Radiomic analysis of soft tissues sarcomas can distinguish intermediate from high-grade lesions.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of grading soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) using MRI features (radiomics). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI (echo planar SE, 1.5T) from 19 patients with STSs and a known histological grading, were retrospectively analyzed. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, obtained by diffusion-weighted imaging acquisitions, were analyzed through 65 radiomic features, intensity-based (first order statistics, FOS) and texture (gray level co-occurrence matrix, GLCM; and gray level run length matrix, GLRLM) features. Feature selection (sequential forward floating search) and classification (k-nearest neighbor classifier) were performed to distinguish intermediate- from high-grade STSs. Classification was performed using the three different sub-groups of features separately as well as all the features together. The entire dataset was divided in three subsets: the training, validation and test set, containing, respectively, 60, 30, and 10% of the data. RESULTS: Intermediate-grade lesions had a higher and less disperse ADC values compared with high-grade ones: most of FOS related to intensity are higher for the intermediate-grade STSs, while FOS related to signal variability were higher in the high grade (e.g., the feature variance is 2.6*105 ± 0.9*105 versus 3.3*105 ± 1.6*105 , P = 0.3). The GLCM features related to entropy and dissimilarity were higher in the high-grade. When performing classification, the best accuracy is obtained with a maximum of three features for each subgroup, FOS features being those leading to the best classification (validation set: FOS accuracy 0.90 ± 0.11, area under the curve [AUC] 0.85 ± 0.16; test set: FOS accuracy 0.88 ± 0.25, AUC 0.87 ± 0.34). CONCLUSION: Good accuracy and AUC could be obtained using only few Radiomic features, belonging to the FOS class. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:829-840.

Determining Image Processing Features Describing the Appearance of Challenging Mitotic Figures and Miscounted Nonmitotic Objects.

CONTEXT: Previous studies showed that the agreement among pathologists in recognition of mitoses in breast slides is fairly modest. AIMS: Determining the significantly different quantitative features among easily identifiable mitoses, challenging mitoses, and miscounted nonmitoses within breast slides and identifying which color spaces capture the difference among groups better than others. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The dataset contained 453 mitoses and 265 miscounted objects in breast slides. The mitoses were grouped into three categories based on the confidence degree of three pathologists who annotated them. The mitoses annotated as "probably a mitosis" by the majority of pathologists were considered as the challenging category. The miscounted objects were recognized as a mitosis or probably a mitosis by only one of the pathologists. The mitoses were segmented using k-means clustering, followed by morphological operations. Morphological, intensity-based, and textural features were extracted from the segmented area and also the image patch of 63 × 63 pixels in different channels of eight color spaces. Holistic features describing the mitoses' surrounding cells of each image were also extracted. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The Kruskal-Wallis H-test followed by the Tukey-Kramer test was used to identify significantly different features. RESULTS: The results indicated that challenging mitoses were smaller and rounder compared to other mitoses. Among different features, the Gabor textural features differed more than others between challenging mitoses and the easily identifiable ones. Sizes of the non-mitoses were similar to easily identifiable mitoses, but nonmitoses were rounder. The intensity-based features from chromatin channels were the most discriminative features between the easily identifiable mitoses and the miscounted objects. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative features can be used to describe the characteristics of challenging mitoses and miscounted nonmitotic objects.