac remodeling. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that for the treatment of AFMR with persistent or long-standing persistent AF and moderate-severe MR, MV repair and concomitant maze procedure may achieve a better outcome than catheter ablation procedure.

Effect of oral tolvaptan for 1 year in patients with functional mitral regurgitation.

The effect of the oral selective vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist tolvaptan for chronic phase therapy on patients with FMR remains unclear. We aimed to determine the efficacy of oral tolvaptan in patients with significant functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) to reduce the mortality and rehospitalization due to worsening heart failure (HF). We enrolled 219 patients (mean age 76 ± 9 years, 59.4% men) who were admitted at our hospital due to congestive HF during different two 1-year periods. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those who had significant FMR (MR ≥ grade 2 [n = 76]) and those who did not (MR < grade 2 [n = 143]) at discharge. The patients were further divided into a study group that received tolvaptan during follow-up and a control group that did not receive tolvaptan. We used an inverse probability of treatment weighting method with the primary end point defined as overall all-cause mortality and rehospitalization due to worsening HF within 1 year. Of the 76 patients with significant FMR at discharge, 2 of 20 (10%) who were administered tolvaptan died and 8 (40%) were readmitted to a hospital. Of the 56 patients who did not receive tolvaptan, 2 (3.5%) died and 18 (27.5%) required rehospitalization. After multiple adjustments, there were no significant differences for overall survival and rehospitalization between the groups (log-rank p = 0.700 and 0.510, respectively). Our results suggest that oral tolvaptan administration in addition to conventional diuretics had less impact on outcomes in patients with significant FMR.

A Case of Transient Mitral Regurgitation: Not Everything Is Always What It Seems.

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common form of valvular heart disease that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. MR can be broadly classified into 2 different categories: primary and secondary MR. Primary MR usually is caused by leaflet abnormalities, whereas secondary MR is a chronic disease secondary to geometric distortion of both the annulus and subvalvular apparatus because of left ventricular remodeling. Without acute changes in loading conditions, myocardial blood flow, or rhythm disturbances, functional MR typically is not transient. In this E-Challenge, the authors show a transient and completely reversible acute and severe form of functional MR with the use of multimodal echocardiography.

Atrial functional mitral regurgitation: The concept has evolved, but inconsistencies still remain.

In our commentary we elucidated the fact that functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is divided into two morphological subtypes: annular dilation with normal leaflet motion (Carpentier type I) and restricted systolic motion with left ventricular remodeling or dysfunction (Carpentier type IIIb). However, these phenotypes show some degree of overlap and there are currently no distinctive diagnostic cut-off values, therefore they may represent a continuum of the same disease. Moreover, correct left chambers quantification is critical for differentiating between atrial FMR and ventricular FMR. Three-dimensional echocardiography can quantify better leaflet areas, lengths, and closing angles, as well as the coaptation index, by eliminating geometric assumptions and integrating tethering of all leaflet surface and annular area enlargement. Also, It is expected that the use of artificial intelligence solutions and the deployment of automated onboard software that requires no or limited human input will stimulate wider clinical use of three-dimensional echocardiography in left chambers quantification.