Perspectives on dementia care self-learning platform: A focus group study of family and professional caregivers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare perspectives of family and professional caregivers regarding an online self-learning platform. METHODS: Family and professional caregivers were interviewed separately. A thematic analysis was conducted with 12 family caregivers and 13 professional caregivers of people living with dementia in Macao using six semi-structured focus group interviews. RESULTS: Family and professional caregivers had different perspectives regarding the application of online learning program Four main themes emerged from the focus groups, including similarities and differences, namely 1) Need for services; 2) Accessibility to services; 3) Barriers to online learning; 4) Adjustments to the platform. CONCLUSIONS: The psychological assurance offered by an online learning program is imperative to the well-being of family caregivers. By identifying the gap between the needs and abilities of family caregivers and those imagined by professional caregivers, it allows for the development of support programs and interventions tailored to meet the specific needs of family caregivers.

A systematic review of online learning programs for nurse preceptors.

BACKGROUND: Nurse preceptors guide students to integrate theory into practice, teach clinical skills, assess clinical competency, and enhance problem solving skills. Managing the dual roles of a registered nurse and preceptor poses tremendous challenges to many preceptors. Online learning is recognized as an effective learning approach for enhancing nursing knowledge and skills. OBJECTIVE: The systematic review aims to review and synthesise the online learning programs for preceptors. DESIGN: A systematic review was designed based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Programs. DATA SOURCES: Articles published between January 2000 and June 2016 were sought from six electronic databases: CINAHL, Medline OVID, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science. METHODS: All papers were reviewed and quality assessment was performed. Nine studies were finally selected. Data were extracted, organized and analysed using a narrative synthesis. RESULTS: The review identified five overarching themes: development of the online learning programs for nurse preceptors, major contents of the programs, uniqueness of each program, modes of delivery, and outcomes of the programs. CONCLUSION: The systematic review provides insightful information on educational programs for preceptors. At this information age, online learning offers accessibility, convenience, flexibility, which could of great advantage for the working adults. In addition, the online platform provides an alternative for preceptors who face challenges of workload, time, and support system. Therefore, it is paramount that continuing education courses need to be integrated with technology, increase the flexibility and responsiveness of the nursing workforce, and offer alternative means to take up courses.

Simple training tool is insufficient for appropriate diagnosis and treatment of malnutrition: A pre-post intervention study in a tertiary center.

OBJECTIVES: To improve malnutrition awareness and management in our department of general internal medicine; to assess patients' nutritional risk; and to evaluate whether an online educational program leads to an increase in basic knowledge and more frequent nutritional therapies. METHODS: A prospective pre-post intervention study at a university department of general internal medicine was conducted. Nutritional screening using Nutritional Risk Score 2002 (NRS 2002) was performed, and prescriptions of nutritional therapies were assessed. The intervention included an online learning program and a pocket card for all residents, who had to fill in a multiple-choice questions (MCQ) test about basic nutritional knowledge before and after the intervention. RESULTS: A total of 342 patients were included in the preintervention phase, and 300 were in the postintervention phase. In the preintervention phase, 54.1% were at nutritional risk (NRS 2002 ≥3) compared with 61.7% in the postintervention phase. There was no increase in the prescription of nutritional therapies (18.7% versus 17.0%). Forty-nine and 41 residents (response rate 58% and 48%) filled in the MCQ test before and after the intervention, respectively. The mean percentage of correct answers was 55.6% and 59.43%, respectively (which was not significant). Fifty of 84 residents completed the online program. The residents who participated in the whole program scored higher on the second MCQ test (63% versus 55% correct answers, P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high ratio of malnourished patients, the nutritional intervention, as assessed by nutritional prescriptions, is insufficient. However, the simple educational program via Internet and usage of NRS 2002 pocket cards did not improve either malnutrition awareness or nutritional treatment. More sophisticated educational systems to fight malnutrition are necessary.