Patient-reported experience with hypoglossal nerve stimulation in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

BACKGROUND: Breathing-synchronized hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) is routinely used as an alternative treatment for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Significant and clinically relevant improvements in disease severity and OSA symptoms such as daytime sleepiness as well as overall quality of life have been reported in randomized-controlled trials and large real-world cohort studies. However, so far, few data exist on patient-reported experience with the treatment. METHODS: A structured survey with 22 questions was constructed using five-level Likert scales (1 = no agreement, 5 = complete agreement) to evaluate patient experience with HNS and perception of the treatment in the domains "Overall experience with therapy," "Experience with treatment process," and "Side-effects from treatment." Additional data were collected on current symptom status, measured with Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) questionnaire, and OSA disease history. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to test associations of medical variables and response behavior. Correlations between variables and domains, as well as individual items, were assessed using Spearman rank test. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients from Germany who were treated with breathing-synchronized HNS were enrolled (mean age 57.3 years, 78% male), and 71 questionnaires with complete data were included for analysis. Two-thirds of participants (67%) had a history of OSA history for 5 years or longer. Of all patients, 76% had normalized OSA symptoms at time of the study (ESS: 6.4 ± 5.0) and 98% reported using stimulation therapy every night. Regression analysis revealed an association of current symptoms measured with ESS and response behavior. Hence, patients with normalized daytime sleepiness reported significantly more positive experience across all domains assessed, compared to patients with residual daytime sleepiness. Overall, only 2% of participants reported side effects that made them reduce or discontinue stimulation therapy. The rate of reported side effects was associated with current symptom control under therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Overall patient-reported experience with breathing-synchronized HNS therapy was positive and high satisfaction with the treatment process was observed. Side effects occurred, but rarely affected subjective use of the therapy or satisfaction. Subjective experience and perception are influenced by residual daytime sleepiness with stimulation therapy.

Surgical management of large lower cranial nerves schwannomas: long term results of a less aggressive resection strategy.

In an effort to reduce the high morbidity and life-threatening complications after radical resection in large schwannoma surgery, alternative strategies of nontotal resections have emerged. To evaluate the long term clinical and oncological outcome after lower cranial nerves (LCN) schwannoma surgery operated on with a cranial nerve-sparing technique. Single center retrospective cohort study of 8 consecutive patients harboring LCN schwannomas operated on between March 2005 and October 2021. The mean LCN schwannoma diameter was 33 mm (range 26-51). Seven patients (87,5%) underwent a modified retrosigmoid approach. Three patients underwent gross total resection (37,5%), 3 had received neartotal resection (mean tumor residue 0,25 cc) and subtotal resection in 2 patients who presented with an extracranial extension of the tumor (mean tumor residue 2,44 cc). Both patients had received upfront additional GKRS. The three patients who presented with preoperative CN IX & X injuries recovered within 6 months after surgery. All of the five patients freed from any preoperative CNs IX & X symptoms experienced transient (80%) or definitive (one patient) disturbances after surgery. They all improved within 6 months but one who required long term gastrostomy feeding tube. This patient harbored a schwannoma originating from the glossopharyngeal nerve, which could not be anatomically preserved during surgery. Tumor control was achieved in 100% of cases with a mean follow-up of 91 months. LCN schwannomas could be surgically removed through a less aggressive non-radical resection strategy with acceptable functional results and excellent tumor control.

An Unusual Case of Contralateral Hypoglossal and Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsies Following Endotracheal Intubation.

We present an unusual case of a 62-year-old male presenting with contralateral hypoglossal and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsies following endotracheal intubation for emergency cardiac surgery. Postoperative, the patient was referred to Speech and Language Therapy due to concerns regarding the safety of his swallow. Oromotor assessment revealed left-sided tongue weakness and aphonia. Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) revealed a right vocal cord palsy and severe oropharyngeal dysphagia. There were no other focal neurological signs. An MRI head did not demonstrate a medial medullary stroke or other intracranial lesion. CT neck showed no abnormality identified in relation to the course of the right vagus nerve or recurrent laryngeal nerve at the skull base or through the neck respectively. The patient required a gastrostomy for nutrition and hydration. He continued to be assessed at several month intervals over the course of a year using FEES to obtain a range of voice, secretion and swallowing outcome measures. The patient commenced intensive dysphagia therapy targeting pharyngeal drive, hyolaryngeal excursion and laryngeal sensation. Swallow manoeuvres were trialled during FEES and a head-turn to the side of the vocal cord palsy during deglutition reduced aspiration risk which expedited return to oral intake. The patient had partial recovery over twelve months. Hypoglossal nerve palsy completely resolved. The right vocal cord remained paralysed however the left vocal cord compensated enabling the patient to produce a normal voice. The patient was able to take thin fluids and regular diet and the gastrostomy was removed.

Should lateral wall collapse be a contraindication for hypoglossal nerve stimulation?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to examine how lateral wall collapse affects treatment outcomes for hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) patients. METHODS: Patients (n = 111) queried from a single surgeon's database of HNS cases were divided into groups based on their degree of oropharyngeal lateral wall collapse noted on drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE): Complete, Partial, None. For each group, apnea hypopnea index (AHI) reduction, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score, stimulation voltage, average nightly usage, need for alternate device configuration/awake sleep endoscopy, and rate of surgical success were collected. Patients with Complete collapse were compared to those with Partial/None via Student's t-tests and Pearson's Chi-square test. RESULTS: Of the 111 eligible patients, 45 had complete, 30 partial, and 36 had no lateral oropharyngeal wall collapse. There were no statistically significant differences found between the Complete and Partial/None groups in terms of age, BMI, sex, AHI (pre and post-op), ESS (pre and post-op), voltage, alternate device configuration, or nightly adherence. Notably, a significantly greater number of the Partial/None group had surgical success (84.84 % vs 66.67 %, p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Partial/None oropharyngeal collapse were significantly more likely than patients with Complete lateral wall collapse to see surgical success. There are many factors to weigh when assessing a patient's surgical candidacy, it is clear that complete lateral wall collapse at the level of the oropharynx is a negative predictor for success in HNS.

Addressing the gaps: What social media tells us about patient experiences with hypoglossal nerve stimulation.

PURPOSE: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) can be an effective treatment for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in positive airway pressure (PAP) intolerant patients. To better understand patient perceptions of HNS therapy, we explored three Facebook groups pertaining to HNS therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of Facebook posts from three HNS-related Facebook groups, from October 1, 2022 to October 1, 2023, was performed. Posts were analyzed for author attitude, content (adverse events, inquiries, or sharing information), and the inclusion of media within the post. RESULTS: From 737 Facebook posts, 752 events were identified, predominantly authored by patients or family (99.5 %). Few posts included media attachments (7.3 %), primarily photos (85.5 %). Post tone was mainly neutral (79.4 %), rather than positive (12.9 %) or negative (7.7 %). Most posts (53.6 %) were queries to the Facebook group, as opposed to sharing information (28.9 %) or detailing adverse events (17.6 %). Notably queries posed by Facebook group members included those pertaining to the postoperative recovery course (10.17 %), physical activity restrictions (6.20 %), HNS therapy eligibility (4.71 %), financial considerations (4.22 %), and more. CONCLUSION: Overall, Facebook group members reported a predominantly neutral tone, typically posting queries to the group rather than sharing information or detailing adverse events. These findings illustrate how diverse data sources, such as social media, can enhance our understanding of patient experiences and identify gaps in patient education with HNS therapy.

Comparative analysis of pain outcomes in hypoglossal nerve stimulation: Avoiding the digastric tendon.

OBJECTIVE: Upper airway stimulation effectively treats patients with obstructive sleep apnea, especially among those with low long-term compliance with continuous positive airway pressure. Traditional methods to implant the hypoglossal nerve stimulator involve retraction of the digastric tendon to identify the nerve and improve exposure for stimulator implantation. Transient submental pain and discomfort are known side effects of the procedure. Placement without retraction provides an alternative approach to minimize postoperative pain. This study compares post-operative pain outcomes of patients in whom the digastric tendon was and was not retracted. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients who received the hypoglossal nerve stimulation implant at a single institution between 2017 and 2021. A combination of descriptive and qualitative data, including age, gender, comorbidities, and postoperative symptoms are analyzed to characterize patient outcomes resulting from this intraoperative technique. The categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using chi-squared tests and independent t-tests, respectively. RESULTS: Patients report overall satisfaction after implantation and titration. A total of 108 patients underwent HGNS implantation between September 2017 and January 2021 using the aforementioned techniques. 1.69 % of patients experienced postoperative submental pain as compared to 18.37 % prior to the change in technique (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Avoidance of digastric tendon retraction in the implantation of the stimulating lead is a safe and effective technique that reduces postoperative pain and discomfort. Our institution has demonstrated an alternative technique for hypoglossal stimulator implantation which improves perioperative outcomes. LAY SUMMARY: Upper airway stimulation is an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. During surgery, the digastric tendon is often moved to identify the nerve and improve access. This study shows that avoiding digastric tendon movement safely reduces postoperative pain and discomfort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Treatment of a floppy epiglottis with upper airway stimulation therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of upper airway stimulation therapy in patients with a floppy epiglottis who have experienced continuous positive airway pressure failure or intolerance. METHODS: A retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted. Patients who received an Inspire Upper Airway Stimulation system and had a 1-year follow-up were included. Baseline and one-year in-laboratory polysomnography examinations were performed. Patient characteristics, Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores and upper airway stimulation device settings were collected. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients were included, of whom 10 had a floppy epiglottis. Patients with a floppy epiglottis had a significant therapeutic response to upper airway stimulation therapy, similar to patients without a floppy epiglottis. According to the Sher's success criteria, 90% of patients with a floppy epiglottis and 68% of patients without a floppy epiglottis were responders to therapy (p = 0.149). In the floppy epiglottis group, the apnea-hypopnea index decreased from 35.1 ± 5.5 events/hour to 11.2 ± 11.3 events/hour (95% CI (15.0, 32.9), p < 0.001), similarly in the non-floppy epiglottis group, the decline was from 36.4 ± 8.3 events/hour to 14.4 ± 9.5 events/hour (95% CI (18.6, 25.2), p < 0.001, between groups p = 0.659). Comparable reductions were observed for the other respiratory parameters. CONCLUSION: Treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea and a floppy epiglottis can be challenging. Continuous positive airway pressure may aggravate the epiglottis collapse. Upper airway stimulation therapy can be considered an effective alternative treatment option for patients with a floppy epiglottis who have encountered either continuous positive airway pressure failure or intolerance.

Comparative effectiveness of hypoglossal nerve stimulation and alternative treatments for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the primary therapeutic modality for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) management. However, despite efforts to encourage patients to comply with CPAP usage, long-term adherence remains low. Consequently, surgical intervention for OSA is considered a secondary option for patients who exhibit non-compliance with CPAP. Therefore, we conducted systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the relative effectiveness of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) treatment and alternative surgical interventions for managing OSA. Five databases were searched. Studies were included if they measured polysomnography parameters and assessed sleep apnea-related quality of life (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]) both before and after HNS, and compared these outcomes with control, CPAP, or airway surgery (uvulopalatopharyngoplasty, expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty, or tongue base surgery) groups. A total of 10 studies (2209 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Compared to other airway surgeries, the rates of post-treatment apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) < 10 and < 15 events/h were significantly lower in the HNS group (odds ratio [OR] 5.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-23.42; and 2.73, 95% CI 1.30-5.71, respectively). Additionally, postoperative AHI was significantly lower in the HNS group than in all other airway surgery groups (AHI: mean difference [MD] -8.00, 95% CI -12.03 to-3.97 events/h). However, there were no significant differences in the rate of post-treatment AHI < 5 events/h (OR 1.93, 95% CI 0.74-5.06) or postoperative ESS score (MD 0.40, 95% CI-1.52 to 2.32) between the two groups. HNS is an effective option for selected patients with moderate-to-severe OSA and CPAP intolerance.

Electric field aspects in hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea: A bilateral electrophysiological evaluation of unilateral electrode configuration changes.

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation is an established treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea in selected patients. A unilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulation system was approved a decade ago, yet the physiological effect of unilateral hypoglossal stimulation on bilateral tongue motion remains unclear. This study examined how electrode configuration, stimulation cuff position, or body mass index influenced the contralateral genioglossus electromyography (EMG) signal. Twenty-nine patients underwent three EMG recordings in a polysomnographic setting after being implanted with a unilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulator for at least 6 months. The ratio of EMG signals between the ipsi- and contralateral sides was evaluated. No difference in EMG signals was demonstrated based on electrode configurations, stimulation-cuff position, body-mass-index, or sleep apnea severity, even in patients with right tongue protrusion only. Our findings may be explained by a significant level of cross-innervation and by a smaller and less variable circumferential electric field than expected based on prior biophysical models. A patient's individual anatomy needs to be considered during therapy titration in order to achieve an optimal response.

An interesting case of crossed syndrome: ipsilateral facial paralysis with contralateral glossoplegia.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is rarely accompanied with peripheral facial paralysis and supranuclear palsy of the hypoglossal nerve. Both sides of the motor cortex innervate the hypoglossal nucleus; therefore, unilateral lesions of the upper motor neurons rarely result in contralateral lingual paresis. We report a rare case of crossed syndrome with associated hyperacute peripheral hemifacial paralysis and contralateral lingual paresis after a lower pontine tegmentum ischemic stroke. CASE PRESENTATION: A 73-year-old man presented with symptoms of hyperacute peripheral hemifacial paralysis. Upon protrusion, the patient's tongue deviated to the contralateral side, without fasciculation or atrophy. Brain imaging showed focal ischemic stroke in the pontine tegmentum. However, lingual hemiparesis and multimodal neuroimaging findings differed. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that cortico-hypoglossal fibers pass through the dorsal pontine. This case of crossed syndrome is a rare report of a lower pontine tegmentum ischemic stroke resembling an upper motor neuron lesion of the contralateral hypoglossal nerve.

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation versus positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea.

PURPOSE: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) has been shown to treat obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) effectively. The aim of this study was to compare HNS with positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment regarding outcome parameters: (1) sleepiness, (2) apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and (3) effectiveness. METHODS: Propensity score matching with nearest neighbor algorithm was used to compare outcomes of HNS and PAP therapy in a real-world setting. Data were collected at baseline and 12 months after initiating OSA treatment including demographics, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), AHI, and objective adherence data. To account for overall treatment efficacy, the mean disease alleviation (MDA) was calculated. RESULTS: Of 227 patients who received treatment consecutively, 126 could be matched 1:1 with regard to age, body mass index, and AHI. After matching, no statistically significant differences between the groups were found. A clinically important symptom improvement was seen at 12 months in both cohorts, though there was a greater difference in ESS improvement in patients treated with HNS (8.0 ± 5.1 points vs. 3.9 ± 6.8 points; p = 0.042). In both groups, mean posttreatment AHI was significantly reduced (HNS: 8.1 ± 6.3/h; PAP: 6.6 ± 8.0/h; p < 0.001). Adherence after 12 months among patients treated with HNS was higher than in those receiving PAP therapy (5.0 ± 2.6 h/night; 4.0 ± 2.1 h/night) but not with statistical significance. Overall effectiveness calculated with the MDA was 59% in patients treated with HNS compared to 51% receiving PAP. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with HNS therapy had significantly greater improvements in daytime sleepiness compared to PAP therapy, while the mean reduction of AHI and overall effectiveness were comparable for both treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT03756805.

Concurrent hypoglossal and phrenic nerve stimulation in patients with obstructive and treatment emergent central sleep apnea.

BACKGROUND: Patients with obstructive or central sleep apnea are primarily treated with positive airway pressure treatment. There are novel implantable options targeting either obstructive sleep apnea using hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) or central sleep apnea using phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS). METHODS: Patients with sleep apnea were implanted with both HNS and PNS devices, and their response to each therapy was monitored using home sleep tests as well as Epworth Sleepiness scale (ESS). RESULTS: We evaluated our concurrent neurostimulation approach in two patients. Both patients were implanted with two neuromodulation devices: The first case suffered from treatment emergent central sleep apnea after HNS activation for primarily obstructive sleep apnea (apnea-hypopnea index/AHI 54/h). The central portion resolved under PNS (AHI 23.7/h). The second case suffered from predominantly central sleep apnea (AHI 82/h). Here, the PNS device was implanted first, resulting in a subsequent reduction of the central portion. The residual obstructive sleep apnea was addressed using HNS (AHI 5.4/h). No interaction between the HNS and PNS systems was noticed in either of the two patients. CONCLUSIONS: In selected cases, a concurrent treatment with hypoglossal and phrenic nerve stimulation may lead to improvement of sleep apnea and patient satisfaction in a safe manner.

The effect of velar collapse patterns on unilateral upper airway stimulation therapy.

PURPOSE: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation is a promising alternative therapy for patients with obstructive sleep apnea with continuous positive airway pressure intolerance or failure. Previous studies concluded that a velar complete concentric collapse might prohibit a good therapeutic outcome. However, certain patients have an upper velar anteroposterior collapse and a lower velar complete concentric collapse. The effect of this velar collapse pattern is unknown, preventing evidence-based decision-making for these patients. This study aimed to compare the results of upper airway stimulation therapy in these patients to patients with a pure anteroposterior velar collapse. METHODS: A retrospective single-center cohort study was performed. Patients were included who were implanted with an upper airway stimulation device and had a 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Of 66 patients, 10 had an upper velar anteroposterior collapse and lower velar complete concentric collapse. Fifty-six patients had a complete or partial velar anteroposterior collapse. At follow-up, all respiratory outcomes were similarly changed between the two groups. The mean apnea and hypopnea index reduced equally (26.9 events/hour vs. 23.9 events/hour, 95% CI (-5.0, 11.0), p = 0.46). A similar decrease in the oxygen desaturation index of ≥ 4% was observed (12.0/hour versus 11.5/hour, 95% CI (-8.7, 9.7) p = 0.92) CONCLUSION: Patients with an upper velar anteroposterior collapse and a lower velar complete concentric collapse are suitable candidates for upper airway stimulation therapy. In these patients, the lower velum may represent a transition zone between the anteroposterior collapse of the upper velum and the lateral collapse of the oropharynx, instead of being a real concentric collapse.

Association of hypoglossal nerve stimulator response with machine learning identified negative effort dependence patterns.

BACKGROUND: Hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) is a therapeutic option for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Improved patient selection criteria are needed to target those most likely to benefit. We hypothesized that the pattern of negative effort dependence (NED) on inspiratory flow limited waveforms recorded during sleep, which has been correlated with the site of upper airway collapse, would contribute to the prediction of HGNS outcome. We developed a machine learning (ML) algorithm to identify NED patterns in pre-treatment sleep studies. We hypothesized that the predominant NED pattern would differ between HGNS responders and non-responders. METHODS: An ML algorithm to identify NED patterns on the inspiratory portion of the nasal pressure waveform was derived from 5 development set polysomnograms. The algorithm was applied to pre-treatment sleep studies of subjects who underwent HGNS implantation to determine the percentage of each NED pattern. HGNS response was defined by STAR trial criteria for success (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) reduced by > 50% and < 20/h) as well as by a change in AHI and oxygenation metrics. The predominant NED pattern in HGNS responders and non-responders was determined. Other variables including demographics and oxygenation metrics were also assessed between responders and non-responders. RESULTS: Of 45 subjects, 4 were excluded due to technically inadequate polysomnograms. In the remaining 41 subjects, ML accurately distinguished three NED patterns (minimal, non-discontinuous, and discontinuous). The percentage of NED minimal breaths was significantly greater in responders compared with non-responders (p = 0.01) when the response was defined based on STAR trial criteria, change in AHI, and oxygenation metrics. CONCLUSION: ML can accurately identify NED patterns in pre-treatment sleep studies. There was a statistically significant difference in the predominant NED pattern between HGNS responders and non-responders with a greater NED minimal pattern in responders. Prospective studies incorporating NED patterns into predictive modeling of factors determining HGNS outcomes are needed.

Important aspect of hypoglossal nerve injury following gunshot wound; Can the clivus has a role? A case report.

Cranial nerve palsies after gunshot injury are not uncommon. We report the mechanism of isolated hypoglossal nerve paralysis caused by a gunshot. We report a 74 years old patient in whom a bullet entered through the right nostril and then ended up right occipital condyle. The only neurologic deficit was tongue deviation which resolved in one week. The bullet was not removed. The effect of clival slope may have an importance in this type of injury.

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Explantation Technique and Outcomes: A Retrospective Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: Upper airway stimulation via the hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) implant is a surgical method for treating obstructive sleep apnea. However, patients may need the implant removed for a variety of reasons. The purpose of this case series is to assess surgical experiences with HGNS explantation at our institution. We report on surgical approach, overall operative times, operative and postoperative complications, and discuss relevant patient-specific surgical findings when removing the HGNS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case series of all patients that underwent HGNS implantation at a single tertiary medical center between January 9, 2021, and January 9, 2022. Subjects included adult patients who presented to the sleep surgery clinic of the senior author for surgical management of previously implanted HGNS. Patient clinical history was reviewed to determine the timing of the patient's implant, reasons for explant, and postoperative recovery course. Operative reports were reviewed to determine overall duration of surgery and any associated difficulties or deviations from the general approach. RESULTS: Between January 9, 2021, and January 9, 2022, 5 patients had an explantation of their HGNS implant. Explantation occurred between 8 and 63 months of their original implant surgery. The average operative time from incisional start time to close was 162 min for all cases with a range of 96-345 min. No significant complications were reported including pneumothorax and nerve palsy. CONCLUSION: This reported case series outlines the general steps for Inspire HGNS explantation as well as details the experiences in a case series of 5 subjects explanted over the year at a single institution. The results from the cases suggest that the explantation of the device can be performed efficiently and safely.

Bilateral Tapia's syndrome secondary to cervical spine injury: a case report and literature review.

A 24-year-old man presented with bilateral Tapia's syndrome (TS) after a traumatic cervical spine injury, manifested by apraxia of the hypoglossal and recurrent laryngeal nerves. The initial presentation was a profound inability to maintain upper respiratory airway patency due to bilateral vocal cord paralysis, accompanied by impairment of swallowing and loss of speech. The diagnosis was based on clinical grounds and verified by endoscopic laryngoscopy. A C7 corpectomy was performed for stabilizing the cervical spine, while conservative treatment with steroids was reserved for the TS. Over the following six months, there was complete resolution of the symptoms.

Parental experience of hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation in adolescents with Down Syndrome and obstructive sleep apnea.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to explore the experience of parents in deciding whether to participate in a clinical trial of the insertion of the Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator (HNS) to treat their adolescent with Down Syndrome (DS) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). DESIGN AND METHODS: A qualitative descriptive design with interviews was used to gather parental experiences from those who consented to HNS for their adolescent with DS and OSA. Interviews were conducted, audiotaped, and transcribed. Basic content analysis was followed to interpret the data. Using a process of data debriefing/engagement, codes were generated, and field/reflective notes were used to assure trustworthiness of the data. RESULTS: Parents, 13 mothers/2 fathers, participated. Three themes were identified: Parents experience desperation about acceptance of standard of care for their adolescent with DS and OSA. This desperation led parents to seek information/insights from social media and they came to rely on those sites to explore options, ultimately leading them to HNS clinical trial. Finally, parents had a desire to share experience with HNS implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Parents described being desperate at acceptance of standards of care for OSA. They shifted reliance on experts and parents by searching social media pages to explore options for treatment of OSA. Parents wished to share experiences with the HNS implantation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Nurses play a role in preparing for the HNS by instructing/educating parents. Nurses can identify supportive social media sites for parents during the HNS decision and suggest ways to measure outcomes of HNS.

[Combined therapy of severe obstructive sleep apnea]. / Kombinierte Therapie eines schwergradigen obstruktiven Schlafapnoesyndroms.

Obstructive sleep apnea is the most common breathing-related sleep disorder. The spectrum of therapy is wide ranging. The symptom of persistent daytime sleepiness can be an important indicator for reviewing the existing treatment. If polygraphic monitoring shows inadequate treatment under ongoing therapy, a combination of therapies should be considered.

Hypoglossal nerve palsy after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination - report of two cases.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is associated with an increased risk for Bell's palsy and some other neurological disorders assumed to be of autoimmune origin. While facial nerve palsy is frequent and usually idiopathic, hypoglossal nerve palsy is rare, and a specific cause is almost always found. We firstly report two patients who developed isolated hypoglossal nerve palsy shortly after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. CASE PRESENTATION: Two otherwise healthy patients, a 49-year-old man and a 39-year-old woman, developed unilateral hypoglossal nerve palsy 10 and 7 days after the second SARS-CoV-2-vaccination (AstraZeneca and BioNTech/Pfizer), respectively. In both subjects, needle electromyography showed denervation and rarefication of motor units. CT, MRI, examination of blood and CSF as well as ENT exam were unremarkable. In both subjects symptoms gradually improved. CONCLUSION: Due to close temporal relationship, the absence of other etiologies, and spontaneous improvement we suspect the vaccination as the cause for hypoglossal nerve palsy in both patients. This is further supported by the rarity of isolated hypoglossal nerve palsies, especially in idiopathic cases. We suggest the addition of hypoglossal nerve palsy to the list of neurological injuries potentially caused by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.