Phase 1b/2 study of penpulimab (AK105), an antiprogrammed cell death-1 immunoglobulin G1 antibody, in advanced or metastatic solid tumors (AK105-204).

BACKGROUND: Penpulimab, a new-generation antiprogrammed cell death-1 immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody, was engineered to optimize receptor occupancy and eliminate fragment crystallizable γ-mediated effector function. In this multicenter, phase 1b/2, multicohort study, the objective was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of penpulimab in advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Patients who had unresectable, advanced solid tumors were enrolled from six centers and received 200 mg penpulimab on day 1 every 2 weeks for up to 24 months. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version criteria 1.1. RESULTS: Between September 2, 2019, and January 1, 2020, 65 patients were enrolled and received penpulimab. At the time of data cutoff (May 11, 2022), the median follow-up was 12.6 months (range, 1.1-28.6 months). The ORR was 12.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5%-22.8%), with three (4.6%) complete responses and five (7.7%) partial responses. Twelve patients (18.5%) achieved stable disease, resulting in a disease control rate of 30.8% (95% CI, 19.9%-43.4%). The median duration of response was not reached (95% CI, 6.70 months to not estimable). In all cohorts, the median progression-free survival was 1.74 months (95% CI, 1.41-2.69 months), and the median overall survival was 16.59 months (95% CI, 7.82-22.18 months). Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events and immune-related adverse events occurred in 9.2% and 27.7% of patients, respectively. Positive antidrug antibody responses to penpulimab were observed in one patient (1.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Penpulimab showed promising antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile, offering a potential new treatment approach for solid tumors. These findings supported the evaluation of penpulimab's durable activity and safety, as monotherapy or in combination therapy, in specific malignancies.

Preclinical evaluation and phase 1 study of the PI3Kα/δ inhibitor TQ-B3525 in Chinese patients with advanced cancers.

BACKGROUND: Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors transformed management of various malignancies. This study preclinically characterized TQ-B3525 (dual PI3Kα/δ inhibitor) and assessed the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics in relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphoma or advanced solid tumors (STs). METHODS: Oral TQ-B3525 was given at eight dose levels on a 28-day cycle. Primary end points were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and safety. RESULTS: TQ-B3525 showed high selectivity and suppressed tumor growth. Between June 12, 2018, and November 18, 2020, 80 patients were enrolled (63 in dose-escalation cohort; 17 in dose-expansion cohort). Two DLTs occurred in two (two of 63, 3.2%) DLT-evaluable patients; MTD was not identified. TQ-B3525 at 20 mg once daily was selected as RP2D. Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events mainly included hyperglycemia (16.3%), neutrophil count decreased (15.0%), and diarrhea (10.0%). Two (2.5%) treatment-related deaths were reported. Sixty patients with R/R lymphoma and 11 advanced STs demonstrated objective response rates of 68.3% and 9.1%, disease control rates of 91.7% and 54.6%, median progression-free survivals of 12.1 and 1.1 months; median overall survivals were not reached. CONCLUSION: TQ-B3525 exhibited rapid absorption and a nearly proportional increase in exposure. Acceptable safety and promising efficacy support further investigation of TQ-B3525 (20 mg once daily) for R/R lymphoma.

Liposomal irinotecan (HR070803) in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase 1b dose-escalation and expansion study.

This phase 1b study aimed to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of HR070803, a novel nanoliposomal formulation of irinotecan, in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with pretreated advanced solid tumors. This study consisted of dose-escalation and expansion stages. Dose escalation was performed with a traditional 3 + 3 design; patients received intravenous infusion of HR070803 from 60 to 80 mg/m2, followed by leucovorin (200 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (2000 mg/m2) every 2 weeks. In the expansion stage, patients received treatments at selected tolerable dose. Fifteen patients received treatments at 60 mg/m2 (n = 12) and 80 mg/m2 (n = 3). DLTs occurred in 2 patients at 80 mg/m2 (grade 2 neutropenia that resulted in a dose delay of ≥ 7 days, n = 1; grade 3 febrile neutropenia, n = 1). The MTD was determined to be 60 mg/m2. The most frequent HR070803related adverse events included anorexia, leukopenia, neutropenia, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea. SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan, exhibited lower maximum plasma concentrations and a prolonged terminal half-life when irinotecan was administered via nanoliposome compared to conventional injection. Overall, 4 patients achieved a partial response (confirmed, n = 2), and 9 had stable disease. The MTD of HR070803 was 60 mg/m2 when infused with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. Nanoliposomal encapsulation modified the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and SN-38. HR070803 with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin demonstrated a manageable safety profile and promising antitumor efficacy in advanced solid tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05086848. Retrospectively registered on Oct. 12, 2021.

NK cells and the profile of inflammatory cytokines in the peripheral blood of patients with advanced carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Natural killer (NK) cells are one of the most crucial immune cells that mediate the antitumoral response due to their ability to immediately recognize and eliminate transformed cells. Because of their great cytotoxic activity, the function of NK cells must be robustly regulated to avoid tissue damage. Such regulation is mediated by a coordinated engagement of activating (NKp46) and inhibitory (CD158b) receptors, which tumor cells may use to escape from immunosurveillance. Also, NK cells are generally divided based on surface molecules, such as CD16 and CD56, and can be classified as CD56brightCD16- (regulatory) and CD56dimCD16+ (cytotoxic) NK cells. Here, we aimed to evaluate the frequency and phenotype of circulating NK cells in patients with advanced carcinomas, as well as their systemic cytokine/chemokine and growth factors production. METHODS: Peripheral blood was collected from 24 patients with advanced solid cancer during or after treatment and from 10 healthy donors. The frequency and the expression of activating (NKp46) and inhibitory (CD158b) molecules of CD56brightCD16- and CD56dimCD16+ NK cells were assessed by flow cytometry and the multiplex Luminex platform was used to quantify the secreted factors in peripheral blood serum. RESULTS: Cancer patients had a lower frequency of the cytotoxic CD56dim CD16+ NK cells subset in comparison with healthy controls. Also, the regulatory CD56bright CD16- NKs isolated from cancer patients exhibited a significantly lower expression of NKp46. Among 29 immunological and growth factors analyzed in the peripheral blood of oncologic patients, MCP-1, IP-10, and eotaxin, and VEGF they have presented a higher proportion. The Pearson correlation test showed that IL-12p40 positively correlates with CD56brightCD16- NK cells. We also observed a positive correlation between MCP-1 and the activating marker NKp46, as well as a negative correlation between IP-10 and TNF-α and NKp46. CD158b expression in CD56dimCD16+ was positively correlated with EGF and negatively correlated with MIP-1ß. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these results suggest that cancer patients present a shift towards a poorly cytotoxic and less activated NK profile which may contribute to tumor development and progression. The understanding of NK cell biology and soluble factors during tumor development could aid in the design of possible targeting therapeutic approaches.

Evaluating the clinical benefit of pembrolizumab as a first-line agent in advanced solid tumors: A comprehensive review.

INTRODUCTION: The study evaluates the first-line application of pembrolizumab in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC), gastric cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. Utilizing the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework (ASCO-VF), the analysis incorporates data from pivotal KEYNOTE trials. METHODS: The study systematically assessed the clinical benefit of pembrolizumab in advanced solid malignancies through nine randomized controlled trials, one of which comprised two experimental arms. Data extraction from primary sources was conducted from PubMed, ASCO, and ESMO publications. Utilizing ESMO-MCBS and ASCO-VF forms, the evaluation focused on clinical benefit, toxicity, and bonus points, with discrepancies resolved through consensus discussions. RESULTS: Nine first-line indications for pembrolizumab received Food and Drug Administration approval for metastatic solid tumors between 2018 and 2023. Notable distinctions in ESMO-MCBS grades revealed seven trials with substantial clinical benefit (grades 5 to 4) and three with moderate to negligible benefit (grades 3 to 1). Bonus points, primarily based on the tail of the curve, were allocated to three trials for overall survival, one for progression-free survival, and one for a significant improvement in quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Our evaluation of pembrolizumab across diverse cancers, especially in mNSCLC and HNSCC, revealed varied outcomes and challenges in clinical benefit interpretation. The assessment of clinical benefit, incorporating quantitative and qualitative endpoints, underscores the need to consider survivorship outcomes and patient perspectives for a comprehensive understanding.

Assessment for the timing of comprehensive genomic profiling tests in patients with advanced solid cancers.

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests have been covered by public insurance in Japan for patients with advanced solid tumors who have completed or are completing standard treatments or do not have them. Therefore, genotype-matched drug candidates are often unapproved or off-label, and improving clinical trial access is critical, involving the appropriate timing of CGP tests. To address this issue, we analyzed the previous treatment data for 441 patients from an observational study on CGP tests discussed by the expert panel at Hokkaido University Hospital between August 2019 and May 2021. The median number of previous treatment lines was two; three or more lines accounted for 49%. Information on genotype-matched therapies was provided to 277 (63%). Genotype-matched clinical trials were ineligible because of an excess number of previous treatment lines or use of specific agents were found in 66 (15%) patients, with the highest proportion in breast and prostate cancers. Many patients met the exclusion criteria of one to two or more treatment lines across cancer types. In addition, previous use of specific agents was a frequent exclusion criterion for breast, prostate, colorectal, and ovarian cancers. The patients with tumor types with a low median number (two or fewer) of previous treatment lines, including most rare cancers, primary unknown cancers, and pancreatic cancers, had significantly fewer ineligible clinical trials. The earlier timing of CGP tests may improve access to genotype-matched clinical trials, with their proportion varying by cancer type. Each relevant society needs to advocate the desirable timing of CGP testing nationwide.

Phase 1b study of pan-AKT inhibitor vevorisertib alone or with paclitaxel or fulvestrant in PIK3CA/AKT/PTEN-mutated advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: In this first-in-human phase 1b study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02761694) of advanced solid tumors with PIK3CA/AKT/PTEN mutations, the authors investigated the safety and efficacy of the pan-AKT inhibitor vevorisertib (MK-4440; ARQ 751) as monotherapy or with paclitaxel or fulvestrant. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed, advanced or recurrent, PIK3CA/AKT/PTEN-mutated solid tumors, measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1 received vevorisertib (dose range, 5-100 mg) alone or with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 or fulvestrant 500 mg. The primary end point was safety and tolerability. Secondary end points included pharmacokinetics and the objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. RESULTS: Of 78 patients enrolled, 58 received vevorisertib monotherapy, 10 received vevorisertib plus paclitaxel, and nine received vevorisertib plus fulvestrant. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in three patients (vevorisertib monotherapy, n = 2 [grade 3 pruritic and maculopapular rashes]; vevorisertib plus paclitaxel, n = 1 [grade 1 asthenia]). Across doses, treatment-related AEs occurred in 46 patients (79%) with vevorisertib monotherapy, in 10 patients (100%) with vevorisertib plus paclitaxel, and in nine patients (100%) with vevorisertib plus fulvestrant; and grade 3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 13 (22%), 7 (70%), and 3 (33%) patients, respectively. No grade 4/5 treatment-related AEs occurred. Maximum vevorisertib concentrations were reached 1-4 hours after dosing; the elimination half-life ranged from 8.8 to 19.3 hours. The objective response rate was 5% with vevorisertib monotherapy (three partial responses), 20% with vevorisertib plus paclitaxel (two partial responses), and 0% with vevorisertib plus fulvestrant. CONCLUSIONS: Vevorisertib alone or with paclitaxel or fulvestrant had a manageable safety profile, and vevorisertib alone or with paclitaxel had minimal to modest antitumor activity in this patient population with PIK3CA/AKT/PTEN-mutated advanced solid tumors. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02761694.

Phase 1b study of combined selinexor and eribulin for the treatment of advanced solid tumors and triple-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Selinexor (KPT-330) is a potent inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1), in turn inhibiting tumor growth. Selinexor enhances the antitumor efficacy of eribulin in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in vitro and in vivo. Given the unmet medical need in TNBC and sarcoma, the authors explored the safety and efficacy of this combination. METHODS: The authors conducted a phase 1b trial of combined selinexor and eribulin using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design in patients who had advanced solid tumors and in those who had TNBC in a dose-expansion cohort. RESULTS: Patients with TNBC (N = 19), sarcoma (N = 9), and other cancers (N = 3) were enrolled in the dose-escalation cohort (N = 10) and in the dose-expansion cohort (N = 21). The median number lines of prior therapy received was four (range, from one to seven prior lines). The most common treatment-related adverse events for selinexor were nausea (77%), leukopenia (77%), anemia (68%), neutropenia (68%), and fatigue (48%). One dose-limiting toxicity occurred at the first dose level with prolonged grade 3 neutropenia. The recommended phase 2 dose was 80 mg of selinexor orally once per week and 1 mg/m2 eribulin on days 1 and 8 intravenously every 3 weeks. The objective response rate (ORR) was 10% in three patients. In the dose-escalation cohort, the ORR was 10%, whereas six patients with had stable disease. In the TNBC dose-expansion cohort (n = 18), ORR was 11%, and there were two confirmed partial responses with durations of 10.8 and 19.1 months (ongoing). CONCLUSIONS: Selinexor and eribulin had an acceptable toxicity profile and modest overall efficacy with durable responses in select patients. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Effective therapies for advanced, triple-negative breast cancer and sarcoma represent an unmet need. Exportin 1 is associated with the transport of cancer-related proteins. Preclinical studies have demonstrated tumor growth inhibition and enhanced tumor sensitivity in patients who receive selinexor combined with eribulin. In this phase 1b study, the authors evaluated the safety profile and clinical activity of the combination of selinexor, a potent oral inhibitor of exportin 1, and eribulin in patients with advanced cancers enriched for triple-negative breast cancer or sarcoma. The combination was well tolerated; most adverse events were mild or moderate, reversible, and managed with dose modifications or growth factor support. The combination of selinexor and eribulin produced an antitumor response, particularly in some patients with triple-negative breast cancer. This work lays the foundation for prospective investigations of the role of selinexor and eribulin in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.

A Phase I Study of a Combination of Liposomal Irinotecan and Veliparib in Solid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Multiple preclinical studies have shown cytotoxic synergy involving combinations of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and topoisomerase 1 (TOP1) inhibitors, but such combinations have proven too toxic in clinical trials. Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) achieved similar intratumoral exposure with better antitumor activity than the conventional TOP1 inhibitor irinotecan in preclinical models. Tumor targeted delivery of TOP1 inhibitor using nal-IRI and an intermittent schedule of administration of PARP inhibitor may provide a tolerable combination. METHODS: A phase I study was performed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of nal-IRI and the PARP inhibitor veliparib in patients with solid tumors resistant to standard treatments. Nal-IRI was administered on days 1 and 15 and veliparib on days 5-12 and 19-25 in 28-day cycles. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled across 3 dose levels. Five patients encountered dose-limiting toxicities, including grade 3 diarrhea lasting more than 72 h in 3 patients and 1 patient each with grade 4 diarrhea and grade 3 hyponatremia. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities included diarrhea (50% of patients), nausea (16.6%), anorexia, and vomiting (11.1% each) (Table 1). There was no difference in frequencies of adverse events based on UGT1A1*28 status or prior opioid use (Table 1). CONCLUSION: The clinical trial was terminated due to high frequency of unacceptable gastrointestinal toxicities, which precluded dose escalation of veliparib in combination with nal-IRI (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02631733).

First-in-class Microbial Ecosystem Therapeutic 4 (MET4) in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced solid tumors (MET4-IO trial).

BACKGROUND: The intestinal microbiome has been associated with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in humans and causally implicated in ICI responsiveness in animal models. Two recent human trials demonstrated that fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from ICI responders can rescue ICI responses in refractory melanoma, but FMT has specific limitations to scaled use. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an early-phase clinical trial of a cultivated, orally delivered 30-species microbial consortium (Microbial Ecosystem Therapeutic 4, MET4) designed for co-administration with ICIs as an alternative to FMT and assessed safety, tolerability and ecological responses in patients with advanced solid tumors. RESULTS: The trial achieved its primary safety and tolerability outcomes. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary ecological outcomes; however, differences in MET4 species relative abundance were evident after randomization that varied by patient and species. Increases in the relative abundance of several MET4 taxa, including Enterococcus and Bifidobacterium, taxa previously associated with ICI responsiveness, were observed and MET4 engraftment was associated with decreases in plasma and stool primary bile acids. CONCLUSIONS: This trial is the first report of the use of a microbial consortium as an alternative to FMT in advanced cancer patients receiving ICI and the results justify the further development of microbial consortia as a therapeutic co-intervention for ICI treatment in cancer.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of pemigatinib (a selective inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-3) monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase i clinical trial.

Pemigatinib is a selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)1-3 inhibitor and has demonstrated acceptable tolerability and clinical activity in advanced solid tumors in Western population. This phase I trial evaluated pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) characteristics, preliminary safety and efficacy of pemigatinib in Chinese patients with advanced, solid tumors. Patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic solid tumors bearing FGF/FGFR1-3 alterations received oral pemigatinib at 13.5 mg once daily (QD) on a 2-weeks-on/1-week-off schedule. The primary endpoint was PK/PD characteristics; secondary endpoints were safety and efficacy. Twelve patients were enrolled (median age: 61 years, 58.3% males). PK data demonstrated pemigatinib (13.5 mg QD) was rapidly absorbed with a geometric mean elimination half-life of 11.3 h. The geometric mean values of maximum serum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state were 215.1 nmol/L and 2636.9 h·nmol/L, respectively. The mean clearance adjusted by bioavailability at steady state was low (11.8 L/h), and the apparent oral volume of distribution was moderate (170.5 L). The PD marker, serum phosphate level, increased on days 8 and 15 of cycle 1 (mean: 2.25 mg/dL, CV% [percent coefficient of variation]: 31.3%) and decreased to baseline post 1 week off. Three (25.0%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Partial response was confirmed in one patient with FGFR1-mutant esophageal carcinoma and one with FGFR2-mutant cholagiocarcinoma. Pemigatinib had similar PK/PD characteristics to Western population and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and potential anti-cancer benefit in Chinese patients with FGF/FGFR1-3 altered, advanced, solid tumor. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04258527 [prospectively registered February 6, 2020]).

HLX22, an anti-HER-2 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors overexpressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2: an open-label, dose-escalation, phase 1 trial.

HLX22 is a novel monoclonal antibody targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). This first-in-human, phase 1 dose-escalation study aimed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of HLX22 in patients with advanced solid tumors who had failed or were intolerant to standard therapies. Enrolled patients aged 18 to 75 years with histologically confirmed HER2-overexpressing advanced or metastatic solid tumors received intravenous HLX22 once every 3 weeks at 3, 10, and 25 mg/kg. Primary endpoints were safety and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and efficacy. Between July 31, 2019, and December 27, 2021, 11 patients were enrolled to receive HLX22 at 3 (n = 5), 10 (n = 3), and 25 (n = 3) mg/kg doses. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were lymphocyte count decreased (45.5%), white blood cell count decreased (36.4%), and hypokalemia (36.4%). No serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities occurred during the treatment period, and the MTD was determined at 25 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. Systemic exposure of HLX22 increased with escalating dose levels. No patients achieved a complete or partial response, and four (36.4%) had stable disease. The disease control rate and median progression-free survival were 36.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.9-64.8) and 44.0 days (95% CI, 41.0-170.0), respectively. HLX22 was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors overexpressing HER2 after failure of standard therapies. The study results support further investigation of HLX22 in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy.

Phase I Study of JNJ-74699157 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors Harboring the KRAS G12C Mutation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with KRAS-mutant cancers have limited treatment options. Here we present a phase I study of JNJ-74699157, an oral, selective, covalent inhibitor of the KRAS G12C isoform, in patients with advanced cancer harboring the KRAS G12C mutation. METHODS: Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) who had previously received or were ineligible for standard treatment received JNJ-74699157 once daily on a 21-day cycle. Dose escalation was guided by a modified continual reassessment method. RESULTS: Ten patients (100 mg: 9 and 200 mg: 1) were enrolled. Tumor types included non-small cell lung cancer (n = 5), colorectal cancer (n = 4), and carcinoma of unknown primary site (n = 1). The median age was 65 (range: 36-74) years and median treatment duration was 2.91 (range: 0.5-7.5) months. Dose-limiting toxicities of grades 3-4 increased blood creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) were observed in 100 mg and 200 mg dose levels. The most common adverse event was increased blood CPK (6 patients). No significant clinical benefit was observed; the best response was stable disease in 4 patients (40%). CONCLUSION: Based on dose-limiting skeletal muscle toxicities and the lack of efficacy at the 100 mg dose, further enrollment was stopped. The safety profile of JNJ-74699157 was not considered favorable for further clinical development. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04006301.

First-in-human phase 1 study of the anti-TIGIT antibody vibostolimab as monotherapy or with pembrolizumab for advanced solid tumors, including non-small-cell lung cancer☆.

BACKGROUND: In this first-in-human phase 1 study (NCT02964013; MK-7684-001), we investigated the safety and efficacy of the anti-TIGIT (T cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain) antibody vibostolimab as monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Part A enrolled patients with advanced solid tumors, and part B enrolled patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients received vibostolimab 2.1-700 mg alone or with pembrolizumab 200 mg in part A and vibostolimab 200 mg alone or with pembrolizumab 200 mg in part B. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. RESULTS: Part A enrolled 76 patients (monotherapy, 34; combination therapy, 42). No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. Across doses, 56% of patients receiving monotherapy and 62% receiving combination therapy had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 9% and 17% of patients, respectively. The most common TRAEs were fatigue (15%) and pruritus (15%) with monotherapy and pruritus (17%) and rash (14%) with combination therapy. Confirmed ORR was 0% with monotherapy and 7% with combination therapy. In part B, 39 patients had anti-PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1)/PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1)-naive NSCLC (all received combination therapy), and 67 had anti-PD-1/PD-L1-refractory NSCLC (monotherapy, 34; combination therapy, 33). In patients with anti-PD-1/PD-L1-naive NSCLC: 85% had TRAEs-the most common were pruritus (38%) and hypoalbuminemia (31%); confirmed ORR was 26%, with responses occurring in both PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors. In patients with anti-PD-1/PD-L1-refractory NSCLC: 56% receiving monotherapy and 70% receiving combination therapy had TRAEs-the most common were rash and fatigue (21% each) with monotherapy and pruritus (36%) and fatigue (24%) with combination therapy; confirmed ORR was 3% with monotherapy and 3% with combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Vibostolimab plus pembrolizumab was well tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors, including patients with advanced NSCLC.

First-in-human phase 1/1b study to evaluate sitravatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Sitravatinib (MGCD516), a spectrum-selective receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting TAM (TYRO3, AXL, MERTK) and split kinase family receptors, has demonstrated preclinical anti-tumor activity and modulation of tumor microenvironment. This first-in-human phase 1/1b study included sitravatinib dose exploration and anti-tumor activity evaluation in selected patients with advanced solid tumors. Primary objectives included assessment of safety, pharmacokinetics and clinical activity of sitravatinib. Secondary objectives included identifying doses for further investigation and exploring molecular markers for patient selection. In phase 1, 32 patients received 10-200 mg, while phase 1b dose expansion comprised 161 patients (150 mg n = 99, 120 mg n = 62). Maximum tolerated dose was determined as 150 mg daily. Dose-limiting toxicity was reported in 4/28 evaluable phase 1 patients (three at 200 mg, one at 80 mg). In phase 1b, 120 mg was defined as the recommended dose due to tolerability. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were experienced by 174/193 patients (90.2%); grade ≥ 3 TRAEs in 103 patients (53.4%). Most common TRAEs were diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension and nausea; TRAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 26 patients (13.5%) and death in one patient. Sitravatinib was steadily absorbed and declined from plasma with a terminal elimination half-life of 42.1-51.5 h following oral administration. Overall objective response rate was 11.8% in phase 1b, 13.2% in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 4.2% in patients with NSCLC with prior checkpoint inhibitor experience. Sitravatinib demonstrated manageable safety and modest clinical activity in solid tumors. NCT02219711 (first posted August 14, 2014).

An open-label, crossover study to compare different formulations and evaluate effect of food on pharmacokinetics of pimitespib in patients with advanced solid tumors.

This study compared the bioavailability of two pimitespib formulations (Formulations A and B), evaluated the food effect on Formulation A, and evaluated the safety and efficacy of multiple pimitespib doses in patients with solid tumors. This clinical, pharmacological multicenter study had two cohorts and periods. A single dose of Formulation A or B was administered in a crossover design to compare the pharmacokinetics in Cohort 1. In Cohort 2, the effects of fed vs fasting conditions were evaluated among those receiving Formulation A. Subsequently, multiple Formulation A doses were administered to all patients for safety and efficacy assessments. In Cohorts 1 and 2, 12 and 16 patients, respectively, were analyzed for pharmacokinetics. Thirty patients were analyzed for safety and efficacy. Maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC)last, and AUCinf geometric mean ratios for Formulations A and B (90% confidence interval [CI]) were 0.8078 (0.6569-0.9933), 0.7973 (0.6672-0.9529), and 0.8094 (0.6697-0.9782), respectively; 90% CIs were not within the bioequivalence range (0.80-1.25). In Cohort 2, mean Cmax, AUClast, and AUCinf were higher in fed vs fasting conditions. No safety concerns emerged with single or multiple administration. Overall response rate, disease control rate, and median progression-free survival were 0%, 33%, and 1.5 months, respectively. Four patients had stable disease ≥ 5 months. Bioequivalence of the two formulations was unconfirmed. Systemic exposure of Formulation A was approximately 20% less than Formulation B. A high-fat/calorie meal increased the relative pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a single 160-mg dose. Trial Registration: JapicCTI-184191 (Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center) registered on November 5, 2018.

Phase I/Ib dose-escalation study of avelumab in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors.

Aim: Data for avelumab (anti-PD-L1 antibody) in Chinese patients are limited. Patients & methods: Phase I/Ib, open-label, dose-escalation study of Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. Primary study objectives were to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of avelumab. Results: 24 patients received avelumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W; n = 3), 10 mg/kg Q2W (n = 7), 20 mg/kg Q2W (n = 6) or 10 mg/kg weekly for 12 weeks and then Q2W thereafter (n = 8). MTD was not reached. Avelumab exposure was increased in higher dose groups. Partial responses occurred in two patients (confirmed in one patient); best overall response was stable disease in nine patients. Conclusion: Data for avelumab in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors were consistent with previous global studies.

Avelumab is a form of medicine that falls under the category of immunotherapy. This means that it can help the immune system find and destroy cancer cells. In this study, researchers looked at the safety of avelumab in a small group of Chinese people with different types of cancer. Researchers also looked at blood levels of avelumab after treatment. Different doses of avelumab were given to different groups of people. Overall, study results for avelumab in Chinese people were similar to results from earlier studies in other countries.  Clinical trial registration: NCT03523390 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

First-in-Human Phase I Study of Envafolimab, a Novel Subcutaneous Single-Domain Anti-PD-L1 Antibody, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

LESSONS LEARNED: Subcutaneous injection was an effective route of administration for envafolimab with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors. Subcutaneous envafolimab was well tolerated and had durable antitumor activity at a wide range of doses and schedules. Envafolimab has the potential to be a more convenient option than currently approved intravenous PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. BACKGROUND: Envafolimab is a novel fusion of a humanized single-domain PD-L1 antibody and human IgG1 Fc fragment formulated for subcutaneous injection. This study explored the safety and feasibility of subcutaneous administration of envafolimab as an alternative to intravenous administration of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of advanced, refractory solid tumors. METHODS: This was a first-in-human, open-label phase I trial. In a dose-escalation phase, patients received subcutaneous envafolimab 0.01-10 mg/kg once weekly following a modified 3+3 design. In a dose-exploration phase, patients received subcutaneous envafolimab 300 mg once every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled (dose escalation n = 18, dose exploration n = 10, median age 66 years; 71% male; ECOG performance score = 0 [21%] or 1 [79%]). No dose-limiting toxicities or injection-site reactions were reported. Envafolimab demonstrated dose-proportional increases in area under the time-concentration curve and maximum plasma concentration. Median time to maximum plasma concentration was 4-7 days. In the dose-exploration phase, terminal half-life was 14 days after dose 1 in cycle 1 and 23 days at steady state. Three patients experienced a confirmed partial response. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous envafolimab had a favorable safety and pharmacokinetic profile, with promising preliminary antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Stem cells-derived natural killer cells for cancer immunotherapy: current protocols, feasibility, and benefits of ex vivo generated natural killer cells in treatment of advanced solid tumors.

Nowadays, natural killer (NK) cell-based immunotherapy provides a practical therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced solid tumors (STs). This approach is adaptively conducted by the autologous and identical NK cells after in vitro expansion and overnight activation. However, the NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy has been faced with some fundamental and technical limitations. Moreover, the desirable outcomes of the NK cell therapy may not be achieved due to the complex tumor microenvironment by inhibition of intra-tumoral polarization and cytotoxicity of implanted NK cells. Currently, stem cells (SCs) technology provides a powerful opportunity to generate more effective and universal sources of the NK cells. Till now, several strategies have been developed to differentiate types of the pluripotent and adult SCs into the mature NK cells, with both feeder layer-dependent and/or feeder laye-free strategies. Higher cytokine production and intra-tumoral polarization capabilities as well as stronger anti-tumor properties are the main features of these SCs-derived NK cells. The present review article focuses on the principal barriers through the conventional NK cell immunotherapies for patients with advanced STs. It also provides a comprehensive resource of protocols regarding the generation of SCs-derived NK cells in an ex vivo condition.

The safety and tolerability of epacadostat alone and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors: results from a first-in-Japanese phase I study (KEYNOTE-434).

PURPOSE: Part A of the open-label, phase I KEYNOTE-434 study evaluated the safety and tolerability of epacadostat, an indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-1 inhibitor, alone and in combination with pembrolizumab in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Japanese patients with refractory/recurrent metastatic or locally advanced tumors were enrolled. Cohort 1 received oral epacadostat 25 mg or 100 mg twice daily (BID) and subsequently received epacadostat in combination with intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. Cohort 2 received epacadostat 25 mg or 100 mg BID with pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. The primary objective was evaluation of safety and tolerability using a modified toxicity probability interval method. Secondary objectives were pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic profiles of epacadostat alone and in combination with pembrolizumab. RESULTS: Six patients were enrolled in cohort 1 (epacadostat 25 mg, n = 3; epacadostat 100 mg, n = 3); none experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Nine patients were enrolled in cohort 2 (epacadostat 25 mg and pembrolizumab, n = 3; epacadostat 100 mg and pembrolizumab, n = 6); one patient receiving epacadostat 100 mg and pembrolizumab experienced grade 4 rhabdomyolysis-a DLT. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in two patients (13.3%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Pembrolizumab had no impact on epacadostat PK and vice versa. The PK profile of pembrolizumab in the current study was comparable with historical pembrolizumab PK data. CONCLUSION: Epacadostat in combination with pembrolizumab was generally safe and well tolerated among Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Clinical trial registration NCT02862457.