Pharmacotherapy considerations for pediatric acute agitation management in the emergency department.

DISCLAIMER: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE: To review the current literature regarding the pharmacological management of acute agitation in pediatric patients and practical considerations when comparing agents for empiric use in the emergency department (ED). SUMMARY: ED providers play an integral role in the management of acute agitation in pediatric patients. The development of acute agitation is multifactorial, and patients may quickly escalate upon arrival or while boarding in the ED. Nonpharmacological de-escalation strategies should be prioritized. If a patient poses a safety risk to themself or staff members, the administration of pharmacological treatment may be necessary to target the underlying cause and allow for the patient to safely engage in assessment and treatment. There is limited guidance regarding medication selection and dosing for acute agitation in pediatrics despite being a key facet of multimodal management. CONCLUSION: The literature regarding pharmacotherapy for acute agitation management in pediatric patients remains scarce. Medications utilized vary depending on institutional practice as well as provider preference. Evidence suggests that implementing an institutional protocol for pediatric acute agitation in the ED may improve patient outcomes. Additional studies are needed optimize the pharmacological management of acute pediatric agitation and patient outcomes in the ED.

The agitated pediatric patient located in the emergency department: The APPLIED observational study.

Objectives: Focused research on pediatric agitation is lacking despite being a common mental and behavioral health (MBH) emergency. Prevalence of pediatric agitation remains unknown, and prior reports may have underestimated the rate of restraint use for pediatric agitation. This is the largest study to provide a focused evaluation of the prevalence and predictors of pediatric agitation and restraint use as well as the emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) and admission rates for agitated patients. Methods: We reviewed records of patients aged ≤18 years with MBH needs who visited the pediatric ED of a tertiary care hospital during a 3-year-period. We identified and ascertained agitated/aggressive patients using documented signs/symptoms, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes, and Behavioral Activity Rating Scale scores. We performed descriptive and multivariable analyses using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute). Results: Of 10,172 patients with MBH needs, 1408 (13.8%) were agitated/aggressive. Of these (n = 1408), 63.7% were boys, and the mean age was 11.9 years. Among agitated patients, the prevalence of restraint use was 28.7%, with a predominance of pharmacologic restraint with atypical antipsychotics. Non-Hispanic Blacks were more likely to be agitated (adjusted odd ratio [aOR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.7), but not restrained (aOR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.3-1.8). Predictors of restraint use include history of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (aOR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5-3.3), autism (aOR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.9-4.5), conduct disorder (aOR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.5), psychosis (aOR, 14.3; 95% CI, 2.5-271.8), and substance use/overdose states (aOR, 1.9; CI, 1.2-3.2). Restrained agitated patients had longer ED LOS (8.4 vs 5.0 hours; P < 0.0001) and higher admission rates (aOR, 2.6; 95% CI, 2.0-3.5). Depression (aOR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.3-0.5) and suicidality (aOR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.3) were protective against agitation and restraint use. Conclusion: Prevalence of acute agitation and restraint use in pediatric EDs may be much higher than previously reported. Predictors of acute agitation and restraint use among MBH patients were consistent with prior reports. Restrained agitated patients had longer ED LOS and higher admission rates.